Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1899 · 24th Convention, St. Louis, Nummer 1 › Page 123
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1899, Page 123
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Scan: Universitätsbibliothek Tübingen, OpenDigi ZE677_24_1899
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
German transcription AI-corrected against the scan
Neunten Delegatenſynode von Miſſouri, Ohio u. a. St. 1899. 123
II. Rudloff⸗Legat.
1. Einnahme:
1896. Beſtand (Bericht, S. 122) ......................................... $65.00
1896. Ertrag des Legats ................................................... 40.00
1897. „ „ „ .................................................................... 40.00
1898. „ „ „ .................................................................... 40.00
$185.00
2. Ausgabe:
1896. An Student Hiller ..................................................... $15.00
1897. „ „ „ ....................................................................... 45.00
„ „ Meyer .................................................................. 15.00
1898. „ „ Stubnatzy .............................................................. 10.00
„ „ Cämmerer .............................................................. 25.00
$110.00
Kaſſenbeſtand ........................................... $75.00
(„Revidirt und richtig befunden.“)
Beſchloſſen, daß die Synode den dringenden Wunſch ausſpricht,
es möchten doch die Unterſtützungscommiſſionen der einzelnen Diſtricte,
ſelbſt wenn ſie keinen Zuſchuß aus der Allgemeinen Kaſſe beziehen, über den
Beſtand ihrer Kaſſen an die Allgemeine Unterſtützungscommiſſion berichten
laut der Beſtimmungen, welche von der Delegatenſynode im Jahre 1896
getroffen worden ſind. (Siehe Bericht vom Jahre 1896, S. 123.)
Beſchloſſen, daß der Antrag, „die Allgemeine Unterſtützungscom⸗
miſſion wolle nicht nur im Synodalbericht quittiren, ſondern ihre Quit⸗
tungen alljährlich auch im ‚Lutheraner' erſcheinen laſſen“, abgelehnt werde.
Beſchloſſen, daß der Wittwe des ſel. Judenmiſſionars D. Lands⸗
mann eine alljährliche Unterſtützung von $240.00 aus der Allgemeinen
Unterſtützungskaſſe gereicht werde.
Beſchloſſen, daß die bisherige genannter Wittwe zu Theil gewordene
Unterſtützung, welche der Judenmiſſionskaſſe entnommen worden iſt, in
dieſe Kaſſe aus der Allgemeinen Unterſtützungskaſſe zurückbezahlt werde.
(Vgl. S. 91.)
Wahlcollegium.
Laut Beſchluſſes der Synode ſoll das Wahlcollegium, falls die Noth⸗
wendigkeit einer Vervollſtändigung desſelben eintritt, ſich ſelbſt, und zwar
in der Weiſe ergänzen, daß es aus den für die Wahl nominirten, aber
nach erfolgter Wahl übrig gebliebenen ſechs Candidaten diejenige Perſon
eintreten läßt, welche bei Vollzug der Wahl die nächſt höchſte Zahl von
Stimmen erhalten hat. — Folgendes iſt das Wahlreſultat:
L. Hölter, 254 Stimmen; C. Groß, 252 Stimmen; Fr. Sie⸗
vers, 237 Stimmen; J. P. Beyer, 230 Stimmen; H. Wunder,
English translation AI translation
Ninth Delegate Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States, 1899. 123
II. The Rudloff Legacy.
1. Income:
1896. Balance (report, p. 122) ........................................... $65.00
1896. Proceeds of the legacy .............................................. 40.00
1897. do. do. do. .............................................................. 40.00
1898. do. do. do. .............................................................. 40.00
$185.00
2. Expenditure:
1896. To student Hiller ...................................................... $15.00
1897. do. do. do. ............................................................... 45.00
do. do. Meyer .......................................................... 15.00
1898. do. do. Stubnatzy ..................................................... 10.00
do. do. Cämmerer ...................................................... 25.00
$110.00
Cash on hand ............................................ $75.00
("Reviewed and found correct.")
Resolved, that the Synod express the urgent wish that the support
committees of the individual Districts, even those that receive no
subsidy from the General Fund, report on the state of their funds to
the General Support Committee, in accordance with the provisions
adopted by the Delegate Synod in 1896. (See the 1896 report, p. 123.)
Resolved, that the motion "that the General Support Committee
should not merely issue receipts in the synodical report, but should
also have its receipts appear annually in the 'Lutheraner,'" be
rejected.
Resolved, that the widow of the late missionary to the Jews, D.
Landsmann, be granted an annual support of $240.00 from the General
Support Fund.
Resolved, that the support previously given to the aforementioned
widow, which had been drawn from the Jewish Missions Fund, be repaid
into that fund from the General Support Fund. (Cf. p. 91.)
The Electoral College [Wahlcollegium].
By resolution of the Synod, should it become necessary to fill a
vacancy in the Electoral College, it is to replenish itself, namely in
such a way that, of the six candidates who were nominated for the
election but left over once the election was held, the person is
seated who received the next-highest number of votes when the
election was carried out. — The following is the result of the
election:
L. Hölter, 254 votes; C. Groß, 252 votes; Fr. Sievers, 237
votes; J. P. Beyer, 230 votes; H. Wunder,