# LCMS Convention Proceedings_St. Louis Missouri_1899_S123 # AI translation — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) Ninth Delegate Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States, 1899. 123 II. The Rudloff Legacy. 1. Income: 1896. Balance (report, p. 122) ........................................... $65.00 1896. Proceeds of the legacy .............................................. 40.00 1897. do. do. do. .............................................................. 40.00 1898. do. do. do. .............................................................. 40.00 $185.00 2. Expenditure: 1896. To student Hiller ...................................................... $15.00 1897. do. do. do. ............................................................... 45.00 do. do. Meyer .......................................................... 15.00 1898. do. do. Stubnatzy ..................................................... 10.00 do. do. Cämmerer ...................................................... 25.00 $110.00 Cash on hand ............................................ $75.00 ("Reviewed and found correct.") Resolved, that the Synod express the urgent wish that the support committees of the individual Districts, even those that receive no subsidy from the General Fund, report on the state of their funds to the General Support Committee, in accordance with the provisions adopted by the Delegate Synod in 1896. (See the 1896 report, p. 123.) Resolved, that the motion "that the General Support Committee should not merely issue receipts in the synodical report, but should also have its receipts appear annually in the 'Lutheraner,'" be rejected. Resolved, that the widow of the late missionary to the Jews, D. Landsmann, be granted an annual support of $240.00 from the General Support Fund. Resolved, that the support previously given to the aforementioned widow, which had been drawn from the Jewish Missions Fund, be repaid into that fund from the General Support Fund. (Cf. p. 91.) The Electoral College [Wahlcollegium]. By resolution of the Synod, should it become necessary to fill a vacancy in the Electoral College, it is to replenish itself, namely in such a way that, of the six candidates who were nominated for the election but left over once the election was held, the person is seated who received the next-highest number of votes when the election was carried out. — The following is the result of the election: L. Hölter, 254 votes; C. Groß, 252 votes; Fr. Sievers, 237 votes; J. P. Beyer, 230 votes; H. Wunder,