Synodical Conference Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1900, Page 17

Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68

der ev.⸗luth. Synodalconferenz von Nord⸗America. 1900. 17

verkörpern große Grundgeſetze, deren Befolgung Gutes erzielt für die Ge⸗
horchenden und für alle Menſchen, und zu gleicher Zeit ſind ſie von Gott gut⸗
geheißen.“ (Besides practical intellectual training, we insist upon
moral and religious development. Of course we cannot give re-
ligious instruction except in a general way, all denominational or
sectarian teaching being excluded. But there is a common and
indisputed ground for all to stand upon. No person rises to the
full stature of manhood until he chooses to model his life accord-
ing to the eternal principles of right, and this is only tantamount
to saying, until he chooses to please God. Love and fear of Him
must be made to result in reverence for Him and in obedience to
His will. . . . All obedience in the family, the school, or the state
should be insisted upon because such obedience is in accordance
with the fundamental principles of right. I do not mean to dis-
cuss the foundation of obligation — whether a given course of con-
duct is right because it results in good, or whether it is right be-
cause it is commanded by the great Creator of all things. The
ten commandments embody great principles, obedience to which
results in good to those who obey and to all men, and at the same
time they have the divine approval. Report U. S. Commiss. of
Ed. 1886—87, p. 201.)

Das mag für manche einen recht berückenden Schein haben, daß ihren
Kindern nun auch der Gehorſam gegen die großen Grundgeſetze, wie ſie in
den zehn Geboten niedergelegt ſind, eingeprägt und von einem Schöpfer,
dem ſie aus Furcht und Liebe ihren Willen unterordnen müſſen, geſagt
werden ſoll. Aber dieſe Religion iſt nicht die chriſtliche; ſie ſteht auf dem
Boden des alten Heidenthums. Wer nur mit dem Geſetz erziehen will,
der erzeugt nur knechtiſchen Sinn. Soll wirklich Furcht und Liebe, Ehr⸗
furcht und Gehorſam gegen Gott in des Kindes Herz gewirkt werden, ſo
kann das allein geſchehen durch das Evangelium. Geſetz ohne Evange⸗
lium iſt nicht das lebendigmachende Wort Gottes, zumal wenn es nicht als
der heilige und gerechte Wille Gottes gelehrt wird. Und darum gilt hier
Luthers Wort: „Wo die heilige Schrift nicht regieret, da rathe ich für⸗
wahr niemand, daß er ſein Kind hinthue.“ (St. L. Ausg., X, 341.)

Das dritte, was wir bei der Beurtheilung der religionsloſen Staats⸗
ſchule bedenken müſſen, iſt dies, daß ſie die Schüler auch nicht zu dem
Ziel aller wahren Erziehung, der Erlangung des ewigen Lebens
durch den Glauben an JEſum Chriſtum, führen kann. Die Staatsſchul⸗
erziehung hat nach den Erklärungen ihrer Hauptvertreter zu ihrem eigent⸗
lichen und letzten Ziel, aus ihren Schülern gute Staatsbürger zu machen.
Sie ſtrebt nicht um ein Haar weiter als die alten römiſchen Schulen, welche
mit der Heranbildung echter Römer ihr Ziel für völlig erreicht anſahen.

of the Ev. Luth. Synodical Conference of North America. 1900. 17

embody great fundamental laws, whose observance brings good for those who obey and for all people, and at the same time they are approved by God." (Besides practical intellectual training, we insist upon moral and religious development. Of course we cannot give religious instruction except in a general way, all denominational or sectarian teaching being excluded. But there is a common and indisputed ground for all to stand upon. No person rises to the full stature of manhood until he chooses to model his life according to the eternal principles of right, and this is only tantamount to saying, until he chooses to please God. Love and fear of Him must be made to result in reverence for Him and in obedience to His will. . . . All obedience in the family, the school, or the state should be insisted upon because such obedience is in accordance with the fundamental principles of right. I do not mean to discuss the foundation of obligation — whether a given course of conduct is right because it results in good, or whether it is right because it is commanded by the great Creator of all things. The ten commandments embody great principles, obedience to which results in good to those who obey and to all men, and at the same time they have the divine approval. Report U. S. Commiss. of Ed. 1886—87, p. 201.)

That may have a quite captivating appearance for many: that their children are now also to have impressed on them obedience to the great fundamental laws as laid down in the Ten Commandments, and to be told of a Creator to whom they must subordinate their will out of fear and love. But this religion is not the Christian one; it stands on the ground of old heathenism. Whoever wants to educate with the Law only produces a servile mind. If fear and love, reverence and obedience toward God are really to be worked in a child's heart, that can happen only through the Gospel. Law without Gospel is not the life-giving Word of God, especially when it is not taught as the holy and righteous will of God. And therefore Luther's word applies here: "Where the Holy Scripture does not rule, there I truly advise no one to put his child." (St. Louis Edition, X, 341.)

The third thing that we must consider in judging the religionless state school is this, that it also cannot lead the pupils to the goal of all true education, the attainment of eternal life through faith in Jesus Christ. State school education, according to the declarations of its chief representatives, has as its real and final aim to make good citizens of its pupils. It strives not a hair's breadth beyond the old Roman schools, which regarded their aim as fully attained with the training of true Romans.