Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 270

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 270

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

270 HIGHER EDUCATION

for one year beginning in October 1974. so that he could serve
as director of the Program Emphasizing Adult Christian Educa-
tion (PEACE project). sponsored by the Board of Parish Edu-
cation of the English District. The other members of the execu-
tive staff who continued to serve included: Dr. Arthur M.
Ahlschwede. Executive Secretary: Dr. Lester R. Bayer and Dr.
Samuel I. Goltermann, Assistant Executive Secretaries: and
Miss Gert Moddelmog. Administrative Assistant.

Activities of the Board

The board met 11 times for a total of 23 days in the 2-year
period since the last convention. One meeting was held on the
campus of Concordia Senior College, Fort Wayne. All other
meetings were conducted in St. Louis or Chicago.

On three occasions the board convened its Advisory Council.
consisting of the presidents of the colleges and seminaries.
for mutual consultation on issues of systemwide concern. One
of these meetings was expanded to include a member of the
board of control and a member of the faculty of each institution.
Another of the sessions was enlarged to include the chairman of
each board of control.

Individual members of the Board for Higher Education and
committees of the board were involved in visiting various cam-
puses, representing higher education at meetings, and serving
on synodical committees that dealt with the needs of individual
schools and with systemwide programs and planning. The board
continued to give special time and attention to the concerns
relating to personnel for the colleges and seminaries. The chair-
man of the board or his representative served as an elector in
the call meetings for presidents and in the interviews of prospec-
tive personnel for the seminaries.

During the biennium the Board for Higher Education spon-
sored separate meetings for in-service growth and system
coordination involving the business managers, deans of students,
academic deans, registrars, and representative instructors of
education and of social sciences. Admissions personnel from the
colleges at Winfield, Austin, and Concordia (Missouri) were in-
volved in a special board-sponsored meeting on recruitment
issues. A vocational counseling-recruitment conference for
representatives from all colleges and seminaries was held.
Several meetings relating to ministerial programs among racial
minority groups were conducted,

The plan designed by the board and carried out under the
direction of the staff for expanded, overall evaluative visits of
each campus over a 3-year period was continued during the
biennium. The teams that visited the various campuses in-
cluded synodical faculty members and “outside” leaders in
higher education, in addition to the staff members of the Board
for Higher Education. After each visit a detailed report, includ-
ing evaluations and recommendations relating to all aspects of
Operations, was presented to the president as the executive
officer of the board of contro! of the institution. The visit plan
also involves follow-up contacts and reports by the staff member
of the board who serves as chairman of the evaluation team that
visits the school.

The Planning Project and the Task Force

Prior to the New Orleans convention the Board for Higher
Education had proposed to synodical officials that a portion
of the funds received from the 125th Anniversary Thankoffering
be used for “a study on the future of higher education, bringing
together the ideas. evaluations, and suggestions of experts
and others interested and involved in the synodical colleges
and seminaries.”’ A detailed plan of the study as proposed by
the board was presented to Floor Committee 6, the committee
on higher education, at the convention. In response to that pro-
posal, to similar suggestions from several of the colleges in their
reports to the Synod, and to a number of overtures suggesting
various studies of higher education, the floor committee pro-
posed. and the delegates at New Orleans adopted, Resolution
6:30: ‘To Consider Restructuring Synod's System of Higher
Education.”

The first two resolves of this most important resolution re-
lating to higher education read:

Resolved. That the BHE convene a meeting with the president,
a member of the Board of Control chosen by that board. and a mem-
ber of the faculty of each synodical college and seminary chosen by

that faculty. in order to discuss aims. objectives, and functions of the
synodical system and of the individual schools: and be it further

Resolved. That the BHE. in consultation with the Board of Direc-
tors, appoint a task force outside of the membership and staff of the
Board for Higher Education to study the Synod’s program of higher
education and to bring concrete resolutions to the 1975 convention
for action.

Immediately after the convention. in July 1973, the Board for
Higher Education began to collect names and information con-
cerning prospective members for the task force. A timetable for
the entire project was adopted, and plans for carrying out the
first resolve were developed.

The major issues relating to the project were identified and
discussed in a meeting involving the Board for Higher Education
and the Advisory Council in September 1973. The college and
seminary boards of control and faculties elected their repre-
sentatives in October. The meeting proposed in the resolution
was scheduled for January 1974.

A comprehensive questionnaire was developed by the
Board for Higher Education to gather adequate background
and preparatory material for the January meeting. The ques-
tionnaire asked for opinions relating to all the central issues
of the project including recruitment, planning theses, pattern
and structure of the system, programs and curricula, financial
considerations, subsidy patterns, seminaries, role of the system,
and role of individual schools.

The questionnaires were mailed in November 1973 to all
Participants of the meeting required by the resolution, and to
the presidium, Board of Directors, and division executives of
the Synod, as well as to a sampling of District Presidents and
District executives.

All questionnaires were returned by Dec. 1. 1973. Each of
the colleges and seminaries submitted not only the completed
individual questionnaires from the President, board of control
member, and faculty delegate but also a school consensus copy
developed through discussions by the representatives of that
school.

The Commission on Research and Planning and members
of the staff of the Board for Higher Education met 3 days in
December to do a summary and analysis of the results of the
questionnaires. The 73-page document developed through these
efforts was mailed to all participants prior to the January
meeting.

In the meeting itself the participants were divided into six
groups. Each group included a member of the Board for Higher
Education, at least two presidents of schools, two faculty repre-
sentatives, two board of control delegates, and a member of the
Board for Higher Education staff or the Commission on Re-
search and Planning. At least eight campuses were represented
in each group by college or seminary delegates.

In the group sessions both written and oral reports were
prepared relating to the issues in higher education and to the
summaries and analyses of the questionnaire results. The re-
corders of each group met toward the close of the conference
and prepared written consensus statements summarizing the
opinions and recommendations of the participants on each of
the issues relating to higher education.

Later in January the Task Force was appointed by the Board
for Higher Education in consultation with the Board of Direc-
tors. Much prayer and great care were involved in the selec-
tion of the Task Force to secure the best expertise possible re-
lating to the issues to be studied and at the same time to include
broad representation from the various groups and areas in
the Synod.

Members who served on the Task Force included: Dr. Milton
Carpenter, Treasurer, The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.
St. Louis, Mo.; Dr. Richard Dickinson, Minister of Urban
Affairs, Northern Illinois District, Chicago, Ill., Dr. William L.
Halvorson, assistant professor of botany and assistant dean of
graduate school, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, R. L:
Dr. Leonard W. Heidemann, pastor, St. John’s Church, Seward.
Nebr.: Rev. Roger J. Humann, pastor, Resurrection Church.
St. Catharines, Ont.. Can.: Dr. Arnold H. Koschmann, professor
of electrical engineering and computer science, University of
New Mexico, Albuquerque, N. Mex.: Mr. Walter H. Moeller,
director of Christian education and principal, Grace Church,
Winter Haven, Fla.: Dr. Gordon E. von Stroh, director of public
administration program and associate professor, College of
Business Administration, University of Denver, Denver, Colo.: