Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 283
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 283
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 283
developments in education and the accompanying problems
facing the synodical institutions. Included in the survey was
a study of the tendency of the institutions to adopt techniques
and methods without examining the basic underlying philos-
ophy or the needs of the Synod for pastors and teachers. Many
of the administrative, curricular, and financial problems con-
fronting the Synod’s higher education system required further
detailed study and resolution.
The survey authorized by the 1941 convention was par-
ticularly concerned about the quality of offerings at the small
junior colleges and the apparent fact that the large number
of junior college programs was unnecessary to provide the
Synod with the number of graduates necessary to fill its needs.
Among specific items with which the survey commission con-
cerned itself were the following:
1) greater synodical use of the educational facilities at Val-
paraiso;
2) the feasibility of pretheological students completing col-
lege work at Valparaiso before entering the St. Louis
seminary:
3) the possible amalgamation of Concordia Teachers Col-
lege, River Forest, and Valparaiso University;
4) the increase of general education at synodical schools;
5) coeducation in Concordia College, Fort Wayne, and Con-
cordia College, St. Paul;
6) proposed consolidation of St. Paul’s College, Concordia,
Mo., St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans., and Concordia
Teachers College, Seward, Nebr.; and
7) the need for immediate construction at Concordia Col-
lege, Portland, Oreg.
The original recommendations of the survey included closing
St. Paul’s College, Concordia, Mo., Concordia College, Portland,
Oreg., and the Concordia Theological Seminary at Springfield.
Public hearings subsequently altered the recommendations
with respect to Concordia College, Portland. The remaining
two recommendations to close schools were not found accept-
able by the convention.
By 1947 the Missouri Synod was the only major Protestant
denomination not requiring college graduation for admission
to its seminaries. This presented difficulties for chaplains en-
tering military service and for pastors pursuing graduate work
at other colleges and universities throughout the country.
Additionally the junior college—seminary route did not meet
the requirements of higher education in American life.
At the centennial convention in 1947 the establishment of
a senior college for the upper levels of college education for
ministerial students was approved. The exigencies of academic
and budgetary considerations pointed towards a new single-
purpose institution focusing on academic excellence, growth
of spiritual maturity, development of leadership qualities, in-
stilling love for the work of the parish pastor, and developing
loyalty to the church. One new institution was preferable to
converting four to eight faculties to the full implications of the
ministerial education, and budgetary and facility costs involved
were felt to be prohibitive. Concordia Senior College opened
its doors in 1957 as a completely new institution for ministerial
education. The new Senior College was a culmination of 18
plans studied by the Board for Higher Education to provide
a way for accreditation of ministerial graduates.
The need for accreditation in order for the synodical junior
college program to be acceptable in American society, together
with the desire of congregations and individuals to provide
Lutheran high school education in the local communities, re-
sulted in a transformation of junior college academies operated
by the Synod. The junior college offerings had to be expanded
to meet this need. As alternatives became available, parents
declined to send their sons away to a synodical high school,
and the costs of operating many of the synodical high schools
became prohibitive. Consequently all but four were closed
during the period from 1966 to 1973.
The General Education Student in the LCMS
With the exception of St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans.,
and Concordia College, Conover, N.C. (no longer in existence),
all preparatory academies and colleges were founded or came
under synodical control as institutions for the purpose of pre-
paring students as pastors or parish school teachers. However,
contrary to what many seem to believe, the Synod has a long
history of general education offerings of one kind or another.
Concordia College, Bronxville, began preparing general high
school students as early as 1908 and expanded its high school
curriculum to include general courses in 1919. The Synod
authorized the college division, begun in 1936, to accept women
in 1939. Concordia, Austin, and Concordia, Portland, have ac-
cepted high percentages of nontheological male students since
the 1920s. Concordia Teachers College, Seward, began accept-
ing women students for teacher training in 1919, Concordia
Teachers College, River Forest, in 1938. For many years prior
to this they admitted male students preparing for secular callings
to the extent allowed by surplus room without offering special
courses. The junior colleges at Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Con-
cordia, Mo., were the last to expand into general education,
with the colleges at Milwaukee and Concordia offering prac-
tically no courses outside the pretheological curriculum until
recently.
The expansion of the Synod’s professional schools into
general education was unquestionably motivated by the ideal
of serving Lutheran members by educating their children in
a Christian environment and of serving the church by training
a consecrated laity. However, it appears that the great urge
of many of the pretheological schools to expand into secular
education was precipitated, in part at least, by very practical
considerations. The depression years of the 1930s brought heavy
declines in enrollment and, consequently, overstaffing, vacant
dormitories, and uncollected student’s accounts. Under this
emergency, self-preservation became a dominant consideration,
and the fusion of ideals and practical needs largely directed the
educational system to accept general education students.
In 1938 and 1941 delegate conventions authorized the Synod
to experiment in general education and coeducation in synodical
colleges in geographical areas not yielding enough ministerial
students to engage the full-time use of the facilities available.
The obvious solution to operating at capacity would be to re-
cruit ministerial students to fill the schools, but this was not
deemed possible or necessary because of the “oversupply” of
ministerial students at that time. The acceptance of a limited
number of students for general education and coeducation was
considered to be on an experimental basis but was introduced
without specific study of the status or character of the schools
and their effectiveness.
The 1944 synodical convention resolved that the Board for
Higher Education actively support general education on the
high school level. The Synod had declared its policy of encour-
agement to congregations to establish independent Christian
high schools and instructed its boards to survey the most prom-
ising fields to assist in organizing congregations or individuals
to support Lutheran high schools and, wherever feasible, also
junior colleges. However, the Synod would contribute no funds
for the erection and maintenance of such high schools and
junior colleges.
The 1944 convention also reaffirmed the basic purposes of
its seminaries, academies, and colleges as being the training
of pastors and teachers. It determined, however, to continue
allowing the limited use of its buildings for the general high
school education of boys at Austin, Bronxville, and Portland,
and for boys and girls at Edmonton, Oakland, and Winfield.
At the college level general education was reaffirmed for men
at Edmonton and Oakland and for men and women at Bronx-
ville and Winfield. The convention encouraged each school to
adopt a cost-accounting system for analyzing costs related to
nontheological students and recommended that an agreement
be developed between each school and the Synod for payment
of excess costs related to general education instruction.
The Board for Higher Education survey results reported
to the 1944 convention had clearly indicated that the command
to teach or to educate was to Christians gathered in local con-
gregations. The human organization, the Synod, as a voluntary
organization of congregations, is organized to do those things
jointly that cannot be done more effectively and efficiently by
individual congregational effort. Consequently, the Synod’s
efforts in the area of specialized education are solely dependent
on the support and authorization of its member congregations.
LCMS Higher Education Compared with That of
Other Lutheran Bodies
The experience of The Lutheran Church-— Missouri Synod
in higher education is substantially different from that of other