Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 283

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 283

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 283

developments in education and the accompanying problems
facing the synodical institutions. Included in the survey was
a study of the tendency of the institutions to adopt techniques
and methods without examining the basic underlying philos-
ophy or the needs of the Synod for pastors and teachers. Many
of the administrative, curricular, and financial problems con-
fronting the Synod’s higher education system required further
detailed study and resolution.

The survey authorized by the 1941 convention was par-
ticularly concerned about the quality of offerings at the small
junior colleges and the apparent fact that the large number
of junior college programs was unnecessary to provide the
Synod with the number of graduates necessary to fill its needs.
Among specific items with which the survey commission con-
cerned itself were the following:

1) greater synodical use of the educational facilities at Val-
paraiso;

2) the feasibility of pretheological students completing col-
lege work at Valparaiso before entering the St. Louis
seminary:

3) the possible amalgamation of Concordia Teachers Col-
lege, River Forest, and Valparaiso University;

4) the increase of general education at synodical schools;

5) coeducation in Concordia College, Fort Wayne, and Con-
cordia College, St. Paul;

6) proposed consolidation of St. Paul’s College, Concordia,
Mo., St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans., and Concordia
Teachers College, Seward, Nebr.; and

7) the need for immediate construction at Concordia Col-
lege, Portland, Oreg.

The original recommendations of the survey included closing
St. Paul’s College, Concordia, Mo., Concordia College, Portland,
Oreg., and the Concordia Theological Seminary at Springfield.
Public hearings subsequently altered the recommendations
with respect to Concordia College, Portland. The remaining
two recommendations to close schools were not found accept-
able by the convention.

By 1947 the Missouri Synod was the only major Protestant
denomination not requiring college graduation for admission
to its seminaries. This presented difficulties for chaplains en-
tering military service and for pastors pursuing graduate work
at other colleges and universities throughout the country.
Additionally the junior college—seminary route did not meet
the requirements of higher education in American life.

At the centennial convention in 1947 the establishment of
a senior college for the upper levels of college education for
ministerial students was approved. The exigencies of academic
and budgetary considerations pointed towards a new single-
purpose institution focusing on academic excellence, growth
of spiritual maturity, development of leadership qualities, in-
stilling love for the work of the parish pastor, and developing
loyalty to the church. One new institution was preferable to
converting four to eight faculties to the full implications of the
ministerial education, and budgetary and facility costs involved
were felt to be prohibitive. Concordia Senior College opened
its doors in 1957 as a completely new institution for ministerial
education. The new Senior College was a culmination of 18
plans studied by the Board for Higher Education to provide
a way for accreditation of ministerial graduates.

The need for accreditation in order for the synodical junior
college program to be acceptable in American society, together
with the desire of congregations and individuals to provide
Lutheran high school education in the local communities, re-
sulted in a transformation of junior college academies operated
by the Synod. The junior college offerings had to be expanded
to meet this need. As alternatives became available, parents
declined to send their sons away to a synodical high school,
and the costs of operating many of the synodical high schools
became prohibitive. Consequently all but four were closed
during the period from 1966 to 1973.

The General Education Student in the LCMS

With the exception of St. John’s College, Winfield, Kans.,
and Concordia College, Conover, N.C. (no longer in existence),
all preparatory academies and colleges were founded or came
under synodical control as institutions for the purpose of pre-
paring students as pastors or parish school teachers. However,

contrary to what many seem to believe, the Synod has a long
history of general education offerings of one kind or another.
Concordia College, Bronxville, began preparing general high
school students as early as 1908 and expanded its high school
curriculum to include general courses in 1919. The Synod
authorized the college division, begun in 1936, to accept women
in 1939. Concordia, Austin, and Concordia, Portland, have ac-
cepted high percentages of nontheological male students since
the 1920s. Concordia Teachers College, Seward, began accept-
ing women students for teacher training in 1919, Concordia
Teachers College, River Forest, in 1938. For many years prior
to this they admitted male students preparing for secular callings
to the extent allowed by surplus room without offering special
courses. The junior colleges at Milwaukee, St. Paul, and Con-
cordia, Mo., were the last to expand into general education,
with the colleges at Milwaukee and Concordia offering prac-
tically no courses outside the pretheological curriculum until
recently.

The expansion of the Synod’s professional schools into
general education was unquestionably motivated by the ideal
of serving Lutheran members by educating their children in
a Christian environment and of serving the church by training
a consecrated laity. However, it appears that the great urge
of many of the pretheological schools to expand into secular
education was precipitated, in part at least, by very practical
considerations. The depression years of the 1930s brought heavy
declines in enrollment and, consequently, overstaffing, vacant
dormitories, and uncollected student’s accounts. Under this
emergency, self-preservation became a dominant consideration,
and the fusion of ideals and practical needs largely directed the
educational system to accept general education students.

In 1938 and 1941 delegate conventions authorized the Synod
to experiment in general education and coeducation in synodical
colleges in geographical areas not yielding enough ministerial
students to engage the full-time use of the facilities available.
The obvious solution to operating at capacity would be to re-
cruit ministerial students to fill the schools, but this was not
deemed possible or necessary because of the “oversupply” of
ministerial students at that time. The acceptance of a limited
number of students for general education and coeducation was
considered to be on an experimental basis but was introduced
without specific study of the status or character of the schools
and their effectiveness.

The 1944 synodical convention resolved that the Board for
Higher Education actively support general education on the
high school level. The Synod had declared its policy of encour-
agement to congregations to establish independent Christian
high schools and instructed its boards to survey the most prom-
ising fields to assist in organizing congregations or individuals
to support Lutheran high schools and, wherever feasible, also
junior colleges. However, the Synod would contribute no funds
for the erection and maintenance of such high schools and
junior colleges.

The 1944 convention also reaffirmed the basic purposes of
its seminaries, academies, and colleges as being the training
of pastors and teachers. It determined, however, to continue
allowing the limited use of its buildings for the general high
school education of boys at Austin, Bronxville, and Portland,
and for boys and girls at Edmonton, Oakland, and Winfield.
At the college level general education was reaffirmed for men
at Edmonton and Oakland and for men and women at Bronx-
ville and Winfield. The convention encouraged each school to
adopt a cost-accounting system for analyzing costs related to
nontheological students and recommended that an agreement
be developed between each school and the Synod for payment
of excess costs related to general education instruction.

The Board for Higher Education survey results reported
to the 1944 convention had clearly indicated that the command
to teach or to educate was to Christians gathered in local con-
gregations. The human organization, the Synod, as a voluntary
organization of congregations, is organized to do those things
jointly that cannot be done more effectively and efficiently by
individual congregational effort. Consequently, the Synod’s
efforts in the area of specialized education are solely dependent
on the support and authorization of its member congregations.

LCMS Higher Education Compared with That of
Other Lutheran Bodies

The experience of The Lutheran Church-— Missouri Synod
in higher education is substantially different from that of other