Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 464
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 464
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
464
REPORT ON DISSE
Jesis knew that death cou'd not annihilate Him but that He woulda
arise and through His rising destroy the power of death (John 11-25 #1.
146, Mark 9:30-32; see Acts 2:22-28: Rom. 1:4. Eph. 1:20). St. Paut
cherishes this same confidence (Phil. 1:23: 2 Cor. 5:8). Other Passages
Cescribe the departed faithful as being with God. (Matt. 22:29-32. Rev
69-14)
The New Testament speaks of the derarted faith‘u: as existing in
Sc 2-8 2°G Diessec state which at the very ieast can be descrined
© pers stance of the ndividual’s identity before God Tre fa:tnfu:
are cesc”.bec as being in the presence of God and of eyodying peace
and rest witn Him. They are also described as s'eeping (1 Thess 4:13}
or of berg in the tombs (John 5:28 f.. Matt 2751-53) The insoired
writers soeak of death variousiy as the separation of body ard sou!
(Gen 35 19} or ag the departure of the spirit (Acts 759: Luke 23 46)
or as the passing of the “|.” the total person (Phil. 1 23). to be with
Crist Tre New Testament also teaches the physical resurrection of
the body 1" several passages ; John 5.281: Rom 811.1 Cor.15 51-54)
Finaity tne New Testament atirms that the physicai bodies of the de-
Partec fa:tnfu: will be glorified. (1 Cor. 15 §1-54: Phil. 3.20-21) ¢ & Stare-
ment cr Death. Resurrection and Immortality pp. 1-2)
in this same documer: the Commission on Theology and Church
Reiations has a'so said
The Lutneren Confessions. the normative statement of Biblical doc-
trne for Lutherans. speaks. ‘ixe Scriptures. of man as having a body
ang a sou: /Formuia of Conserd, Epitome IX. 1° Large Catechism
Baptism 45, Sma'caid Articies Part lll, Af. i 11). But the references
citea here clearly teach that man’s body anc soul are imegraity united
both are covrupted by sin anc subject to death (FC. Eo 1 4.8)
12.464. S 4. Partill. Art i *1). Togetne: they constitute mans esserce
or nature (FC. SO. i. 2} According to the Athanasian Creed the
rational so. and the fiesh are cne man as God anc man are one
onrist (35)
The Confessions agree with Scripture anc the a! but unanimous
traditor. cf the Church in ass-gring significant theologica’ mearings
tc death Tre Confessions rule out the corte porary view trat ceath is
@ pleasant ard pa-niess transitior into a perfect worid. For them death
S destruction the destructic” of the s.nfu! ‘esh go tnat believers may
ase comp.etely renewed 'Ano/ogy XIl 153 FC.. Epit : 12) Deatnis
also the divine eterna: judgment on bedy and sou'~2 horr-o'e and
frighterirg sroscect to comtema'ate—exces! ‘or those wre vive in
Jes.sCr-st
The Cerfess.ons afirm tne persistence c! perscnal ICertty pevond
death. ©cr example. the Sra‘cad Artic-es refer to the sa in teir
graves and .n “eaven” iPart li Art |! 28. il Ill 26 see aisoFkF OS. SO
i 37: Apotogy XX1, 9;
oO
immutable wil’ and speaks in the first place of its use ‘to bring men to
a knowledge cf their sins.” it echoes the language of the Formula of Con-
cord which says “We unanimously believe. teach, and confess .. ‘that.
Strictly speaking. the 'aw is a divine doctrine whicn revea's the righteousness
and immutable will cf God’ and which then Quotes Luther's words, The
Proper function of which [the law! i3 to condemn sin and to tead te a knowi-
edge of sin. (FC SDV. 17)
Wnen “4 Statement” then goes on to affirm in the second place the
instructiona. funciion of the jaw. this is by no means to be understood as in
some way Olayirg down the accusing function of the !aw which is attirmed in
tne first piace. it “A Statement’ had inverted the order in which it designates
the uses of the ‘aw. then it might justly be said that its formulation leaves
tne impressicr that the instructional function is Primary and the accusing
functon or'y inc:oental. As it is the language of “A Statement property
understood cannot justly be construed as in any way contrary to the con-
fessional empnas:s tnat the iaw always accuses |Ap iV, 38, 128. 167, 204
250. 270. 285. 295 319) and trat “tc reprove '$ the rea: function of the
faw. (FC SD Vi. +4;
2, The Law and The New Man In Christ
‘t iS aileced a'so that the sentence ‘9 question implies that the ‘new
man in Christ ss without mora! direction unti! the iaw is prociaimed ts him
A Statement’ says the law provides Christians with instruction about
gOCG works: it does not say that the law provides the ‘new man” with in-
Struction about good works. This entire matter is clearly exolaneo in the
folowing quotation from the Formula of Concord
It ig also necessary to set forth distinctly what tne Gosce! does
creates. and works in connection wth the rew obedience of beviavers
and wnat function the law performs in this matter, as far as the good
works of betievers are cor.cerned. The law indeed tel!s us that it is
God's will and command that we shouid waik in the new lite. but it
does not give the power and ability to begin it or to doit. Itis the Holy
Spirit. who is not given and received through the jaw but through the
ereaching of the Gospel! (Gai. 3:2 14) who renews the heart. Then he
empioys the law to instruct the regenerate out of it and to show and
indicate to them in the Ten Commandments what the accentabie wii!
of God is (Rom. 12.2) and in what good works. which God has prepared
beforerard they should walk ‘Eph. 2°10}. He aiso admonishes trem
to do these and when because of the flesh they are lazy negligent.
and recaic:trant. the Holy So:rit repreves them through the iaw !n this
way the noly Spirit simultanecusly derforms both offces ne niiis
and Drings to ‘ife. he brings down into Snec! and raises uc” is office
IS Not aione to comfort but also to rebuke. as 'tis written Wren the
Holy Spirt shal: come. he will convince tne wor'd (to which the Cid
Adam bdeiongs) of sin and of righteousness and of judgment” Sin is
everything that is contrary to the law of God and St. Pau: says. “Ali
Scripture is imsaired by God and protitabie for teacning. for reprcat'
12
vT
The Lutheran Confessions permit the use of the expression which is
so deepiy embedded in Christian piety: ‘The soul of the departed has
gone to heaven to be with its Maker.” But they require that this phrase
be used in a context which includes a true. Scripture-based under-
standing of the meaning of death of the resurrection of Jesus Christ
and of the nature of man’s eternal existence
Concerning the resurrection of the flesh. the Confessions are crystal-
ciear Tne Formula of Concord speaks of our flesh rising (FC. S.0
1 46) The Large Catecnis™ aHirms that ou: flesh wil! be out to death
witli be borad anc wil core forth gicrovs'y and ase. (Creed.
57) (Dd, p 2)
This same document includes among its ‘summary observations
the statement that tne Scriptures and the Lutneran Confessions compel us
to reject the teaching that tne sou! sleeps between death and the resur-
rection in Such a way that itis not consc'ous of bliss’ (/bid, p 3)
B. CRITICISM OF PART II
There are two principa! criticisms of Part | of A Statement
1. Use of the Law
Part |i conta:ns the foliowing sentence The Law. as the expression
of God's immutable will, is to be used by the church to bring men to a knowl-
edge of their sins as well as to provide Christ:ans with instruction about
good werks.
tt 1s alleged that to speak tn this way of the instructional function of the
‘aw is to imply that the jaw is merely a set of regulations Providing Christians
with pious directives which they are able to observe and to lose sight of the
iaw s function to reprove sin and accuse the sinner. It is alleged that the
sentence in question separates a purely instructional function of the law from
tS accusing function
A Statement does not separate the accusing and instructional func-
tions of the law: it distinguishes these functions just as the Formula of
Concord does when it says: The true function of the law remains. to rebuke
Sin and to give instruction about good works’ (FC SD V. 18). “A Statement”
and the Corfessions teach that the law always accuses, but they do not teach
the iaw only accuses. It is confessional doctrine that the law accuses ‘as
we'' as’ provides instruction about good works
The ‘o.lowing statement of the Formuia of Concord teaches that while
the law accuses :t 'nstructs. wane it instructs it accuses’ But the Law of
Sod prescribes tc believers good works in this way. that it shows and indi-
Cates at tne same tyme. as +n a Mirror. thatin this tife they are stil imperfect
and impure 'r ss. / ‘Aber Gesetz Gottes schre:bt den Giaubigen die
guten Werke aise vor. dass es zugierch (Latin’ simu!’ } we in einem Spiegel!
219 UND west. Cass sie in UNS In diesem Leben Och UNVOlikommen und
unrein seen (i (FC SO Vi, 21. Concordia Trg cotta 9.969 emphasis ours)
When A Statement’ refess to the law 25 the expression af Gods
But to reprove is the ree! function of the law. As often, therefore. as
Christians trip. they are rebuked through the Spirit of God out of the
law. But the same Spirit raises them up again and comforts them with
the preaching of the holy Gospel. (FC SD VI, 10-14: emphasis ours)
C. CRITICISM OF PART iil
The Primary Mission of the Church
The princ:pal objection to Part Ill of "A Statement.” expressed in a great
rumber of communications, is that it speaks of the church's ministry to
men's physical needs as serving the primary mission of making disciples
trrough the preaching of the Gospel and the administration of the sacra-
ments. The objection is that if the cnurch performs works of charity for the
Durpose of promoting some cther objective. this corrupts love at its very
heart.
Deeds of love have their own integrity and certainly ought to be done
‘or their own sake Nevertheless. it is in accord with the Scriptures to remind
Christians that by their good works they prove the sincerity of their love
.2 Cor, 8:8). give a winning witness to the transforming power of their faith
it Peter 3:1-2). and lead men to glority God in the day of visitation (1 Peter
212). The Lutheran Confessions remind ug that it is by our service to the
neighdor in our regular caliings 1n life that Christ shows His rule before the
word. celebrates His victory cve: the devil. and’ in order to keep the Gospel
a™ong men. he y sibly pits the witness fof the good works] of the saints
against the rule of the devil.” (Ap IV. 189-192)
When the church meets the challenges that God offers for ministry
to men’s physical needs. such Gospel-motivated service glorifies God
2 Cor. 9:13) and is one way for the church to become “slave of all” for the
sake of the Gospel that it may share in the Gospel's blessings and by all
means win the more and save some (1 Cor. 9:19-23). The apostie Paul
admonishes the Philippians (Phil. 2'12-16) to exercise their new life in Christ
so that their whole conduct as children of God will be an observable testi-
™ony to the wor'd adout the renewing power of the Gospe! which they con-
fess and so that by a manner of life worthy of the Gospel (Pnil. 1 27) they will
70.0 forth the word of life and shine as lights in the world
Since a redeemed life lived to the glory of God and in loving service
to the neighbor 1s a powertu! testimony to the transforming grace at work
among those who acclaim Christ as Savior and Lord. “A Statement’ might
we'll include in Part Il anotney antithesis which rejects any view of the
church's mission. that fais to recognize the witness vaiue of deeds of love
wricn flow from faith,
0. CRITICISM OF PART IV
The crit cism of Part lV of A Statement” 1s that large sections of its
teacning about tne Scriptures ara neither Scriptural nor confessional: they
are merely traditional. Particularly it is asserted tnat there 1s no Scriptural
13