Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 301
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 301
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 301
difficult unless Canadian seminary training was open to them.
Courses of study in the United States seminaries are by neces-
sity oriented toward a United States ministry. Candidates
trained for ministry in Canada are best served by Canadian-
oriented theological training. For those and other reasons
the Colloquy Committee explored the possibility of devising
a way in which Canadian students could receive theological
training in a Canadian seminary under Missouri Synod supervi-
sion.
Through the initiative of the Colloquy Committee a meeting
at Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, was held Nov.
12, 1970. During this meeting a plan for making theological
training possible at Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon,
for Missouri Synod students was developed. At the 1971 con-
vention authorization was given for the establishment of a
theological chair on the faculty of Lutheran Theological Semi-
nary, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada (jointly operated by the
Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada and the Lutheran
Church in America, Canada Section). The 1973 convention was
asked to restudy the cooperative seminary arrangement with
Lutheran Theological Seminary. No action was finalized, how-
ever, but was referred under omnibus resolution to the Board
of Directors.
The Ontario District Board of Directors established a three-
man task force to determine how soon a house of studies or a
branch seminary could be established in Ontario for the training
of Canadian men for ministry in Canada. The study gave con-
sideration to the needs for seminary training in Canada, Cana-
dian geography, Lutheran church in Canada history, placement
of candidates, the potential of an Eastern Canada seminary
extension center, and a site recommendation.
Canadian population projections suggest a population of 35
million by the year 2001, of which some 32 percent, nearly
doubling to 14.7 million, will reside within the province of
Ontario, which represents slightly less than 11 percent of the
land area. The four western provinces are projected to increase
from 5.7 million to 9.6 million people on some 29 percent of the
total land area.
The three major Lutheran segments in Canada are relatively
equal in communicant membership but are rather unevenly
distributed throughout the various regions. The Evangelical
Lutheran Church of Canada (ALC-related) has a communicant
membership of 53,000 with 309 of its 320 congregations and 97
percent of its membership in the western provinces. The Lu-
theran Church in America, Canada Section, with a communcant
membership of 82,000, has nearly half of its 325 congregations
and 58 percent of its membership in Ontario, and 135 congrega-
tions and 33 percent of the membership in the western prov-
inces. The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, with 66,000
communicants, has 133 of its 369 congregations and 45 percent
of its membership located in Ontario and 229 congregations and
54 percent of the members in the western provinces. The other
Canadian Lutheran churches have long provided for training
of Canadian pastors in Canada. With the predominant strength
in western Canada, the ALC located its seminary in the West
at Saskatoon, Sask.: the LCA, with broad representation in both
eastern and western Canada, established seminaries at Water-
loo, Ont., and Saskatoon, Sask. The two western seminaries
were merged into the jointly operated Lutheran Theological
Seminary at Saskatoon.
Placement of Missouri Synod pastoral candidates from the
United States seminaries and the subsequent retention rate in
Canada indicate a real need for concern of the effectiveness of
the process. Of a total of 215 candidates placed from 1953 to
1967, 147 were U.S. citizens, of whom 34 are still serving in
Canada as of 1974. Of the 68 Canadian candidates placed, 54
are still serving in Canada in 1974. It is interesting that western
Canadians placed in western Canada during that period totaled
36 with 28 still serving in the West in 1974. Eight western Cana-
dians were placed in eastern Canada with six still serving there.
Of the 12 eastern Canadians placed in the East, 7 are still serving,
but of 12 eastern Canadians placed in the West, only two are
still serving in the West. It is significant to note that U.S. candi-
dates originally placed in Canada do not serve for any great
length of time but that Canadian candidates do remain active
in Canada. The divergence of background between eastern and
western Canada is reflected in the tendency of the eastern
residents placed in the West to return to the area from which
they originated. The same situation exists in reviewing the
enrollment at Concordia College, Edmonton, where we find
that few students from eastern Canada have ever participated
in the educational program.
Canada has historically had a difficult time providing suffi-
cient workers to satisfy its needs. Consequently Canada has
been subsidized with pastoral candidates since work first was
started. Presently nearly half of the ordained clergy in Ontario
alone are not native born. Nonnative Canadians are experienc-
ing increasing difficulty in entering Canada, and historically a
high percentage have not remained for sufficient periods of
time to adapt to the Canadian scene. The size of Canada in
relation to population presents a number of difficulties. In a land
6,000 square miles larger than the United States, a population
of 22 million people resides. The vast majority of this population
lives within 100 miles of the United States border, but 75 percent
live south of the northern United States boundary from Lake of
the Woods to the Pacific Ocean.
People from the Ontario District feel rather strongly that The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is too evenly divided geo-
graphically to consider one seminary as being capable of serving
both regions of the country. They feel that the tremendous
development in the population growth expected in eastern
Canada requires primary attention as it forecasts a tremendous
growth potential for the church. Also, the generally positive
feeling on potential Lutheran unity that exists in western
Canada is not as noticeably present in the East.
In western Canada LCMS officials are reasonably satisfied
with the present arrangements at the Saskatoon seminary and
are supportive of increased efforts to strengthen LCMS partici-
pation. At the same time there is concern that since unity of
the Lutheran bodies has not taken place there is a need to recog-
nize that some pastors and congregations object to having LCMS
students trained largely by non-LCMS staff. The officials of Lu-
theran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, are willing to make
whatever appropriate adjustments are necessary to accommo-
date LCMS concerns.
It is obvious that seminary education in Canada presents a
number of unique situations. The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod needs to relate to the special circumstances of the Cana-
dian people. The geography of Canada creates barriers not
evident in the United States. The thousand plus miles of virtually
unsettled forested area between the population centers of
Ontario and the farm land of the plains does not lend itself
to a nation speaking with one voice. The political realities,
the cultural, educational and traditional differences of this vast
nation add to the difficulties of seminary education for LCMS
members. In addition strong feelings of nationalism have
developed into a number of legal restrictions that make it nearly
impossible for Canadians to study at the United States semi-
naries. The present situation demands immediate attention, but
it also demands that the seminary programs in Canada be
synodical, so that Missouri Synod congregations are served, be
acceptable to Canadians, be viable for prospective students,
and be flexible, so that future developments concerning po-
tential merger of Lutheranism at least in western Canada can
be adequately accommodated.
The Task Force received voluminous correspondence from
Canadians and also had a number of personal appearances of
concerned Canadian individuals on the various points of view
regarding questions of seminary education in Canada.
The Task Force Recommends
H-Cl. That separate points for seminary education be estab-
lished in eastern and western Canada:
H-C2. That for western Canada a seminary program be de-
veloped in conjunction with Lutheran Theological Seminary,
Saskatoon:
H-C3. That for eastern Canada a seminary extension pro-
gram be established at St. Catharines as recommended by the
Ontario District task force:
H-C4. That the Board for Higher Education through the
administration of Concordia Theological Seminary, Springfield
(Fort Wayne), establish appropriate synodical programs of
studies, staff, and financial support at the above locations to
insure certification for Missouri Synod graduates: and
H-C5. That financial support for Canadian seminary educa-
tion be the mutual responsibility of the various Canadian
Districts and the Board for Higher Education.