Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 301

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 301

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 301

difficult unless Canadian seminary training was open to them.
Courses of study in the United States seminaries are by neces-
sity oriented toward a United States ministry. Candidates
trained for ministry in Canada are best served by Canadian-
oriented theological training. For those and other reasons
the Colloquy Committee explored the possibility of devising
a way in which Canadian students could receive theological
training in a Canadian seminary under Missouri Synod supervi-
sion.

Through the initiative of the Colloquy Committee a meeting
at Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, was held Nov.
12, 1970. During this meeting a plan for making theological
training possible at Lutheran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon,
for Missouri Synod students was developed. At the 1971 con-
vention authorization was given for the establishment of a
theological chair on the faculty of Lutheran Theological Semi-
nary, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada (jointly operated by the
Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada and the Lutheran
Church in America, Canada Section). The 1973 convention was
asked to restudy the cooperative seminary arrangement with
Lutheran Theological Seminary. No action was finalized, how-
ever, but was referred under omnibus resolution to the Board
of Directors.

The Ontario District Board of Directors established a three-
man task force to determine how soon a house of studies or a
branch seminary could be established in Ontario for the training
of Canadian men for ministry in Canada. The study gave con-
sideration to the needs for seminary training in Canada, Cana-
dian geography, Lutheran church in Canada history, placement
of candidates, the potential of an Eastern Canada seminary
extension center, and a site recommendation.

Canadian population projections suggest a population of 35
million by the year 2001, of which some 32 percent, nearly
doubling to 14.7 million, will reside within the province of
Ontario, which represents slightly less than 11 percent of the
land area. The four western provinces are projected to increase
from 5.7 million to 9.6 million people on some 29 percent of the
total land area.

The three major Lutheran segments in Canada are relatively
equal in communicant membership but are rather unevenly
distributed throughout the various regions. The Evangelical
Lutheran Church of Canada (ALC-related) has a communicant
membership of 53,000 with 309 of its 320 congregations and 97
percent of its membership in the western provinces. The Lu-
theran Church in America, Canada Section, with a communcant
membership of 82,000, has nearly half of its 325 congregations
and 58 percent of its membership in Ontario, and 135 congrega-
tions and 33 percent of the membership in the western prov-
inces. The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, with 66,000
communicants, has 133 of its 369 congregations and 45 percent
of its membership located in Ontario and 229 congregations and
54 percent of the members in the western provinces. The other
Canadian Lutheran churches have long provided for training
of Canadian pastors in Canada. With the predominant strength
in western Canada, the ALC located its seminary in the West
at Saskatoon, Sask.: the LCA, with broad representation in both
eastern and western Canada, established seminaries at Water-
loo, Ont., and Saskatoon, Sask. The two western seminaries
were merged into the jointly operated Lutheran Theological
Seminary at Saskatoon.

Placement of Missouri Synod pastoral candidates from the
United States seminaries and the subsequent retention rate in
Canada indicate a real need for concern of the effectiveness of
the process. Of a total of 215 candidates placed from 1953 to
1967, 147 were U.S. citizens, of whom 34 are still serving in
Canada as of 1974. Of the 68 Canadian candidates placed, 54
are still serving in Canada in 1974. It is interesting that western
Canadians placed in western Canada during that period totaled
36 with 28 still serving in the West in 1974. Eight western Cana-
dians were placed in eastern Canada with six still serving there.
Of the 12 eastern Canadians placed in the East, 7 are still serving,
but of 12 eastern Canadians placed in the West, only two are
still serving in the West. It is significant to note that U.S. candi-
dates originally placed in Canada do not serve for any great
length of time but that Canadian candidates do remain active
in Canada. The divergence of background between eastern and
western Canada is reflected in the tendency of the eastern
residents placed in the West to return to the area from which
they originated. The same situation exists in reviewing the

enrollment at Concordia College, Edmonton, where we find
that few students from eastern Canada have ever participated
in the educational program.

Canada has historically had a difficult time providing suffi-
cient workers to satisfy its needs. Consequently Canada has
been subsidized with pastoral candidates since work first was
started. Presently nearly half of the ordained clergy in Ontario
alone are not native born. Nonnative Canadians are experienc-
ing increasing difficulty in entering Canada, and historically a
high percentage have not remained for sufficient periods of
time to adapt to the Canadian scene. The size of Canada in
relation to population presents a number of difficulties. In a land
6,000 square miles larger than the United States, a population
of 22 million people resides. The vast majority of this population
lives within 100 miles of the United States border, but 75 percent
live south of the northern United States boundary from Lake of
the Woods to the Pacific Ocean.

People from the Ontario District feel rather strongly that The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is too evenly divided geo-
graphically to consider one seminary as being capable of serving
both regions of the country. They feel that the tremendous
development in the population growth expected in eastern
Canada requires primary attention as it forecasts a tremendous
growth potential for the church. Also, the generally positive
feeling on potential Lutheran unity that exists in western
Canada is not as noticeably present in the East.

In western Canada LCMS officials are reasonably satisfied
with the present arrangements at the Saskatoon seminary and
are supportive of increased efforts to strengthen LCMS partici-
pation. At the same time there is concern that since unity of
the Lutheran bodies has not taken place there is a need to recog-
nize that some pastors and congregations object to having LCMS
students trained largely by non-LCMS staff. The officials of Lu-
theran Theological Seminary, Saskatoon, are willing to make
whatever appropriate adjustments are necessary to accommo-
date LCMS concerns.

It is obvious that seminary education in Canada presents a
number of unique situations. The Lutheran Church — Missouri
Synod needs to relate to the special circumstances of the Cana-
dian people. The geography of Canada creates barriers not
evident in the United States. The thousand plus miles of virtually
unsettled forested area between the population centers of
Ontario and the farm land of the plains does not lend itself
to a nation speaking with one voice. The political realities,
the cultural, educational and traditional differences of this vast
nation add to the difficulties of seminary education for LCMS
members. In addition strong feelings of nationalism have
developed into a number of legal restrictions that make it nearly
impossible for Canadians to study at the United States semi-
naries. The present situation demands immediate attention, but
it also demands that the seminary programs in Canada be
synodical, so that Missouri Synod congregations are served, be
acceptable to Canadians, be viable for prospective students,
and be flexible, so that future developments concerning po-
tential merger of Lutheranism at least in western Canada can
be adequately accommodated.

The Task Force received voluminous correspondence from
Canadians and also had a number of personal appearances of
concerned Canadian individuals on the various points of view
regarding questions of seminary education in Canada.

The Task Force Recommends

H-Cl. That separate points for seminary education be estab-
lished in eastern and western Canada:

H-C2. That for western Canada a seminary program be de-
veloped in conjunction with Lutheran Theological Seminary,
Saskatoon:

H-C3. That for eastern Canada a seminary extension pro-
gram be established at St. Catharines as recommended by the
Ontario District task force:

H-C4. That the Board for Higher Education through the
administration of Concordia Theological Seminary, Springfield
(Fort Wayne), establish appropriate synodical programs of
studies, staff, and financial support at the above locations to
insure certification for Missouri Synod graduates: and

H-C5. That financial support for Canadian seminary educa-

tion be the mutual responsibility of the various Canadian
Districts and the Board for Higher Education.