Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 294
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 294
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
294 HIGHER EDUCATION
Tees only. Dees mot ruce reoz, boaré, capital use tees,
chure -werk ceposit, KS, travel, cx personal expenses
college must continually counsel its students to consider pre-
paring for full-time church-work careers because many stu-
dents are uncertain of their educational objectives until quite
late in their college program and are in need of advice and
counsel.
Because the educational colleges have been encouraged to
develop additional local financing, they have appointed develop-
ment officers, undertaken extensive recruitment programs, and
by necessity become more concerned with local needs and de-
sires. As local resources have been sought, local needs and
desires had to be given a higher priority than had been the case
in the past.
As the high school departments were phased out, the schools
affected had faculties and facilities available for use by general
education college students. In order to put these resources to
productive use and for the institutions to remain viable in the
eyes of the church and the general public, an enrollment level
had to be secured that would permit a reasonable variety of
programs and course offerings. Consequently, during the past
7 years we have witnessed rather dramatic changes for several
of our colleges. Although these ‘‘new developments” were not
entirely new for some of the colleges, the number of general
education course offerings has increased, the number of college
programs attracting these students has increased, and the
synodical subsidy as a percentage of support has decreased.
Our institutions have had to change in order to successfully
survive rapidly changing circumstances in higher education
irrespective of the impact on the total LCMS system. The
majority of these changes have not been specifically planned for
or requested by the Synod.
“Preferred Route’ Changed by Synodical Action and
General Developments
The 1967 convention (New York) passed Resolution 6-52
granting authorization to graduates of Concordia Senior College,
Fort Wayne, to attend the seminary at Springfield, Il. The
Springfield seminary had been granting the Bachelor of Divinity
degree and was at the point of qualifying for accreditation in the
American Association of Theological Schools. Prior to this
period the Springfield seminary had been accepting high
percentages of students without college degrees. The conven-
tion in effect said that official sanction should be given to gradu-
ates of Concordia Senior College to attend the seminary of their
choice.
This official synodical action appears to have been a contri-
buting factor for the St. Louis seminary to actively encourage
the entrance of college graduates from outside the synodical
system. The number of non-Concordia Senior College graduates
entering the St. Louis seminary increased from four in 1967 to
42 in 1972, while entering Senior College graduates went from
168 in 1967 to 116 in 1972. Senior College graduates entering the
Springfield seminary reached a peak of 25 students during this
period.
It may be somewhat speculative to state that there was a
direct correlation between the 1967 convention action officially
authorizing Senior College graduates to study at Springfield and
the enrollment decline at the Senior College. However, it should
be noted that the peak enrollment in the junior college pre-
ministerial programs and also at the Senior College was reached
in 1967. A steady decline has occurred since, while enrollment
in other church-work programs continued to expand for several
more years.
In years past Missouri Synod seminary students assumed that
the only option was the “preferred route” through the synodical
Junior College. This attitude carried over into the Senior Col-
lege program at Fort Wayne to obtain the bachelor’s degree
required for entrance to the degree-granting seminary at
St. Louis. Accompanying this general attitude was the fact that,
because the options were limited, it seemed necessary for stu-
dents to make early commitments to preministerial study. By
the early 1960s larger percentages of students were postponing
the final commitment to seminary education until a later time
partly because the increased tax-supported educational op-
portunities became viable low-cost options while students made
decisions for their future. During this same period the Spring-
field seminary was raising its academic standards for the
younger men, seeking accreditation of its theological program,
and recruiting more college graduates.
Certainly there are a variety of factors that have played a
part in the preministerial enrollment decline. It does appear,
however, that the acceptance of nonsystem graduates into both
seminary programs has permitted students to choose alternative
approaches in pursuing their educational objectives of seminary
entrance. Although these changes have not detracted from the
excellence of the “preferred route” through the Concordia
Senior College program for preseminary training, the reality
of the declining preministerial enrollment throughout the
system requires the immediate adoption of new approaches
that fully recognize the developments that have occurred.
Task Force Recommendations for the Future
Since one of the primary objectives of The Lutheran Church
~ Missouri Synod is to provide its member congregations with
professional church workers for varied ministries, the Synod has
developed a system of high schools, colleges, and seminaries.
At the present time the facilities of a limited number of high
schools and junior colleges, three 4-year colleges, and one
seminary would seem to be capable of meeting congregational
needs for professional workers. However, the practical con-
siderations that would be involved in reducing the present
system to this level are extremely complex, and it appears that
future requirements and methods of operation strongly suggest
that such drastic action may not prove to be in the best interest
of the Synod.
The educational ‘system’ operated by The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod has served its constituency extremely
well over the past century. Modifications, alterations, additions,
and subtractions have been made over the years, always with
the goal of insuring that the church was well supplied with
pastors and teachers. From the old Gymnasium concept the
church moved toward a junior college system for the training
of pastors. Change has not always come easy in the church.
Traditions are long-lived and difficult to alter. However, in spite
of any difficulties that may have occurred from time to time, the