Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 299
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 299
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 299
Task Force has had difficulty in determining a proper direction
for Christ College, Irvine. Although the 1973 convention had
called for a restudy of the synodical educational system, it had
also acted to instruct the Board of Directors to begin construc-
tion even if funds had to be borrowed. The various convention
resolutions concerning higher education on the West Coast
emanated from a period of history when the synodical colleges
were growing at a rather rapid pace and the Synod itself was
experiencing significant growth. At the present time it is rather
difficult to conceive of a 4-year institution in southern California
that would not have a very serious impact on other colleges in
the synodical system. Based on the number of students presently
enrolled in the synodical system from the California area and
from areas of a similar-sized constituency, it is difficult to con-
clude that a 4-year institution primarily educating church work
students would in fact be a viable operation at this time.
The leaders of Christ College, Irvine, the Board of Control,
and the Irvine Foundation report community, District, and
regional enthusiasm and support for the establishment of Christ
College as a liberal arts program in a Christian setting for stu-
dents preparing for various vocations, including professional
church work, and to expand educational opportunities to repre-
sentatives of ethnic and international communities. A new 4-year
college in southern California that would have a large percent-
age of general education students from its very inception ap-
pears to be a possibility but would be a new type of undertaking
for The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.
The Task Force believes that the present 4-year synodical
colleges can accommodate a sufficient number of students to
meet current and future needs for pastors, teachers, and other
ministries. The development of additional 4-year programs
would only serve to spread the limited number of church work
students among more colleges and thereby tend to weaken
present programs.
The Task Force also recognizes that from the point of view
of synodical finances the present is a poor time to expand
educational programs. Christ College, Irvine, could expect
at best very limited support from the Synod for any additional
building programs or capital improvements, and such funds
would have to be developed from alternate sources not now
made available to the Synod. The operating costs of the educa-
tional programs at Christ College, Irvine, could be supported in
accord with the general tuition support program as recom-
mended by the Task Force emphasizing the support for students
preparing for full-time church work. However, in line with the
recommendation of the Task Force that no new 4-year schools
or programs be implemented, the Task Force cannot support
the development of Christ College, Irvine, as a 4-year institution.
The leaders of Christ College, Irvine, have proposed an inter-
esting variety of educational offerings as part of their proposed
curriculum. Such proposals should be encouraged, and the
implementation of these programs should be explored with the
Board for Higher Education for development in cooperation with
existing colleges of the Synod.
The Task Force recognizes the value of a synodical school
in the Pacific Southwest and the contributions such a school
could make to the development of Lutheranism in that area,
as well as to the recruitment of students for the teaching and
preaching ministry of the Synod.
The Task Force was led to accept the following conclusions
in regard to Christ College, Irvine, because (1) the financial
needs of the present synodical higher educational system are
greater than it seems possible to adequately support: and (2) the
present program conception of Christ College was not felt to be
entirely in keeping with the synodical priorities of education
for pastors, teachers, and other full-time church workers.
Some members of the Task Force felt that Irvine should be
closed. However, in view of previous commitments of the Synod
and the vast amount of work already completed, other members
felt that the future development of Irvine should be encouraged
but should proceed in a very cautious manner.
The Task Force Recommends
F1. That Christ College, Irvine, be instructed to discontinue
all efforts for the development and inauguration of 4-year pro-
grams. Education for students at the freshman and sophomore
level should be developed on an extension center basis in coop-
eration with existing synodical colleges:
F2. That no additional building programs are to be under-
taken until specific financial resources are developed and
secured under the approval of the Board for Higher Education
and the synodical Board of Directors:
F3. That students studying at Christ College, Irvine, for
authorized church work programs receive tuition support from
the Synod in line with the support formula recommended for
all schools by the Task Force: and
F4. That all educational programs initiated at Christ College,
Irvine, in cooperation with existing synodical colleges be
reviewed and approved by the Board for Higher Education to
insure that they are appropriate and consistent with the pro-
grams of teacher and preministerial education in the Synod.
G. Concordia College and High School. Edmonton. Alberta
The concerns of the Task Force relative to Concordia Col-
lege and High School, Edmonton, Alta., have been reflective
of the synodical endorsement of the Detroit convention in 1965.
The adoption of Resolution 6.08 resolved:
The plans and problems associated with the development of an
indigenous Canadian ministry require that the future of Edmonton
be considered apart from the long-range plans for the synodical
schools in the United States.
The realities of cultural, political, and educational differ-
ences between Canada and the United States have been
amplified since the 1965 convention to the point where they are
now extremely important and fairly permanent factors in
operating a “‘synodical” education program in Canada. The
financial, attendance, and constituency support data concerning
Concordia College and High School, Edmonton, clearly indicate
to the Task Force that changes must be made in order for the
needs of students and of Canadian congregations to be fully met.
At the present time the college department offers only the
freshman year in affiliation with the University of Alberta. Upon
completion of this year, students must transfer to the secular
university or to synodical colleges in the United States. Upon
completion of college level work in the secular Canadian
universities or in the synodical colleges in the United States,
pastoral candidates must continue their education at the United
States seminaries or transfer to the affiliated program with
Lutheran Theological Seminary at Saskatoon. It has become
increasingly apparent that Canadian citizens cannot be attracted
to the educational alternatives available in the United States
schools. Additionally it should be pointed out that at the present
time Canada has needs and opportunities quite different from
those in the United States. In Canada there are only two Lu-
theran grade schools and the high school at Edmonton. Con-
sequently there is a very limited need for teachers but a broader
need for other types of ministries. In the current year of an
enrollment of 66 college students, five college students indicate
church-work career goals and one student indicates a Lutheran
elementary teacher goal. The high school department shows a
total of 10 students indicating a church-work career, of whom
five indicate pastoral intent. In terms of church affiliation, 68
of the total 230 students have a Missouri Synod background, an
additional 18 are from other Lutheran backgrounds, with the
remaining 144 students, or almost 63 percent of the student
body, coming from other affiliations. Alberta residency is indi-
cated for 167 of the 230 students, of whom 96 are from the
Edmonton area.
Synodical support for the school has been approximately
$140,000 during each of the past 6 or 7 years. Other sources of
income, such as government grants, and tuition and fees have
increased rather dramatically from $145,000 in 1968 to $263,000
in 1973.
The faculty at Concordia, Edmonton, is quite interested in
developing a 4-year college program to better relate to the
higher educational needs of the Lutheran laity in Canada.
Immediate need is felt for the development of the second
college year with the third and fourth year added ata later time,
either in affiliation with the University of Alberta or as a separate
college program. It should be noted, however, that history
indicates such a college will be largely serving as a Lutheran
educational missionary endeavor offering Christian higher edu-
cation to a student body largely interested in secular careers.
It is felt by the faculty that growth of the Lutheran Church in
Canada is dependent more on the laity than on professionally
trained church workers.
Current discussion, particularly in western Canada, for po-