Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 299

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 299

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 299

Task Force has had difficulty in determining a proper direction
for Christ College, Irvine. Although the 1973 convention had
called for a restudy of the synodical educational system, it had
also acted to instruct the Board of Directors to begin construc-
tion even if funds had to be borrowed. The various convention
resolutions concerning higher education on the West Coast
emanated from a period of history when the synodical colleges
were growing at a rather rapid pace and the Synod itself was
experiencing significant growth. At the present time it is rather
difficult to conceive of a 4-year institution in southern California
that would not have a very serious impact on other colleges in
the synodical system. Based on the number of students presently
enrolled in the synodical system from the California area and
from areas of a similar-sized constituency, it is difficult to con-
clude that a 4-year institution primarily educating church work
students would in fact be a viable operation at this time.

The leaders of Christ College, Irvine, the Board of Control,
and the Irvine Foundation report community, District, and
regional enthusiasm and support for the establishment of Christ
College as a liberal arts program in a Christian setting for stu-
dents preparing for various vocations, including professional
church work, and to expand educational opportunities to repre-
sentatives of ethnic and international communities. A new 4-year
college in southern California that would have a large percent-
age of general education students from its very inception ap-
pears to be a possibility but would be a new type of undertaking
for The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.

The Task Force believes that the present 4-year synodical
colleges can accommodate a sufficient number of students to
meet current and future needs for pastors, teachers, and other
ministries. The development of additional 4-year programs
would only serve to spread the limited number of church work
students among more colleges and thereby tend to weaken
present programs.

The Task Force also recognizes that from the point of view
of synodical finances the present is a poor time to expand
educational programs. Christ College, Irvine, could expect
at best very limited support from the Synod for any additional
building programs or capital improvements, and such funds
would have to be developed from alternate sources not now
made available to the Synod. The operating costs of the educa-
tional programs at Christ College, Irvine, could be supported in
accord with the general tuition support program as recom-
mended by the Task Force emphasizing the support for students
preparing for full-time church work. However, in line with the
recommendation of the Task Force that no new 4-year schools
or programs be implemented, the Task Force cannot support
the development of Christ College, Irvine, as a 4-year institution.

The leaders of Christ College, Irvine, have proposed an inter-
esting variety of educational offerings as part of their proposed
curriculum. Such proposals should be encouraged, and the
implementation of these programs should be explored with the
Board for Higher Education for development in cooperation with
existing colleges of the Synod.

The Task Force recognizes the value of a synodical school
in the Pacific Southwest and the contributions such a school
could make to the development of Lutheranism in that area,
as well as to the recruitment of students for the teaching and
preaching ministry of the Synod.

The Task Force was led to accept the following conclusions
in regard to Christ College, Irvine, because (1) the financial
needs of the present synodical higher educational system are
greater than it seems possible to adequately support: and (2) the
present program conception of Christ College was not felt to be
entirely in keeping with the synodical priorities of education
for pastors, teachers, and other full-time church workers.
Some members of the Task Force felt that Irvine should be
closed. However, in view of previous commitments of the Synod
and the vast amount of work already completed, other members
felt that the future development of Irvine should be encouraged
but should proceed in a very cautious manner.

The Task Force Recommends

F1. That Christ College, Irvine, be instructed to discontinue
all efforts for the development and inauguration of 4-year pro-
grams. Education for students at the freshman and sophomore
level should be developed on an extension center basis in coop-
eration with existing synodical colleges:

F2. That no additional building programs are to be under-

taken until specific financial resources are developed and
secured under the approval of the Board for Higher Education
and the synodical Board of Directors:

F3. That students studying at Christ College, Irvine, for
authorized church work programs receive tuition support from
the Synod in line with the support formula recommended for
all schools by the Task Force: and

F4. That all educational programs initiated at Christ College,
Irvine, in cooperation with existing synodical colleges be
reviewed and approved by the Board for Higher Education to
insure that they are appropriate and consistent with the pro-
grams of teacher and preministerial education in the Synod.

G. Concordia College and High School. Edmonton. Alberta

The concerns of the Task Force relative to Concordia Col-
lege and High School, Edmonton, Alta., have been reflective
of the synodical endorsement of the Detroit convention in 1965.
The adoption of Resolution 6.08 resolved:

The plans and problems associated with the development of an

indigenous Canadian ministry require that the future of Edmonton

be considered apart from the long-range plans for the synodical
schools in the United States.

The realities of cultural, political, and educational differ-
ences between Canada and the United States have been
amplified since the 1965 convention to the point where they are
now extremely important and fairly permanent factors in
operating a “‘synodical” education program in Canada. The
financial, attendance, and constituency support data concerning
Concordia College and High School, Edmonton, clearly indicate
to the Task Force that changes must be made in order for the
needs of students and of Canadian congregations to be fully met.

At the present time the college department offers only the
freshman year in affiliation with the University of Alberta. Upon
completion of this year, students must transfer to the secular
university or to synodical colleges in the United States. Upon
completion of college level work in the secular Canadian
universities or in the synodical colleges in the United States,
pastoral candidates must continue their education at the United
States seminaries or transfer to the affiliated program with
Lutheran Theological Seminary at Saskatoon. It has become
increasingly apparent that Canadian citizens cannot be attracted
to the educational alternatives available in the United States
schools. Additionally it should be pointed out that at the present
time Canada has needs and opportunities quite different from
those in the United States. In Canada there are only two Lu-
theran grade schools and the high school at Edmonton. Con-
sequently there is a very limited need for teachers but a broader
need for other types of ministries. In the current year of an
enrollment of 66 college students, five college students indicate
church-work career goals and one student indicates a Lutheran
elementary teacher goal. The high school department shows a
total of 10 students indicating a church-work career, of whom
five indicate pastoral intent. In terms of church affiliation, 68
of the total 230 students have a Missouri Synod background, an
additional 18 are from other Lutheran backgrounds, with the
remaining 144 students, or almost 63 percent of the student
body, coming from other affiliations. Alberta residency is indi-
cated for 167 of the 230 students, of whom 96 are from the
Edmonton area.

Synodical support for the school has been approximately
$140,000 during each of the past 6 or 7 years. Other sources of
income, such as government grants, and tuition and fees have
increased rather dramatically from $145,000 in 1968 to $263,000
in 1973.

The faculty at Concordia, Edmonton, is quite interested in
developing a 4-year college program to better relate to the
higher educational needs of the Lutheran laity in Canada.
Immediate need is felt for the development of the second
college year with the third and fourth year added ata later time,
either in affiliation with the University of Alberta or as a separate
college program. It should be noted, however, that history
indicates such a college will be largely serving as a Lutheran
educational missionary endeavor offering Christian higher edu-
cation to a student body largely interested in secular careers.
It is felt by the faculty that growth of the Lutheran Church in
Canada is dependent more on the laity than on professionally
trained church workers.

Current discussion, particularly in western Canada, for po-