Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 274

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 274

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

274 HIGHER EDUCATION

to implement the resolution to this effect passed at the Mil-
waukee convention in 1971,

However, there also are blessings. opportunities, and
hopeful signs for future work among minority groups. The
school at Selma continues to draw qualified blacks for the
ministerial programs, the number of blacks enrolled in Lutheran
elementary and secondary schools is slowly growing, the Indian
ministries program at Seward continues to show good potential
and some successes, progress is being made in the seminary
level training program for work among Hispanics. and the
colleges generally have made determined efforts to initiate the
changes in program and student life needed to provide more
adequately for the students from minority groups who do enroll.
But the recruitment efforts among racial and cultural minority
groups will need to be given higher priority if the Synod is to
make better use of the opportunities and needs for future
ministry with these groups. An urgent need still exists to add
faculty members from among minority groups.

South America

Enrollment at the seminario at José Leon Suarez. Province
Buenos Aires, Argentina, remains low — about 7 to 10 students.
The instituto on the same campus has about 80 students and
continues to have a recognized excellent quality of instruction.
However, because of the extraordinarily high cost involved in
paying the government-prescribed faculty salaries. the Board
for Higher Education has concluded that the March 1—Nov. 30,
1975, school term must be the last year of synodical subsidy
for Instituto Concordia at José Leon Suarez.

Seminario Concordia at Porto Alegre in southern Brazil
usually enrolls about 100 students and has both a capable
student body and faculty. The physical plant is old and needs
repair. However. before any major expenditures are made on
the facilities, decisions will need to be reached concerning
the possibilities of moving the seminary operation to the San
Leopoldo campus (20 miles) or the now unused Sao Paulo
campus (400 miles).

Faculty

When the last total examination and planning project for
synodical schools was done in 1966—67. part of that program
included an analysis of the system by a number of “outside”
consultants chosen because of their prominence in the American
educational scene and because they represented a wide spec-
trum of experience in public and private institutions. In their
various reports these experts consistently identified the synod-
ical faculty as one of the major strengths of our schools.

The Board for Higher Education feels confident that the Task
Force presently examining the system will reach the same
conclusion. Our church has been blessed with excellent faculty
people.

Almost anyone spending time on one of the synodical college
campuses is bound to be most favorably impressed by the dedi-
cation to students and to the work and by the academic back-
ground, teaching experience, parish experience, and compe-
tency in subject areas among the faculty people.

The seminary faculties, especially our faculty at St. Louis,
have admittedly suffered a most severe setback as a result
of the controversy in the Synod and the formation of Seminex.
This makes it even more urgent that everyone in the church
truly work toward a God-pleasing solution to our doctrinal
problems.

Moratorium on Tenure

During the biennium the Board for Higher Education urged
a moratorium at all schools on granting tenure to faculty people.
This step was taken because of the work of the Task Force and
the possible reduction in staff that might result from its findings,
because of the lack of mobility among faculty people resulting
from declining enrollments, and because of the difficulties that
might result from having too high a percentage of the total
faculty with tenure if overstaffing becomes a problem in the
future. The Advisory Council (college and seminary presidents)
is currently studying the entire issue of tenure policies and
practices and will be making recommendations to the board in
the near future. so that necessary decisions relating to tenure
can be made.

Limitation of Academic Freedom

In keeping with Resolution 3-02 of the New Orleans conven-

tion, the Board for Higher Education developed and distributed
a statement concerning limitation of academic freedom to be
used by the schools at the time of appointments and reappoint-
ments. The statement definitely generated concerned responses
from faculty members at some of the schools. In retrospect,
a much more detailed explanation should have accompanied
the statement when it was first distributed. It is hoped the state-
ment will serve as a genuine help to both schools and individual
faculty members in the future as suspicions and distrust are
overcome.
Faculty Salaries

The Synod in convention has consistently developed and
passed resolutions recognizing the problems created by low
faculty salaries, reminding “the constituent congregations and
Districts of their stewardship privilege and responsibility in this
matter” and urging the “Board for Higher Education and the
Board of Directors to give faculty salary improvement high
priority.”

The Board for Higher Education has used every means it
can find to implement those convention resolutions. The Board
of Directors has consistently given many evidences of its con-
cern for adequate salary structures. However, because of the
very limited amount of total funds available for higher education,
the increases granted in faculty salaries during the past bien-
nium were again less than the increases in the cost of living.

Changes in Presidents

As shown in the accompanying listing of presidents. the
colleges at Milwaukee, Portland, and Seward are the only
synodical schools in the United States and Canada that have
not changed presidents since 1970. At the time of this writing.
requests for nominations for president have been submitted
by Concordia Seminary. St. Louis, and Concordia College,
Edmonton.

First Year

School President in Office
Ann Arbor Merlin S. Pohl 1974
Austin Ray F. Martens 1972
Bronxville Robert V. Schnabel 1971
Concordia Walter L. Rosin 1971
Edmonton Alfred R. Roth (Acting) 1974
Fort Wayne Herbert G. Bredemeier 1972
Milwaukee Walter W. Stuenkel 1953
Portland Erhardt P. Weber 1958
River Forest Paul A. Zimmerman 1973
St. Louis Ralph A. Bohlmann (Acting) 1974
St. Paul Harvey Stegemoeller 1971
Selma Willis L. Wright 1971
Seward W. Theophil Janzow 1962
Springfield Robert D. Preus 1974
Winfield Michael J. Stelmachowicz 1972

In February of this year Rev. Roland Frantz, president of
the synodical school in Edmonton, died suddenly. Professor
Frantz was on a sabbatical leave at the time of his death, having
decided to resign the presidency in June 1975 in keeping with
the Handbook regulation that permits a president to be retired
from the presidency after 15 years of service at a school. Cer-
tainly the Synod has reason to mourn the loss of this leader but
also to thank God for the blessings brought to higher education
and the church through his faithful service.

Program

The various changes and improvements in programs imple-
mented at the schools of the Synod are described in this Work-
book in the reports from the individual institutions. A study of
these materials reveals that the schools have continued to play
an important and legitimate role in the work of the Synod
through their programs and offerings.

Especially noteworthy are the creative and innovative
improvements being made in the “fieldwork” and other outside-
the-classroom learning experiences; the meaningful, unique,
and challenging offerings at many of the colleges, especially
during the interims that have been built into the academic
calendar; the progress toward more effective work with minor-
ity groups especially at Seward, St. Paul, River Forest, and
Bronxville; the greater success at all colleges in relating “head
knowledge” to personal faith and life as evidenced in student