Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 184

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 184

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

184 ADMINISTRATION

soliciting financial support in the United States. Money given
for synodical operations shall not be used.

2. Stimulate proposals by alerting mission fields and sister
churches to the possibilities of economic activity for profit by
programs of various kinds such as seminars.

3. Determine the feasibility of each proposal submitted by
establishing good screening procedures including field visita-
tion where warranted.

4. Start only those projects where capable local leadership
is available, potential leadership is willing to be trained. and the
local church is willing to become actively involved and re-
sponsible.

5. Maintain the highest standards of Christian business
ethics in all operations and dealings.

6. Pay all taxes normally applied to profit-making enter-
prises, and do not seek exceptions because of religious affiliation.

7. Keep the size of each enterprise within reasonable limits.

8. Utilize distributable profits for church programs in that
national church or mission field where the business enterprise
is in operation.

9. Establish the objective of transferring full ownership and
operation of the enterprise to the sister church.

Ad Hoc Committee to Study Supplemental Funding
Erwin L. Paul, Chairman

Paul F. Bente Jr.

Gerhardt W. Hyatt

Richard H. Mever

Ralph Petering

Walter Rugland

Jay Pfotenhauer

A, Lorenz Grumm

4-14

Report re Lutheran Church— Canada

This report is being written immediately following the 16th
regular convention of Lutheran Church — Canada.

Since our last report to the Synod traced the background
and development of LC—C (New Orleans, Workbook. pp. 180—
82), it hardly seems necessary to review that history again.
Instead we shall proceed immediately to highlight the various
activities of LC—C’'s activity and note a number of significant
actions arising out of our convention.

I. Consultation and Coordination: LCIC

Lutheran Council in Canada was organized in 1966 as a co-
operative agency of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Can-
ada, Lutheran Church in America~Canada Section, and
Lutheran Church - Canada.

One of the most obvious reasons for forming a cooperative
agency is to provide a forum for consultation and coordination.
Lutheran Council serves that function well, especially through
the regional structures that are constituted under its various
divisions of service. Not only are we avoiding unnecessary
duplication of effort, manpower, and money: we are also buying
expertise in the five men who serve us as executive staff. That
does not mean that we should approach Council with the ex-
pectation that this is a cheaper way of doing things. Rather we
should feel assured that wherever joint planning and coordina-
tion is possible, we are exercising responsible stewardship and
doing more with the limited resources we have.

And resources are limited! Council's operation, especially
in the past few years, has been severely handicapped by
recurring financial restrictions imposed by shortages in the
Synod's grants to LC-—C for our pro-rata share of LCIC's
budget. Under normal circumstances this can serve a whole-
some purpose in that it forces us to evaluate the work of the
various divisions as well as the overall structures in the interest
of more efficient ways of carrying out the tasks we have agreed
to do together. Several years ago a thorough study resulted in
a rather extensive overhaul of Council's operation. More
recently another subcommittee examined our philosophy of
social ministry and effected the reordering of some priorities
in that division. And again at the last annual meeting the Execu-
tive Committee was instructed to find ways of operating under

a budget reduced even further by the serious shortfall in the
Synod’s 1975 grant to LC—C for our partnership in Council.
All of which prompted the delegates at our April 1—3, 1975,
convention of LC-C to pass the following motion (2-04):

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod has al-
ways encouraged the development of Lutheranism in Canada:
and

WHEREAS, Lutheran Church — Canada recognizes the impor-
tance of the work of Lutheran Council in Canada and its divi-
sions: and

WHEREAS, This work is severely handicapped to the extent
that some divisions cannot even exist or function because of the
lack of financial support: therefore be it

Resolved. That Lutheran Church—Canada petition the
Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
to give special consideration to the work of Lutheran Council
in Canada: and be it further

Resolved. That Lutheran Church—Canada petition the
Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod,
if at all possible, to honour the amount of money requested by
Lutheran Church—Canada for participation in the work of
Lutheran Council in Canada.

II. Strengthening the Ties: Fellowship with the ELCC

In his official greetings to our LC—C convention Dr. S. T.
Jacobson, President of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of
Canada, expressed appreciation and gratitude for the fellow-
ship his church enjoys with The Lutheran Church-— Missouri
Synod (Denver, 3-16). This, he said. has created a new climate
of trust, making possible the realignment of parishes, shared
ministries, and other joint endeavours. Our own leaders agree
that fellowship between our churches, especially in western
Canada, has been a blessing to the overall mission of the church.
We therefore share Dr. Jacobson’s hope that our relationships
will continue to grow and that our many contacts will be mutually
strengthening.

III. Toward Full Fellowship and One Canadian Lutheran
Church: JCILR

The Joint Commission on Inter-Lutheran Relationships is
the committee constituted by the unity committees of the three
Lutheran churches in Canada to pursue the quest for consensus,
fellowship, and merger. The JCILR is the result of a long history
of discussions that began in the late ‘50s as “exploratory conver-
sations” and gradually assumed more official status throughout
the 60s as discussions focused on altar and pulpit fellowship.

As of 1973 thse discussions have turned in the direction of
negotiations aimed at merger into one independent Lutheran
Church in Canada. Both Lutheran Chureh—Canada and the
Lutheran Church in America—Canada Section have accepted
the invitation of the ELCC to enter negotiations toward eventual
merger. Simultaneous with these merger discussions is the quest
for altar and pulpit fellowship between LCA—CS and Lutheran
Church —Canada. A ‘Plan of Action” has been adopted setting
forth the step-by-step procedures required in the pursuit of
fellowship and merger. A Theological Committee has been hard
at work preparing Theses on the Scriptures, statements on Con-
fessional Subscription, the Mission of the Church, and Theses on
Inter-Church Relations. Still to come are studies on the Role of
Women in the Church, Anti-Christian Ideologies, Unionism and
Ecumenical Relations. Another committee on Function and
Form has been charged with the task of translating the mission
of the church into shape and structure. That will be followed at
a later date by a Committee on Constitutions. Two other sub-
committees have been appointed, the one to study seminary
training and theological education, the other to give attention
to other church-related colleges and institutes.

At last year’s conventions of the respective jurisdictional
units of all three churches (Districts and Synods) forums on
Lutheran unity were held, followed by an opinion poll dis-
tributed to the delegates. The findings of that poll make it clear
that while there is an awareness of certain issues requiring fur-
ther attention, the membership of our churches is strongly in
favour of a united Canadian Lutheran church. The mandate is
clear, and it calls for our most earnest endeavours as we strive