Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 184
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 184
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
184 ADMINISTRATION
soliciting financial support in the United States. Money given
for synodical operations shall not be used.
2. Stimulate proposals by alerting mission fields and sister
churches to the possibilities of economic activity for profit by
programs of various kinds such as seminars.
3. Determine the feasibility of each proposal submitted by
establishing good screening procedures including field visita-
tion where warranted.
4. Start only those projects where capable local leadership
is available, potential leadership is willing to be trained. and the
local church is willing to become actively involved and re-
sponsible.
5. Maintain the highest standards of Christian business
ethics in all operations and dealings.
6. Pay all taxes normally applied to profit-making enter-
prises, and do not seek exceptions because of religious affiliation.
7. Keep the size of each enterprise within reasonable limits.
8. Utilize distributable profits for church programs in that
national church or mission field where the business enterprise
is in operation.
9. Establish the objective of transferring full ownership and
operation of the enterprise to the sister church.
Ad Hoc Committee to Study Supplemental Funding
Erwin L. Paul, Chairman
Paul F. Bente Jr.
Gerhardt W. Hyatt
Richard H. Mever
Ralph Petering
Walter Rugland
Jay Pfotenhauer
A, Lorenz Grumm
4-14
Report re Lutheran Church— Canada
This report is being written immediately following the 16th
regular convention of Lutheran Church — Canada.
Since our last report to the Synod traced the background
and development of LC—C (New Orleans, Workbook. pp. 180—
82), it hardly seems necessary to review that history again.
Instead we shall proceed immediately to highlight the various
activities of LC—C’'s activity and note a number of significant
actions arising out of our convention.
I. Consultation and Coordination: LCIC
Lutheran Council in Canada was organized in 1966 as a co-
operative agency of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Can-
ada, Lutheran Church in America~Canada Section, and
Lutheran Church - Canada.
One of the most obvious reasons for forming a cooperative
agency is to provide a forum for consultation and coordination.
Lutheran Council serves that function well, especially through
the regional structures that are constituted under its various
divisions of service. Not only are we avoiding unnecessary
duplication of effort, manpower, and money: we are also buying
expertise in the five men who serve us as executive staff. That
does not mean that we should approach Council with the ex-
pectation that this is a cheaper way of doing things. Rather we
should feel assured that wherever joint planning and coordina-
tion is possible, we are exercising responsible stewardship and
doing more with the limited resources we have.
And resources are limited! Council's operation, especially
in the past few years, has been severely handicapped by
recurring financial restrictions imposed by shortages in the
Synod's grants to LC-—C for our pro-rata share of LCIC's
budget. Under normal circumstances this can serve a whole-
some purpose in that it forces us to evaluate the work of the
various divisions as well as the overall structures in the interest
of more efficient ways of carrying out the tasks we have agreed
to do together. Several years ago a thorough study resulted in
a rather extensive overhaul of Council's operation. More
recently another subcommittee examined our philosophy of
social ministry and effected the reordering of some priorities
in that division. And again at the last annual meeting the Execu-
tive Committee was instructed to find ways of operating under
a budget reduced even further by the serious shortfall in the
Synod’s 1975 grant to LC—C for our partnership in Council.
All of which prompted the delegates at our April 1—3, 1975,
convention of LC-C to pass the following motion (2-04):
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod has al-
ways encouraged the development of Lutheranism in Canada:
and
WHEREAS, Lutheran Church — Canada recognizes the impor-
tance of the work of Lutheran Council in Canada and its divi-
sions: and
WHEREAS, This work is severely handicapped to the extent
that some divisions cannot even exist or function because of the
lack of financial support: therefore be it
Resolved. That Lutheran Church—Canada petition the
Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
to give special consideration to the work of Lutheran Council
in Canada: and be it further
Resolved. That Lutheran Church—Canada petition the
Board of Directors of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod,
if at all possible, to honour the amount of money requested by
Lutheran Church—Canada for participation in the work of
Lutheran Council in Canada.
II. Strengthening the Ties: Fellowship with the ELCC
In his official greetings to our LC—C convention Dr. S. T.
Jacobson, President of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of
Canada, expressed appreciation and gratitude for the fellow-
ship his church enjoys with The Lutheran Church-— Missouri
Synod (Denver, 3-16). This, he said. has created a new climate
of trust, making possible the realignment of parishes, shared
ministries, and other joint endeavours. Our own leaders agree
that fellowship between our churches, especially in western
Canada, has been a blessing to the overall mission of the church.
We therefore share Dr. Jacobson’s hope that our relationships
will continue to grow and that our many contacts will be mutually
strengthening.
III. Toward Full Fellowship and One Canadian Lutheran
Church: JCILR
The Joint Commission on Inter-Lutheran Relationships is
the committee constituted by the unity committees of the three
Lutheran churches in Canada to pursue the quest for consensus,
fellowship, and merger. The JCILR is the result of a long history
of discussions that began in the late ‘50s as “exploratory conver-
sations” and gradually assumed more official status throughout
the 60s as discussions focused on altar and pulpit fellowship.
As of 1973 thse discussions have turned in the direction of
negotiations aimed at merger into one independent Lutheran
Church in Canada. Both Lutheran Chureh—Canada and the
Lutheran Church in America—Canada Section have accepted
the invitation of the ELCC to enter negotiations toward eventual
merger. Simultaneous with these merger discussions is the quest
for altar and pulpit fellowship between LCA—CS and Lutheran
Church —Canada. A ‘Plan of Action” has been adopted setting
forth the step-by-step procedures required in the pursuit of
fellowship and merger. A Theological Committee has been hard
at work preparing Theses on the Scriptures, statements on Con-
fessional Subscription, the Mission of the Church, and Theses on
Inter-Church Relations. Still to come are studies on the Role of
Women in the Church, Anti-Christian Ideologies, Unionism and
Ecumenical Relations. Another committee on Function and
Form has been charged with the task of translating the mission
of the church into shape and structure. That will be followed at
a later date by a Committee on Constitutions. Two other sub-
committees have been appointed, the one to study seminary
training and theological education, the other to give attention
to other church-related colleges and institutes.
At last year’s conventions of the respective jurisdictional
units of all three churches (Districts and Synods) forums on
Lutheran unity were held, followed by an opinion poll dis-
tributed to the delegates. The findings of that poll make it clear
that while there is an awareness of certain issues requiring fur-
ther attention, the membership of our churches is strongly in
favour of a united Canadian Lutheran church. The mandate is
clear, and it calls for our most earnest endeavours as we strive