Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 463
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 463
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
REPORT ON DISSENT
be pointed out that the objections to A Statement” treated in this report
were gathered from the total correspondence and that it must not be as-
sumed that everyone who expressed disagreement with “A Statement” on
one or the other point wishes to be identified with every Criticism submitted
to the Commission on Theology and Church Relations. The major criticisms
of each part of “A Statement" are noted in the following section of this report
and are accompanied by a response.
A. CRITICISM OF PART t
1. Universalism
The most serious objection to Part | of “A Statement’ has to do with
the declaration ‘that al! who die without faith in Him [Christ] are eternally
damned.” This assertion is deemed untenable in view of the consolation
traditionally offered to the parents of an infant who died without opportunity
to be baptized and on the basis of the contention that both the Scriptures and
the Lutheran Confessions teach only that those who reject Christ will be
damned.
Relative to the eternal state of infants who die before being baptized
it must be noted that traditional pastoral practice is not the foundation of
church dogma. It is a basic principle of Lutheran theology that we must
carefully distinguish between what is revealed in God's Word and what is
not revealed (FC SD XI. 52). Concerning what is not revealed. “we should
accustom ourselves not to speculate” (FC SD XI, 13), always mindful of the
rule ‘that it is only from the Word of God that judgments on articles of faith
are to be pronounced’ (FC SD Il. 8). While Lutheran theology on the basis of
revelation comforts the parents of infants who died without baptism with the
assurance that God is just and upright in all His doings and exhorts them
to commit their child into God's hands with the full confidence that all He
does is good. Lutheran theology stops short of making pronouncements
about God's dealings with such children which go beyond what is revealed
in the Word
It is the opinion of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
that it is in full accord with the Scriptures and the Confessions to teach that
all who die without faith in Christ are eternally damned
The Great Commission suggests no other way to make disciples of
the nations than by baptizing and teaching (Matt. 28:19-20). St. Paul de-
scribes the condition of the Gentiles prior to the time when God ‘came
and preached peace” to them (Eph. 2:17). and therefore prior to any oppor-
tunity to reject the Gospe!. as ‘separated from Christ strangers to the
covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world
(Eph. 2:12). Immediately following the marvelous Gospei assurance of John
3:16-18a that whoever believes in the Son of God is not condemned. the
evangelist states categorically, He who does not believe is condemned
already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God
(John 3:18b; cf. 2 Thess. 1:8)
When the Formula of Concord discusses “how man is converted to
means but through the Word. as indeed he has commanded the preaching ot
repentance and forgiveness of sin’ (FC SD XI. 27), and ‘wills that all men
should hear this proclamation. (FC SD XI. 68)
Finally, we must ask whether the statement of the Apology that the
Promise of salvation ‘does not apply to those who are outside of Christ's
church’ (extra ecc/esam Christ) (Ap IX, 2), and the statement of the For-
mula of Concord that it is God's will to call men to eternal salvation
through this means and in no other way’ / ‘visum est Deo per hoc medium
et non alio modo homines ad aeternam saiutem vocare’) (FC SD Il 50)
do not in fact translate into a) only within the church ts there salvation /s0/um
intra ecclesiam Salus), and b) only in the manner just recounted’ [so/o eo
modo (quem 1am recitavimus)'} will God bring men to eternal salvation
(FC SD XI, 23). These two only's’ deserve further attention
a. Only within the church 1s there salvation ‘Where Christ Is not
preached. there is no Holy Spirit to create, call. and gather the Christian
church. and outside it no one can come to the Lord Christ’ (LC Il, 45). Atl
though the whole world has sought painstakingly to learn what God is and
what he thinks and does. yet it has never succeeded in the least’ (LC Il
63). “All who are outside the Christian church. whether heathen Turks
Jews, or false Christians and hypocrites. even though they believe in and
worship only the one. true God. nevertheless do not know what his attitude
1s toward them Therefore they remain in eternal wrath and damnation
for they do not have the Lord Christ. and besides. they are not illuminated
and blessed by the gifts of the Holy Spirit.” (LC Il. 66)
b. Only in this way will God bring men to eternal salvation. The Formuta
of Concord, in setting forth what the Scriptures teach about predestination
enumerates eight points that must be taken together if we want to think or
speak correctly and profitably about the eternal election and ordering of the
children of God to eternal life. Points 2. 3, and 4 say that God has ordained
2 That this merit and these benefits of Christ are to be offered. given
and distributed to us through his Word and sacraments
3. That he would be effective and active in us by his Holy Spirit
through the Word when it is preached. heard, and meditated on. would
convert hearts to true repentance. and would enlighten them in the
true faith
4. That he would justify and graciously accept into the adoption of
children and into the inheritance of eternal life all who in sincere re-
pentance and true faith accept Christ (FC SD XI. 16—18)
The Formula goes on to Say that God has ‘ordained that in the man-
ner just recounted he wills to bring them to salvation’ and then adds
According to the Scriptures all this is included in the teaching of the
eternal election of God to adoption and to eterna! salvation. It should be
understood as included therein and never be excluded or omitted when we
speak of the purpose. foreknowledge. election. and ordinance of God to
eternal salvation. (FC SD XI. 23-24)
The consistent use by the Lutheran Confessions of what may be calied
God. how and by what means (namely. the oral Word and the holy sacra-
ments) the Holy Spirit wills to be efficacious in us.” it says: “God provides
for the public proclamation of his divine. eternal law and the wonderful
counsel concerning our redemption. namely, the holy and only saving
Gospel of his eternal Son. our only Saviour and Redeemer, Jesus Christ
Thereby he gathers an eternal church for himself out of the human race
and works In the hearts of men true repentance and knowledge of their sins
and true faith in the Son of God. Jesus Christ. And it is God's will to call men
to eternal salvation. to draw them to himself. convert them. beget them
anew. and sanctify them through this means and in no other way — namely.
through his holy Word (when one hears it preached or reads it) and the
sacraments (when they are used according to his Word) All who would
be saved must hear this preaching. for the preaching and the hearing of
God's Word are the Holy Spirit's instrument in, with, and through which he
wills to act efficaciously, to convert men to God’ (FC SD Il, 48-52). "We
must condemn with all seriousness and zeai. and in no wise tolerate in the
church of God. the enthusiasts who imagine that without means, without
the hearing of the divine Word and without the use of the holy sacraments,
God draws man to himself. illuminates. justifies. and saves him.” (FC SD
NW. 80; ef. FC Ep Il. 13)
In these words the Formula of Concord simply repeats the doctrine of
the earlier symbols. Almost word for word the Augsburg Confession says the
same thing, including even the condemnation: ‘Through the Word and the
sacraments. aS through instruments. the Holy Spirit is given, and the Holy
Spirit produces faith Our churches condemn the Anabaptists and others
who think that the Holy Spirit comes to men without the external Word,
through their own preparations and works.” (AC V. 2-4)
The Apology states it as axiomatic that “one cannot deal with God or
grasp him except through the Word” (Ap IV. 67). The Holy Spirit works
through the Word and the sacraments’ (Ap XXIV, 70: cf. Ap XIII, 5). The
Smatcald Articles emphatically declare that “we must hold firmly to the
conviction that God gives no one his Spirit or grace except through or with
the external Word’ (SA Ill, viil. 3): “we should and must constantly maintain
that God will not deal with us except through his external Word and sacra-
ment.” (SA ttl. vii, 10)
The Large Catechism explains that ‘although the work was accom-
plished and forgiveness of sins was acquired on the cross. yet it cannot come
to us in any other way than through the Word. How should we know that this
has been accomplished and offered to us if it were not proclaimed by preach-
ing. by the oral Word? Whence do they know of forgiveness, and how can
they grasp and appropriate it. except by steadfastly believing the Scriptures
and the Gospel?’ (LC V, 31) “Neither you nor | could ever know anything of
Christ. or believe in him and take him as our Lord. unless these were first
offered to us and bestowed on our hearts through the preaching of the
Gospel by the Holy Spirit.” (LC I. 38)
The Formula of Concord sums up what the symbols have said on this
subject when it quite categorically declares. “God does not call without
the ‘exclusive particles’ in setting forth the Scriptural teaching about
whom God will bring to eternal salvation and in what manner He will do this.
leads to the inescapable conclusion that according to the symbols outside
of the church there is no salvation (extra ecciesiam nulla salus) and that
the notion of salvation apart trom faith in Christ cannot be reconciled with
the confessional doctrine.
2. Interim State
Another criticism of Parti of AStatement’ has to do with the assertion
We believe that those who believe in Christ will enjoy a blissful relationship
with Him during the interim between their death and His second coming - It
Is objected specifically that recognition of Christ's saviorhood and lordship
does not depend on one’s acceptance of a particular view about the state of
the soul between the death of a believer and his resurrection
tt is true. of course. that itis possible for one to hold erroneous opinions
about the life after death and still genuinely acclaim Christ as Savior and
Lord. This is not to say. however. that it is a matter of indifference if one
adopts a position on this point that 1s contrary to the Scriptures and the
church's confession and does so on the plea that neither the Scriptures nor
the Contessions have a position which must be recognized. The language of
A Statement intends to assert that the lordship of Christ extends also over
the blessed in the life to come
As to the state of the soul after death “A Statement’ affirms that from
the moment of death believers enjoy a blissful relationship with their Savior
In a document adopted in 1969 and commended by the Synod to its member-
ship for reference and guidance (Resolution 2-03, Convention Proceedings
1973. p 109), the Commission on Theology and Church Relations stated
The Old Testament Scriptures contain many references to the con-
tinuation of life after death. For example. the patriarchs believed that
after their death they would be ‘gathered to their fathers in peace
This expression did not imply interment in a family grave. for it 1s used
of Abraham. Isaac. Jacob. and Moses, even though they were buried
tar from the land of their fathers (Gen 25:8-10. 35:29, 49:33. Num
27:13 Deut 32°50). The expression “he was gathered to his people” or
he slept with his peopie’ shows the intense hope of the Israelite to be
united with his ancestors. even in death. Our Lord summarized the Old
Testament hope when He reminded the Sadducees that God was not
the God of the dead but of the living. (Matt. 22 32)
Sheol. despite its often grim and shadowy character. was a place of
continued existence in some form (Job 26:5-6. Num 16:30; 1 Sam. 2 6)
Some passages describe sheo! as a place of darkness (Job 10:20-22).
or a place to hide (Job 14 13), or a place of hopelessness (Is. 28°18)
from which there 1s no return (Job 7:9). Other passages contain amore
positive affirmation about lite after death and assure the pious Israelite
that God will not abandon His saints in death but will abide with them
deliver them from sheo/, and receive them to glory. (Ps. 169-11
49:15, 73:24)
463