Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 463

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 463

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

REPORT ON DISSENT

be pointed out that the objections to A Statement” treated in this report
were gathered from the total correspondence and that it must not be as-
sumed that everyone who expressed disagreement with “A Statement” on
one or the other point wishes to be identified with every Criticism submitted
to the Commission on Theology and Church Relations. The major criticisms
of each part of “A Statement" are noted in the following section of this report
and are accompanied by a response.

A. CRITICISM OF PART t

1. Universalism

The most serious objection to Part | of “A Statement’ has to do with
the declaration ‘that al! who die without faith in Him [Christ] are eternally
damned.” This assertion is deemed untenable in view of the consolation
traditionally offered to the parents of an infant who died without opportunity
to be baptized and on the basis of the contention that both the Scriptures and
the Lutheran Confessions teach only that those who reject Christ will be
damned.

Relative to the eternal state of infants who die before being baptized
it must be noted that traditional pastoral practice is not the foundation of
church dogma. It is a basic principle of Lutheran theology that we must
carefully distinguish between what is revealed in God's Word and what is
not revealed (FC SD XI. 52). Concerning what is not revealed. “we should
accustom ourselves not to speculate” (FC SD XI, 13), always mindful of the
rule ‘that it is only from the Word of God that judgments on articles of faith
are to be pronounced’ (FC SD Il. 8). While Lutheran theology on the basis of
revelation comforts the parents of infants who died without baptism with the
assurance that God is just and upright in all His doings and exhorts them
to commit their child into God's hands with the full confidence that all He
does is good. Lutheran theology stops short of making pronouncements
about God's dealings with such children which go beyond what is revealed
in the Word

It is the opinion of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
that it is in full accord with the Scriptures and the Confessions to teach that
all who die without faith in Christ are eternally damned

The Great Commission suggests no other way to make disciples of
the nations than by baptizing and teaching (Matt. 28:19-20). St. Paul de-
scribes the condition of the Gentiles prior to the time when God ‘came
and preached peace” to them (Eph. 2:17). and therefore prior to any oppor-
tunity to reject the Gospe!. as ‘separated from Christ strangers to the
covenants of promise, having no hope and without God in the world
(Eph. 2:12). Immediately following the marvelous Gospei assurance of John
3:16-18a that whoever believes in the Son of God is not condemned. the
evangelist states categorically, He who does not believe is condemned
already, because he has not believed in the name of the only Son of God
(John 3:18b; cf. 2 Thess. 1:8)

When the Formula of Concord discusses “how man is converted to

means but through the Word. as indeed he has commanded the preaching ot
repentance and forgiveness of sin’ (FC SD XI. 27), and ‘wills that all men
should hear this proclamation. (FC SD XI. 68)

Finally, we must ask whether the statement of the Apology that the
Promise of salvation ‘does not apply to those who are outside of Christ's
church’ (extra ecc/esam Christ) (Ap IX, 2), and the statement of the For-
mula of Concord that it is God's will to call men to eternal salvation
through this means and in no other way’ / ‘visum est Deo per hoc medium
et non alio modo homines ad aeternam saiutem vocare’) (FC SD Il 50)
do not in fact translate into a) only within the church ts there salvation /s0/um
intra ecclesiam Salus), and b) only in the manner just recounted’ [so/o eo
modo (quem 1am recitavimus)'} will God bring men to eternal salvation
(FC SD XI, 23). These two only's’ deserve further attention

a. Only within the church 1s there salvation ‘Where Christ Is not
preached. there is no Holy Spirit to create, call. and gather the Christian
church. and outside it no one can come to the Lord Christ’ (LC Il, 45). Atl
though the whole world has sought painstakingly to learn what God is and
what he thinks and does. yet it has never succeeded in the least’ (LC Il
63). “All who are outside the Christian church. whether heathen Turks
Jews, or false Christians and hypocrites. even though they believe in and
worship only the one. true God. nevertheless do not know what his attitude
1s toward them Therefore they remain in eternal wrath and damnation
for they do not have the Lord Christ. and besides. they are not illuminated
and blessed by the gifts of the Holy Spirit.” (LC Il. 66)

b. Only in this way will God bring men to eternal salvation. The Formuta
of Concord, in setting forth what the Scriptures teach about predestination
enumerates eight points that must be taken together if we want to think or
speak correctly and profitably about the eternal election and ordering of the
children of God to eternal life. Points 2. 3, and 4 say that God has ordained

2 That this merit and these benefits of Christ are to be offered. given
and distributed to us through his Word and sacraments

3. That he would be effective and active in us by his Holy Spirit
through the Word when it is preached. heard, and meditated on. would
convert hearts to true repentance. and would enlighten them in the
true faith

4. That he would justify and graciously accept into the adoption of
children and into the inheritance of eternal life all who in sincere re-
pentance and true faith accept Christ (FC SD XI. 16—18)

The Formula goes on to Say that God has ‘ordained that in the man-
ner just recounted he wills to bring them to salvation’ and then adds
According to the Scriptures all this is included in the teaching of the
eternal election of God to adoption and to eterna! salvation. It should be
understood as included therein and never be excluded or omitted when we
speak of the purpose. foreknowledge. election. and ordinance of God to
eternal salvation. (FC SD XI. 23-24)
The consistent use by the Lutheran Confessions of what may be calied

God. how and by what means (namely. the oral Word and the holy sacra-
ments) the Holy Spirit wills to be efficacious in us.” it says: “God provides
for the public proclamation of his divine. eternal law and the wonderful
counsel concerning our redemption. namely, the holy and only saving
Gospel of his eternal Son. our only Saviour and Redeemer, Jesus Christ
Thereby he gathers an eternal church for himself out of the human race
and works In the hearts of men true repentance and knowledge of their sins
and true faith in the Son of God. Jesus Christ. And it is God's will to call men
to eternal salvation. to draw them to himself. convert them. beget them
anew. and sanctify them through this means and in no other way — namely.
through his holy Word (when one hears it preached or reads it) and the
sacraments (when they are used according to his Word) All who would
be saved must hear this preaching. for the preaching and the hearing of
God's Word are the Holy Spirit's instrument in, with, and through which he
wills to act efficaciously, to convert men to God’ (FC SD Il, 48-52). "We
must condemn with all seriousness and zeai. and in no wise tolerate in the
church of God. the enthusiasts who imagine that without means, without
the hearing of the divine Word and without the use of the holy sacraments,
God draws man to himself. illuminates. justifies. and saves him.” (FC SD
NW. 80; ef. FC Ep Il. 13)

In these words the Formula of Concord simply repeats the doctrine of
the earlier symbols. Almost word for word the Augsburg Confession says the
same thing, including even the condemnation: ‘Through the Word and the
sacraments. aS through instruments. the Holy Spirit is given, and the Holy
Spirit produces faith Our churches condemn the Anabaptists and others
who think that the Holy Spirit comes to men without the external Word,
through their own preparations and works.” (AC V. 2-4)

The Apology states it as axiomatic that “one cannot deal with God or
grasp him except through the Word” (Ap IV. 67). The Holy Spirit works
through the Word and the sacraments’ (Ap XXIV, 70: cf. Ap XIII, 5). The
Smatcald Articles emphatically declare that “we must hold firmly to the
conviction that God gives no one his Spirit or grace except through or with
the external Word’ (SA Ill, viil. 3): “we should and must constantly maintain
that God will not deal with us except through his external Word and sacra-
ment.” (SA ttl. vii, 10)

The Large Catechism explains that ‘although the work was accom-
plished and forgiveness of sins was acquired on the cross. yet it cannot come
to us in any other way than through the Word. How should we know that this
has been accomplished and offered to us if it were not proclaimed by preach-
ing. by the oral Word? Whence do they know of forgiveness, and how can
they grasp and appropriate it. except by steadfastly believing the Scriptures
and the Gospel?’ (LC V, 31) “Neither you nor | could ever know anything of
Christ. or believe in him and take him as our Lord. unless these were first
offered to us and bestowed on our hearts through the preaching of the
Gospel by the Holy Spirit.” (LC I. 38)

The Formula of Concord sums up what the symbols have said on this
subject when it quite categorically declares. “God does not call without

the ‘exclusive particles’ in setting forth the Scriptural teaching about
whom God will bring to eternal salvation and in what manner He will do this.
leads to the inescapable conclusion that according to the symbols outside
of the church there is no salvation (extra ecciesiam nulla salus) and that
the notion of salvation apart trom faith in Christ cannot be reconciled with
the confessional doctrine.

2. Interim State

Another criticism of Parti of AStatement’ has to do with the assertion
We believe that those who believe in Christ will enjoy a blissful relationship
with Him during the interim between their death and His second coming - It
Is objected specifically that recognition of Christ's saviorhood and lordship
does not depend on one’s acceptance of a particular view about the state of
the soul between the death of a believer and his resurrection
tt is true. of course. that itis possible for one to hold erroneous opinions
about the life after death and still genuinely acclaim Christ as Savior and
Lord. This is not to say. however. that it is a matter of indifference if one
adopts a position on this point that 1s contrary to the Scriptures and the
church's confession and does so on the plea that neither the Scriptures nor
the Contessions have a position which must be recognized. The language of
A Statement intends to assert that the lordship of Christ extends also over
the blessed in the life to come
As to the state of the soul after death “A Statement’ affirms that from
the moment of death believers enjoy a blissful relationship with their Savior
In a document adopted in 1969 and commended by the Synod to its member-
ship for reference and guidance (Resolution 2-03, Convention Proceedings
1973. p 109), the Commission on Theology and Church Relations stated

The Old Testament Scriptures contain many references to the con-
tinuation of life after death. For example. the patriarchs believed that
after their death they would be ‘gathered to their fathers in peace
This expression did not imply interment in a family grave. for it 1s used
of Abraham. Isaac. Jacob. and Moses, even though they were buried
tar from the land of their fathers (Gen 25:8-10. 35:29, 49:33. Num
27:13 Deut 32°50). The expression “he was gathered to his people” or

he slept with his peopie’ shows the intense hope of the Israelite to be
united with his ancestors. even in death. Our Lord summarized the Old
Testament hope when He reminded the Sadducees that God was not
the God of the dead but of the living. (Matt. 22 32)

Sheol. despite its often grim and shadowy character. was a place of
continued existence in some form (Job 26:5-6. Num 16:30; 1 Sam. 2 6)
Some passages describe sheo! as a place of darkness (Job 10:20-22).
or a place to hide (Job 14 13), or a place of hopelessness (Is. 28°18)
from which there 1s no return (Job 7:9). Other passages contain amore
positive affirmation about lite after death and assure the pious Israelite
that God will not abandon His saints in death but will abide with them
deliver them from sheo/, and receive them to glory. (Ps. 169-11
49:15, 73:24)

463