Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 296

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 296

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

296 HIGHER EDUCATION

as a life of service to the Lord and His church, indicating that
they have been chosen with great care.

When these young people have indicated a desire to begin
such preparation, the congregation “lays hands’ on them,
thereby indicating that it is Christ through His church who is
calling them to begin preparing for the professional ministry.
On the recommendation of the pastor and the elders the con-
gregation approves any necessary financial support for these
young people and encourages preparation to begin already at
the high school age.

B. Financial Support of the Synodical Educational Objective

Synodical financing of its educational programs has indeed
fallen short of needs in recent years. In past years The Lutheran
Church — Missouri Synod was able to provide nearly free educa-
tion for its future professional ministry. This gradually changed
so that by 1953 nonsynodical finances were required to pay for
costs not directly related to the academic program. In recent
years educational costs have risen much faster than contribu-
tions made available to the Synod. As a consequence tuitions
have had to be increased dramatically to assure the financial
stability of the various schools.

Changes in enrollment trends, differences in student com-
mitments to professional ministry at similar ages as in previous
times, and educational innovations require that the synodical
educational objective of training for the professional ministry
be emphasized to our congregations. These changes also dictate
that the synodical financial resources for education be specifi-
cally directed to the synodical objective.

In order to assure that contributions of congregational mem-
bers support the purpose for which they are given and in order
to fully recognize the necessity for colleges to serve the needs
of students as well as the Synod, it is necessary that subsidy
dollars be provided to the college in behalf of students who
desire to enter professional church ministry.

The present method of synodical subsidy distribution is no
longer equitably supporting students for the professional
ministry. The Board for Higher Education has been unable to
respond to the financial needs of the schools with additional
dollars or by way of a redistribution of support based on the
service performed for the Synod. Changes have been occurring
rapidly while subsidy dollars have remained almost constant.
The subsidy distribution appropriate a few years ago is now
drastically out of proportion.

There is no perfect solution to distributing the synodical
educational dollar, yet it is clear to the Task Force that the
synodical objective of “training” professional workers must be
the criterion for the distribution of congregational contributions.
To meet this need, it is felt that financial support must be
provided to the school for the direct benefit of the individual
student committed to the professional ministry. This can be ac-
complished by a method of tuition support in the form of synodi-
cal “scholarship aid.’ The institutional needs must be recog-
nized but must be secondary to the primary objective of provid-
ing assistance to the students interested in the professional
ministry.

The Task Force Recommends

Bl. That synodical resources available for educational objec-
tives be allocated for tuition support in the form of scholarships
for church-work students who can become qualified for Board
of Assignments placement in the Synod:

B2. That such tuition support be directed so that church-
work students, as defined above, are encouraged to complete
their studies at the college(s) designated by the Synod:

B3. That tuition support be allocated to present synodical
schools for credit to the accounts of church-work students so
long as the church-work programs offered by these schools meet
the requirements established by the Board for Higher Educa-
tion:

B4. That tuition support be allocated for such students
according to a formula developed by the Board for Higher
Education based on the following principles:

a) an increasing amount of tuition support shall be allocated
as students progress through the class levels of each
church-work program:

b) priority shall be given for support of students preparing
for the pastoral ministry:

c) a significant factor in determining the allocation of tuition
support shall be the ability of each school to meet the
needs of the Synod as reflected by the percentage of
graduates who enroll in the next level of study (e. g., pre-
seminary to seminary) and the percentage of graduates
placed in full-time professional service of the Synod:

a minimum of 75% of the funds available for the support
of educational objectives shall be allotted as tuition sup-
port with the balance made available for special ministries
and for general institutional support to meet special and
contingency needs as determined by the Board for Higher
Education: and

all of the above principles shall be phased into operation
immediately with full implementation by Sept. 1, 1978.

d

e

A number of other support methods are being used by
governmental and private organizations to attain desired
objectives. The Task Force is aware that the tuition-support
or scholarship-aid method suggested may be subject to some
abuse by individuals or schools. However, it is expected that
the suggested formula will provide adequate safeguards and
incentives for students to be properly counseled to pursue
appropriate career objectives, so that the success rate of trans-
fer for continuing church-work programs or of professional
placement will permit interested students to attend school with
significant synodical assistance. In the case of students who
are unable to make a church-work commitment, aid needed by
such students will have to come from nonsynodical sources.

C. Necessity for a Synodical Academy

Studies on the recruitment of young persons for full-time
ministry in the church indicate that this vocational decision
is made by a significant number of people at an early age.
Preparation for their vocational choice could and probably
should begin during the high school years. The years spent in
high school play a significant role in reinforcing such a decision
or in altering that decision. The opportunity to attend a synodi-
cal high school, which through its curriculum and instructors
encourages and reinforces the commitment to enter the full-time
ministry of the church, is extremely important. Our Lutheran
community high schools also have a responsibility to seek every
possible way to identify students who have potential as future
full-time church workers and to encourage them to begin early
preparation for this service.

At the present time the Synod is subsidizing the operation
of four high school departments. All of these are operated in
conjunction with a junior college program. With the exception
of the high school enrollment at Concordia, Mo., the vast ma-
Jority of these high school students have not made acommitment
to study for professional church work. In the case of Portland,
the high school largely serves as a community high school, de-
sires to do so, and is encouraged to effect such a transfer in the
near future. The program at Selma, while having largely a
general education enrollment with a sizable number of students
of non-Lutheran backgrounds, has served and continues to
serve as the primary recruitment source for blacks in The
Lutheran Church— Missouri Synod. The enrollment at Con-
cordia High School, Edmonton, is almost totally general educa-
tion with a majority of non-Lutheran students from the local
area. Recommendations for Edmonton and Selma appear else-
where in this report.

The geographic distribution of synodical congregations is
such that a large segment of the Synod is far removed from the
communities where Lutheran high school programs are being
offered. In order to adequately serve the congregations of the
Synod, at least one facility is necessary to offer young people
the opportunity to begin preparing for full-time ministry at high
school age. Such a facility, in order to attract committed stu-
dents, must offer a quality academic program where ministry
interests can be nurtured. Available data indicate that congre-
gational and synodical commitment to such a worthy objective
could secure sufficient students to justify the costs involved.

The Task Force Recommends:

Cl. That the Synod retain one academy thigh school) in
which young people may receive education directed toward
preparation for full-time ministry in the church:

C2. That an academy with high standards of academic excel-
lence in a curriculum directed primarily toward full-time