Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 81
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 81
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 81
WHEREAS, The Commission on Theology and Church Rela-
tions has since its adoption indicated areas where A Statement
needs to be reworded or clarified; therefore be it
Resolved. That the Synod in convention at Anaheim rescind
Resolution 3-01 or offer the convention the opportunity to revise
A Statement of Scriptural and Confessional Principles as sug-
gested by the Commission on Theology and Church Relations.
Lutheran Church of The Messiah
Saginaw, Mich.
Harold K. Sawyers, President
Alice Daugherty, Secretary
Paul Bramstedt, Pastor
3-61
To Seek Clarification of Status of
“A Statement” and to Guard
Against Misuse
WHEREAS, The adoption by the New Orleans convention of
Resolution 2-12, “To Understand Article II of the Synod’s
Constitution as Requiring the Formulation and Adoption of
Synodical Doctrinal Statements,” and 3-01, ‘“‘To Adopt ‘A State-
ment,’ ’’ were actions that in the opinion of many Ohio District
members represented a significant departure from the Synod’s
declared policies of the past; and
WHEREAS, The adoption of these resolutions was vigorously
opposed by a very significant minority of the delegates at the
New Orleans convention; and
WHEREAS, After the New Orleans convention many of the
Synod’s members have voiced strong misgivings with regard
to the correctness, the wisdom, the charity, and the constitu-
tionality of these resolutions; and
WHEREAS, Many of the Synod’s members have objected to
these resolutions on the basis that such actions have the effect
of amending the Synod’s Constitution without following the
proper procedures for amending the Constitution; and
WHEREAS, The upholding of these resolutions by the Com-
mission on Constitutional Matters of the Synod has accentuated
the division that had already existed; and
WHEREAS, There seems to be a lot of confusion in the Synod
with regard to the use of the terms “binding” and “binding on
conscience” as applied to doctrinal statements; and
WHEREAS, Experience since the New Orleans convention
indicates that it would be wise for the Synod to take more time
to consider and reconsider and to allow ample time for dis-
cussion of any resolution intended to serve as ‘‘a more formal
statement of belief”; therefore be it
Resolved. That the District question the validity of the ruling
of the CCM with regard to Resolutions 2-12 and 3-01.
Ohio District
Carl A. Brummé, Secretary
3-62A
To Declare “A Statement” Not Binding
WHEREAS, The Commission on Constitutional Matters, in
receipt of objections to the adoption of A Statement on constitu-
tional grounds, has ruled that doctrinal statements, to wit,
Resolution 3-01, do not constitute a revision or addition to
Article II of the Constitution; and
WHEREAS, The Commission on Theology and Church Rela-
tions in its ‘Report on Dissent’”’ published in September 1974
has endorsed this position and especially the proposal offered
to study proposed changes to the Handbook: and
WHEREAS, The provisions of the Handbook for adding to or
clarifying the confessional stance of our church are clearly
defined in the provisions for modifying Article II; and
WHEREAS, The practice of adopting doctrinal resolutions by
simple majority vote has been distressing the Synod and has
contributed to the unrest within the synodical fellowship, par-
ticularly when it is stated: “Indeed, insofar as such resolutions
are in accord with the Scriptures, they are binding on those
who accept Article II of the Synod’s Constitution” (Res. 2-12,
New Orleans); therefore be it
Resolved. That New Orleans Resolution 3-01 is officially
acknowledged as not modifying or adding to Article II and
therefore not binding upon members of the Synod: and be it
further
Resolved. That we encourage the adoption of doctrinal
statements, pertinent to the issues of our day, for theological
discussion and study; however, all doctrinal statements that are
to bind the members of the Synod shall be so identified and
adopted, using the procedures established by Article XIV, even
though these statements are not to enjoy the status of Article II.
Lutheran Church of the Ascension
Burnsville, Minn.
Leo L. Bosh, President
Barbara C. Puch, Secretary
Identical or similar:
3-62B
Board of Directors, Atlantic District R. Ressmeyer
3-63A
To Test Whether Synod Really Wants
Confessional Basis Interpreted or
Changed as Resolutions 2-12 and 3-01
Attempt to Do
WHEREAS, The Synod’s Constitution in Article XIV clearly
spells out procedures to be followed for any possible “‘changes
in, and amendments to, the Constitution,” stating that at a con-
vention where such changes or amendments are proposed
“a two-thirds majority of all votes cast” (by voting delegates)
“shall be necessary for adoption,” and ‘amendments to the
Constitution of the Synod shall’be submitted directly to each
voting congregation of the Synod on an official ballot... . The
proposed amendment shall become effective . . . provided a
two-thirds majority of the votes cast within that period shall
have favored the amendment”; and
WHEREAS. Many members and congregations of the Synod
believe that New Orleans Resolutions 2-12 and 3-01, adopted
by about a 56%-44% vote of delegates at the convention, have
the very real effect of changing or amending the confessional
basis of the Synod; and
WHEREAS, Many members and congregations of the Synod
do not accept as valid the reasoning used in these resolutions
and in subsequent presentations by those favoring these reso-
lutions, as though these resolutions do not change the Synod’s
confessional basis but merely interpret it, and as though there-
fore Article XIV does not apply; and
WHEREAS, Resolutions 2-12, 3-01, and the concepts contained
in them have a potential for being misused as a foundation for
other resolutions and actions to be built upon them and may be
used as a ‘‘new standard of orthodoxy” in measuring the per-
missible or nonpermissible theological position of people who
joyfully subscribe to Article II of our Constitution;
Therefore in the interest of peace and harmony in the Synod,
Redeemer Lutheran Congregation, Burnsville, Minn., petitions
the Synod at its Anaheim convention to pass resolutions re-
quiring in this controverted situation —
a) that, whether required or not required to do so, the Synod
make use of the procedure outlined in Article XIV of our
Constitution in order to test whether the Synod really wants its
confessional basis interpreted or changed as done by N. O.
Resolutions 2-12 and 3-01;
b) that it be ascertained at the Anaheim convention whether
two thirds of the voting delegates at that convention favor the
way Resolutions 2-12 and 3-01 interpret or change our con-
fessional basis;
c) that if there are not that many delegates (2/3) who favor
the way N.O. Resolution 2-12 and 3-01 interpret or change our