Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 272

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 272

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 front matter 19 front matter 20 front matter 21 front matter 22 front matter 23 front matter 24 front matter 25 front matter 26 front matter 27 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437 Page 438 Page 439 Page 440 Page 441 Page 442 Page 443 Page 444 Page 445 Page 446 Page 447 Page 448 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Page 458 Page 459 Page 460 Page 461 Page 462 Page 463 Page 464 Page 465 Page 466 Page 467 Page 468 Page 469 Page 470 Page 471 Page 472 Page 473 Page 474 Page 475 Page 476 Page 477 Page 478 Page 479 Page 480 Page 481 Page 482 Page 483 Page 484 Page 485 Page 486 Page 487 Page 488 Page 492 Page 493 Page 494 Page 495 Page 496 Page 497 Page 498 Page 499 Page 500 Page 501 Page 502

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

272 HIGHER EDUCATION

the Synod continue to express the desire to use these schools.

For these reasons the Board for Higher Education agrees
with the position consistently held by the Synod through its
action in recent years, that beyond the special cases. one or
more strong high schools should be maintained that can be
fostered as outstanding academic institutions for the early re-
cruitment and training of ministers.

Transfers

The number of transfers who enter synodical colleges for
the first time at the college junior year has increased slightly
in recent years. However, their total still accounts for only about
three percent of the college junior class. This is an area that
should receive more attention for recruitment in the future. The
percentage of students nationwide who begin their college work
at local community junior colleges has continued to rise sharply.
Although it is true that less than 25 percent of those who enroll
at a community college ever transfer to an upper level school.
the potential exists for synodical colleges to receive more such
transfers than at present, especially in the teacher education
program. Generally very little of the recruitment effort in the
Synod has been directed at those enrolled in junior colleges.

Seminary Level

The number of students who enter the synodical system
for the first time at the seminary level has remained constant
during the past 6 years. Prior to this past fall, the number of such
students at St. Louis had increased slightly but had dropped
somewhat at Springfield. The public and private colleges and
universities of the nation could become a much better source
for prospective seminary students. Closer relationships between
campus pastors and the seminaries need to be developed. All
members of the Synod should be doing more recruiting for the
pastoral ministry from among college and university students.

However, appropriately individualized programs need to
be structured to meet the needs of matriculating students from
diverse academic backgrounds. The experiences in the synod-
ical college pastoral training program still provide the best
preparation for entrance to the seminaries. More efforts are
needed to provide as many similar experiences as possible for
those who enter for the first time at the seminary level.

The number of synodical teacher college graduates entering
the seminary has increased slightly. This. of course. does help
the supply of pastors but not the total supply of workers.

General Education Students

The number of young people who enroll as general education
students in a synodical school and later change to a ministerial
program has been increasing but still accounts for only about
four percent of the church work graduates. This number, how-
ever, can likely be increased if more efforts are made to recruit
Lutheran students. rather than non-Lutherans, into the general
education program and if the on-campus recruitment efforts
are increased.

Withdrawal Rate

Increasing the supply of workers through any significant
change in the withdrawal or drop-out rate among students is
not a likely option. The number of withdrawals does vary from
year to year according to factors such as the social and political
climate but has remained surprisingly steady for the past 20
years. School officials who have done student-by-student studies
of withdrawals generally conclude that only a small number
of drop-outs probably could or should have remained in the
program.

College Freshmen

Finally then, the biggest immediate hope for increasing the
future supply of workers is in turning around the downward
trend in the number who enter the various ministerial pro-
grams at the college freshman level. The enrollment at that level
continues to be the most immediate, sensitive, and accurate way
to predict the future number of eligible workers.

As can be seen in Figure 1, the freshman pastoral and male
teacher enrollments suffered another sharp drop in the first
year of the past biennium and a slight drop in the second year.
The female teacher enrollment dropped sharply both years. In
order to understand the implications of these figures for the
future supply of workers, it should be remembered that the
pastoral students who were placed this spring and summer

were those who entered as college freshmen in 1967, and the
teachers placed were those who entered in 1971.

FIGURE 1

Enrollments in College Freshman Pastoral and Teacher
Education Programs at Synodical Colleges

a

Cs es ee
AN Oe ee ee ee
Lp [tees

100

Fall of: 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974

Recruitment Plans

The facts remain then that the major purpose of our schools
is the preparation of ministers and that more students must be
enrolled in the ministerial program if we are to have an ade-
quate supply of workers in the future. Success or failure in
recruitment is never dependent simply on the amount of pro-
gramed effort exerted by the organized church body, never-
theless added attention to recruitment responsibilities remains
essential for the individual Christian. for congregations, for
Districts. and for the Synod.

President J. A. O. Preus in his ‘A Report to the Church,”
distributed to all synodical officials. pastors, and congregation
chairmen in January 1975. devoted a very significant part of
his statements to recruitment needs. He ended that section of
the report by stating: ‘Therefore I am requesting the Board
for Higher Education to give me information for presentation
to the Anaheim convention concerning their plans and activities
of recruitment of church workers. I am also asking the District
Presidents to give me a report for presentation to the convention
of the efforts of the recruitment and scholarship committees in
their respective districts. And I am asking the presidents of our
colleges to give me a report relative to their plans, activities,
and achievements in the area of recruitment of students which
can also be presented to the Anaheim convention.” Certainly
such a direct attack on the recruitment needs by so many in
the Synod should have a significant effect.

On the basis of its studies and findings concerning needs
and programs in recruitment, the Board for Higher Education
plans to give special emphasis during the years ahead to five
aspects of its work with those responsible for recruitment at
the colleges and in the Districts of the church. The five areas
include: local congregations, District recruitment committees,
community Lutheran high schools, community junior colleges,
and private and public 4-year colleges and universities. Under-
lying all of the suggestions relating to these five areas is the
continuing belief that a renewed emphasis must be placed on
vocational concerns and teachings by the church.

Individual Christians and Local Congregations

Young people are looking for guidance as they face the
task of selecting a career from among the exploding number
of possibilities open to them. Many college students say they did
not consider the ministry as a possible vocation because they
were never confronted by anyone who suggested it to them as
an option. Individual Christians, parents, pastors, teachers, and
peers in the local congregation are often in the best position to
“confront” our young people with the opportunities in ministry.
Church work students have consistently identified pastors,