Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1975 · 51st Convention › Page 272
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1975, Page 272
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
front matter 19
front matter 20
front matter 21
front matter 22
front matter 23
front matter 24
front matter 25
front matter 26
front matter 27
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Page 438
Page 439
Page 440
Page 441
Page 442
Page 443
Page 444
Page 445
Page 446
Page 447
Page 448
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Page 458
Page 459
Page 460
Page 461
Page 462
Page 463
Page 464
Page 465
Page 466
Page 467
Page 468
Page 469
Page 470
Page 471
Page 472
Page 473
Page 474
Page 475
Page 476
Page 477
Page 478
Page 479
Page 480
Page 481
Page 482
Page 483
Page 484
Page 485
Page 486
Page 487
Page 488
Page 492
Page 493
Page 494
Page 495
Page 496
Page 497
Page 498
Page 499
Page 500
Page 501
Page 502
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
272 HIGHER EDUCATION
the Synod continue to express the desire to use these schools.
For these reasons the Board for Higher Education agrees
with the position consistently held by the Synod through its
action in recent years, that beyond the special cases. one or
more strong high schools should be maintained that can be
fostered as outstanding academic institutions for the early re-
cruitment and training of ministers.
Transfers
The number of transfers who enter synodical colleges for
the first time at the college junior year has increased slightly
in recent years. However, their total still accounts for only about
three percent of the college junior class. This is an area that
should receive more attention for recruitment in the future. The
percentage of students nationwide who begin their college work
at local community junior colleges has continued to rise sharply.
Although it is true that less than 25 percent of those who enroll
at a community college ever transfer to an upper level school.
the potential exists for synodical colleges to receive more such
transfers than at present, especially in the teacher education
program. Generally very little of the recruitment effort in the
Synod has been directed at those enrolled in junior colleges.
Seminary Level
The number of students who enter the synodical system
for the first time at the seminary level has remained constant
during the past 6 years. Prior to this past fall, the number of such
students at St. Louis had increased slightly but had dropped
somewhat at Springfield. The public and private colleges and
universities of the nation could become a much better source
for prospective seminary students. Closer relationships between
campus pastors and the seminaries need to be developed. All
members of the Synod should be doing more recruiting for the
pastoral ministry from among college and university students.
However, appropriately individualized programs need to
be structured to meet the needs of matriculating students from
diverse academic backgrounds. The experiences in the synod-
ical college pastoral training program still provide the best
preparation for entrance to the seminaries. More efforts are
needed to provide as many similar experiences as possible for
those who enter for the first time at the seminary level.
The number of synodical teacher college graduates entering
the seminary has increased slightly. This. of course. does help
the supply of pastors but not the total supply of workers.
General Education Students
The number of young people who enroll as general education
students in a synodical school and later change to a ministerial
program has been increasing but still accounts for only about
four percent of the church work graduates. This number, how-
ever, can likely be increased if more efforts are made to recruit
Lutheran students. rather than non-Lutherans, into the general
education program and if the on-campus recruitment efforts
are increased.
Withdrawal Rate
Increasing the supply of workers through any significant
change in the withdrawal or drop-out rate among students is
not a likely option. The number of withdrawals does vary from
year to year according to factors such as the social and political
climate but has remained surprisingly steady for the past 20
years. School officials who have done student-by-student studies
of withdrawals generally conclude that only a small number
of drop-outs probably could or should have remained in the
program.
College Freshmen
Finally then, the biggest immediate hope for increasing the
future supply of workers is in turning around the downward
trend in the number who enter the various ministerial pro-
grams at the college freshman level. The enrollment at that level
continues to be the most immediate, sensitive, and accurate way
to predict the future number of eligible workers.
As can be seen in Figure 1, the freshman pastoral and male
teacher enrollments suffered another sharp drop in the first
year of the past biennium and a slight drop in the second year.
The female teacher enrollment dropped sharply both years. In
order to understand the implications of these figures for the
future supply of workers, it should be remembered that the
pastoral students who were placed this spring and summer
were those who entered as college freshmen in 1967, and the
teachers placed were those who entered in 1971.
FIGURE 1
Enrollments in College Freshman Pastoral and Teacher
Education Programs at Synodical Colleges
a
Cs es ee
AN Oe ee ee ee
Lp [tees
100
Fall of: 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974
Recruitment Plans
The facts remain then that the major purpose of our schools
is the preparation of ministers and that more students must be
enrolled in the ministerial program if we are to have an ade-
quate supply of workers in the future. Success or failure in
recruitment is never dependent simply on the amount of pro-
gramed effort exerted by the organized church body, never-
theless added attention to recruitment responsibilities remains
essential for the individual Christian. for congregations, for
Districts. and for the Synod.
President J. A. O. Preus in his ‘A Report to the Church,”
distributed to all synodical officials. pastors, and congregation
chairmen in January 1975. devoted a very significant part of
his statements to recruitment needs. He ended that section of
the report by stating: ‘Therefore I am requesting the Board
for Higher Education to give me information for presentation
to the Anaheim convention concerning their plans and activities
of recruitment of church workers. I am also asking the District
Presidents to give me a report for presentation to the convention
of the efforts of the recruitment and scholarship committees in
their respective districts. And I am asking the presidents of our
colleges to give me a report relative to their plans, activities,
and achievements in the area of recruitment of students which
can also be presented to the Anaheim convention.” Certainly
such a direct attack on the recruitment needs by so many in
the Synod should have a significant effect.
On the basis of its studies and findings concerning needs
and programs in recruitment, the Board for Higher Education
plans to give special emphasis during the years ahead to five
aspects of its work with those responsible for recruitment at
the colleges and in the Districts of the church. The five areas
include: local congregations, District recruitment committees,
community Lutheran high schools, community junior colleges,
and private and public 4-year colleges and universities. Under-
lying all of the suggestions relating to these five areas is the
continuing belief that a renewed emphasis must be placed on
vocational concerns and teachings by the church.
Individual Christians and Local Congregations
Young people are looking for guidance as they face the
task of selecting a career from among the exploding number
of possibilities open to them. Many college students say they did
not consider the ministry as a possible vocation because they
were never confronted by anyone who suggested it to them as
an option. Individual Christians, parents, pastors, teachers, and
peers in the local congregation are often in the best position to
“confront” our young people with the opportunities in ministry.
Church work students have consistently identified pastors,