Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 260
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 260
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
260 HIGHER EDUCATION
of the church for service. Spirited recruitment can best be
done by spirited people who care about the future of the
church of our Lord and who know full well that the future
depends on an able ministry of the New Testament.
Plant and Facilities
Oct. 15, 1972, was a day of celebration because that was
the date for the formal dedication of the new Herbert P.
Buetow Memorial Music Center. This facility, announced to
the Synod in our last report, has already proved to be a most
productive, functional building. In addition to its instruc-
tional use for quality music education for the church, the
building serves many college needs and also the Districts
and the community. Special paeans of praise should be re-
corded in this report: Mrs. Herbert P. Buetow, Miss Dorothy
Schoknecht, Dr. Henry Neils, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Schilling,
the Minnesota South District, the Minnesota North District,
the Aid Association for Lutherans, the Lutheran Brother-
hood, and many other individuals combined to present a
nearly million dollar facility to the assets of Synod at Con-
cordia in St. Paul.
Jan. 4, 1973, was another day of celebration as the doors
were opened to the new Concordia College Union. This
facility, too, has quickly proved to be a pleasant and helpful
asset to the life of the school. Some financing is still needed
from private sources for this project, but the students them-
selves are to be credited with much of the impetus and most
of the funds. Their fees will amortize the HUD subsidized
oan,
Other projects are in planning to improve the educa-
tional opportunities and to enrich the campus life. An im-
mediate priority is the creation of a new Art Department
facility which will join the relatively new Administration
Building to the new College Union.
Conclusion
Concordia’s primary purpose continues to be the prepa-
ration of church workers for service in the Synod. Students,
faculty, and administration are conscious of this purpose.
We are thankful for the blessings of support from the Synod
for the past 80 years. We face the future with commitment
to the Great Commission of our Lord Jesus and implore
the prayers and blessings of the Synod to sustain us in that
commitment. The world and all its cultural components, the
Synod and its institutions, may all together look very shaky
at times. But we are hearing a voice that says, “In Thee,
O Lord, do I put my trust ... for Thou art my rock and
my fortress; ...I1 will be glad and rejoice in Thy mercy.”
Boarp OF CONTROL
Harvey Stegemoeller, Executive Officer
Concordia Senior College
Fort Wayne, Ind.
The Board of Control of Concordia Senior College. with
gratitude to God, who has graciously supported its efforts
and has directed the course of the institution and kept His
protecting hand over it, herewith makes its regular report
to the convention of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod.
At a time when developments of deepest significance for
the future welfare of the Synod and its entire system of
ministerial education are being widely discussed, we wish
to call attention to several items. A most fundamental issue
in synodical higher education is whether it will remain a
system of synodically owned and operated colleges and sem-
inaries, each with a defined purpose and function in relation
to other synodical schools, or will become a number of
synodically related but academically self-contained and func-
tionally independent educational institutions. The answer to
this will affect the basic objectives of the Synod in higher
education; and the vital specific relationship of the colleges
and seminaries to each other and to the Synod. Nothing could
be of more vital significance in the future welfare of the
church than an erosion or weakening of the solid ministerial
education foundation from which the Synod has derived
basic strength and unity since its founding and to which it
has committed enormous investments of thought, manpower,
and funds during the past 125 years.
We are aware that many strong voices are being raised
calling for abandonment of the Synod’s junior college-senior
college-seminary plan of ministerial education and, particu-
larly, of the “systems concept” which it embodies and upon
which it is predicated. This is happening at the very time
when the dominant thrust of educational thought in higher
education in both the public and private sectors to call for
a movement toward consortia, cloisters, and other types of
interinstitutional cooperation and collaboration similar to
the type of working arrangement the Synod has had all these
years on a national scale. There are now 28 separate upper-
level colleges and universities in the United States. The
major advantage of the Synod’s “system approach” is the
avoidance of isolated, individual institutions carrying for-
ward costly, wasteful, and unnecessary duplication of pro-
grams and expansion in competition with each other. To
propose so-called “equally effective alternate routes” to the
ministry will weaken and eventually vitiate the validity of
the fundamental concept and unique purpose of synodical
activity and expenditures in the field of higher education.
It has become commonplace to say that we live in an age
of transition. The transition is that of a whole social order,
an order that is still undergoing the severe strains associ-
ated with rather fundamental shifts in national goals, atti-
tudes, and values. Permeating all we see around us are
rapidly shifting social and ethical norms — whether of col-
lective or of personal behavior. Everyone is aware that
colleges are part of this rapidly changing social environment
and therefore undergo, like the broader society, periods of
disorder, uncertainty, and even trauma. But what everyone
does not perceive is that higher education has met, with
a demonstrable suppleness, the strains of recent years and
is emerging with rather remarkable strength envisioned.
In any case, new conditions and opportunities lend urgent
emphasis to the responsibility of the Synod’s colleges and
seminaries to examine and reexamine the programs they
offer to prepare effective ministers for service in the context
in which the church must do her work. Concordia Senior
College has not been insensitive to the changing social con-
texts and ministerial needs in which members of the church
carry forward our Lord's commission to preach, to teach,
and live out the Gospel in the world. On the basis of 15
years’ experience, the college is attempting faithfully to
meet its obligations to interpret the significance of these
changes and the church's needs in terms of ministerial edu-
cation. Provisions have been made from the college’s begin-
ning for continuing institutional research, curriculum study
and revision, in student guidance.
In all these studies we need to insure that measures
taken today will contribute to the long-range health of the
ministerial training program and we assume that the only
valid reason for the church to own and support colleges is
to prepare workers who are sensitive not only to the prob-
lems of our complex contemporary society, but who are
specifically oriented to theological, spiritual, pastoral minis-
try in distinction from the clinical approach of nonchurch
workers in such fields of counselling and other social work
activity. Sound stewardship principles clearly require this
Board and faculty to explore every possibility of developing
programs which respond in a meaningful way to the de-
mands of the current context in which the church does its
work.
In keeping with the recommendations of the Carnegie
Commission on Higher Education, Concordia Senior College
proposes to offer highly qualified high-school graduates the
opportunity to complete the requirements for the B. A. degree
by spending 3 years on the Concordia Senior College cam-
pus. It is predicated on the assumption that able and highly
motivated students can receive quality education in less
time. The purpose of the program is to attract highly quali-
fied voung men into the Lutheran ministry by placing the
preministerial requirements on the same level as those re-
quired for young men preparing for medicine, dentistry, law
and other professions, since many colleges and universities
offer a 3-year B.A. to these. The program is also intended
to shorten the ministerial program of such students and in
that way to provide opportunity for additional time of ser-
vice in the Lord’s kingdom.
Concordia Senior College believes that the introduction