Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 140
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 140
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
140 SEMINARY ISSUES
(Article VI, for example, acceptance of the confessional basis
of Article II, etc.); and
Wuereas, The Synod’s Handbook shows that the Synod’s
theological schools are to be directed and supervised ac-
cording to the doctrine and practice of the Synod within the
intent and resolutions of the Synod (6.03, 6.05, 6.21, 6.37,
6.39), acting as agents of the Synod; and
WHEREAS, The American Association of Theological
Schools (AATS) has placed Concordia Theological Semi-
nary of St.Louis on a 2-year academic probation because
of what it called undue outside interference in its operation,
which in fact was supervision by the President of Synod and
Synod’s Board for Higher Education according to constitu-
tional provision for supervision on the basis of theological
standards and doctrine; and
WuereEas, The AATS makes a theological judgment in the
question whether a certain professor has gone beyond the
limits of Lutheran doctrine, despite its constitution which
States that it will not involve itself in doctrinal matters of
a denomination: and
WHEREAS, The faculty and Board of Control of the semi-
nary have the option of appealing the decision of the AATS;
and
Wuereas, The President of the Synod has appointed
a committee to study the matter and to work out a God-
pleasing solution; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Michigan District in convention en-
courage the President of Synod and Synod’s Board for
Higher Education to remind the AATS to keep true to its
constitution by not involving itself in doctrinal matters of
a denomination; and be it further
Resolved, That in answer to the faculty's appeal for help
to remedy the situation we remind them of the Synod’s will
to supervise the doctrinal standards of our theological
schools through the Board of Control, Board for Higher
Education, and the Synod’s President on the basis of the
Synod’s historic position in doctrine and practice; and be it
finally
Resolved. That the Michigan District ask the Synod in
convention at New Orleans in 1973 to declare that the Synod
will not give up its controls of its faculties on the basis of
criticism of subjective judgments of accrediting agencies
such as the AATS. MIcHican District
Howard W. Kramer, Secretary
Similar:
3-87B
South Wisconsin District, Robert A. Schmidt, Secretary,
with substitution of final whereas:
Wuereas, The majority of the faculty of our St. Louis
seminary first requests help from members of the Synod
to remedy the situation which brought about the recent
action of the AATS, and it places the blame upon the
President of Synod and Synod’s Board for Higher Education
by declaring that neither the school’s faculty nor its Board
of Control was primarily responsible for the conditions
which led to the probation; therefore be it an
3-88
To Propose Updating of AATS Standards
Wuereas, The American Association of Theological
Schools has objected to the role of the Board for Higher
Education as defined by the synodical Handbook; and
WHEREAS, The AATS placed the Concordia Seminary,
St. Louis, on probation because of the Board for Higher Edu-
cation action in declining to give prior consent to the ap-
pointment of Dr. Arlis Ehlen to the faculty of Concordia
Seminary, St. Louis; and
Wuereas, The AATS standards fail to account for the
position of the Board of Higher Education within the LCMS
which is similar to the statewide governing and coordinating
boards in state educational systems; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Board of Control of Concordia Semi-
nary, St. Louis, call the attention of the AATS to the parallel
in authority and responsibility between these new statewide
governing and coordinating boards and the Board for Higher
Education; and be it finally
Resolved, That the Board of Control propose to the AATS
that its standards be updated to reflect this significant edu-
cational development. Trinity LUTHERAN CHURCH
Indianapolis, Ind.
William Harding, Secretary
3-89
To Protest Actions of AATS Toward
Concordia Seminary, St. Louis
Wuereas, The AATS accrediting agency makes a theologi-
cal judgment in the question whether a certain professor has
gone beyond the limits of Lutheran doctrine, despite its
constitution which states that it will not involve itself in
doctrinal matters of a denomination; and
Wuereas, Dr. Arthur Repp, President John Tietjen of
Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, and David Schuller are offi-
cers of the AATS, thus showing conflict of interest; there-
fore be it
Resolved, That the Synod in convention continue to de-
sire accreditation from the AATS only if the AATS apolo-
gize for its incursion into synodical affairs and promises that
Dr. Arthur Repp, President John Tietjen, and David Schuller
will neither be instrumental in nor involved in future deci-
sions regarding the seminary in St.Louis and its accredita-
tion. TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
Sturgis, Mich.
Bruce Schaeffer,Chairman
Albert Bumann, Secretary
H. M. Heidenreich, Pastor
3-90
To Challenge AATS on its Judgment
Whereas, The Commission on Accrediting of the Amer-
ican Association of Theological Schools has objected to the
actions of the President of Synod in carrying out his duties
under Article XI of the synodical Constitution; and
WHEREAS, The Commission on Accrediting has expressed
particular concern over the action of President Preus in ap-
pointing a Fact Finding Committee, charging undue inter-
ference of the synodical President in the affairs of Concordia
Seminary, St.Louis; and
Whereas, Kenrick Seminary, St.Louis, is accredited by
the AATS, and is governed by a Board of Directors made
up of the Archbishop of St. Louis, who serves as its Presi-
dent; the Vicar General and Chancellor of the Diocese of
St. Louis: and other members elected by the ex officio mem-
bers of the Board of Directors; and
WHEREAS, St. Thomas Seminary, Denver, is also accredited
by the AATS, and is governed by the Board of Trustees
made up of the Rector, appointed by the Vincentian Pro-
vincial, and four other members of the Vincentian Fathers
elected or reelected annually by the Board itself; and
Whereas, St. John University School of Divinity, College-
ville, Minn., is also accredited by the AATS, and is gov-
erned by a Board of Trustees consisting of the Chancellor,
three appointed and two elected members of the Order of
St. Benedict, and up to five other Trustees selected by the
Board of Trustees; and
Wuereas, It, therefore, appears that the AATS applies
different standards to different seminaries, objecting at Con-
cordia Seminary, to the interference of the synodical Presi-
dent, but accepting other Boards of Trustees made up largely
of church officials; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Board of Control of Concordia Sem-
inary be directed to protest to the American Association of
Theological Schools the unequal treatment of Concordia
Seminary, St. Louis, is receiving; and be it further
Resolved, That if satisfactory adjustment of this inequity
is not forthcoming, the Board of Control of Concordia Sem-
inary, St.Louis, and the Board of Control of Concordia