Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 137
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 137
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
a
SEMINARY ISSUES 137
with “The Gospel,” (Gospel reductionism, which considers
questions of historicity and historical accuracy in the Scrip-
ture irrelevant, provided the Gospel is not diminished or de-
nied): and be it further
Resolved, That we firmly confess the infallibility and in-
errancy of the Scriptures, in all its parts: and be it finally
Resolved, That we ask Synod in convention in New Or-
leans to join us in this affirmation of Scriptural inerrancy.
SoutH Wisconsin DIsTRICT
Robert A. Schmidt, Secretary
3-69
To Assure Adherence to Scripture and Not
Simply to a Mystic “Gospel Principle”
Wuereas, Individual Christians as well as some congrega-
tions of the Synod, conferences, and other groups have dur-
ing the past decade become increasingly apprehensive, du-
bious, and disturbed in regard to the alleged Scriptural
soundness of some theological views and approaches to Bible
interpretations on the part of certain instructors at some col-
leges and seminaries of the Synod; and
Wuereas, The Constitution of The Lutheran Church —
Missouri Synod (Article XI B 1-4 and Bylaw 2.29) imposes
upon the President of the Synod “the supervision regarding
the doctrine and the administration of: (a) all officers of
the Synod; (b) all such as are employed by the Synod”; and
Wuereas, Delegates of the Synod in convention at Mil-
waukee, July 9—16, 1971, specifically charged the Board of
Control of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, to take appropriate
action on the basis of the report of a fact finding committee
which had previously carried out the directive of the Presi-
dent to assess the Scriptural soundness of that seminary’s
faculty; therefore be it
Resolved, That the voters’ assembly of Grace congrega~
tion, Wayne. Nebr. support the action of President J. A, O.
Preus, Ph.D., in his efforts to carry out the directives of
the Milwaukee convention and to bring into focus specific
issues which need to be resolved: and be it further
Resolved, That we earnestly petition the responsible
board and:or the delegates assembled in convention at New
Orleans, July 6—13, 1973. to take necessary steps to assure
adherence to the sacred Scriptures of the Old and New
Testaments in their capacity as teachers of the Word as set
forth and more precisely defined in the Lutheran Con-
fessions and not simply in consonance with a mystic “Gospel
principle. Grace LUTHERAN CHURCH
Wayne, Nebr.
Charles R. Maier, Chairman
Howard R. Schmidt, Secretary
E. J. Bernthal, Pastor
3-70A
To Repudiate “Gospelism”
WuereEas, The faculty of Concordia Seminary. St. Louis,
Mo.. has issued a statement entitled Faithful To Our Calling.
Faithful To Our Lord. and in particular Part I, “A Witness
to Our Faith, A Joint Statement and Discussion of Issues’;
and
Wuereas, The seminary faculty in this document states,
“The message remains the same whether we consider the
text of Genesis 2—3 a literal historical account or some
other kind of literature” (p. 17), and “Biblical men of faith
operating with the same limitations of human language in
a given culture were moved by the Spirit to portray the
creative work of God in diverse ways (p. 13), and these
quotations in context make clear the position of the faculty
that the Biblical writers suffer from exactly the same human
limitations as noninspired writers as to the facticity of what
they convey, the Bible thus having no factual advantage
over non-Biblical material: and
Wuereas, The faculty also states that Christians are mis-
led when “they demand an absolute acceptance of each de-
tail of the miracle, precisely as it is reported, as a test of
their own faith and the faith of others” (p. 19), and that.
after all, a miracle such as the feeding of the five thousand
“was important only as a means of leading them to know
and trust in Jesus Christ” (p. 20), and these quotations in
context make clear that the facticity of New Testament mir-
acles is of no more consequence to the faculty than the
historicity of the Creation and Fall narratives, and thus faith
in Christ is separated from the miraculous events in His
life and allowed to float free without any necessary factual
grounding; and
Wuereas, The seminary faculty downgrades the authority
of the Bible in the areas of historicity and inerrancy by
claiming that it is “a misunderstanding of the nature of the
Gospel” to “insist on a public acceptance of the historicity of
every detail of the life of Jesus as recorded by the evange-
lists, as if that were a test of our faith” (p. 25). and that our
faith “rests in the promises of a faithful God. not in the ac-
curacy of ancient historians” (p. 26), thus placing the in-
spired writers on the same level as “ancient historians,”
with no better claim to precision or accuracy than they; and
Wuereas, It is clear from the foregoing that the Saint
Louis seminary faculty embraces the fideistic error of con-
temporary theology by which matters of belief are separated
from questions of Scriptural accuracy and it is alleged that
one can claim commitment to Christianity even while sub-
jecting all Biblical statements to nonfactual interpretation;
and
Wuereas, This position contradicts Luke's express claim
that his narrative derived from “those who from the be-
ginning were eyewitnesses” (Luke 1:1-4), and Peter's as-
sertion that “we did not follow cleverly devised myths when
we made known to you the power and coming of our Lord
Jesus Christ. but we were eyewitnesses of His majesty”
(2 Peter 1:16): and
Wuereas. This position is contrary to the New Testament's
own method of using historically factual events as proof of
the theological truth proclaimed (1 Cor. 15:3-19); and
Wuereas. The St. Louis seminary faculty endeavors to
eliminate the Bible as a basis for faith in the interests of the
Gospel by stating: To “begin with the assumption that the
doctrine of Scriptural infallibility guarantees the validity of
our theology” would not be Lutheran. “We, as Lutherans,
start with the Gospel of Jesus Christ.... We are saved by
grace through faith in Christ alone, not through faith in
Christ and something else, even if that something else be the
Bible itself” (pp. 20—21): and
Wuereas. The faculty thus puts the power of the Gospel
and the infallibility of the Scriptures that reveal that Gospel
in false opposition to each other, and thus in effect the fac-
ulty claims that a church can legitimately operate on the
basis of the central doctrine of the Scriptures (the Gospel)
without unqualified acceptance of the factual truthfulness of
the Scriptures: therefore be it
Resolved. That the Synod recognize that the St. Louis
seminary faculty has introduced a new theology alien to the
Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions; and be it further
Resolved. That the Synod _ reaffirm and uphold its Lu-
theran and doctrinal position that the infallible Scriptures
are the formal principle. the source of all doctrine. and the
standard by which all else is judged: and be it further
Resolved. That the Synod reject the “Gospelism” of the
St. Louis Seminary faculty as a false doctrine relegating the
Scriptures to the position of a fallible witness and thus en-
dangering the purity of the very Gospel itself; and be it
further
Resolved. That the Synod declare that the St. Louis semi-
nary has violated its solemn pledge and oath to be faithful
to the Holy Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions (Ar-
ticle II of the Constitution of The Lutheran Church — Mis-
souri Synod): and be it finally
Resolved, That the Synod direct the Board of Control to
remove from office all administrators and professors of the
St. Louis seminary who adhere to the unscriptural doctrinal
stance set forth in Faithful to Our Calling, etc., Part I.
BEAUTIFUL SAVIOR LUTHERAN CHURCH
Broomfield, Colo.
Virgil E. Balke, Chairman
Gordon Bundy, Secretary