Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 29

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 29

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

2. THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

REPORTS

2-01
Report of Commission on Theology
and Church Relations

Throughout its history the Commission on Theology and
Church Relations has provided study documents and state-
ments on a number of significant theological issues. It has
also been the Synod’s primary agency for carrying out its
ecumenical responsibilities with other Christians. During the
past biennium, the commission has again endeavored to be faith-
ful in carrying out its assigned functions and duties in these
areas.

Many of the issues considered by the commission during the
past biennium were assigned by synodical conventions. Several
questions were referred by the President of the Synod. In-
creased use of the commission for theological evaluations and
opinions has been made by boards of control, Districts, District
officials and others. The commission worked together with other
boards and commissions of the Synod on topics jointly assigned
by synodical conventions. It continued to supervise the work of
the Exchange Study Committee and the Bible Versions Com-
mittee. A great deal of time and effort was spent in conducting
conferences and workshops throughout the Synod. The com-
mission has been increasingly involved in representing the
Synod in meetings with other churches and with ecumenical
agencies.

Because of delays in the appointment of new members of
the commission following the 1971 synodical convention, the
commission was unable to get its program for the new biennium
under way until January 1972. During the past biennium, the
commission met in nine plenary sessions averaging 3 days each.
There were also several sessions of its various committees.

Dr. Ralph Bohlmann, who had been serving the commission
on a part-time basis, was elected to the office of Executive
Secretary in March 1972. Dr. Bohlmann was granted a leave
of absence from his teaching duties at the St. Louis seminary
for up to 2 years to enable him to accept the appointment. The
commission also had the part-time assistance of Pastor Harry
Huth and Mr. Gilbert Meilaender. In addition. the commission
sought and received the authorization from the Board of Di-
rectors to secure the services of an assistant executive secretary.
A call for nominations has been published and the election will
be held as soon as the nominations can be processed by the
Synodical Service Commission.

All but five members of the commission during the past bi-
ennium also served in the previous biennium. Of these new
members, one was elected by the Synod, one by the Council
of Presidents, and two were appointed by the President. Dr.
Richard Schultz was appointed in May 1972 to fulfill the unex-
pired term of Dr. Bohlmann.

The officers of the commission during the past biennium were
Dr. Theodore Nickel, chairman: Dr. Henry Eggold, vice-chair-
man: Pastor Norbert H. Mueller, secretary. The commission, to
facilitate its work, divided itself into four study committees.
The officers of these committees were Dr. Howard Tepker,
Pastor Harry Huth, Dr. Arthur Nitz, and Pastor Roland Hop-
mann, chairmen: Dr. John Tietjen, Mr. Richard Korthals, Mr.
Lyle Saeger, and Mr. John Jass, secretaries. Members of the
Executive Committee were Dr. Henry Eggold. chairman: Pastor
Norbert H. Mueller, secretary: Dr. Edwin Weber, Dr. Frede
Mortensen, and Dr. Theodore Nickel: and, ex officio, President
Jacob Preus and Executive Secretary Ralph Bohlmann.

Other members of the commission were Dr. Richard Bar-
dolph, Dr. Erwin Sagehorn, Dr. Clarence Stuckwisch, Dr. Erich
Kiehl, Dr. Fred Kramer, Dr. Edgar Krentz, Dr. Paul Bretscher,
Mr. Norman Troyke, Dr. Herbert Mayer, Dr. Richard Schultz,
and Dr. Roland Wiederaenders, ex officio.

In the paragraphs below the commission reports its major
activities since the 1971 synodical convention and offers several
recommendations in the commission’s two areas of responsi-
bility: theology and church relations.

29

I. THEOLOGY

A. Biblical Interpretation

Conferences

Since its beginning in 1962, the commission has been devoting
considerable time to studies in Biblical interpretation. A number
of study documents have been prepared over the years. In 1969
and again in 1971, the commission recommended that con-
ferences and workshops be held throughout the Synod on the
issues involved in this area. Because of budgetary problems,
the commission was unable to carry out the recommendation
of the 1969 convention to hold such conferences. The 1971
synodical convention repeated the request that the commission
“include in this study the participation of the Districts of the
Synod through pastor-teacher conferences, to which laymen are
invited” (Res. 2-52). By means of a special grant from the Board
of Directors, this project was undertaken in the fall of 1972.
Since that time. more than 55 conferences have been held or
planned in 36 Districts of the Synod. The planning of these con-
ferences or workshops has always been undertaken in consulta-
tion with the responsible District officials.

The conferences have endeavored to discuss basic theologi-
cal questions without dealing in personalities or specific institu-
tions. They have had a threefold aim: (1) to provide information
on definitions, terminology, and issues involved in discussions
of Biblical interpretation today: (2) to offer guidance to the
church on the basis of documents prepared by the commission
throughout its history: and (3) to listen to the conference partici-
pants in order to determine where their actual questions and
concerns lie.

The program at these conferences has typically consisted of
four parts: (1) a presentation and discussion of the major em-
phases of the CTCR document entitled “A Lutheran Stance
Toward Contemporary Biblical Studies’: (2) an exegetical
presentation of a Biblical pericope illustrating how typical
contemporary historical-critical scholars approach the text,
and comparing their methodology with traditional methods of
Biblical interpretation: (3) a presentation and discussion of the
relationship between the Gospel and the Scripture, employing
as resource material the document prepared by the commission
on that theme: and (4) an open forum discussion period for ques-
tions and suggestions.

Although it is difficult to assess the results of such con-
ferences, the overwhelming majority of responses to them indi-
cate that they have been a very helpful means of involving par-
ticularly the pastors of the church in a discussion of critical
issues. Such conferences promise to provide a useful way of
dealing with other issues affecting the Synod.

Gospel and Scripture

One of the most important studies undertaken by the com-
mission in recent years dealt with the interrelationship between
Holy Scripture, which is the source and norm of theology (formal
principle), and the Gospel of Jesus Christ, which is the heart
and center of Lutheran theology (material principle). This study
was completed during the past biennium and shared with the
pastors and teachers of the Synod. (For the text of the document,
see the Appendix of this WORKBOOK.) The commission recom.
mends:

1. That the Synod commend the position paper entitled “Gos-
pel and Scripture” to its members for study and guidance.

Historical-Critical Method

Since its inception, the commission has been encouraged
to give a high priority to the completion of its study on Biblical
interpretation. Resolution 2-52 of the 1971 synodical convention
specifically called upon the commission to make a study and
evaluation of the historical-critical method. As a part of its study.
and in an effort to help the church understand the similarities
and differences between important aspects of historical-gram-
matical methodology and those of historical-critical methodology,
the commission has issued a document comparing these two
methods of Biblical interpretation. (For the text of this docu-