# LCMS Convention Workbook_St. Louis Missouri_1973_S262 # Machine transcription, uncorrected — CHI Digital Archive (demonstration) 260 HIGHER EDUCATION of the church for service. Spirited recruitment can best be done by spirited people who care about the future of the church of our Lord and who know full well that the future depends on an able ministry of the New Testament. Plant and Facilities Oct. 15, 1972, was a day of celebration because that was the date for the formal dedication of the new Herbert P. Buetow Memorial Music Center. This facility, announced to the Synod in our last report, has already proved to be a most productive, functional building. In addition to its instruc- tional use for quality music education for the church, the building serves many college needs and also the Districts and the community. Special paeans of praise should be re- corded in this report: Mrs. Herbert P. Buetow, Miss Dorothy Schoknecht, Dr. Henry Neils, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Schilling, the Minnesota South District, the Minnesota North District, the Aid Association for Lutherans, the Lutheran Brother- hood, and many other individuals combined to present a nearly million dollar facility to the assets of Synod at Con- cordia in St. Paul. Jan. 4, 1973, was another day of celebration as the doors were opened to the new Concordia College Union. This facility, too, has quickly proved to be a pleasant and helpful asset to the life of the school. Some financing is still needed from private sources for this project, but the students them- selves are to be credited with much of the impetus and most of the funds. Their fees will amortize the HUD subsidized oan, Other projects are in planning to improve the educa- tional opportunities and to enrich the campus life. An im- mediate priority is the creation of a new Art Department facility which will join the relatively new Administration Building to the new College Union. Conclusion Concordia’s primary purpose continues to be the prepa- ration of church workers for service in the Synod. Students, faculty, and administration are conscious of this purpose. We are thankful for the blessings of support from the Synod for the past 80 years. We face the future with commitment to the Great Commission of our Lord Jesus and implore the prayers and blessings of the Synod to sustain us in that commitment. The world and all its cultural components, the Synod and its institutions, may all together look very shaky at times. But we are hearing a voice that says, “In Thee, O Lord, do I put my trust ... for Thou art my rock and my fortress; ...I1 will be glad and rejoice in Thy mercy.” Boarp OF CONTROL Harvey Stegemoeller, Executive Officer Concordia Senior College Fort Wayne, Ind. The Board of Control of Concordia Senior College. with gratitude to God, who has graciously supported its efforts and has directed the course of the institution and kept His protecting hand over it, herewith makes its regular report to the convention of The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod. At a time when developments of deepest significance for the future welfare of the Synod and its entire system of ministerial education are being widely discussed, we wish to call attention to several items. A most fundamental issue in synodical higher education is whether it will remain a system of synodically owned and operated colleges and sem- inaries, each with a defined purpose and function in relation to other synodical schools, or will become a number of synodically related but academically self-contained and func- tionally independent educational institutions. The answer to this will affect the basic objectives of the Synod in higher education; and the vital specific relationship of the colleges and seminaries to each other and to the Synod. Nothing could be of more vital significance in the future welfare of the church than an erosion or weakening of the solid ministerial education foundation from which the Synod has derived basic strength and unity since its founding and to which it has committed enormous investments of thought, manpower, and funds during the past 125 years. We are aware that many strong voices are being raised calling for abandonment of the Synod’s junior college-senior college-seminary plan of ministerial education and, particu- larly, of the “systems concept” which it embodies and upon which it is predicated. This is happening at the very time when the dominant thrust of educational thought in higher education in both the public and private sectors to call for a movement toward consortia, cloisters, and other types of interinstitutional cooperation and collaboration similar to the type of working arrangement the Synod has had all these years on a national scale. There are now 28 separate upper- level colleges and universities in the United States. The major advantage of the Synod’s “system approach” is the avoidance of isolated, individual institutions carrying for- ward costly, wasteful, and unnecessary duplication of pro- grams and expansion in competition with each other. To propose so-called “equally effective alternate routes” to the ministry will weaken and eventually vitiate the validity of the fundamental concept and unique purpose of synodical activity and expenditures in the field of higher education. It has become commonplace to say that we live in an age of transition. The transition is that of a whole social order, an order that is still undergoing the severe strains associ- ated with rather fundamental shifts in national goals, atti- tudes, and values. Permeating all we see around us are rapidly shifting social and ethical norms — whether of col- lective or of personal behavior. Everyone is aware that colleges are part of this rapidly changing social environment and therefore undergo, like the broader society, periods of disorder, uncertainty, and even trauma. But what everyone does not perceive is that higher education has met, with a demonstrable suppleness, the strains of recent years and is emerging with rather remarkable strength envisioned. In any case, new conditions and opportunities lend urgent emphasis to the responsibility of the Synod’s colleges and seminaries to examine and reexamine the programs they offer to prepare effective ministers for service in the context in which the church must do her work. Concordia Senior College has not been insensitive to the changing social con- texts and ministerial needs in which members of the church carry forward our Lord's commission to preach, to teach, and live out the Gospel in the world. On the basis of 15 years’ experience, the college is attempting faithfully to meet its obligations to interpret the significance of these changes and the church's needs in terms of ministerial edu- cation. Provisions have been made from the college’s begin- ning for continuing institutional research, curriculum study and revision, in student guidance. In all these studies we need to insure that measures taken today will contribute to the long-range health of the ministerial training program and we assume that the only valid reason for the church to own and support colleges is to prepare workers who are sensitive not only to the prob- lems of our complex contemporary society, but who are specifically oriented to theological, spiritual, pastoral minis- try in distinction from the clinical approach of nonchurch workers in such fields of counselling and other social work activity. Sound stewardship principles clearly require this Board and faculty to explore every possibility of developing programs which respond in a meaningful way to the de- mands of the current context in which the church does its work. In keeping with the recommendations of the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education, Concordia Senior College proposes to offer highly qualified high-school graduates the opportunity to complete the requirements for the B. A. degree by spending 3 years on the Concordia Senior College cam- pus. It is predicated on the assumption that able and highly motivated students can receive quality education in less time. The purpose of the program is to attract highly quali- fied voung men into the Lutheran ministry by placing the preministerial requirements on the same level as those re- quired for young men preparing for medicine, dentistry, law and other professions, since many colleges and universities offer a 3-year B.A. to these. The program is also intended to shorten the ministerial program of such students and in that way to provide opportunity for additional time of ser- vice in the Lord’s kingdom. Concordia Senior College believes that the introduction