Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 357
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 357
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
IEEE IIe
354 SPECIAL AND SUNDRY MATTERS
11-17A
To Call English District Board of Directors
to Repentance
WHEREAS, The Nov. 5, 1972, English District Edition of the
Lutheran Witness carried a resolution of the Board of Di-
rectors of the English District adopted at a regular session
at Chicago, IIl., on Sept. 11-12, 1972; and
Whereas, The English District Board of Directors in the
resolution made a slanderous attack on Dr. J. A. O. Preus by
i i i attempts to usurp power” and of “vio-
lating the rights and privileges of the office of President con-
ferred on him by election”: and
Wuereas, The same resolution of the English District
Board of Directors stated, “we reject and repudiate Dr.
Preus’ imposition of his ‘Statement of Principles’ as a rule,
WHEREAS, The English District Board of Directors also at-
tacked Dr. Preus for “flagrant violation of the Bylaw pro-
vision (Section 2: 29) which limits the President's ‘exercise of
WuHerEas, The English District Board of Directors, on Jan.
31, 1973, withdrew their resolution from reconsideration
without referring to their slanderous and unbrotherly state-
ments concerning the synodical President so that this of-
fense still stands as a flagrant and public Violation of the law
of Christian love; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
in convention assembled call upon the English District Board
of Directors and the President of the English District to
apologize to the Synodical President for their intemperate
and unbrotherly language and slanderous accusations; and
be it finally
Resolved, That said apology be carried in the English Dis-
trict Edition of the Lutheran Witness.
BEAUTIFUL Savior LUTHERAN CHURCH
Broomfield, Colo.
Virgil Balke, Chairman
Gordon Bundy, Secretary
Similar:
11-17B
Trinity Ev. Lutheran Church, Bluffs, Ml, George Krusa,
President; Rev, Donald Kroll, Pastor.
11-18
To Thank the Synodical President
WHEREAS, The President of The Lutheran Church — Mis-
souri Synod, the Rev. Jacob A. O, Preus, Ph. D., D.D., has
acted courageously and demonstrated faithfulness to the
Lutheran Confessions, as they are also confessed by the
Constitution and the Resolutions of the LCMS; and
WHEREAs, President Preus has carried out the desires of
false doctrine in a pastoral way; and
WHEREAS, President Preus has received no or little co-
operation in the excercise of his duties from certain boards,
faculties, and other agencies in the LCMS; and
WHEREas, President Preus has not received full or com-
plete support from the District Presidents in following the
mandates of the LCMS; and
Whereas, President Preus has been publicly slandered in
the press, both secular and ecclesiastical: and
Whereas, In the midst of all these trials, sent by Satan,
he has remained Steadfast to the true faith of the Holy Bible
and the Lutheran Confessions; and
Wuereas, His personal and full commitment to the teach-
ings of the Lutheran church has exemplified itself in carry-~
ing out the duties, functions, and obligations of his office;
therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
assure President Preus of their prayers of gratitude and of
supplication for his continued perseverance in the true faith;
and be it further
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
also assure President Preus of their gratitude for his pastoral
concern in his attempts to remove false teachers from the
church and of their Support in continuing to carry out such
pastoral discipline. BEavtIFUL Savior LUTHERAN CuuRcH
Broomfield, Colo,
Virgil Balke, Chairman
Gordon Bundy, Secretary
11-19
To Determine an Ethical Question
WHEREAS, The President of the Synod, Dr. J. A. O. Preus,
has been attacked in many publications of the church be-
cause of his investigation of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis,
Mo.; and
WHEREAS, For example, the May 1972 issue of the Cresset
carried an editorial by John Strietelmeier entitled “Ortho-
doxy vs. Fundamentalisny” in which judgment is made that
Dr. Preus “is a fundamentalist" and in which his administra-
tion of his duties imposed upon him by the Constitution of
the Synod is referred to as “his bull-in-a-china-shop treat-
ment of the Seminary"; and
WHEREAS, The Synod at its Milwaukee convention adopted
a statement on ethics Proposed by the Council of Presi-
dents: and
WHEREAs, Publications of the type described above seem
to be in violation of this statement on ethics and seem to be
public attacks upon a brother in the faith: therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod,
in convention assembled at New Orleans, pass on the ques-
TRINITy Ey, LUTHERAN CHURCH
Bluffs, Ill.
George Krusa, President
Gary Vortman, Secretary
Donald Kroll, Pastor
11-20
To Rule on an Ethical Question
WHEREAS, The Southern Illinois Communicator, official
edition of the Lutheran Witness supplement in the Southern
Hlinois District, on Nov, 5, 1972, publicly condemned the
Fact Finding Committee for “deciding to stir the pot, peev-
ishy condemning Dr. Tietjen”: and
WHerEas, The statement in the Lutheran Witness referred
to by the Communicator was in defense of the Fact Finding
Committee following publication of stringent accusations by
President Tietjen against the committee in the columns of
the Lutheran Witness: and
WHEREAS, The Communicator thereby judges the Fact
Finding Committee without reference to the facts in the case
and without making a response Possible on the part of the
Fact Finding Committee: and
WHEREAS, This type of journalism in the Synod has be-
come common, namely, attacks upon the President of the