Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 357

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 357

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

IEEE IIe

354 SPECIAL AND SUNDRY MATTERS

11-17A

To Call English District Board of Directors
to Repentance

WHEREAS, The Nov. 5, 1972, English District Edition of the
Lutheran Witness carried a resolution of the Board of Di-
rectors of the English District adopted at a regular session
at Chicago, IIl., on Sept. 11-12, 1972; and

Whereas, The English District Board of Directors in the
resolution made a slanderous attack on Dr. J. A. O. Preus by
i i i attempts to usurp power” and of “vio-
lating the rights and privileges of the office of President con-
ferred on him by election”: and

Wuereas, The same resolution of the English District
Board of Directors stated, “we reject and repudiate Dr.
Preus’ imposition of his ‘Statement of Principles’ as a rule,

WHEREAS, The English District Board of Directors also at-
tacked Dr. Preus for “flagrant violation of the Bylaw pro-
vision (Section 2: 29) which limits the President's ‘exercise of

WuHerEas, The English District Board of Directors, on Jan.
31, 1973, withdrew their resolution from reconsideration
without referring to their slanderous and unbrotherly state-
ments concerning the synodical President so that this of-
fense still stands as a flagrant and public Violation of the law
of Christian love; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
in convention assembled call upon the English District Board
of Directors and the President of the English District to
apologize to the Synodical President for their intemperate
and unbrotherly language and slanderous accusations; and
be it finally

Resolved, That said apology be carried in the English Dis-
trict Edition of the Lutheran Witness.

BEAUTIFUL Savior LUTHERAN CHURCH
Broomfield, Colo.

Virgil Balke, Chairman

Gordon Bundy, Secretary

Similar:

11-17B

Trinity Ev. Lutheran Church, Bluffs, Ml, George Krusa,
President; Rev, Donald Kroll, Pastor.

11-18

To Thank the Synodical President

WHEREAS, The President of The Lutheran Church — Mis-
souri Synod, the Rev. Jacob A. O, Preus, Ph. D., D.D., has
acted courageously and demonstrated faithfulness to the
Lutheran Confessions, as they are also confessed by the
Constitution and the Resolutions of the LCMS; and

WHEREAs, President Preus has carried out the desires of

false doctrine in a pastoral way; and

WHEREAS, President Preus has received no or little co-
operation in the excercise of his duties from certain boards,
faculties, and other agencies in the LCMS; and

WHEREas, President Preus has not received full or com-
plete support from the District Presidents in following the
mandates of the LCMS; and

Whereas, President Preus has been publicly slandered in
the press, both secular and ecclesiastical: and

Whereas, In the midst of all these trials, sent by Satan,
he has remained Steadfast to the true faith of the Holy Bible
and the Lutheran Confessions; and

Wuereas, His personal and full commitment to the teach-
ings of the Lutheran church has exemplified itself in carry-~
ing out the duties, functions, and obligations of his office;
therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
assure President Preus of their prayers of gratitude and of
supplication for his continued perseverance in the true faith;
and be it further

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
also assure President Preus of their gratitude for his pastoral
concern in his attempts to remove false teachers from the
church and of their Support in continuing to carry out such

pastoral discipline. BEavtIFUL Savior LUTHERAN CuuRcH
Broomfield, Colo,
Virgil Balke, Chairman
Gordon Bundy, Secretary

11-19

To Determine an Ethical Question

WHEREAS, The President of the Synod, Dr. J. A. O. Preus,
has been attacked in many publications of the church be-
cause of his investigation of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis,
Mo.; and

WHEREAS, For example, the May 1972 issue of the Cresset
carried an editorial by John Strietelmeier entitled “Ortho-
doxy vs. Fundamentalisny” in which judgment is made that
Dr. Preus “is a fundamentalist" and in which his administra-
tion of his duties imposed upon him by the Constitution of
the Synod is referred to as “his bull-in-a-china-shop treat-
ment of the Seminary"; and

WHEREAS, The Synod at its Milwaukee convention adopted
a statement on ethics Proposed by the Council of Presi-
dents: and

WHEREAs, Publications of the type described above seem
to be in violation of this statement on ethics and seem to be
public attacks upon a brother in the faith: therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod,
in convention assembled at New Orleans, pass on the ques-

TRINITy Ey, LUTHERAN CHURCH
Bluffs, Ill.

George Krusa, President

Gary Vortman, Secretary
Donald Kroll, Pastor

11-20
To Rule on an Ethical Question

WHEREAS, The Southern Illinois Communicator, official
edition of the Lutheran Witness supplement in the Southern
Hlinois District, on Nov, 5, 1972, publicly condemned the
Fact Finding Committee for “deciding to stir the pot, peev-
ishy condemning Dr. Tietjen”: and

WHerEas, The statement in the Lutheran Witness referred
to by the Communicator was in defense of the Fact Finding
Committee following publication of stringent accusations by
President Tietjen against the committee in the columns of
the Lutheran Witness: and

WHEREAS, The Communicator thereby judges the Fact
Finding Committee without reference to the facts in the case
and without making a response Possible on the part of the
Fact Finding Committee: and

WHEREAS, This type of journalism in the Synod has be-
come common, namely, attacks upon the President of the