Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 339
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 339
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
EES: A CG, OSS
336 CHURCH LITERATURE AND COMMUNICATIONS
Suggestions in the future resolutions of the TV Board.”
(April 1973)
Your TV Board would like to summarize the chief recom-
mendations of the conference here for the record. Partici-
pants in the study are listed at the conclusion of this report
to the convention.
First of all, we are very pleased to report that there was
a most positive reaction to the Synod’s television ministry.
Our church has enviable rapport and a high reputation
among professional telecasting people. Of prime importance
is the reaction that our church has no need to “soft-pedal”
theology. In fact, the conferees were very comfortable with
the content and religious approach of This Is The Life.
Evaluation of “This Is the Life”
There was general consensus that This Is the Life (Life)
is an excellent product, that it stands apart as a leader
among religious TV programs, even after 22 years, and that
it is better than some commercial programs aired in after-
noon or evening time. It was the unanimous feeling among
the conferees that the Missouri Synod would be making a
serious mistake if it cut back, weakened, or dropped Life.
They strongly encouraged the Church to continue the pro-
gram and to enhance its impact.
“This Is the Life is a credit to the industry, to religion, as
well as to The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod,” they
said. Life communicates well, and “the name Lutheran Tele-
vision on a product is like sterling on silver!”
The evaluators divided the majority of good religious
television into three categories:
1. The personality-variety program for prime time, i.e.,
Billy Graham, Oral Roberts. They do well; it would be
foolish to compete.
2. “Other” commercial, religious programs, i. e., Katherine
Kuhlman, Day of Discovery, etc. Most buy time locally
and are not a strong national factor. They are all dif-
ferent in format, but none are primarily drama.
3. Dramatic programs like This Is the Life, and Insight.
The conferees felt that This Is the Life is distinctive, and
it stands almost alone in the field of religious drama. “If
there is an abiding succesful format over the past 25 years
of TV history, it has to be the dramatic story, and This Is
the Life is good drama! Don’t look for new formats; you
have a unique series now. Keep it, but refresh it!”
This Is the Life is over the 20-year mark and can be
strengthened. In a strengthening process Lutheran Tele-
vision would, in essence, release a “new” and fresh show
like the “new” Perry Mason, which would carry Life to new
penetration and success.
There were five specific recommendations to achieve an
expansion of This Is the Life penetration, to renew the
show, and to make it more effective as a witness to the
Gospel on behalf of Lutheran congregations,
1) The Missouri Synod should produce more episodes, up
to 26 per year.
2) We should introduce “continuing characters” — “per-
sonalities” to allow This Is the Life to be carried by a
personality a la Billy Graham or Marcus Welby, or an
updated Pastor Martin.
3) We should promote the package much more heavily
in local print advertising, both within the church
and with general public.
4) We should consider purchasing time in certain areas
to reach new, different, and larger audiences,
5) We should take advantage of the “booklet offer” to
gain financial support for our work from those out-
side the church who watch.
The first priority is to keep new production high. By
cutting back to 13, 18, or even 20 new episodes annually, the
church runs a real risk of “killing” the program. The point
was made that improving the format would not insure its suc-
cess if funds could not be obtained to release the program in
sufficient quantity — that a weekly public service dramatic
show cannot keep audience and station interest if the ma-
jority of its programs are reruns. Twenty-six new episodes
make a full complement for each season,
A nearly unanimous recommendation for freshening the
format was that Life might be strengthened by including
personalities around which stories could be built . . . the
“continuing characters” so commonly seen in most success-
ful TV programs. The conference saw the following po-
tentials:
A) Better identification for The Lutheran Church —
Missouri Synod.
B) A larger continuing audience (people tuning in week
after week to see a personality they have come to
know and identify with).
C) Better air time as stations see the enhanced audience
interest of Life.
D) Better promotion and PR potential for Life.
Lutheran Television was also urged to begin a more ag-
gressive national and local promotion effort for Life as a
means of counteracting new competition from locally pro-
duced religious programs.
The question was raised as to how Life could combat a
growing trend of stations placing sustaining (public service)
religion programming in earlier Sunday morning hours. Pur-~
chased time was mentioned as a possible solution, but some
conferees suggested that if Lutheran TV purchased time in
one market, we may be forced to purchase time in all
markets. There was a consensus that the question of pur-
chased time should be approached with caution, but re-
searched carefully as policies are changing daily in this area
and there is a real potential with purchased time to reach
different and greater audiences.
Evaluation of Seasonal Specials
There was very strong endorsement for the board's “fam-
ily special” activities for prime time evening television.
The evaluators were very complimentary about “Christ-
mas Is,” referring to it as “prime evening time program-
ming.” There was favorable comparison to evening network
progams such as the “Peanuts— Charlie Brown” specials,
and the Hallmark specials. They felt that Benji and Waldo
as “personalities” were very winning.
There was consensus that the Synod should place pri-
ority on “Easter Is” as a second special and that we utilize
“Christmas Is” as a “Christmas Classic” in prime time again
for 1973.
There was hope that the Board would add “seasons” (i.e.,
Christmas, Easter, Summer, or Thanksgiving) to the specials
lineup.
The general consensus was that children’s specials offer
an added dimension to the impact of Lutheran Television,
but that primary emphasis should also continue to be placed
on Life because of the importance of weekly impressions and
audiences.
Evaluation of the New “Tension Point” Series
The conferees saw very strong possibilities for using
Tension Point in congregations, but saw some challenge in
gaining widespread weekly use of the program as a half-
hour public service panel television show. “The idea of
Tension Point is excellent! Proceed, but expect only 13
weeks maximum in any given year.” It could be that three
or four episodes might be integrated into an existing panel
format carried by the station.
Evaluation of Television Spot Announcements
After viewing the experimental thirty-second “spots” for
children, the opinion of the conferees was that more study
should be done on how unchurched children are presently
being attracted to church. Should “spots” be aimed at un-
churched parents, motivating them to bring children to
church? (Should they be aimed at children alone? Should
they be aimed at one through the other?)
It was the unanimous consensus of the broadcasters that
Lutheran Television should not give up the basic concept or
the basic goal of these TV commercials in a “media-mix”
setting utilizing TV, print, and other media to focus the
theme.
Evaluation of Ten-Second Commercials
Lutheran Television’s ten-second 1971 Easter, July 4, and
Christmas slide commercials were viewed favorably with
the suggestion that they be continued.