Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 293

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 293

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

PARISH SERVICES AND YOUTH 293

_attention is currently being given to a variety of funding re-
sources, including federal aid

_the School Department has participated in the formulation
and work of a coalition of education groups known as Citizens
Relief for Education by Income Tax (CREdIT), which at-
tempts to help in the shaping and passage of federal legisla-
tion for financial aid to parents of nonpublic school children

_one section of “Performing Our Patterns” materials is de-
signed to aid in intensifying commitment.

Issue IV: Developing Outside Relationships
The Issue

People in public and nonpublic education should not think of
Lutheran elementary and secondary schools as opponents but
as partners in education. Educators, government officials, and
the general public should understand Lutheran schools, their
purposes and available programs, as unique educational options.
To eliminate misunderstandings and distrust and to develop ac-
curate and positive concepts of Lutheran schools we must:

—communicate to others the purposes and practices of our
schools

—capitalize on the expertise of those in other school systems
while sharing with them the dedication, insights, and talents
of Lutheran educators

—cooperate with chief school officers, administrators, and
teachers of local public and nonpublic schools and participate
in joint Conferences and education associations

_ inform educational and congressional personnel at the federal,
state, and local levels about Lutheran schools.

How the Board Has Confronted the Issue

_direct relationships and involvement on committees and in
meetings continue with the United States Office of Education

—information on Lutheran schools was shared with President
Nixon’s Commission on School Finance and his Panel for
Nonpublic Schools

—national level discussions were held with public school super-
intendents and national church leaders on the challenges and
needs of nonpublic schools

—the School Department was instrumental in the formulation
of a coalition of nearly all major nonpublic school systems
known as The Council for American Private Education
(CAPE). CAPE made it possible to share ideas and materials,
to represent nonpublic education to the government in an
organized manner. CAPE made it possible to testify in behalf
of Lutheran schools to the Senate Subcommittee on Education
and to the House Committee on Ways and Means, as well as
have consultations with individual Congressmen, education
officials, and White House aides.

How the Local Parish Can Confront the Issues

Lutheran congregations with schools are faced with a crisis
of opportunity. At no time has there been a more critical need
and opportunity to minister to the needs of mankind, to bring
reconciliation to the church, and to bring the peace of God to
all. At no time have we had the facilities, materials, communi-
cation resources, and personnel for carrying out our educational
mission that we have now.

Suggestions on how local congregations can confront the four
issues are in part implicit in the issues themselves, and in part
they were indicated specifically earlier in this report. Some of
the issues can be dealt with by the professional staff, but many
require lay consideration and board of education action. In
summary:

— Congregations and boards should recognize their teachers
as ministers of the Gospel, thus sharing in the responsibility of
strengthening morale:

—Congregations and boards should encourage professional
growth and make possible the utilization of growth opportuni-
ties, thus sharing in the responsibility for performing quality:

—Congregations and boards should rekindle in themselves
and others the desire to support Christian education sacri-
ficially, thus sharing in the responsibility of intensifying com-
mitment:

—Congregations and boards should urge the broadening
of contacts and associations with public and nonpublic edu-
eators, thus sharing in developing outside relationships.

How the Synod Can Confront the Issues

The four issues highlighted in this report are not new.
Synod’s congregations and its Board of Parish Education have
confronted them in varying degrees and varying ways in the
past. Today they stand out as issues demanding immediate and
sustained attention to meet present-day challenges.

In addition to the suggestions of this report, which are in-
tended to serve as guidelines for congregations and the Synod’s
Board of Parish Education for the future, many overtures could
be submitted to the New Orleans Convention to deal with the
various facets of each issue that call for united attention and
action.

However, in the interest of brevity. the number of overtures
is being held to a minimum. Four overtures were deemed im-
perative, each emphasizing one important aspect of an issue.
These overtures appear elsewhere in the CONVENTION WORK-
BOOK. In brief, the overtures expand on these four needs:

1) The strengthening of morale by giving consideration to the
status of the female teacher that she might be included on the
roster of Synod’s teachers, and receive consideration for pro-
fessional opportunities, status, and remuneration equal to those
of her male counterpart.

2) The performing of quality through continued utilization
of faculty in-service activities, continued provision for in-service
and leadership materials, with special attention given to the
needs and opportunities of early childhood education.

3) The intensifying of commitment through the communica-
tion of purpose, with special consideration toward funding of
Lutheran schools through a variety of sources including pro-
vision for tuition grants to the poor.

4) The developing of outside relationships by encouraging
school personnel to participate actively, where appropriate, in
the activities and meetings of local public and nonpublic school
personnel and other local and state level groups, including
government, that have educational concerns and jurisdiction.

VII. THE BOARD OF PARISH EDUCATION IS
COMMITTED TO BUILD ON WHAT IS GOOD IN OUR
PAST WHILE EXPLORING NEW POTENTIALS IN THE
FUTURE

A. Introduction

The Board of Parish Education and its staff are committed
to retaining what is good from our past. There is a deep com-
mitment to a strong program of Christian education not only by
the Board but also by the congregations of the Synod. The early
fathers of the Synod provided strong programs of Christian edu-
cation not only at the elementary level. They had plans for
secondary schools (Walther College in St. Louis), vocational
schools, and hopes for a university as the curriculum design
for the Perry County log cabin college shows.

Congregations today are equally concerned and therefore
plan to expand their programs from nursery to adulthood, in-
cluding new agencies and settings.

The Board’s research division is on the alert for data on
parish activities and programs that not only touch the achieve-
ments of the past but also challenge the possibilities of an even
stronger program of Christian education in the future.

Recent research such as the Study of Generations suggests
that Scripture knowledge is a positive factor. In its materials
the Board encourages continued and deepened Bible study by
even greater numbers, especially adults.

B. Research Projects Completed During Past Biennium

1. Comparison of teachers who attended the Church School
Teachers Convention in Washington and those who field tested the
Mission:Life curriculum in 1970-71

Teachers in the field test program as well as those attending
the Washington convention were less authoritarian and more
open to change than those in Dr. Earl Gaulke’s study of church
school teachers in 1968. Since the differences seldom reached
the level of statistical significance it may be that they actually
reflect a change in society rather than a difference in people.

The finding should reassure potential users of Mission: Life
that the material can easily be handled by the kind of teachers
who attend church school teachers conventions.