Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 293
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 293
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
PARISH SERVICES AND YOUTH 293
_attention is currently being given to a variety of funding re-
sources, including federal aid
_the School Department has participated in the formulation
and work of a coalition of education groups known as Citizens
Relief for Education by Income Tax (CREdIT), which at-
tempts to help in the shaping and passage of federal legisla-
tion for financial aid to parents of nonpublic school children
_one section of “Performing Our Patterns” materials is de-
signed to aid in intensifying commitment.
Issue IV: Developing Outside Relationships
The Issue
People in public and nonpublic education should not think of
Lutheran elementary and secondary schools as opponents but
as partners in education. Educators, government officials, and
the general public should understand Lutheran schools, their
purposes and available programs, as unique educational options.
To eliminate misunderstandings and distrust and to develop ac-
curate and positive concepts of Lutheran schools we must:
—communicate to others the purposes and practices of our
schools
—capitalize on the expertise of those in other school systems
while sharing with them the dedication, insights, and talents
of Lutheran educators
—cooperate with chief school officers, administrators, and
teachers of local public and nonpublic schools and participate
in joint Conferences and education associations
_ inform educational and congressional personnel at the federal,
state, and local levels about Lutheran schools.
How the Board Has Confronted the Issue
_direct relationships and involvement on committees and in
meetings continue with the United States Office of Education
—information on Lutheran schools was shared with President
Nixon’s Commission on School Finance and his Panel for
Nonpublic Schools
—national level discussions were held with public school super-
intendents and national church leaders on the challenges and
needs of nonpublic schools
—the School Department was instrumental in the formulation
of a coalition of nearly all major nonpublic school systems
known as The Council for American Private Education
(CAPE). CAPE made it possible to share ideas and materials,
to represent nonpublic education to the government in an
organized manner. CAPE made it possible to testify in behalf
of Lutheran schools to the Senate Subcommittee on Education
and to the House Committee on Ways and Means, as well as
have consultations with individual Congressmen, education
officials, and White House aides.
How the Local Parish Can Confront the Issues
Lutheran congregations with schools are faced with a crisis
of opportunity. At no time has there been a more critical need
and opportunity to minister to the needs of mankind, to bring
reconciliation to the church, and to bring the peace of God to
all. At no time have we had the facilities, materials, communi-
cation resources, and personnel for carrying out our educational
mission that we have now.
Suggestions on how local congregations can confront the four
issues are in part implicit in the issues themselves, and in part
they were indicated specifically earlier in this report. Some of
the issues can be dealt with by the professional staff, but many
require lay consideration and board of education action. In
summary:
— Congregations and boards should recognize their teachers
as ministers of the Gospel, thus sharing in the responsibility of
strengthening morale:
—Congregations and boards should encourage professional
growth and make possible the utilization of growth opportuni-
ties, thus sharing in the responsibility for performing quality:
—Congregations and boards should rekindle in themselves
and others the desire to support Christian education sacri-
ficially, thus sharing in the responsibility of intensifying com-
mitment:
—Congregations and boards should urge the broadening
of contacts and associations with public and nonpublic edu-
eators, thus sharing in developing outside relationships.
How the Synod Can Confront the Issues
The four issues highlighted in this report are not new.
Synod’s congregations and its Board of Parish Education have
confronted them in varying degrees and varying ways in the
past. Today they stand out as issues demanding immediate and
sustained attention to meet present-day challenges.
In addition to the suggestions of this report, which are in-
tended to serve as guidelines for congregations and the Synod’s
Board of Parish Education for the future, many overtures could
be submitted to the New Orleans Convention to deal with the
various facets of each issue that call for united attention and
action.
However, in the interest of brevity. the number of overtures
is being held to a minimum. Four overtures were deemed im-
perative, each emphasizing one important aspect of an issue.
These overtures appear elsewhere in the CONVENTION WORK-
BOOK. In brief, the overtures expand on these four needs:
1) The strengthening of morale by giving consideration to the
status of the female teacher that she might be included on the
roster of Synod’s teachers, and receive consideration for pro-
fessional opportunities, status, and remuneration equal to those
of her male counterpart.
2) The performing of quality through continued utilization
of faculty in-service activities, continued provision for in-service
and leadership materials, with special attention given to the
needs and opportunities of early childhood education.
3) The intensifying of commitment through the communica-
tion of purpose, with special consideration toward funding of
Lutheran schools through a variety of sources including pro-
vision for tuition grants to the poor.
4) The developing of outside relationships by encouraging
school personnel to participate actively, where appropriate, in
the activities and meetings of local public and nonpublic school
personnel and other local and state level groups, including
government, that have educational concerns and jurisdiction.
VII. THE BOARD OF PARISH EDUCATION IS
COMMITTED TO BUILD ON WHAT IS GOOD IN OUR
PAST WHILE EXPLORING NEW POTENTIALS IN THE
FUTURE
A. Introduction
The Board of Parish Education and its staff are committed
to retaining what is good from our past. There is a deep com-
mitment to a strong program of Christian education not only by
the Board but also by the congregations of the Synod. The early
fathers of the Synod provided strong programs of Christian edu-
cation not only at the elementary level. They had plans for
secondary schools (Walther College in St. Louis), vocational
schools, and hopes for a university as the curriculum design
for the Perry County log cabin college shows.
Congregations today are equally concerned and therefore
plan to expand their programs from nursery to adulthood, in-
cluding new agencies and settings.
The Board’s research division is on the alert for data on
parish activities and programs that not only touch the achieve-
ments of the past but also challenge the possibilities of an even
stronger program of Christian education in the future.
Recent research such as the Study of Generations suggests
that Scripture knowledge is a positive factor. In its materials
the Board encourages continued and deepened Bible study by
even greater numbers, especially adults.
B. Research Projects Completed During Past Biennium
1. Comparison of teachers who attended the Church School
Teachers Convention in Washington and those who field tested the
Mission:Life curriculum in 1970-71
Teachers in the field test program as well as those attending
the Washington convention were less authoritarian and more
open to change than those in Dr. Earl Gaulke’s study of church
school teachers in 1968. Since the differences seldom reached
the level of statistical significance it may be that they actually
reflect a change in society rather than a difference in people.
The finding should reassure potential users of Mission: Life
that the material can easily be handled by the kind of teachers
who attend church school teachers conventions.