Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 338

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 338

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

eee ee

CHURCH LITERATURE AND COMMUNICATIONS 335

time and will also afford another utilization for current and
past films.

Clay Whitehead. director of the President's Office of Tele-
Communications recently commented: “50°C of all American
homes will be on cable by the end of this century. There
will be no technical limit as to the number of channels a
home can view; there will be a limitation only by economics.
The public won't be limited to programs that must reach
40 million people to be successful. but will be choosing what
they want to see from the entire spectrum. This will offer
opportunity for less ‘prime time’ programming in that there
will be so many more channels and so much more pro-
gramming.”

Our church will also be able to take advantage of cable
outlets with This Is the Life. Pattern for Living, (a rerun
series) and Tension Point.

The Board continues to cooperate closely with the Mis-
sion Board and the overseas field men in the utilization of
programming and concepts for international mission out-
reach through television. Perhaps most notably, “Christmas
Is” was telecast in Beirut, Lebanon, this year. and This Is
the Life runs at 7:00 p.m. all over Holland on one of only
two television channels available to the Dutch population.

The staff is very active in working on local programming
with field missionaries, and in integrating This Is the Life
coverage in 34 countries with cur local mission presence.
Little time has been available to devote to the sporadic net-
work availabilities to our church through the CBS Series
“Look Up and Live™ and “Lamp unto My Feet,” and the
NBC “Directions” series. It is hoped that we can take further
advantage of these opportunities as they are cultivated in
the future.

An Invaluable Investment

The Synod has an invaluable, irreplaceable. and very
significant investment in a corporate television ministry. a
ministry which cannot function individually. or through
parishes alone, but which has been accomplished by God's
prace as a Synod for over 22 years.

In the Lutheran Laymen’s League, Synod has an ener-
getic. enthusiastic. and able cosponsor. Continuing strong,
positive, grassroots support for the TV ministry is plainly
evident in the important, generous financial contributions
made each year by the cosponsoring LLL. Cosponsorship
began in 1968 with $250,000; current LLL support is at the
$410,000 level for 1973.

On the basis of mutual long associations and a quality
product, Synod has the value of an enviable entree within
the communications media, which hold The Lutheran Church
_ Missouri Synod and its 20 years of experience in this area
in high regard. We have learned how to utilize this great
medium efficiently and with economy to carry the Good
News in Jesus Christ. In a nutshell, “We've Come a Long.
Long Way!”

Nationally distributed programs by Synod have created
open doors for our congregations, for our lay people, and
for the preaching of the Gospel, which we dare not shut.
But if we are to keep them open this year, next year, and
the next, we will need consecrated mission dollars.

TV Priority Moving Lower

With due concern for the fiscal dilemmas which have
faced the Synod and her Board of Directors now and then
over the past 5 years, it is nonetheless true that the tele-
vision ministry has not enjoyed growth together with the
other ministries of the Synod, and is in serious danger of
dilution and weakness at a crucial time which requires
strength, if Synod's objectives are to be accomplished.

Given the fact that the Synod accepted and welcomed
the cosponsorship of the Lutheran Laymen’s League in or-
der to reinforce the effectiveness and the forward thrust of
this ministry, the Television Board has found it increas-
ingly necessary to secure outside support. through one-time
grants, beyond our cosponsorship, not to expand, but merely
to stay alive and vibrant.

It was massive outside support that made our special
“Christmas Is” possible (CPH): a quarter million dollars
of outside support keeps This Is the Life strong today (AAL)
and the board is very grateful to the members of Aid Asso-
ciation for Lutherans for this generous grant for eight addi-

tional episodes of This Is the Life; outside support was nec~
essary for our experiment with television spot announce-
ments for children (LWML): and outside support developed
the shorter series, Tension Point (AAL). We are please
that these outside agencies understand and are sympathetic
to the opportunities that lie before us.

Synodical Support Declining

Synodical budget subsidy for the television ministry is
progressively and substantially declining. For the current
(1973) spending program in which the Synod’s budget was
raised, subsidy for Television is $537,721.00, the lowest sup-
port level since this ministry began 22 years ago, an 11%
reduction from last year, and an overall 21% reduction from
the $750,000 set side for TV in 1952, 22 years ago.

While our brethren in the LLL have raised their com-
mitments to Television 70°; since 1968, ($250,000 to $410,000),
synodical subsidy has fallen 24% (from $707,000 to $537,721)
in that period.

The declining synodical subsidy has impaired the service
and thrust of our television ministry to both the Synod and
to the unchurched public.

Synodical Resolutions Have Called for New Priority

Yet the Synod in her 1969 and 1971 conventions at Den-
ver and Milwaukee, recognizing the growth potential of
this significant means of spreading the Gospel in a contempo-
rary way, called for new priority for communication.

Resolved, That the Synod encourage and instruct the Board
for Lutheran Television to carry out the Great Commission of
our Lord to “preach the Gospe] to every creature’ in its area
of activity by continuing to explore and utilize more fully the
developing television opportunities at home and abroad.

Resolved, That the Synod allocate necessary funds to carry
out its previous action at Denver “to expand the use of media
of mass communications at home and abroad.” (MIL 10-19]

Resolved, That the Division of Communications be instructed
to present specific plans and projects with appropriate budgetary
requests for the 1973 New Orleans convention of the Synod for
action. [MIL 10-11}

Resolved, To re-evaluate priorities for the expanded use of
the media of mass communications in the proclamation of the
Gospel. {Denver 1-12]

While understandably dismayed over the ever-increasing
opportunity and need coupled simultaneously with decreas-
ing priority and subsidy support, your TV Board is mak-
ing every possible effort to give substance to the synodical
resolutions at Denver and Milwaukee.

Evaluation Conference

In order to plan as professionally as possible, and to carry
out the directives of the synodical resolutions to bring to
New Orleans new plans and budgets for an expanded use of
mass communication, the TV Board felt that an objective
analysis of the Synod’s TV work would prove helpful.

In order to achieve professional assessment of the past
and a projection of potential for the future, the Board for
Lutheran Television was privileged recently to sponsor an
evaluation conference. different in scope from those pre-
viously held. This conference was made possible by a gene-
rous grant from the members of Aid Association for Lu-
therans.

Twelve television professionals with broadly recognized
competence within the broadcast industry for creative pro-
gram development, marketing, and station relations, were
invited, Most of the men were not known previously to the
staff of Lutheran Television and most were not Lutheran.
Several members of the Synod’s Board of Directors were in
attendance, and our cosponsoring LLL management was also
invited.

The Board considers the input of the conference to be
very significant for the future of the Synod and this min-
istry, and the conference ranks in importance with previous
communication studies for Synod, i.e. the “Conley PR Re-
port,” the “Holt Radio Report,” the “Spitz Mass Media Re-
port.” and the “Temme Task Force” Report.

After study of the preliminary findings of the conference,
the Synod's Board of Directors resolved “to commend the
TV Board for holding the Evaluation Conference and en-
couraged it to study the recommendations made by the con-
sultants and to endeavor to implement their worthwhile