Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 338
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 338
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
eee ee
CHURCH LITERATURE AND COMMUNICATIONS 335
time and will also afford another utilization for current and
past films.
Clay Whitehead. director of the President's Office of Tele-
Communications recently commented: “50°C of all American
homes will be on cable by the end of this century. There
will be no technical limit as to the number of channels a
home can view; there will be a limitation only by economics.
The public won't be limited to programs that must reach
40 million people to be successful. but will be choosing what
they want to see from the entire spectrum. This will offer
opportunity for less ‘prime time’ programming in that there
will be so many more channels and so much more pro-
gramming.”
Our church will also be able to take advantage of cable
outlets with This Is the Life. Pattern for Living, (a rerun
series) and Tension Point.
The Board continues to cooperate closely with the Mis-
sion Board and the overseas field men in the utilization of
programming and concepts for international mission out-
reach through television. Perhaps most notably, “Christmas
Is” was telecast in Beirut, Lebanon, this year. and This Is
the Life runs at 7:00 p.m. all over Holland on one of only
two television channels available to the Dutch population.
The staff is very active in working on local programming
with field missionaries, and in integrating This Is the Life
coverage in 34 countries with cur local mission presence.
Little time has been available to devote to the sporadic net-
work availabilities to our church through the CBS Series
“Look Up and Live™ and “Lamp unto My Feet,” and the
NBC “Directions” series. It is hoped that we can take further
advantage of these opportunities as they are cultivated in
the future.
An Invaluable Investment
The Synod has an invaluable, irreplaceable. and very
significant investment in a corporate television ministry. a
ministry which cannot function individually. or through
parishes alone, but which has been accomplished by God's
prace as a Synod for over 22 years.
In the Lutheran Laymen’s League, Synod has an ener-
getic. enthusiastic. and able cosponsor. Continuing strong,
positive, grassroots support for the TV ministry is plainly
evident in the important, generous financial contributions
made each year by the cosponsoring LLL. Cosponsorship
began in 1968 with $250,000; current LLL support is at the
$410,000 level for 1973.
On the basis of mutual long associations and a quality
product, Synod has the value of an enviable entree within
the communications media, which hold The Lutheran Church
_ Missouri Synod and its 20 years of experience in this area
in high regard. We have learned how to utilize this great
medium efficiently and with economy to carry the Good
News in Jesus Christ. In a nutshell, “We've Come a Long.
Long Way!”
Nationally distributed programs by Synod have created
open doors for our congregations, for our lay people, and
for the preaching of the Gospel, which we dare not shut.
But if we are to keep them open this year, next year, and
the next, we will need consecrated mission dollars.
TV Priority Moving Lower
With due concern for the fiscal dilemmas which have
faced the Synod and her Board of Directors now and then
over the past 5 years, it is nonetheless true that the tele-
vision ministry has not enjoyed growth together with the
other ministries of the Synod, and is in serious danger of
dilution and weakness at a crucial time which requires
strength, if Synod's objectives are to be accomplished.
Given the fact that the Synod accepted and welcomed
the cosponsorship of the Lutheran Laymen’s League in or-
der to reinforce the effectiveness and the forward thrust of
this ministry, the Television Board has found it increas-
ingly necessary to secure outside support. through one-time
grants, beyond our cosponsorship, not to expand, but merely
to stay alive and vibrant.
It was massive outside support that made our special
“Christmas Is” possible (CPH): a quarter million dollars
of outside support keeps This Is the Life strong today (AAL)
and the board is very grateful to the members of Aid Asso-
ciation for Lutherans for this generous grant for eight addi-
tional episodes of This Is the Life; outside support was nec~
essary for our experiment with television spot announce-
ments for children (LWML): and outside support developed
the shorter series, Tension Point (AAL). We are please
that these outside agencies understand and are sympathetic
to the opportunities that lie before us.
Synodical Support Declining
Synodical budget subsidy for the television ministry is
progressively and substantially declining. For the current
(1973) spending program in which the Synod’s budget was
raised, subsidy for Television is $537,721.00, the lowest sup-
port level since this ministry began 22 years ago, an 11%
reduction from last year, and an overall 21% reduction from
the $750,000 set side for TV in 1952, 22 years ago.
While our brethren in the LLL have raised their com-
mitments to Television 70°; since 1968, ($250,000 to $410,000),
synodical subsidy has fallen 24% (from $707,000 to $537,721)
in that period.
The declining synodical subsidy has impaired the service
and thrust of our television ministry to both the Synod and
to the unchurched public.
Synodical Resolutions Have Called for New Priority
Yet the Synod in her 1969 and 1971 conventions at Den-
ver and Milwaukee, recognizing the growth potential of
this significant means of spreading the Gospel in a contempo-
rary way, called for new priority for communication.
Resolved, That the Synod encourage and instruct the Board
for Lutheran Television to carry out the Great Commission of
our Lord to “preach the Gospe] to every creature’ in its area
of activity by continuing to explore and utilize more fully the
developing television opportunities at home and abroad.
Resolved, That the Synod allocate necessary funds to carry
out its previous action at Denver “to expand the use of media
of mass communications at home and abroad.” (MIL 10-19]
Resolved, That the Division of Communications be instructed
to present specific plans and projects with appropriate budgetary
requests for the 1973 New Orleans convention of the Synod for
action. [MIL 10-11}
Resolved, To re-evaluate priorities for the expanded use of
the media of mass communications in the proclamation of the
Gospel. {Denver 1-12]
While understandably dismayed over the ever-increasing
opportunity and need coupled simultaneously with decreas-
ing priority and subsidy support, your TV Board is mak-
ing every possible effort to give substance to the synodical
resolutions at Denver and Milwaukee.
Evaluation Conference
In order to plan as professionally as possible, and to carry
out the directives of the synodical resolutions to bring to
New Orleans new plans and budgets for an expanded use of
mass communication, the TV Board felt that an objective
analysis of the Synod’s TV work would prove helpful.
In order to achieve professional assessment of the past
and a projection of potential for the future, the Board for
Lutheran Television was privileged recently to sponsor an
evaluation conference. different in scope from those pre-
viously held. This conference was made possible by a gene-
rous grant from the members of Aid Association for Lu-
therans.
Twelve television professionals with broadly recognized
competence within the broadcast industry for creative pro-
gram development, marketing, and station relations, were
invited, Most of the men were not known previously to the
staff of Lutheran Television and most were not Lutheran.
Several members of the Synod’s Board of Directors were in
attendance, and our cosponsoring LLL management was also
invited.
The Board considers the input of the conference to be
very significant for the future of the Synod and this min-
istry, and the conference ranks in importance with previous
communication studies for Synod, i.e. the “Conley PR Re-
port,” the “Holt Radio Report,” the “Spitz Mass Media Re-
port.” and the “Temme Task Force” Report.
After study of the preliminary findings of the conference,
the Synod's Board of Directors resolved “to commend the
TV Board for holding the Evaluation Conference and en-
couraged it to study the recommendations made by the con-
sultants and to endeavor to implement their worthwhile