Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 72
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 72
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
re
THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
~1
i)
apostolicity of the Church (Eph. 2:20), but on the very Lord-
ship of Christ, For this reason we reject them unconditionally.
This does not mean that we reject either reason or scholar-
ship. Quite on the contrary. We hold that it is the function of
Biblical interpretation to understand and apply the Bible as a
whole and in all its Parts. But everyone who takes the Reforma-
tion’s sola Scriptura seriously must insist that the proper func.
tion of reason, and thus of scholarship, is in every respect un-
der and not over Scripture — as handmaid. and not as mistress.
As emphatically as we reject any use of reason as master or
judge over Scripture, so we affirm the fullest use of reason,
with all its scholarly tools, as a servant, to understand and make
clear what the Sacred text says and means.
Literary -Historical Aspects and Sources
In keeping with the Statement made earlier it is not the in-
tention of this section to assert dogmatically what interpretation
of these difficult chapters or what approach to an interpretation
is alone possible Within the Church. And the Theses of Agree-
ment in Section I show how differences of interpretation must
be distinguished from church divisive differences over doctrine.
It is, however, necessary to state and confess what these chap-
ters teach:
1. The creation ex nihilo—a creation from nothing — as a
six-day work on the Part of God.
2. The creation by God of the first man. Adam. and the first
woman, Eve; and the creation of man as a mature, rational,
moral and responsible being in the image of God, that is, in true
righteousness and holiness, endowed with a perfect knowledge
of God’s will and in blissful relationship with his Creator,
4. The promise of the Saviour,
The statements of the chapters themselves are supported and
confirmed especially by the whole thrust of the New Testament
and many individual Passages of it (Rom. 5:12-21; 1 Cor. 15:
ff.; 1 Cor, 11:7-12: 1 Tim. 2:13 ff.), Clearly there -
fore the factual-historical framework of the Genesis narrative
is the indispensable foundation not only for the history of the
People of God which follows, but for the very Incarnation and
Redemption. Within this framework figurative elements are no
doubt to be found, But we must reject all interpretations which
be taken to represent not actual persons and events, but timeless
myths or parables of What happens to every man.
Mr. OLIVE LuruHeran CHURCH
Anoka, Mich.
Leslie Wagner, Secreta ry
Carl Pullmann, Pastor
Similar:
2-84B
Redeemer Lutheran Church, Wayzata. Minn., Al Lavan-
ger, President: Edwin Grimm, Secretary,
2-85A
To Insist on Scriptural Doctrine
of Original Sin
Whereas, The Scriptures clearly teach that Adam and
Eve were two real historical people, the progenitors of the
uman race, who by their Fall into sin brought sin and
death upon the entire human race, so that all born in the
natural way have inherited sin through their parents from
Adam (Gen. 2—3; Rom.5:12ff.: 1 Cor. 15:45 ff: 1 Tim. 2:
13 ff.) ; and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Confessions clearly assume the
same facts to be true (AC II, 1; Apol. XII,55; SA III, I, 1;
III, VIII, 5; FC Epit. I, 4; SD, I, 7, 9, 23, 27, 42): and
Wuereas, The Missouri Synod in convention assembled
firmed that such was the teaching of Scripture on the Crea-
tion, Fall, and related subjects: therefore be it
Resolved, That the Missouri Synod once again reaffirm its
position on these vital matters, recognizing that a Biblical
Position on such matters definitely impinges upon our teach-
ing concerning the Law and the Gospel: and be it further
Resolved, That the Synod reject every interpretation of
Scripture and our Confessions which undermines or denies
this historical position of Scripture and the Confessions com-
monly held among us, such as
which does not necessarily affirm the reality and historicity
of Adam and Eve and their fall into sin and the subsequent
hereditary sin which as a result passed on to all human
beings. (See St. Louis seminary statement: Faithful To Our
Calling; Faithful To Our Lord, I, 16—17)
b. the position that the historicity of the account of Adam
and Eve may be subjects of theological debate and not
touchstones of Biblical truth. (Ibid. II, 68)
mation about the historicity of the Fall but only tell us of
the native sinfulness of every human being as far back as
history goes. (Ibid. II, 118)
d. the position that the question whether Adam actually
lived on earth is ultimately Irrelevant (Ibid. II, 126); and be
it further
Resolved, That those in Synod who hold Positions of
teaching and teach any of the above aberrations be asked
to desist from their false doctrine and teach only the Bib-
lical doctrine and the historic position of our Confessions
and our Synod: and be it finally
CurIst LUTHERAN CHURCH
Coos Bay, Oreg.
Ed Schwartz, President
Gary Tonn, Secretary
Identical:
2-85B
Trinity Lutheran Church, Bend, Oreg., Walter A. Ander-
son, Pastor; Roy A. Scurlock, Secretary.
2-86
To Insist That ‘“Almah” in Isaiah 7:14
Means Virgin
WHEREAS. Faithful To Our Calling, Faithful To Our Lord
by the faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, says that
Isaiah “spoke of a young woman of his day giving birth to
a child named Immanuel and of a future roval figure with
throne names like “Mighty God’ and ‘Prince of Peace’ ”. and
Wuereas, God the Holy Spirit in the New Testament
(Matt.1:23) declares that the Hebrew Almah in Is.7:14
must be translated “virgin” and not “young woman”: and
WHEREas, Martin Luther, Walter Maier Sr., George Stoeck-
translated “virgin” (see “What Does Almah Mean?” by Wil-
liam Beck, Lutheran News, April 3, 1967; “Etymology and
Biblical Usage of ‘Almah’” by John E. Steinmueller, Cath-
olic Biblical Quarterly, January 1940: “Who Is ‘The Boy’ in
Isaiah 7:16?” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 1944, pp. 435—443) ;
and
Wuereas, Isaiah could not have been referring to the
birth of any child at his time since there has been only one
virgin birth; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
insist that all of its pastors and professors teach that almah
should be translated virgin and that almah in Is. 7:14 refers
to the virgin mother of Jesus Christ,
TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
New Haven, Mo.
Larry Scheer, Secretary
2-87
To Warn Against Charismatic Movement
WHEREas, An increasing number of Lutherans are joining
the Charismatic (modern tongues) movement: and
WHEREAS, This movement fails to stress the importance
of such Scriptural doctrines as the means of grace and jus-
tification by faith alone: and