Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 72

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 72

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

re

THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS

~1
i)

apostolicity of the Church (Eph. 2:20), but on the very Lord-
ship of Christ, For this reason we reject them unconditionally.

This does not mean that we reject either reason or scholar-
ship. Quite on the contrary. We hold that it is the function of
Biblical interpretation to understand and apply the Bible as a
whole and in all its Parts. But everyone who takes the Reforma-
tion’s sola Scriptura seriously must insist that the proper func.
tion of reason, and thus of scholarship, is in every respect un-
der and not over Scripture — as handmaid. and not as mistress.
As emphatically as we reject any use of reason as master or
judge over Scripture, so we affirm the fullest use of reason,
with all its scholarly tools, as a servant, to understand and make
clear what the Sacred text says and means.

Literary -Historical Aspects and Sources

In keeping with the Statement made earlier it is not the in-
tention of this section to assert dogmatically what interpretation
of these difficult chapters or what approach to an interpretation
is alone possible Within the Church. And the Theses of Agree-
ment in Section I show how differences of interpretation must
be distinguished from church divisive differences over doctrine.
It is, however, necessary to state and confess what these chap-
ters teach:

1. The creation ex nihilo—a creation from nothing — as a
six-day work on the Part of God.

2. The creation by God of the first man. Adam. and the first
woman, Eve; and the creation of man as a mature, rational,
moral and responsible being in the image of God, that is, in true
righteousness and holiness, endowed with a perfect knowledge
of God’s will and in blissful relationship with his Creator,

4. The promise of the Saviour,

The statements of the chapters themselves are supported and
confirmed especially by the whole thrust of the New Testament
and many individual Passages of it (Rom. 5:12-21; 1 Cor. 15:
ff.; 1 Cor, 11:7-12: 1 Tim. 2:13 ff.), Clearly there -
fore the factual-historical framework of the Genesis narrative
is the indispensable foundation not only for the history of the
People of God which follows, but for the very Incarnation and
Redemption. Within this framework figurative elements are no
doubt to be found, But we must reject all interpretations which

be taken to represent not actual persons and events, but timeless
myths or parables of What happens to every man.
Mr. OLIVE LuruHeran CHURCH
Anoka, Mich.
Leslie Wagner, Secreta ry
Carl Pullmann, Pastor

Similar:
2-84B

Redeemer Lutheran Church, Wayzata. Minn., Al Lavan-
ger, President: Edwin Grimm, Secretary,

2-85A

To Insist on Scriptural Doctrine
of Original Sin

Whereas, The Scriptures clearly teach that Adam and
Eve were two real historical people, the progenitors of the
uman race, who by their Fall into sin brought sin and
death upon the entire human race, so that all born in the
natural way have inherited sin through their parents from
Adam (Gen. 2—3; Rom.5:12ff.: 1 Cor. 15:45 ff: 1 Tim. 2:
13 ff.) ; and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Confessions clearly assume the
same facts to be true (AC II, 1; Apol. XII,55; SA III, I, 1;
III, VIII, 5; FC Epit. I, 4; SD, I, 7, 9, 23, 27, 42): and

Wuereas, The Missouri Synod in convention assembled

firmed that such was the teaching of Scripture on the Crea-
tion, Fall, and related subjects: therefore be it

Resolved, That the Missouri Synod once again reaffirm its
position on these vital matters, recognizing that a Biblical
Position on such matters definitely impinges upon our teach-
ing concerning the Law and the Gospel: and be it further

Resolved, That the Synod reject every interpretation of
Scripture and our Confessions which undermines or denies
this historical position of Scripture and the Confessions com-
monly held among us, such as

which does not necessarily affirm the reality and historicity
of Adam and Eve and their fall into sin and the subsequent

hereditary sin which as a result passed on to all human
beings. (See St. Louis seminary statement: Faithful To Our
Calling; Faithful To Our Lord, I, 16—17)

b. the position that the historicity of the account of Adam
and Eve may be subjects of theological debate and not
touchstones of Biblical truth. (Ibid. II, 68)

mation about the historicity of the Fall but only tell us of
the native sinfulness of every human being as far back as
history goes. (Ibid. II, 118)

d. the position that the question whether Adam actually
lived on earth is ultimately Irrelevant (Ibid. II, 126); and be
it further

Resolved, That those in Synod who hold Positions of
teaching and teach any of the above aberrations be asked
to desist from their false doctrine and teach only the Bib-
lical doctrine and the historic position of our Confessions
and our Synod: and be it finally

CurIst LUTHERAN CHURCH

Coos Bay, Oreg.

Ed Schwartz, President

Gary Tonn, Secretary
Identical:

2-85B

Trinity Lutheran Church, Bend, Oreg., Walter A. Ander-
son, Pastor; Roy A. Scurlock, Secretary.

2-86

To Insist That ‘“Almah” in Isaiah 7:14
Means Virgin

WHEREAS. Faithful To Our Calling, Faithful To Our Lord
by the faculty of Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, says that
Isaiah “spoke of a young woman of his day giving birth to
a child named Immanuel and of a future roval figure with
throne names like “Mighty God’ and ‘Prince of Peace’ ”. and

Wuereas, God the Holy Spirit in the New Testament
(Matt.1:23) declares that the Hebrew Almah in Is.7:14
must be translated “virgin” and not “young woman”: and

WHEREas, Martin Luther, Walter Maier Sr., George Stoeck-

translated “virgin” (see “What Does Almah Mean?” by Wil-
liam Beck, Lutheran News, April 3, 1967; “Etymology and
Biblical Usage of ‘Almah’” by John E. Steinmueller, Cath-
olic Biblical Quarterly, January 1940: “Who Is ‘The Boy’ in
Isaiah 7:16?” Catholic Biblical Quarterly, 1944, pp. 435—443) ;
and

Wuereas, Isaiah could not have been referring to the
birth of any child at his time since there has been only one
virgin birth; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church — Missouri Synod
insist that all of its pastors and professors teach that almah
should be translated virgin and that almah in Is. 7:14 refers
to the virgin mother of Jesus Christ,

TRINITY LUTHERAN CHURCH
New Haven, Mo.
Larry Scheer, Secretary

2-87

To Warn Against Charismatic Movement

WHEREas, An increasing number of Lutherans are joining
the Charismatic (modern tongues) movement: and

WHEREAS, This movement fails to stress the importance
of such Scriptural doctrines as the means of grace and jus-
tification by faith alone: and