Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 249

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 249

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Sheet 260 Page 6 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 277 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 273 Page 276 Page 283 Page 284 Sheet 301 Page 7 Page 286 Page 287 Page 288 Page 289 Page 290 Page 291 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Sheet 423 Sheet 424 Sheet 425 Sheet 426 Sheet 427 Sheet 428 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Sheet 432 Page 400 Sheet 434 Page 402 Sheet 436 Sheet 437 Sheet 438 Page 406 Sheet 440 Page 408 Sheet 442 Page 410 Sheet 444 Page 412 Sheet 446 Sheet 447 Sheet 448 Sheet 449 Sheet 450 Sheet 451 Sheet 452 Sheet 453 Sheet 454 Sheet 455 Sheet 456 Sheet 457 Sheet 458 Sheet 459 Page 427 Sheet 461 Page 430 Sheet 463 Page 432 Sheet 465 Sheet 466 Sheet 467 Page 436 Sheet 469 Sheet 470 Page 4 Page 440 Sheet 473 Page 442 Sheet 475 Page 444 Sheet 477 Page 446 Sheet 479 Sheet 480 Page 449 Page 450 Page 451 Page 452 Page 453 Page 454 Page 455 Page 456 Page 457 Sheet 490 Sheet 491 Sheet 492 Sheet 493 Sheet 494 Sheet 495 Sheet 496 Sheet 497 Sheet 498 Sheet 499 Sheet 500 Page 1 Page 470 Sheet 503 Page 472 Sheet 505 Page 474 Page 13 Page 476 Page 1 Sheet 510

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 249

tional increases have been announced by almost all schools for
the 1973-1974 school year.

As student fees have increased, the need for student financial
aid has risen sharply. The majority of the students in synodical
schools come from homes with low-middle to middle level in-
comes. Each significant increase in fees makes it necessary for
an additional large number of students to enter the group which
requires some aid. Also, summer and part-time jobs have
become less plentiful than in the past. Last year, over 63% of
the professional students enrolled received some financial sup-
port beyond that paid by the students and their immediate
families.

Prior to 1946 almost all student aid came from the Districts
of the Synod. Presently, of course, aid comes from many places.
However, the Districts continue to be the largest single source.
While the average amount per communicant spent for student
aid has continued to rise slowly, the percentage of the total
income of the Districts which is used for student aid is actually
only one half as large now as it was in the 1930s. A few Districts
continue to spend as little as 10 cents per communicant for stu-
dent aid.

The response of local congregations in supplying student
aid has been outstanding. About 20 percent of all aid now comes
from this source. More of the congregations which have no stu-
dents enrolled in a synodical school in a given year are encour-
aged also to include an amount for student aid in their regular
budgets. These funds can then, for example, be sent to one of
the colleges or seminaries for distribution to students with
financial needs who come from other parishes.

The board still feels that the need for financial assistance for
students from minority groups is severe enough to warrant
direct support from the Synod. It is most unfortunate that the
Board of Directors of the Synod was not able to implement the
resolution to this effect which was passed at the Milwaukee
convention.

The fourth area relates to securing more income from other
sources —“‘other” than synodical subsidy and student fees. Al-
though the amount from these “other sources” accounted for
only 10 percent of the total income last year, it has been growing
at a faster rate than either subsidy or student fees. In actual
dollar amounts over the past 10 years, synodical subsidy has
been increased by 55 percent, student fees by 130 percent and
“other sources” by 260 percent.

The trend toward making state funds available to students
in private and church-related colleges picked up momentum in
the past biennium. Many current efforts are aimed at finding
ways in which students can carry these funds across state lines.
Our colleges have continued to apply to the federal and state
governments “for funds from the grant and loan programs which
will make only positive contributions to the schools in the ful-
filment of the synodically approved objectives for the system,”
as directed by the Synod at the New York convention.

Our schools are receiving more funds each year from indi-
viduals, foundations, and other private and public organizations.
More “church funds” are being sought and received which are
not available to the congregations, Districts, or general Synod,
but which are available to the colleges.

—In Institutions

The colleges at Ann Arbor and Milwaukee presently have
requests before the Board for Higher Education for expansion
into 4-year institutions. Both schools have worked carefully
with the statements of the board which list the criteria for 2-year
colleges requesting to become 4-year schools. The board has
the authority, with the approval of the Board of Directors of the
Synod, the Council of Presidents, and the local board of control,
“to grant approval and to permit development of such carefully
prepared 4-year programs as serve the purposes of the church
and are economically feasible." The board has felt up to this
time that it would be unwise to expand any additional schools
into senior colleges. Further consolidation, at least in fiscal
operations, will be necessary, in the board's opinion, before any
additional expansions are ‘‘economically defensible.”

During the biennium, President Frantz of our school at Ed-
monton has been spending one day each week at the Lutheran
Theological Seminary in Saskatoon, teaching one course and
advising The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod students en-
rolled. Upon the suggestion of the Commission on Constitutional
Matters, the board is proposing a Bylaw change for the synodical
Handbook to help clarify the resolution of the Milwaukee con-

vention, 6-20, relating to Saskatoon. The suggested Bylaw itself
is among the overtures in the Convention Workbook.

Several additional items relating to individual institutions
in the future are simply listed here. Added information is avail-
able in the reports to the convention by the individual schools.

Alabama Lutheran College at Selma must move forward in
seeking accreditation for its college department, and major
attention is being given to this need. The board has approved the
combined recommendation of our colleges at Austin, Tex.:
Concordia, Mo.: and Winfield, Kans., that the three schools
continue as individual institutions, with added approved pro-
grams, more cooperative efforts, and regular evaluations and
reviews of progress. The board has scheduled a major review
for 1976 to consider possible consolidations or closings among
the three schools. The popularity of the concepts of high school
students beginning college work during their junior and senior
years has opened new opportunities for the synodica! high
schools. The long range use of the Oakland property has not
been determined. For the immediate future, it will be used by
a private high school association, led by members of the Synod
in the Bay area, to operate a Lutheran high school. The Irvine
school is now scheduled to open in 1975. Funding plans will
need to move forward quickly, however, if that date is to remain
viable. The difficulties being faced in South America in supply-
ing and supporting a program for the preparation of a profes-
sional ministry make it necessary that major attention be given
to our schools there in the next biennium. Study is continuing,
but has not been completed as yet, on the assignment given to
the board by the Milwaukee convention for a plan for “field
service of all seminary faculty members at regular intervals.”
The board feels strongly that accreditation by the St. Louis
and Springfield seminaries can and will be maintained.

—In Continuing Education

No really comprehensive program of continuing education
for pastors and teachers got under way during the past bi-
ennium. This is not to say that individual programs, conducted
by schools and Districts, were not conspicuously successful, but
certainly no reasonable goal in terms of numbers of persons was
attained. Apparently the right formula has not yet been found,
due perhaps to insufficient efforts and funds to develop that
formula by experimentation.

Most members of the Synod’s professional corps readily
agree that regular involvement in a systematic program of con-
tinuing professional education, renewal and refreshment is
greatly desirable, but this consensus did not seem to develop
into an effective demand at the point of purchase.

As profitable as continuing education is acknowledged to be,
most pastors and teachers resist any program that appears to
be mandatory or limited to one designated approach —and the
board has tended to agree. We must necessarily continue to
look for funds to undertake some rather bold experiments lead-
ing to the development of some “packages” which have good
salability.

But we do not want to give a dismal impression regarding
continuing education. Favorable attention should be directed to
the excellent financial support provided by the Aid Association
for Lutherans for a number of continuing education projects to
the successful summer and graduate programs at the seminaries
and teachers colleges, and to the Clergy cassette program, co-
sponsored by Concordia Publishing House and the Board for
Higher Education. The Family Life seminars supported by the
Wheat Ridge Foundation and the Boards of Parish Education,
Social Ministry, Missions, and Higher Education in collaboration
with the several Districts of the Synod, have seen similar
success.

The future possibilities for continuing education programs
still look excellent because of the almost universal popularity of
the concept. Congregations can help insure that adequate pro-
grams become a reality by providing for such areas as educa-
tional leaves (distinct from vacation periods) for their workers,
educational stipends, and book and cassette allowances.

Conclusion

As the colleges and seminaries of the church face the years
immediately ahead, we find we must refute some contentions
and support others.

One notion which needs to be dispelled is that the recent
years have seen the deterioration and destruction of something