Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1973 · 50th Convention › Page 249
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1973, Page 249
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Sheet 260
Page 6
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 277
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 273
Page 276
Page 283
Page 284
Sheet 301
Page 7
Page 286
Page 287
Page 288
Page 289
Page 290
Page 291
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Sheet 423
Sheet 424
Sheet 425
Sheet 426
Sheet 427
Sheet 428
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Sheet 432
Page 400
Sheet 434
Page 402
Sheet 436
Sheet 437
Sheet 438
Page 406
Sheet 440
Page 408
Sheet 442
Page 410
Sheet 444
Page 412
Sheet 446
Sheet 447
Sheet 448
Sheet 449
Sheet 450
Sheet 451
Sheet 452
Sheet 453
Sheet 454
Sheet 455
Sheet 456
Sheet 457
Sheet 458
Sheet 459
Page 427
Sheet 461
Page 430
Sheet 463
Page 432
Sheet 465
Sheet 466
Sheet 467
Page 436
Sheet 469
Sheet 470
Page 4
Page 440
Sheet 473
Page 442
Sheet 475
Page 444
Sheet 477
Page 446
Sheet 479
Sheet 480
Page 449
Page 450
Page 451
Page 452
Page 453
Page 454
Page 455
Page 456
Page 457
Sheet 490
Sheet 491
Sheet 492
Sheet 493
Sheet 494
Sheet 495
Sheet 496
Sheet 497
Sheet 498
Sheet 499
Sheet 500
Page 1
Page 470
Sheet 503
Page 472
Sheet 505
Page 474
Page 13
Page 476
Page 1
Sheet 510
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 249
tional increases have been announced by almost all schools for
the 1973-1974 school year.
As student fees have increased, the need for student financial
aid has risen sharply. The majority of the students in synodical
schools come from homes with low-middle to middle level in-
comes. Each significant increase in fees makes it necessary for
an additional large number of students to enter the group which
requires some aid. Also, summer and part-time jobs have
become less plentiful than in the past. Last year, over 63% of
the professional students enrolled received some financial sup-
port beyond that paid by the students and their immediate
families.
Prior to 1946 almost all student aid came from the Districts
of the Synod. Presently, of course, aid comes from many places.
However, the Districts continue to be the largest single source.
While the average amount per communicant spent for student
aid has continued to rise slowly, the percentage of the total
income of the Districts which is used for student aid is actually
only one half as large now as it was in the 1930s. A few Districts
continue to spend as little as 10 cents per communicant for stu-
dent aid.
The response of local congregations in supplying student
aid has been outstanding. About 20 percent of all aid now comes
from this source. More of the congregations which have no stu-
dents enrolled in a synodical school in a given year are encour-
aged also to include an amount for student aid in their regular
budgets. These funds can then, for example, be sent to one of
the colleges or seminaries for distribution to students with
financial needs who come from other parishes.
The board still feels that the need for financial assistance for
students from minority groups is severe enough to warrant
direct support from the Synod. It is most unfortunate that the
Board of Directors of the Synod was not able to implement the
resolution to this effect which was passed at the Milwaukee
convention.
The fourth area relates to securing more income from other
sources —“‘other” than synodical subsidy and student fees. Al-
though the amount from these “other sources” accounted for
only 10 percent of the total income last year, it has been growing
at a faster rate than either subsidy or student fees. In actual
dollar amounts over the past 10 years, synodical subsidy has
been increased by 55 percent, student fees by 130 percent and
“other sources” by 260 percent.
The trend toward making state funds available to students
in private and church-related colleges picked up momentum in
the past biennium. Many current efforts are aimed at finding
ways in which students can carry these funds across state lines.
Our colleges have continued to apply to the federal and state
governments “for funds from the grant and loan programs which
will make only positive contributions to the schools in the ful-
filment of the synodically approved objectives for the system,”
as directed by the Synod at the New York convention.
Our schools are receiving more funds each year from indi-
viduals, foundations, and other private and public organizations.
More “church funds” are being sought and received which are
not available to the congregations, Districts, or general Synod,
but which are available to the colleges.
—In Institutions
The colleges at Ann Arbor and Milwaukee presently have
requests before the Board for Higher Education for expansion
into 4-year institutions. Both schools have worked carefully
with the statements of the board which list the criteria for 2-year
colleges requesting to become 4-year schools. The board has
the authority, with the approval of the Board of Directors of the
Synod, the Council of Presidents, and the local board of control,
“to grant approval and to permit development of such carefully
prepared 4-year programs as serve the purposes of the church
and are economically feasible." The board has felt up to this
time that it would be unwise to expand any additional schools
into senior colleges. Further consolidation, at least in fiscal
operations, will be necessary, in the board's opinion, before any
additional expansions are ‘‘economically defensible.”
During the biennium, President Frantz of our school at Ed-
monton has been spending one day each week at the Lutheran
Theological Seminary in Saskatoon, teaching one course and
advising The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod students en-
rolled. Upon the suggestion of the Commission on Constitutional
Matters, the board is proposing a Bylaw change for the synodical
Handbook to help clarify the resolution of the Milwaukee con-
vention, 6-20, relating to Saskatoon. The suggested Bylaw itself
is among the overtures in the Convention Workbook.
Several additional items relating to individual institutions
in the future are simply listed here. Added information is avail-
able in the reports to the convention by the individual schools.
Alabama Lutheran College at Selma must move forward in
seeking accreditation for its college department, and major
attention is being given to this need. The board has approved the
combined recommendation of our colleges at Austin, Tex.:
Concordia, Mo.: and Winfield, Kans., that the three schools
continue as individual institutions, with added approved pro-
grams, more cooperative efforts, and regular evaluations and
reviews of progress. The board has scheduled a major review
for 1976 to consider possible consolidations or closings among
the three schools. The popularity of the concepts of high school
students beginning college work during their junior and senior
years has opened new opportunities for the synodica! high
schools. The long range use of the Oakland property has not
been determined. For the immediate future, it will be used by
a private high school association, led by members of the Synod
in the Bay area, to operate a Lutheran high school. The Irvine
school is now scheduled to open in 1975. Funding plans will
need to move forward quickly, however, if that date is to remain
viable. The difficulties being faced in South America in supply-
ing and supporting a program for the preparation of a profes-
sional ministry make it necessary that major attention be given
to our schools there in the next biennium. Study is continuing,
but has not been completed as yet, on the assignment given to
the board by the Milwaukee convention for a plan for “field
service of all seminary faculty members at regular intervals.”
The board feels strongly that accreditation by the St. Louis
and Springfield seminaries can and will be maintained.
—In Continuing Education
No really comprehensive program of continuing education
for pastors and teachers got under way during the past bi-
ennium. This is not to say that individual programs, conducted
by schools and Districts, were not conspicuously successful, but
certainly no reasonable goal in terms of numbers of persons was
attained. Apparently the right formula has not yet been found,
due perhaps to insufficient efforts and funds to develop that
formula by experimentation.
Most members of the Synod’s professional corps readily
agree that regular involvement in a systematic program of con-
tinuing professional education, renewal and refreshment is
greatly desirable, but this consensus did not seem to develop
into an effective demand at the point of purchase.
As profitable as continuing education is acknowledged to be,
most pastors and teachers resist any program that appears to
be mandatory or limited to one designated approach —and the
board has tended to agree. We must necessarily continue to
look for funds to undertake some rather bold experiments lead-
ing to the development of some “packages” which have good
salability.
But we do not want to give a dismal impression regarding
continuing education. Favorable attention should be directed to
the excellent financial support provided by the Aid Association
for Lutherans for a number of continuing education projects to
the successful summer and graduate programs at the seminaries
and teachers colleges, and to the Clergy cassette program, co-
sponsored by Concordia Publishing House and the Board for
Higher Education. The Family Life seminars supported by the
Wheat Ridge Foundation and the Boards of Parish Education,
Social Ministry, Missions, and Higher Education in collaboration
with the several Districts of the Synod, have seen similar
success.
The future possibilities for continuing education programs
still look excellent because of the almost universal popularity of
the concept. Congregations can help insure that adequate pro-
grams become a reality by providing for such areas as educa-
tional leaves (distinct from vacation periods) for their workers,
educational stipends, and book and cassette allowances.
Conclusion
As the colleges and seminaries of the church face the years
immediately ahead, we find we must refute some contentions
and support others.
One notion which needs to be dispelled is that the recent
years have seen the deterioration and destruction of something