Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1983 · 55th Convention › Page 334
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1983, Page 334
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
334
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS
Gud come to the point of being ina position to he reconsidered
axa person qualified to be entrusted once more with the powers
of the pastural office...
It is equally true that in the application of this teaching to
individual cases pastors may confront marriages which cannot
be preserved, even after long and serious attempts to do so. The
conflict between the Creator's primal ordinance and the broken-
ness of human life in a world characterized by our “hardness of
heart” will continue until the end of the age. In such circum-
stances the pastor is called on to deal with the brokenness of
human life in a sinful world while at the same time seeking
ways to affirm the Creator's will for marriage. These can only
be occasions for sorrow, repentance, and reaffirmation of God's
never-failing commitment to us.
A person who has obtained a divorce for unscriptural
reasons may under certain circumstances, with repentance as
the primary prerequisite. remarry. The absence of hope fora
reconciliation is also a consideration. and there may be other
pastoral concerns as well.
Those who are seeking a divorce for a reasin other than that
allowed by the Seriptures need tu be warned against the
danger uf “planned repentance.” Since genuins sorrow acer
nme’s sin auainst God and faith in the forget ness of Christ
belong to the essence of repentance, it gous witht suing that
tu proceed prema ditatively indoing that which une Kneis to be
contrary te God's will, with the intention uf becoming contrite
later, makes it impossible for faith and the Holy Spirit tu
remain tn the heart (2 Sam. 110 1 John tix 3:4. 5:18). Tu
proceed inseeuringa dirorer with the full knowledge that suck
an action is contrary te God's will with the intention of
becoming repentant at sume point inthe future is, therefore,
ta enter Into great spiritual peril t
id
Rerrarriage. Mora vat ” ‘ Tyson 141
work of Christ prevails within the hierarchy of marriage.
permanence of the marriage bond is assured.
To vnide rstand something af the sist tn which hu rarcha
ry marriage istuhe recommended ive should distinguish treo
surts of hierarchies: of funetion and af merits Heerarchis sal
Fanetion ccour wher those wha ire different are nevertheless
oF
united In an arganio nu nity which ix more than a eontrartual
association, Thais, for esam pl ie might eunsiderthe relatinn
uf parentand child. The parent ’slegitimat authorityuce rths
child is not based simply an the fact that the parent knows
more and has more esperiencs than the child. [f these were the
only considerations, we could ¢ qually ive tlassiqn children ta
uther adults tur ty same kind of state-run organizations for
their rearing. But the family isa fellowship, a community,
And the mombersufsuch anarganicunity hare different rales
to plain the Life of the while (EB ph. 61-42 Peter tlt Ws
mau think of Paul's refers ner ta the church as Christ’ hed
having maou members) Hence inn his rareha af function a
kind of imequalituafaathortyerists, Yetoue would seares ly
conclude fram this that ons nismber af the sarin tthe parent
was of great rcabe or rorth more thay an aths vtthe childs,
In referring to this his rarcha of fanetion uy are Ning
nothing mere than that in their comimion Life tuge thee sears
must lead and others follow ifthe characte ratthe anian isto he
marntarned and ther common lity sustrined,
Adithrentcrample may make clear whata hirrarch “ot
merit would involve, Woe grant that within the elussroun
teachers hare a legitimah authority, this ix nu dauht beenuse
of the knowledge the teachers hare acquired and are able te
impart, Lo hincever after class a teacher with no mecha nie!
ability skonid walk inte the parking lot sun find that his ear
will not start, any one of his students with mechaniea!
aptitude crimediately becomes his superior on a new pols
hit, Hierarchy here depends prvevs
Supe rloribe
relation poten Same
We maa note important differences he borer hierarchies
ufthe twa sorts, Hierarchiesuffanction are stable, The re
super and subordination du not change. Tn his reared u
ven the ralesare constantly chang ng, Hierarehiss
B. Headship Within Marriage
The principle which determines how husbands and wives
are to conduct themselves toward each other within the order of
marriage is that of mutual service (Eph. 5:21). Their attitude
toward each other's assigned role is to be shaped by their
recollection of the self-giving love of Christ for the church( Eph.
5:2)."For the Son of man also came not to be served but toserve,
and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). As the
church's Head devoted Himself totally to the needs of His
church. so the husband is to devote himself to the needs of his
wife. And as the church yields itself completely to the love. care.
and direction of the Lord. so the wife is to yield herself to her
husband.
The apostle's exhortation that husbands and wives “be
subject to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph. 5:21)
must not be interpreted to mean that there ceases to be
hierarchy within marriage. The call to mutual service pre-
supposes that an ordered relationship hetween husband and
wife exists. Under the principle of mutual service. however,
hierarchy within marriage is viewed not as a political relation-
ship of the ruler over the ruled but as an arrangement whereby
the welfare of the other may be served.
The Christian husband will therefore understand that the
position of headship has been entrusted to him for the exercise
of sacrifivial Jove toward his wife. Mindful of Christ's willing-
ness to suffer death for His beloved. the church. the husband
will seek to bind his wife to himself by love and gentleness. The
Christian wife will understand that. in requiring that she be
subject to her husband. God has put her in a position of
supporting her husband in his responsibility to care for those
who belong to his household. Such a relationship. which cannot
be equated simply with obedience, carries with it the honor of
accepting a role which the Son of God Himself assumed before
His Father (1 Cor. 15:28).**
Where mutual service of the kind we find in the life and
of nardtare tuid and ina cunstant state of change precisely
because noone merits saperord nation on all nspects of hte,
Weeanecensaythata surtufequality ss biailt itu hes rapes
of mieritin the sense thatthe y ineules a constant xe tafchunges,
Atay geen moment not equalitithat saps repaid saburdina-
tron pertein, However, these rolesare constantha shitting, and
revons as always in authority, Conssquntly, distinetions
which rest apan merit necer make om po rear head afitnoths r
per se. They du siuun
[tail
hesrarchiesaftunction for itwillabcaus
thatthe yshualderistatail isd
normal sort ty justify their eristenes, Weare aceustined te
aoeith pe speet te cortiin aetictus,
peer he difficult far people tude ng the gist nes of
healitth masts usa
ie
alt tages reasonsut
f some
superior attohute or ahilitu—one person merits headship
Yet oust these sorts uF reasons are ruled cut in diseussing
accept as reasons erplanations wha—on the ha
hierarchiss of funetian,
The Christian claim thata hierarchy of function— with
wife subordinate ta hushand—is appr
proceeds Fram the Ch
Hushand and with are not interchangeable ms miers afta
Prete ine Arie
istian clew af male and femal,
contractualasserintion, hears ne ners uf ahady.d anion.
Their pa rsurkond is proteeted not ha stressing that hath are
ing the d
nie ntal te the fellowship in whieh thy qeume to know the mse lors
persons hat ha empha
as mae and woman, in which, that is. theq reais theor
identity. Such a anion tn dace cannot come tu fructian apnless
the different roles uf husband and wife are reeugnind
Withuata aillingness tocomplementyach other in th sory. a
power struggle must ensue whenever dispiated matt rs arise
Without, that ix. a recognition hy hoth husband and wit ut
leqitimat authority within their aniun, the perinie nee at
that union is endangered, The insight of Ephesians 5 ques
des pestafterall: Permane ne and herarchy implysach athe r,
Afeu qualifications are still inorder, Hill te he ipfal te
note that several standard ohwetiuns tu hierarch withen
til te tuuch the position vatlined ahoce, Jt will
marriage |
aheags he Ceappraprearte th ask far some special rensan wha
the matraaghttacsercess headshiporerthe waman, athe ethan
the reason that God ordained the hur rarchy whiek
sts om
marriage. Any uther sack reasan wasid almost es rtnindy
Omiply some superar ability or merit on the pert uf ths
ood,
trate
hushand, hut that is net the suet ut besrarchs on
Sindlarlacadcacates cf the suhardinntian of wires
3h