Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1983 · 55th Convention › Page 334

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1983, Page 334

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

334

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS

Gud come to the point of being ina position to he reconsidered
axa person qualified to be entrusted once more with the powers
of the pastural office...

It is equally true that in the application of this teaching to
individual cases pastors may confront marriages which cannot
be preserved, even after long and serious attempts to do so. The
conflict between the Creator's primal ordinance and the broken-
ness of human life in a world characterized by our “hardness of
heart” will continue until the end of the age. In such circum-
stances the pastor is called on to deal with the brokenness of
human life in a sinful world while at the same time seeking
ways to affirm the Creator's will for marriage. These can only
be occasions for sorrow, repentance, and reaffirmation of God's
never-failing commitment to us.

A person who has obtained a divorce for unscriptural
reasons may under certain circumstances, with repentance as
the primary prerequisite. remarry. The absence of hope fora
reconciliation is also a consideration. and there may be other
pastoral concerns as well.

Those who are seeking a divorce for a reasin other than that
allowed by the Seriptures need tu be warned against the
danger uf “planned repentance.” Since genuins sorrow acer
nme’s sin auainst God and faith in the forget ness of Christ
belong to the essence of repentance, it gous witht suing that
tu proceed prema ditatively indoing that which une Kneis to be
contrary te God's will, with the intention uf becoming contrite
later, makes it impossible for faith and the Holy Spirit tu
remain tn the heart (2 Sam. 110 1 John tix 3:4. 5:18). Tu
proceed inseeuringa dirorer with the full knowledge that suck
an action is contrary te God's will with the intention of
becoming repentant at sume point inthe future is, therefore,
ta enter Into great spiritual peril t

id

Rerrarriage. Mora vat ” ‘ Tyson 141

work of Christ prevails within the hierarchy of marriage.
permanence of the marriage bond is assured.

To vnide rstand something af the sist tn which hu rarcha
ry marriage istuhe recommended ive should distinguish treo
surts of hierarchies: of funetion and af merits Heerarchis sal
Fanetion ccour wher those wha ire different are nevertheless

oF

united In an arganio nu nity which ix more than a eontrartual
association, Thais, for esam pl ie might eunsiderthe relatinn
uf parentand child. The parent ’slegitimat authorityuce rths
child is not based simply an the fact that the parent knows
more and has more esperiencs than the child. [f these were the
only considerations, we could ¢ qually ive tlassiqn children ta
uther adults tur ty same kind of state-run organizations for
their rearing. But the family isa fellowship, a community,

And the mombersufsuch anarganicunity hare different rales
to plain the Life of the while (EB ph. 61-42 Peter tlt Ws
mau think of Paul's refers ner ta the church as Christ’ hed
having maou members) Hence inn his rareha af function a
kind of imequalituafaathortyerists, Yetoue would seares ly
conclude fram this that ons nismber af the sarin tthe parent

was of great rcabe or rorth more thay an aths vtthe childs,
In referring to this his rarcha of fanetion uy are Ning
nothing mere than that in their comimion Life tuge thee sears
must lead and others follow ifthe characte ratthe anian isto he
marntarned and ther common lity sustrined,
Adithrentcrample may make clear whata hirrarch “ot
merit would involve, Woe grant that within the elussroun
teachers hare a legitimah authority, this ix nu dauht beenuse
of the knowledge the teachers hare acquired and are able te
impart, Lo hincever after class a teacher with no mecha nie!
ability skonid walk inte the parking lot sun find that his ear
will not start, any one of his students with mechaniea!
aptitude crimediately becomes his superior on a new pols
hit, Hierarchy here depends prvevs

Supe rloribe

relation poten Same

We maa note important differences he borer hierarchies
ufthe twa sorts, Hierarchiesuffanction are stable, The re
super and subordination du not change. Tn his reared u
ven the ralesare constantly chang ng, Hierarehiss

B. Headship Within Marriage

The principle which determines how husbands and wives
are to conduct themselves toward each other within the order of
marriage is that of mutual service (Eph. 5:21). Their attitude
toward each other's assigned role is to be shaped by their
recollection of the self-giving love of Christ for the church( Eph.
5:2)."For the Son of man also came not to be served but toserve,
and to give his life as a ransom for many” (Mark 10:45). As the
church's Head devoted Himself totally to the needs of His
church. so the husband is to devote himself to the needs of his
wife. And as the church yields itself completely to the love. care.
and direction of the Lord. so the wife is to yield herself to her
husband.

The apostle's exhortation that husbands and wives “be
subject to one another out of reverence for Christ" (Eph. 5:21)
must not be interpreted to mean that there ceases to be
hierarchy within marriage. The call to mutual service pre-
supposes that an ordered relationship hetween husband and
wife exists. Under the principle of mutual service. however,
hierarchy within marriage is viewed not as a political relation-
ship of the ruler over the ruled but as an arrangement whereby
the welfare of the other may be served.

The Christian husband will therefore understand that the
position of headship has been entrusted to him for the exercise
of sacrifivial Jove toward his wife. Mindful of Christ's willing-
ness to suffer death for His beloved. the church. the husband
will seek to bind his wife to himself by love and gentleness. The
Christian wife will understand that. in requiring that she be
subject to her husband. God has put her in a position of
supporting her husband in his responsibility to care for those
who belong to his household. Such a relationship. which cannot
be equated simply with obedience, carries with it the honor of
accepting a role which the Son of God Himself assumed before
His Father (1 Cor. 15:28).**

Where mutual service of the kind we find in the life and

of nardtare tuid and ina cunstant state of change precisely
because noone merits saperord nation on all nspects of hte,
Weeanecensaythata surtufequality ss biailt itu hes rapes
of mieritin the sense thatthe y ineules a constant xe tafchunges,

Atay geen moment not equalitithat saps repaid saburdina-

tron pertein, However, these rolesare constantha shitting, and

revons as always in authority, Conssquntly, distinetions
which rest apan merit necer make om po rear head afitnoths r
per se. They du siuun

[tail
hesrarchiesaftunction for itwillabcaus
thatthe yshualderistatail isd
normal sort ty justify their eristenes, Weare aceustined te

aoeith pe speet te cortiin aetictus,

peer he difficult far people tude ng the gist nes of

healitth masts usa

ie

alt tages reasonsut

f some
superior attohute or ahilitu—one person merits headship

Yet oust these sorts uF reasons are ruled cut in diseussing

accept as reasons erplanations wha—on the ha

hierarchiss of funetian,

The Christian claim thata hierarchy of function— with
wife subordinate ta hushand—is appr
proceeds Fram the Ch
Hushand and with are not interchangeable ms miers afta

Prete ine Arie

istian clew af male and femal,

contractualasserintion, hears ne ners uf ahady.d anion.
Their pa rsurkond is proteeted not ha stressing that hath are
ing the d
nie ntal te the fellowship in whieh thy qeume to know the mse lors

persons hat ha empha

as mae and woman, in which, that is. theq reais theor
identity. Such a anion tn dace cannot come tu fructian apnless
the different roles uf husband and wife are reeugnind
Withuata aillingness tocomplementyach other in th sory. a
power struggle must ensue whenever dispiated matt rs arise
Without, that ix. a recognition hy hoth husband and wit ut
leqitimat authority within their aniun, the perinie nee at
that union is endangered, The insight of Ephesians 5 ques
des pestafterall: Permane ne and herarchy implysach athe r,
Afeu qualifications are still inorder, Hill te he ipfal te
note that several standard ohwetiuns tu hierarch withen
til te tuuch the position vatlined ahoce, Jt will

marriage |
aheags he Ceappraprearte th ask far some special rensan wha

the matraaghttacsercess headshiporerthe waman, athe ethan

the reason that God ordained the hur rarchy whiek

sts om

marriage. Any uther sack reasan wasid almost es rtnindy

Omiply some superar ability or merit on the pert uf ths
ood,
trate

hushand, hut that is net the suet ut besrarchs on

Sindlarlacadcacates cf the suhardinntian of wires

3h