Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1983 · 55th Convention › Page 91
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1983, Page 91
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 203
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Page 284
Page 285
Page 286
Page 292
Page 293
Page 294
Page 295
Page 296
Page 297
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Page 338
Page 339
Page 340
Page 341
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Page 346
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Page 357
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 367
Page 368
Page 369
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Page 373
Page 374
Page 375
Page 376
Page 377
Page 378
Page 379
Page 380
Page 381
Page 382
Page 383
Page 384
Page 385
Page 386
Page 387
Page 388
Page 389
Page 390
Page 391
Page 392
Page 393
Page 394
Page 395
Page 396
Page 397
Page 398
Page 399
Page 400
Page 401
Page 402
Page 403
Page 404
Page 405
Page 406
Page 407
Page 408
Page 409
Page 410
Page 411
Page 412
Page 413
Page 414
Page 415
Page 416
Page 417
Page 418
Page 419
Page 420
Page 421
Page 422
Page 423
Page 424
Page 425
Page 426
Page 427
Page 428
Page 429
Page 430
Page 431
Page 432
Page 433
Page 434
Page 435
Page 436
Page 437
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 91
logical foundation according to which social ministry pro-
grams may be evaluated and planned. The commission im-
mediately assigned this study to its Social Concerns Committee
and has been informed that the SCC has proceeded to carry out
the initial work on this assignment.
6. Church Discipline
At its September 1980 meeting the commission, at the
request of the President of the Synod, placed on its agenda a
study of church discipline and excommunication. From time to
time the commission has received inquiries from persons
seeking guidance as they deal with questions that often arisein
this area of pastoral care. The commission has assigned this
study to one of its standing committees.
7. Role of Women in the Church
In response to a 1977 request of the Synod that the CTCR
and its Social Concerns Committee give particular attention
“to studying and clarifying issues concerning woman suffrage
and women teachers’’ (1977 Res. 3-06), the commission is in the
process of preparing a study on the role of women in the church,
with special attention to be given to what the Scriptures and
Lutheran Confessions teach concerning the order of creation.
8. Church-State Issues
In May 1982 the President of the Synod asked the CTCR
and its Social Concerns Committee to review synodical docu-
ments, position papers, and other materials on the question of
church-state relationships and to report the results of this
review to his office. He noted that this request was occasioned
in part by a request from LCUSA asking its member bodies to
review their documents related to civil disobedience and report
on any necessary steps they might be taking ‘“‘to assure their
adequacy for this new context.” President Bohlmann also
indicated that the Board of Directors of the Synod requested
that a committee explore the whole matter of church-state
relationships in the light of issues which have surfaced in
recent discussions (tuition tax credits, prayerin public schools,
increased support in the voluntary sector, the peace question,
etc.). The commission has forwarded this assignment to its
Social Concerns Committee.
9. Studies on Scripture
Two studies related to the doctrine of Scripture are presently
on the agenda of the commission. The 1973 convention of the
Synod adopted a resolution presented from the floor requesting
the CTCR ‘‘to conduct an intensive study of the doctrine of
inerrancy and also of the traditional] interpretation of Genesis
1—3 and the interpretation of the Book of Jonah” (1973
Proceedings, p. 46). In addition to this assignment the com-
mission itself, noting 1975 Overture 3-126 (‘To Publish Theses
and Antitheses on the Term ‘Word of God. 1975 Workbook,
pp. 100—101), initiated a study of the “Word of God” in 1975.
The commission believes that these assignments address
critical issues in the area of contemporary Biblical studies and
hopes that it can complete these studies in the not too distant
uture.
10. Conscience and the Third Use of the Law
As the commission reported to the 1981 convention of the
Synod, the study of conscience and the third use of the Law was
placed on its agenda in response to a suggestion made by the
President of theSynod in his January 1975 report to the CTCR.
While recognizing that this issue continues to be a matter of
some concern, due to the press of other assignments the
commission has not given this study priority during the past
biennium.
11. The Charismatic Movement
In his report to the November 1982 meeting of the com-
mission, the President of the Synod expressed the need for the
CTCR to continue its evaluation of the goals and strategies of
the charismatic movement as indicated by leaders in the
movement. The commission has assigned this matter to one of
its standing committees to assist the commission in evaluating
and monitoring recent developments within the movement.
12. Christian Counseling
At the request of the CTCR, the Social Concerns Committee
has been conducting a basic study on “Christian Counseling.”
This assignment was made tothe SCC in response to inquiries
to the commission regarding the evaluation, from a Christian
perspective, of the various methods of counseling in use today.
C. Requests for Theological Opinions
1. Board for Mission Services Request Regarding Joint
Mission Work with Lutheran Mission in Thailand
The Board for Mission Services, through its executive
secretary, has requested an opinion from the CTCR on whether
or not it would be appropriate for the LCMS to carry out joint
mission work with the Lutheran Mission in Thailand (LMT),
an organization composed of Norwegian and Finnish mission
societies. (The Evangelical Lutheran Church of Hong Kong
has contributed funds to LMT but does not have personnel in
Thailand.)
In requesting this opinion the Board for Mission Services
has provided the CTCR with the following background in-
formation: (1) Due to governmental restrictions, affiliation with
the LMT is the only way that LCMS missionaries can enter
Thailand. (2) The Lutheran Mission in Thailand is an associ-
ation of mission societies affiliated with the state churches of
Norway and Finland. (3) The LCMS is not in altar and pulpit
fellowship with the state churches of Finland and Norway. (4)
One of the expressed purposes of LMT is the formation of a
new, confessional Lutheran Church in Thailand.
On the basis of this information, the CTCR understands the
fundamental question before it to be the following: Is it
consistent with the fellowship principles of the LCMS for the
Synod through the Board for Mission Services to join an
agency which willinvolve synodical missionaries in acommon
ministry of Word and Sacrament with missionaries of mission
societies associated with church bodies not in altar and pulpit
fellowship with the LCMS?
In response to this question, the CTCR offers the following
opinion: The Board for Mission Services may join an agency in
behalf of the Synod which will involve synodical missionaries
in a common ministry of Word and Sacrament with mission-
aries of mission societies associated with church bodies not in
altar and pulpit fellowship with the LCMS without violating
the fellowship principles of the Synod when the following two
conditions exist: (1) When one of the expressed purposes of the
agency is the formation of a new, confessional Lutheran
church where none presently exists; and (2) where there is
agreement in doctrine among the individual members of the
agency engaged in the common ministry.
In offering this opinion the commission emphasizes that it
is not rendering an opinion as to whether or not these
conditions do in fact obtain with respect to the situation in
Thailand. If the Board for Mission Services is inclined to
proceed in the direction of joining Lutheran Mission to Thai-
land, the commission recommends that the Board for Mission
Services request the President of the Synod to make provisions
for ascertaining whether the two conditions set forth above
exist in this situation. The commission further recommends, in
view of the differing views which it has received from the
partner churches of the Synod in response to its request for
assistance in offering this opinion, that, regardless of action
taken with reference to Thailand, the President of the Synod
request that a study of the meaning and implications of
fellowship be placed on the agenda of the next meeting of the
International Lutheran Conference, with special reference to
the theoretical issues involved in this opinion.
2. Luther’s *‘Anti-Semitic” Statements
In the summer of 1982 President Bohlmann forwarded
to the CTCR requests from the South Wisconsin District and
the Board for Evangelism Services for guidance regarding the
“anti-Semitic” statements of Luther such as those found in his
1543 treatise ‘On the Jews and Their Lies.” Dr. Bohlmann
asked the CTCR “to develop a statement for use by the various
boards, agencies. and individual members of the Synod as they
see fit in dealing with the above question.” The commission
recognizes that this is a matter of some sensitivity in certain