Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1983 · 55th Convention › Page 93

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1983, Page 93

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 203 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Page 284 Page 285 Page 286 Page 292 Page 293 Page 294 Page 295 Page 296 Page 297 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Page 338 Page 339 Page 340 Page 341 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Page 346 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Page 357 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 367 Page 368 Page 369 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Page 373 Page 374 Page 375 Page 376 Page 377 Page 378 Page 379 Page 380 Page 381 Page 382 Page 383 Page 384 Page 385 Page 386 Page 387 Page 388 Page 389 Page 390 Page 391 Page 392 Page 393 Page 394 Page 395 Page 396 Page 397 Page 398 Page 399 Page 400 Page 401 Page 402 Page 403 Page 404 Page 405 Page 406 Page 407 Page 408 Page 409 Page 410 Page 411 Page 412 Page 413 Page 414 Page 415 Page 416 Page 417 Page 418 Page 419 Page 420 Page 421 Page 422 Page 423 Page 424 Page 425 Page 426 Page 427 Page 428 Page 429 Page 430 Page 431 Page 432 Page 433 Page 434 Page 435 Page 436 Page 437

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS 93

Sarela’s letter and offered guidance as to how to respond to this
recent decision of the CLCF. Having reviewed all of the
correspondence carried on between the LCMS and the CLCF
since 1970, the commission advised President Bohlmann that
it found itself in agreement with observations made by Presi-
dent Preus in 1979 that since our Synod has never officially
broken fellowship with the CLCF, it should not be necessary
for the Synod to take any official action at its next convention
other than to acknowledge with thanksgiving the decision of
the CLCF. In keeping with this counsel, the CTCR recommends
the following resolution to the Synod for adoption:

WHEREAS, The Confessional Lutheran Church of Finland
has declared that it once again extends the hand of church
fellowship to The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. a re-
lationship which our churches enjoyed for nearly 50 years prior
to the CLCF'’s 1970 decision to suspend church fellowship with
the Synod; and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has
never officially broken fellowship with the CLCF: therefore be
it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod express its profound gratitude and praise to God for the
long history of fraternal association it has enjoyed with the
Confessional Lutheran Church of Finland and, especially now,
for the recent decision of this church to extend once again the
hand of church fellowship to our Synod; and be it further

Resolved, That in response to this overture of our brethren
in the CLCF the Synod reaffirm with thanksgiving church
fellowship with the CLCF; and be it finally

Resolved, That we petition our heavenly Father to continue
to enrich and strengthen in the days tocome the fellowship He
has given to the Synod and this our sister church.

c. Evangelical Lutheran Church—Synod of France
and Belgium

At its April 30—May 2, 1982, convention the Evangelical
Lutheran Church—Synod of France and Belgium (EEL—SFB)
adopted a number of resolutions relating to its relationship to
the LCMS. Of special interest to the Synod is Resolution
9, 82,‘Pulpit and Altar Fellowship with the Lutheran Church-
Missouri Synod,” in which the EEL—SFB expressed its desire
to “fervently and as quickly as possible .. . restore normal
relations” with the LCMS. Since 1969 the EEL—SFB has
remained in “a state of protesting and vigilant fellowship
(status confessionis)” with the Synod. However, in its 1982
Resolution 9/82 the EEL—SFB reported that, having evalu-
ated those factors which led to the 1969 decision of the Synod to
establish altar and pulpit fellowship with the ALC, it has
reached the conclusion that ‘‘very important steps have been
made, especially during the last vears, on the way to orthodoxy
and confessionalism.”

In this same resolution the EEL—SFB made known its
continued concern regarding LCMS’ membership in LCUSA,
inviting the Synod to provide the rationale for such member-
ship. Responding to this concern, the President of the Synod
referred the EEL—SFB to the CTCR’s 1977 evaluation of the
Synod’s membership in LCUSA and informed them of his
proposal] for a new inter-Lutheran agency in the USA.

The commission expresses its appreciation for the loving
and fraternal spirit which pervades the recent resolutions of
the EEL—SFB and for its kind words of encouragement and
prayer. It is the prayer of the commission that the Lord will
hasten the day when the EEL—SFB will see fit to once again
restore “normal pulpit and altar fellowship relations” with the

LCMS.

2. Evangelical Lutheran Church of Canada

The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has been in altar
and pulpit fellowship with the ELCC since 1969 (1969 Res.
3-16). The ELCC, formerly a district of The American Lutheran
Church, has been an autonomous church body since 1967.

Noting that the ELCC had decided in 1976 “‘to permit the
ordination of women to the pastoral ministry,” the 1977 LCMS
convention called upon the President of the Synod to appointa
committee “‘to initiate discussions with official representatives
of the ELCC on the doctrine of Scripture, the ordination of

women, and other possible differences” (1977 Res. 3-14). The
ELCC responded positively to the request from the LCMS to
make provision for a discussion of these issues, but the first
meeting of representatives of these two church bodies did not
take place until Jan. 6—8, 1983. The report of the LCMS
representatives to these discussions is attached to this report.
Initial discussions focused on the history of relationships
between these two churches. developments in Canadian
Lutheranism, and the CTCR’s report on “The Nature and
Implications of the Concept of Fellowship.” A second meeting
has been scheduled for June 8—9, 1983. to discuss the authonty
of Scripture and the ordination of women.

LCMS representatives to discussions with the ELCC are
Rev. Elroy Treit, president, Lutheran Church—Canada; Rev.
Ed Lehman. president, ABC District; Rev. Karl Koslowsky, Dr.
Samuel Nafzger. and Rev. Allen Schade.

The CTCR recommends:

That the Synod urge that continued discussions with the
ELCC take place during the coming biennium, with the prayer
that the disagreements between our two churches may be
resolved.

3. Other Lutheran Relationships
a. Lutheran Council in the U.S.A.

The members of the Lutheran Council in the U.S.A. are The
American Lutheran Church, the Association of Evangelical
Lutheran Churches, the Latvian Evangelical Lutheran
Church, the Lutheran Church in America, and The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod. The Commission on Theology and
Church Relations receives regular reports about the activities
of LCUSA from the President of Synod.

The commission's primary contact with LCUSA is through
the Division of Theological Studies (DTS). Representing the
LCMS on this committee are Dr. John Johnson, Concordia
Seminary, St. Louis; Dr. Samuel Nafzger, CTCR executive
secretary, and Dr. Michael Stelmachowicz, chairman of the
CTCR.

During the past biennium representatives from the LCMS
have participated in study conferences convened by LCUSA’s
Division of Theological Studies on in vitro fertilization and the
historic episcopate, in consultations with the Jews, and in a
free conference to discuss the World Council of Churches’
“Statement on Baptism, Eucharist and the Ministry’(BEM).

In the fall of 1982 President Bohlmann, following the
decision of three Lutheran church bodies in the Lutheran
Council (ALC, LCA, and AELC) to form a new church body,
prepared a proposal for a new inter-Lutheran agency. In
response to the President's request that the CTCR review this
proposal, the commission endorsed it and expressed the hope
that a new inter-Lutheran agency would be so structured that
al] Lutherans in this country would be able to participate in it
without compromising their principles of fellowship.

The CTCR recommends:

That the Svnod endorse the President of the Synod's
proposal for a new inter-Lutheran agency.

b. The American Lutheran Church

In 1981 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod declared
that it was no longer “in altar and pulpit fellowship with the
American Lutheran Church.” thereby bringing to an end a
relationship which had existed between them since 1969 (1981
Res. 3-01). Already in 1977 the Synod had entered a state of
“fellowship in protest” with the ALC because of doctrinal
differences in the areas of the inspiration and inerrancy of
Scripture, the ordination of women into the pastoral office, and
the nature and basis of fellowship (1977 Res. 3-02A). When four
years of intensive doctrinal discussions had produced no
progress toward resolving these disagreements, the Synod
concluded that it was necessary “with deep sorrow’ to bring to
an end an oOfficia] relationship which it has traditionally
understood to be based on agreement in doctrine and practice.

The CTCR is pleased to note that steps have been taken by
President Bohlmann to implement the commitment made by
the Synod in 1981 Res. 3401 ‘‘to pursue doctrinal discussions
with the ALC” and that the American Lutheran Church has