Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 282
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 282
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
182 THEOLOGY AND CHURCH RELATIONS
3-95
To Encourage Resumption of Discussions with RIM
Background Information
During 1991 and 1992 the President of the Synod facilitated
three discussions between Synod and RIM representatives “with a
view toward a God-pleasing resolution of differences” (1989 con-
vention Res. 3-15). These discussions resulted in considerable
progress toward this goal, which was reported in detail to the 1992
convention with the recommendation that further discussions be
held to seek resolution of remaining issues. Since 1992 RIM has
repeatedly been asking President Barry to resume these discus-
sions.
Finally in 1996 plans were underway to resume this important
task. President Barry and RIM appointed participants whose names
appeared in an official announcement in the Reporter. Then some-
one pointed out to President Barry that Dr. Ted Jungkuntz, one of
the RIM representatives. was no longer on Synod’s clergy roster.
Even though Dr. Jungkuntz was a full participant in the previous
discussions and was in the participant list in the aforementioned
Reporter announcement, President Barry insisted that Dr.
Jungkuntz could not be a participant in the resumed discussions
since he was no longer a member of Synod.
RIM then suggested to President Barry that Dr. Jungkuntz be
permitted to attend the resumed discussions but only as an “advi-
sor” to the RIM team with RIM even picking up his costs. Presi-
dent Barry declined this suggestion. RIM then postponed the
planned resumption of these talks until all attempts to have Dr.
Jungkuntz’s clergy status restored are exhausted since RIM be-
lieves his “Confessions expertise” is invaluable toward accom-
plishing the desired results of these talks and that he was removed
from the clergy roster illegally. (See overture “To Restore Dr. Ted
Jungkuntz’s CRM Status” elsewhere in the 1998 Convention Work-
book.)
Therefore we submit the following overture to the 1998 con-
vention of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod:
Wuereas, Both President Barry and RIM desire a resumption
of the discussions between the Synod and RIM representatives: and
Wuereas, Dr. Ted Jungkuntz provided much theological ex-
pertise in the previous discussions and would be an asset for a res-
olution of remaining issues: therefore be it
Resolved, That the President of the Synod involve Dr. Ted
Jungkuntz in future discussions between the Synod and RIM. and
be it further
Resolved. That these discussions be resumed at a time as de-
cided by Synod’s President in consultation with RIM.
Nazareth, Buffalo, NY; Holy Cross, Bordentown, NJ;
Trinity, Walden, NY; East Bethlehem, Detroit, Ml; Faith,
Geneva, IL; Bethlehem, Nekoosa, WI; Grace,
Streamwood, IL; Oak Road, Lilburn, GA; St. James,
Marion, IN; Faith, Sugar Land. TX; Zion, Holland, MI;
Grace, Huntsville, AL; Resurrection. Charlotte, NC
3-96
To Encourage Resumption of Discussions
with RIM
WHEREAS, It would be helpful for the church if both President
Barry and RIM resume discussions between Synod and RIM rep-
resentatives; and
WHEREAS. Dr. Ted Jungkuntz provided much theological ex-
pertise in the previous discussions and would be an asset for a res-
olution of remaining issues; therefore be it
Resolved, That the President of Synod involve Dr. Ted
Jungkuntz in future discussions between Synod and RIM; and be it
further
Resolved, That these discussions be resumed at a time as de-
cided by Synod’s President in consultation with RIM.
Gloria Dei
Houston, TX
3-97
To Reject Renewal in Missouri
Wuereas, Renewal in Missouri, consisting primarily of pastors
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS), seeks to make
the charismatic movement acceptable to the LCMS; and
WnerEAS, The CTCR has found Renewal in Missouri to be at
odds with the doctrinal position of the LCMS: and
WHEREAS, Renewal in Missouri has repeatedly been admon-
ished by the LCMS; and
WHEREAS, The continued affiliation of LCMS pastors with Re-
newal in Missouri risks an offense to the confession of the church,
which teaches, “... we should and must constantly maintain that
God will not deal with us except through His external Word and
Sacrament. Whatever is attributed to the Spirit apart from such
Word and Sacrament is of the Devil” (SA III, VIII 10); therefore be
it
Resolved, That pastors who will not sever their ties to Renewal
in Missouri by December 31, 1998, and send written notice of such
action to their District President and the synodical President, be de-
clared unrepentant false teachers; and be it further
Resolved, That the District Presidents be required to carry out
their obligation to remove unrepentant false teachers from the ros-
ter of Synod.
Our Redeemer, Forsyth, IL; Bethany, Fort Wayne, IN
3-98
To Affirm Support for RIM
WHEREAS, The Scriptures tell us to seek spiritual gifts (1 Cor.
14:1); and
WHEREAS, These gifts are part of the inheritance that all Chris-
tians can use and enjoy for the common good (1 Cor. 12-14); and
WuereEas, The Lutheran Confessions have a strong doctrine of
the Holy Spirit; and
Wuereas, Luther and the Lutheran Confessions allow for the
expression of spiritual gifts; and
WHEREAS, The Constitution of The Lutheran Church—Missouri
Synod gives as reason for the forming of a synodical union, that
“Our Lord’s will that the diversities of gifts should be for the com-
mon profit” (1 Cor. 12:4-31); and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has never
officially accepted a dispensational theology; and
WHEREAS, Renewal in Missouri has been used by God to revive
people in their faith and reintroduce them to spiritual gifts; and
WHEREAS, RIM has shown in its response to the CTCR docu-
ments on Charismatic Renewal that RIM is in agreement with the
LCMS; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention affirm its support for RIM and the work it carries on for
ongoing spiritual renewal in our church body and thus allow ortho-
doxy and spiritual renewal to have a positive leavening effect on
each other.
St. John
Glendale, NY