Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 74
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 74
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
74 SYNODICAL REPORTS
The following is a summary of the activities of the Internal
Audit Department during the triennium:
1. Districts of the Synod. The Department conducted financial
audits of 16 Districts and 7 related corporate District entities during
fiscal year 1995-96, 18 Districts and 10 related corporate District
entities in fiscal years 1996-97, and 17 Districts and 9 related cor-
porate District entities in fiscal years 1997-98. In all of the above
years, the Department reviewed financial audit reports prepared by
independent auditors of the remaining Districts.
Annually, the Department prepares a standardized reporting for-
mat for District independent auditors to comply with current gen-
erally accepted accounting principles for not-for-profit organiza-
tions and to promote uniformity in District financial reporting. This
format is utilized by the Internal Audit Department and most Dis-
trict independent auditors.
To enable District and Church Extension Fund Boards and per-
sonnel to evaluate the feasibility of joining the Lutheran Church
Extension Fund, a pre-entry review of District Church Extension
Funds was performed in one District during the last three fiscal
years. The results of this review assisted in the development of
policies and procedures for the orderly combination of District and
national Church Extension Funds.
2. Seminaries, colleges, universities, and high school. The
Department and independent auditors developed a joint-audit ap-
proach to implement the Single Audit Act at each of the synodical
educational institutions. During this triennium, this audit approach
was used at each institution annually. Additional audits of state-
funded student financial assistance programs, local foundations of
various educational institutions, and other federal assistance and
guarantees were performed jointly by internal audit and indepen-
dent auditors. The joint audit approach significantly reduced exter-
nal audit fees, standardized reporting requirements, maximized
audit efficiencies, and improved the timeliness of reporting.
In each of the last three fiscal years, the Department performed
a financial audit of St. Paul’s High School in Concordia, Missouri.
3. Departments and other entities. Annually the Department
performed a financial audit of Concordia Historical Institute and
the Office of Information Systems.
The Department performed and reported on operational audits
of the Family Initiative Council, Mission Services, and four Con-
cordia Plans service providers during the triennium and analyzed
financial data of social ministry organizations.
At the request of various boards, departments, and the Audit
Committee, special operational reviews were performed of selected
functions and activities. The results of these reviews were shared
with the Audit Committee and the respective requesting entity.
The Department provided staff assistance to the independent au-
ditors in the conduct of their audits of the financial statements of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, the Lutheran Church Ex-
tension Fund, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation,
and Worker Benefit Plans during each of the triennium years.
Charles E. Rhodes, Director
R4-06
Financial Aid Task Force
The “Financial Aid Task Force,” was asked by the President to
look into two issues:
¢ the level of financial support currently being provided to certain
retired church workers’ or their widowed spouses; and,
* the level of indebtedness facing rostered church workers’ within
our Synod where such indebtedness, generally, is attributed to
the burden associated with the cost of education.
It was then asked to provide proposed solutions that would ad-
dress these issues currently facing our Synod.
The Parameters
The parameters within which the task was undertaken, as above
outlined, are best summarized in the following 10 statements.
First, that our Synod has as two of its obligations (1) the
“(r)ecruit(ing) and train(ing of) pastors, teachers and other professional
church workers and provid(ing for them the) opportunity for their con-
tinuing growth” and (2) “(a)id(ing) in providing for the welfare of pas-
tors, teachers and other church workers, and their families in the event
of illness, disability, retirement, special need, or death” (Constitution,
Art. IL, 3 and 10).
Second, that the Board of Directors of the Synod under the authority
of 3.191 c of the Bylaws of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is
vested with the general management and supervision of the Synod’s af-
fairs which would necessitate assuring adequate assistance and support
for the church workers of our Synod whether in current service or re-
tired.
Third, that our Synod throughout its 150 years of existence, acting
under the grace of our Lord, has valued highly its professional church
workers.
Fourth, and as God’s Word directs us (e.g., Luke 10:7, Rom. 4:4
and } Tim. 5:18), that our Synod’s professional church workers are wor-
thy of their individual hire.
Fifth, that our Synod, under God’s Word as seen in Matthew
25:37-40—acting as a corporate entity, as organizations within that en-
tity and as individuals—is to be about serving those in need.
Sixth, that the issues of inadequate retirement funding and indebt-
edness of church workers are problems of the Synod as a whole.
Seventh, that in identifying these issues and preparing solutions for
them the Synod 4s being both people sensitive and people centered.
Eighth, that the recommendations of the Financial Aid Task Force
should be directed toward permanent solutions.
Ninth, that the solutions are to encompass both preventive (or pro-
active) ideas and remedial measures.
Tenth, that the solutions will necessarily involve multiple entities
within the Synod each taking ownership of a course of action within its
individual area of expertise.
The report is divided into two sections. The first will deal with
the issue of church worker indebtedness; the second will deal with
support of certain retired church workers or their widowed spouses.
In each section we first report the facts surrounding the identified
issue and then provide our recommendations (both preventive and
remedial).
The Issue: Professional Church Worker Indebtedness
The Facts
1. Total educational costs (meaning tuition, books, and room and
board) at our Synod’s colleges, universities, and seminaries are
typical and not out-of-line with such costs as seen in compara-
ble institutions. Accordingly, one can conclude that our syn-
odical educational institutions are acting responsibly in setting
realistic fees that generally reflect the cost of education today.
2. Total collegiate educational debt becomes further compounded
by four years of seminary education.
3. That added to educational debt at the college/university/semi-
nary is debt from the expenditure on legitimate living ex-
penses. It is this type of debi, i.e., expenditures on legitimate
living expenses and other needs such as medical coverage,
which is the underlying cause for the growing level of student
indebtedness.
4. That while the growth in educational indebtedness is not an in-
surmountable problem, no entity within our Synod has effec-
tively addressed the problem and no one entity can solve the
problem by itself.
5. That the average, recorded debt level (i.e., that known to the
institution), today, of graduates leaving our Synod’s colleges
and universities approaches $13,000, while at our seminaries
the figure approaches $15,000. That while such figures en-
compass direct loans they do not include either indirect bor-
rowing (e.g., through relatives) or the growing indebtedness
through credit cards. The level of “indirect” indebtedness will
likely remain unknowable due to the fact that the educational
institution is legally prohibited from inquiring about such in-
formation.
6. That reference, however, to an average debt level does not de-
pict the true situation.