Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 74

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 74

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

74 SYNODICAL REPORTS

The following is a summary of the activities of the Internal
Audit Department during the triennium:

1. Districts of the Synod. The Department conducted financial
audits of 16 Districts and 7 related corporate District entities during
fiscal year 1995-96, 18 Districts and 10 related corporate District
entities in fiscal years 1996-97, and 17 Districts and 9 related cor-
porate District entities in fiscal years 1997-98. In all of the above
years, the Department reviewed financial audit reports prepared by
independent auditors of the remaining Districts.

Annually, the Department prepares a standardized reporting for-
mat for District independent auditors to comply with current gen-
erally accepted accounting principles for not-for-profit organiza-
tions and to promote uniformity in District financial reporting. This
format is utilized by the Internal Audit Department and most Dis-
trict independent auditors.

To enable District and Church Extension Fund Boards and per-
sonnel to evaluate the feasibility of joining the Lutheran Church
Extension Fund, a pre-entry review of District Church Extension
Funds was performed in one District during the last three fiscal
years. The results of this review assisted in the development of
policies and procedures for the orderly combination of District and
national Church Extension Funds.

2. Seminaries, colleges, universities, and high school. The
Department and independent auditors developed a joint-audit ap-
proach to implement the Single Audit Act at each of the synodical
educational institutions. During this triennium, this audit approach
was used at each institution annually. Additional audits of state-
funded student financial assistance programs, local foundations of
various educational institutions, and other federal assistance and
guarantees were performed jointly by internal audit and indepen-
dent auditors. The joint audit approach significantly reduced exter-
nal audit fees, standardized reporting requirements, maximized
audit efficiencies, and improved the timeliness of reporting.

In each of the last three fiscal years, the Department performed
a financial audit of St. Paul’s High School in Concordia, Missouri.

3. Departments and other entities. Annually the Department
performed a financial audit of Concordia Historical Institute and
the Office of Information Systems.

The Department performed and reported on operational audits
of the Family Initiative Council, Mission Services, and four Con-
cordia Plans service providers during the triennium and analyzed
financial data of social ministry organizations.

At the request of various boards, departments, and the Audit
Committee, special operational reviews were performed of selected
functions and activities. The results of these reviews were shared
with the Audit Committee and the respective requesting entity.

The Department provided staff assistance to the independent au-
ditors in the conduct of their audits of the financial statements of
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, the Lutheran Church Ex-
tension Fund, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation,
and Worker Benefit Plans during each of the triennium years.

Charles E. Rhodes, Director

R4-06

Financial Aid Task Force

The “Financial Aid Task Force,” was asked by the President to
look into two issues:
¢ the level of financial support currently being provided to certain
retired church workers’ or their widowed spouses; and,

* the level of indebtedness facing rostered church workers’ within
our Synod where such indebtedness, generally, is attributed to
the burden associated with the cost of education.

It was then asked to provide proposed solutions that would ad-
dress these issues currently facing our Synod.

The Parameters

The parameters within which the task was undertaken, as above
outlined, are best summarized in the following 10 statements.
First, that our Synod has as two of its obligations (1) the
“(r)ecruit(ing) and train(ing of) pastors, teachers and other professional
church workers and provid(ing for them the) opportunity for their con-

tinuing growth” and (2) “(a)id(ing) in providing for the welfare of pas-

tors, teachers and other church workers, and their families in the event

of illness, disability, retirement, special need, or death” (Constitution,

Art. IL, 3 and 10).

Second, that the Board of Directors of the Synod under the authority
of 3.191 c of the Bylaws of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod is
vested with the general management and supervision of the Synod’s af-
fairs which would necessitate assuring adequate assistance and support
for the church workers of our Synod whether in current service or re-
tired.

Third, that our Synod throughout its 150 years of existence, acting
under the grace of our Lord, has valued highly its professional church
workers.

Fourth, and as God’s Word directs us (e.g., Luke 10:7, Rom. 4:4
and } Tim. 5:18), that our Synod’s professional church workers are wor-
thy of their individual hire.

Fifth, that our Synod, under God’s Word as seen in Matthew
25:37-40—acting as a corporate entity, as organizations within that en-
tity and as individuals—is to be about serving those in need.

Sixth, that the issues of inadequate retirement funding and indebt-
edness of church workers are problems of the Synod as a whole.

Seventh, that in identifying these issues and preparing solutions for
them the Synod 4s being both people sensitive and people centered.

Eighth, that the recommendations of the Financial Aid Task Force
should be directed toward permanent solutions.

Ninth, that the solutions are to encompass both preventive (or pro-
active) ideas and remedial measures.

Tenth, that the solutions will necessarily involve multiple entities
within the Synod each taking ownership of a course of action within its
individual area of expertise.

The report is divided into two sections. The first will deal with
the issue of church worker indebtedness; the second will deal with
support of certain retired church workers or their widowed spouses.
In each section we first report the facts surrounding the identified
issue and then provide our recommendations (both preventive and
remedial).

The Issue: Professional Church Worker Indebtedness

The Facts

1. Total educational costs (meaning tuition, books, and room and
board) at our Synod’s colleges, universities, and seminaries are
typical and not out-of-line with such costs as seen in compara-
ble institutions. Accordingly, one can conclude that our syn-
odical educational institutions are acting responsibly in setting
realistic fees that generally reflect the cost of education today.

2. Total collegiate educational debt becomes further compounded
by four years of seminary education.

3. That added to educational debt at the college/university/semi-
nary is debt from the expenditure on legitimate living ex-
penses. It is this type of debi, i.e., expenditures on legitimate
living expenses and other needs such as medical coverage,
which is the underlying cause for the growing level of student
indebtedness.

4. That while the growth in educational indebtedness is not an in-
surmountable problem, no entity within our Synod has effec-
tively addressed the problem and no one entity can solve the
problem by itself.

5. That the average, recorded debt level (i.e., that known to the
institution), today, of graduates leaving our Synod’s colleges
and universities approaches $13,000, while at our seminaries
the figure approaches $15,000. That while such figures en-
compass direct loans they do not include either indirect bor-
rowing (e.g., through relatives) or the growing indebtedness
through credit cards. The level of “indirect” indebtedness will
likely remain unknowable due to the fact that the educational
institution is legally prohibited from inquiring about such in-
formation.

6. That reference, however, to an average debt level does not de-
pict the true situation.