Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 269

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 269

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION 269

7-95

To Seek to Restore Robert Rahn to Ministerium

Wuereas, Robert Rahn has been removed from the ministerium
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and

WHEREAS, This removal by the Council of Presidents, upon the
suggestion of former District President John Heins, took place be-
cause information was withheld from them and incorrect informa-
tion was given to them; and

WhereEAS, His removal from office required only a majority
vote, but his reinstatement requires a 75 percent vote of the Coun-
cil of Presidents, which he did not receive when he sought rein-
statement; and

WuerEAS, He must wait three years before he can again seek
reinstatement; therefore be it

Resolved, That the Commission on Constitutional Matters be
asked to determine whether, on the basis of the evidence in this
case” Robert Rahn was properly removed from office.

St. Paul
Brookfield, IL

71-96

To Reinstate Robert Rahn to Clergy Roster of Synod

WHEREAS, Rev. Robert Rahn has not had his CRM (Candidatus
Reverendi Ministerium/Candidate for the Holy Ministry) status ex-
tended and was thereby removed from the ministerium of the
Synod; and

Wuereas, Rev. Robert Rahn has not been accused or found
guilty of false doctrine or of an immoral life; and

WherEAS, He cannot reapply for admission to the clergy roster
of the Synod for three years; and

WHEREAS, There are presently 300-400 men who are CRM sta-
tus and some whose CRM status goes back as far of 1984; and

WHEREAS, Two pastors of the congregation in which Rev.
Robert Rahn is a member have indicated that he is involved in a
Word and Sacrament ministry and was awaiting a call to serve; and

WhereEAS, Rev. Robert Rahn is the executive director of the
Lutheran Heritage Foundation whose sole purpose is to translate
and publish confessional Lutheran writing into languages which do
not have such writing, the most ambitious of which is the transla-
tion of the Book of Concord into eight languages which do not yet
have these historic writings of our faith; and

WHEREAS, There are many who have the CRM status who are
not actively involved in “church work,” whose CRM status was not
removed, therefore be it

Resolved, That the CID in convention by copy of this resolu-
tion request the Michigan District President to bring to the Council
of Presidents the matter of reinstating Rev. Rahn; and be it further

Resolved, That the Central Illinois District in convention memo-
rialize Synod in its 1998 convention to direct the Council of Presi-
dents to reinstate Rev. Robert Rahn to candidate status on the
LCMS Minister of Religion/Ordained roster.

Central Illinois District

7-97
To Restore Dr. Ted Jungkuntz’s Candidate Status

Background Information (Ex Post Facto)

On Sept. 12, 1985, Dr. Ted Jungkuntz was granted CRM status
(now called “Candidate Status”), When this occurred, Synod’s own
rule said that such status was good for three years. That meant that
Dr. Jungkuntz could remain on said status until Sept. 12, 1988.
However, in 1986 Synod altered the term of initial CRM status to
two years, and it was under this new rule (which should not apply
to Dr. Jungkuntz’s case) that he was removed from the synodical
clergy roster after only two years of his three-year CRM status.

This removal was illegal, for Dr. Jungkuntz should have been dealt
with under the rule which was in effect for him. Another sad fact in
this matter is that when he was removed from the clergy roster by
the Council of Presidents (COP) on Nov. 17, 1987, he was never
officially informed of this action (a breach of pastoral ethics). In
simple language, he was deprived of approximately one year of
CRM status and was removed from the roster without notification
or warning before his original three-year “time of grace” had
elapsed.

While it is certainly possible that the COP was ignorant of this
legal error at the time they took the above action, nevertheless an
error was made. In 1992 the Commission on Constitutional Mat-
ters (CCM) was asked to rule on this procedure. The CCM’s reply
was: ‘“‘As to the matter of a person who was granted candidate sta-
tus under the three-year rule, the Commission concludes that he
cannot be required to meet a two year-rule for initial candidate sta-
tus which was subsequently passed. The Bylaw may not be applied
ex post facto." While no names are mentioned, this ruling certainly
would apply to Dr. Jungkuntz’s request for the restoration of his
“lost year” of clergy status in the Synod. The COP was informed
by the Secretary of Synod of the CCM’s decision at least two times.
Page 68 of the 1995 Handbook gives information as to the mem-
bership and functions of the CCM. Bylaw 3.905 d states: “An opin-
ion rendered by the commission shall be binding on the question
decided unless and until it is overruled by a synodical convention.”
Perhaps the COP was unaware of its ignoring of 3.905 d. At any
rate, the CCM’s ruling should negate the COP’s action which re-
moved Dr. Jungkuntz from the clergy roster.

We have addressed these matters (especially the ex post facto
issue) to the COP a number of times and this matter has not been
corrected.

WHEREAS, The COP made a legal error by disregarding ex post
facto law in regard to the term originally granted Dr. Theodore
Jungkuntz (three years); and

WHEREAS, The COP made a pastoral error by not properly in-
forming Dr. Jungkuntz of any anticipated or actual change in his
candidate status; and

WHEREAS, The COP made an ecclesiastical error when it disre-
garded the CCM ruling on ex post facto matters even after this had
been brought to its attention relative to Dr. Jungkuntz; therefore be
it

Resolved, That the COP immediately restore the “lost year” of
his candidate status to Dr. Jungkuntz; and be it further

Resolved, That during this year the President of the appropri-
ate District meet with Dr. Jungkuntz to work together for a God-
pleasing resolution as to his future status; and be it finally

Resolved, That the convention direct the COP to apologize to
Dr. Jungkuntz for its procedural error as well as for its failure to
rectify the situation after the facts of the case had been brought to
its attention.

Zion, Holland, MI; Faith, Sugar Land, TX; Gloria Dei,
Houston, TX; Nazareth, Buffalo, NY; Holy Cross,
Bordentown, NJ; Trinity, Walden, NY; East Bethlehem,
Detroit, MI; Our Savior, Colonie, NY; Faith, Geneva, IL;
Bethlehem, Nekoosa, WI; Grace, Streamwood, IL; Oak
Road, Lilburn, GA; Resurrection, Charlotte, NC; Grace,
Huntsville, AL; St. James. Marion, IN

7-98

To Remove Pastors Involved in Renewal in Missouri
(RIM)
WHEREAS, Renewal in Missouri (RIM), issued chiefly by pas-

tors of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, seeks to make the
charismatic movement acceptable to the LCMS; and

WHEREAS, The RIM News/etter claims that more pastors are be-
coming interested in R/M’s charismatic position; and