Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 269
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 269
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION 269
7-95
To Seek to Restore Robert Rahn to Ministerium
Wuereas, Robert Rahn has been removed from the ministerium
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod; and
WHEREAS, This removal by the Council of Presidents, upon the
suggestion of former District President John Heins, took place be-
cause information was withheld from them and incorrect informa-
tion was given to them; and
WhereEAS, His removal from office required only a majority
vote, but his reinstatement requires a 75 percent vote of the Coun-
cil of Presidents, which he did not receive when he sought rein-
statement; and
WuerEAS, He must wait three years before he can again seek
reinstatement; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Commission on Constitutional Matters be
asked to determine whether, on the basis of the evidence in this
case” Robert Rahn was properly removed from office.
St. Paul
Brookfield, IL
71-96
To Reinstate Robert Rahn to Clergy Roster of Synod
WHEREAS, Rev. Robert Rahn has not had his CRM (Candidatus
Reverendi Ministerium/Candidate for the Holy Ministry) status ex-
tended and was thereby removed from the ministerium of the
Synod; and
Wuereas, Rev. Robert Rahn has not been accused or found
guilty of false doctrine or of an immoral life; and
WherEAS, He cannot reapply for admission to the clergy roster
of the Synod for three years; and
WHEREAS, There are presently 300-400 men who are CRM sta-
tus and some whose CRM status goes back as far of 1984; and
WHEREAS, Two pastors of the congregation in which Rev.
Robert Rahn is a member have indicated that he is involved in a
Word and Sacrament ministry and was awaiting a call to serve; and
WhereEAS, Rev. Robert Rahn is the executive director of the
Lutheran Heritage Foundation whose sole purpose is to translate
and publish confessional Lutheran writing into languages which do
not have such writing, the most ambitious of which is the transla-
tion of the Book of Concord into eight languages which do not yet
have these historic writings of our faith; and
WHEREAS, There are many who have the CRM status who are
not actively involved in “church work,” whose CRM status was not
removed, therefore be it
Resolved, That the CID in convention by copy of this resolu-
tion request the Michigan District President to bring to the Council
of Presidents the matter of reinstating Rev. Rahn; and be it further
Resolved, That the Central Illinois District in convention memo-
rialize Synod in its 1998 convention to direct the Council of Presi-
dents to reinstate Rev. Robert Rahn to candidate status on the
LCMS Minister of Religion/Ordained roster.
Central Illinois District
7-97
To Restore Dr. Ted Jungkuntz’s Candidate Status
Background Information (Ex Post Facto)
On Sept. 12, 1985, Dr. Ted Jungkuntz was granted CRM status
(now called “Candidate Status”), When this occurred, Synod’s own
rule said that such status was good for three years. That meant that
Dr. Jungkuntz could remain on said status until Sept. 12, 1988.
However, in 1986 Synod altered the term of initial CRM status to
two years, and it was under this new rule (which should not apply
to Dr. Jungkuntz’s case) that he was removed from the synodical
clergy roster after only two years of his three-year CRM status.
This removal was illegal, for Dr. Jungkuntz should have been dealt
with under the rule which was in effect for him. Another sad fact in
this matter is that when he was removed from the clergy roster by
the Council of Presidents (COP) on Nov. 17, 1987, he was never
officially informed of this action (a breach of pastoral ethics). In
simple language, he was deprived of approximately one year of
CRM status and was removed from the roster without notification
or warning before his original three-year “time of grace” had
elapsed.
While it is certainly possible that the COP was ignorant of this
legal error at the time they took the above action, nevertheless an
error was made. In 1992 the Commission on Constitutional Mat-
ters (CCM) was asked to rule on this procedure. The CCM’s reply
was: ‘“‘As to the matter of a person who was granted candidate sta-
tus under the three-year rule, the Commission concludes that he
cannot be required to meet a two year-rule for initial candidate sta-
tus which was subsequently passed. The Bylaw may not be applied
ex post facto." While no names are mentioned, this ruling certainly
would apply to Dr. Jungkuntz’s request for the restoration of his
“lost year” of clergy status in the Synod. The COP was informed
by the Secretary of Synod of the CCM’s decision at least two times.
Page 68 of the 1995 Handbook gives information as to the mem-
bership and functions of the CCM. Bylaw 3.905 d states: “An opin-
ion rendered by the commission shall be binding on the question
decided unless and until it is overruled by a synodical convention.”
Perhaps the COP was unaware of its ignoring of 3.905 d. At any
rate, the CCM’s ruling should negate the COP’s action which re-
moved Dr. Jungkuntz from the clergy roster.
We have addressed these matters (especially the ex post facto
issue) to the COP a number of times and this matter has not been
corrected.
WHEREAS, The COP made a legal error by disregarding ex post
facto law in regard to the term originally granted Dr. Theodore
Jungkuntz (three years); and
WHEREAS, The COP made a pastoral error by not properly in-
forming Dr. Jungkuntz of any anticipated or actual change in his
candidate status; and
WHEREAS, The COP made an ecclesiastical error when it disre-
garded the CCM ruling on ex post facto matters even after this had
been brought to its attention relative to Dr. Jungkuntz; therefore be
it
Resolved, That the COP immediately restore the “lost year” of
his candidate status to Dr. Jungkuntz; and be it further
Resolved, That during this year the President of the appropri-
ate District meet with Dr. Jungkuntz to work together for a God-
pleasing resolution as to his future status; and be it finally
Resolved, That the convention direct the COP to apologize to
Dr. Jungkuntz for its procedural error as well as for its failure to
rectify the situation after the facts of the case had been brought to
its attention.
Zion, Holland, MI; Faith, Sugar Land, TX; Gloria Dei,
Houston, TX; Nazareth, Buffalo, NY; Holy Cross,
Bordentown, NJ; Trinity, Walden, NY; East Bethlehem,
Detroit, MI; Our Savior, Colonie, NY; Faith, Geneva, IL;
Bethlehem, Nekoosa, WI; Grace, Streamwood, IL; Oak
Road, Lilburn, GA; Resurrection, Charlotte, NC; Grace,
Huntsville, AL; St. James. Marion, IN
7-98
To Remove Pastors Involved in Renewal in Missouri
(RIM)
WHEREAS, Renewal in Missouri (RIM), issued chiefly by pas-
tors of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, seeks to make the
charismatic movement acceptable to the LCMS; and
WHEREAS, The RIM News/etter claims that more pastors are be-
coming interested in R/M’s charismatic position; and