Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Sheet 299
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Sheet 299
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
284 BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE
Wuereas, The report does not seek to change Bylaw 4.71 a and
remove the title “chief executive officer” from District Presidents
as well; and
WuerEas, Removing the title “Chief Executive Officer” from
the synodical President while retaining it for District Presidents is
inconsistent and confusing, and can prove to become a source of
further misunderstanding, confusion, and controversy; therefore be
it
Resolved, That the Blue Ribbon Committee Report as distrib-
uted to the Synod be rejected; and be it further
Resolved, That the same Blue Ribbon Committee be charged
with making a new report to the Synod that reconciles the incon-
sistency between the proposed Bylaw 3.101 a and the existing
Bylaw 4.71 a.
Hope
Akron, OH
8-05
To Retain Present Method of Election
of Directors of Entities
WHEREAS, The Blue Ribbon Committee on Structure’s proposal
in Bylaw 3.55 calls for one-third of the members of the LCEF
Board of Directors to be elected by the synodical convention, and
WHEREAS, This proposed change would provide a basis for a
participating District to initiate the process to remove itself from
membership in the LCEF; and
WHEREAS, The ability of each participating District in LCEF to
influence the policies of LCEF by electing its Board of Directors is
what has made LCEF the responsive organization it is today; there-
fore be it
Resolved, That Synod retain the present procedures in the elec-
tion of directors of entities.
Board of Directors
Lutheran Church Extension Fund
8-06
To Adopt Nov. 14, 1997, Blue Ribbon
Committee Proposal on Higher Education
WuEREAS, Our Lord has richly blessed the development of our
Synod’s colleges and seminaries since the very beginning of our
church body; and
WHEREAS, Until recent years our colleges were created and
maintained primarily for the purpose of preparing young men and
women for the teaching ministry, or to prepare young men to be
able to enter postgraduate studies in our seminaries with the goal of
ordination into the pastoral ministry, and
WuerEAS, Under the above system it made much sense for our
Synod to establish one umbrella board called the Board for Higher
Education, whose task it was to coordinate the colleges and semi-
naries in a unified system of higher education; and
Wuereas, In recent years our colleges have, under the blessing
of God, branched out into a much wider variety of programs of ed-
ucation than only that of preparing workers for the pastoral and the
teaching ministries of the church, including many vocations which
are not intended to be church-related in any sense; and
WuerEas, This has resulted in the formation of the Concordia
University System and in the addition of more members to both the
Board for Higher Education and the respective local boards of re-
gents of the colleges and universities, while keeping the member-
ship of the seminaries’ boards of regents to nine members each,
thus exhibiting the fact that Synod recognizes the differences be-
tween pastoral education and other types of education; and
WHEREAS, The seminaries, with the exception of their graduate
schools, have as their nearly exclusive purpose the training of or-
dained pastors and missionaries, a task which is very different from
that of training teachers and even more different from that of edu-
cating people to serve in non-church-related vocations; and
WHEREAS, Among these differences are certain government reg-
ulations and requirements connected with student loans and grants,
the average ages of the students, the experiences or lack thereof in
life, the kinds of housing needed, the kinds of library facilities re-
quired, the types of accrediting agencies involved, and many other
distinct differences which exist between post-bachelor seminary
education and bachelor college-university education; and
WHEREAS, The configuration of authority as proposed by the
President’s Blue Ribbon Committee in its report of Nov. 14, 1997,
would create a CUS (Concordia University System) board and a
Seminary board separate from each other but with very adequate
liaison between the two boards, thus taking into consideration the
above differences in types of education as outlined above; there-
fore be it
Resolved, That our Synod in convention adopt the proposal for
Higher Education in The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as
recommended by the Blue Ribbon Committee on Nov. 14, 1997.
Board of Regents
Concordia Theological Seminary
Fort Wayne, IN
8-07
To Merge Seminary Boards of Regents
WHEREAS, Boards of Regents are primarily responsible for poli-
cies at synodical educational institutions, and not for administra-
tive decisions regarding faculty, curriculum, finance and student
affairs; and
WHEREAS, It is desirable that policies related to these matters in
the preparation of candidates for the pastoral ministry be as uni-
form as possible; and
Wuereas, The primary concern of the Synod is not where can-
didates are prepared, but how well they are prepared in order that
the Synod is assured of a quality and quantity of pastoral candi-
dates to meet its changing and future needs; and
WHEREAS, Administrative issues at our seminaries in recent
years have at times negatively impacted the confidence of some in
the Synod and its seminaries; and
WHEREAS, It is desirable that preparation of pastoral candidates
be carried out with as much coordination and as little duplication as
possible; and
WHEREAS, Individuality and specialization with a single Board
of Regents can still be maintained by reason of the character and
quality of the faculties and a separate administration at each semi-
nary; and
WHEREAS, The President’s Blue Ribbon Committee has recom-
mended a restructuring of the Board for Higher Education to in-
clude a Standing Committee for Pastoral Education, thereby in-
creasing the size of the Board; and
WHEREAS, The concerns of the President’s Blue Ribbon Com-
mittee for pastoral education could be met through a less costly and
more direct approach; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Boards of Regents of Concordia Theological
Seminary, Fort Wayne, and Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, be
merged into a single Board of Regents responsible to the Synod for
these two institutions; and be it further
Resolved, That the single Board of Regents consist of eleven
members, eight of whom are elected by the convention of Synod
(three pastors, one teacher and four laymen), and be it further
Resolved, That from among the District Presidents, two are also
elected by the convention of the Synod to serve as members of the
single seminary Board of Regents; and be it further
Resolved, That the remaining member of the Board of Regents
shall be the President of the Synod or his representative, and be it
further