Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 77
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 77
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNODICAL REPORTS 77
District Presidents should be informed to whom such letters
are sent.
If the current budget of WBP is insufficient to permit the
above-referenced informational survey, then monies should ei-
ther be earmarked for such an effort in the next budget of
WBP and/or monies can be provided through the offering or
gift collections as mentioned in paragraph 5 below.
3. That the District Presidents affirmatively inquire into (1) how
many retired workers or widowed spouses under either the
CRP or the PPPT exist within their Districts and (2) the
specific financial needs of such retired workers or widowed
spouses. Such information, where permissible, should be
shared, in confidence, with the WBP.
4. That WBP, after reviewing all necessary facts, establish a
likely benefit and payment stream that would provide
adequate funding to retired church workers or their widowed
spouses currently under the PPPT programs.
5. That the Board of Directors establish within the Synod‘a
designated Sunday on which day a special offering would be
collected to alleviate the unmet financial needs of those
retired workers or their widowed spouses. In addition, special
gifts can be solicited through the LCMSF. That such monies
collected be set aside in a special fund administered by the
LCMSF in cooperation with the WBP.
6. That the Synod authorize the Board of Directors (or if funds
are available, the Board of Directors authorize their
expenditure) to provide in the annual budget the funds
necessary, supplemental to those collected under item (5),
above to finance the benefit and payment stream as deter-
mined in item 4 above.
In conclusion, of the two issues identified in the mandate to the
Task Force, the inadequate funding of retirement benefits for indi-
viduals under the Synod’s old PPPT program is a more readily
identifiable problem and should be capable of a systematic, man-
ageable resolution (over the period of the next 20 years), Never-
theless, our Synod’s retired church workers or their widowed
spouses who have current, unmet financial needs should have these
needs met by our church body.
On the other hand, the issue associated with the increasing level
of debt of our Synod’s professional church workers is a problem
that is growing rapidly, needs to be immediately identified as to
both the number of impacted students and church workers and the
individual scope of the problem of each student or worker, and then
addressed with both preventive and remedial solutions. It is a prob-
lem that, even though it will nor take care of itself, can be resolved.
It is the recommendation of the Financial Aid Task Force that
this report be submitted to the Synod’s 1998 convention for adop-
tion in its entirety. In order to assist both the President and the
Synod in convention, a summary of this report is attached identify-
ing by issue the responsible entity within the Synod to be tasked
with particular undertakings. Where the initiation of some or all of
the suggested courses of action will incur costs currently outside
of the budget of the responsible entity of our Synod it should be
noted that what is proposed is that funds will be raised either
through special synodical offerings or designated and earmarked
gifts.
Finally, it is imperative that when steps are implemented,
through the respective entities of the Synod, the President direct
that reports be given to himself, or the Board of Directors, at spec-
ified intervals, in order to insure that corrective actions are in fact
implemented and the issues identified are being resolved; or, if not,
that additional steps be undertaken or matters implemented to as-
sure the necessary resolution of these identified problems.
We know that “all things” do work together for “the good of
those who trust in the Lord” (Rom. 8:28) and accordingly are as-
sured that through the guidance of His wisdom resolution of these
identified challenges will be forthcoming. °
Edwin Suelflow, Chairman
Appendix R4-06A
Summary
Indebtedness of the Professional Church Worker
Which Indebtedness Is Mainly Attributed to the
Burden Associated with the Cost of Education
First Issue:
Resolution: Both Assist in the Reduction in the Level of Such
Indebtedness and Establish Programs to Provide
Guidance for the Christian Management of Debt
Agency: Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation
Responsible Action:
* establish and manage a special fund(s) to which contribu-
tions may be made and from which portions of the principal
and/or interest earned is used to underwrite both the devel-
opment and implementation of the numerous programs es-
tablished pursuant to this report
Agency: Lutheran Church Extension Fund
Responsible Action:
* implement a low-interest loan program, to Districts and con-
gregations, both for consolidation of high-interest debt and
the underwriting of educational costs at synodical schools
* implement a program that will permit the earmarking of in-
terest income from LCEF investments into the “special”
fund(s) established within the LCMS Foundation, as outlined
above
Agency: Stewardship Department
Responsible Action:
* continue and expand its current pilot program of personal fi-
nancial management workshops
* seek from both within and without the Synod the requisite ex-
pertise in the area of managing financial resources
share with the Synod’s colleges, universities, and seminaries
the expertise it is developing in the area of personal financial
management workshops
Agency: Concordia University System/Board for Higher
Education and Synodical Seminaries
Responsible Action:
* identify and assist students who have financial problems at
the individual institution
* provide financial planning workshops for students at the time
of entry into the educational system
¢ make available continuing financial planning resources to
students during their stay at the educational institution
Agency: District Presidents
Responsible Action:
* identify those professional church workers under their eccle-
siastical supervision who have unresolved debt problems
implement programs within their Districts that will provide
guidance to professional church workers in the area of per-
sonal financial management
* establish specific compensation guidelines for congregations
within their Districts
counsel congregations to follow the established compensa-
tion guidelines
* consider not approving applications for candidates from par-
ticular congregations where the compensation guidelines at
that congregation do not meet the District salary guidelines
* identify individuals applying for admittance to our Synod’s
seminaries where the individuals’ ability to finance their sem-
inary education may be in doubt in order to provide counsel-
ing and so inform the respective seminary
e