Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 68
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 68
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
68 SYNODICAL REPORTS
state the desired outcomes that meet prescribed human needs at a
prescribed cost; ‘
* determine board philosophy, its accountability, and specifics of
its governance job;
* clarify the manner by which delegation of authority to staff will
take place as well as how evaluation of performance will occur;
* set boundaries of acceptability within which methods and activi-
ties are responsibly expected of staff.
Results of this process appear to be that
* responsibility and authority are clear;
* focus is on performance, not activities;
* issues, not details, are addressed;
* board and staff are looking ahead, not backward;
adjustments (corrections) to policy are made as change occurs;
* board dialogue is open and challenging;
relationships are strengthened and trust improves;
* meetings are focused and participants are prepared;
parameters of acceptable behavior are stated, with roles defined.
Based upon the guiding principles and the board’s understand-
ing of its role in leadership, the Gift Planning staff goes about the
business of serving all LCMS donors regardless of to whom they
wish to donate. We have a most unique Foundation structured to
serve the totality of the Synod, its congregations, and related orga-
nizations. No other Foundation like this exists anywhere. There-
fore, we must be about the business of enhancing the individual
donor’s stewardship life and provide opportunities for expansion
and enhancement of the donor’s expression of God’s love in their
life. In almost every case we work with donors who know that “He
made the earth by His power, He established the world by His wis-
dom, and He stretched out the heavens by His understanding” (Je-
remiah 51:15). These Christian stewards know that the Lord has
plans for them. *... plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans
to give you hope and a future.” (Jeremiah 29:11). (See chart.)
As always, a great deal of work remains to be done, especially
in the area of staff training and the development of relationships,
including a closer “alliance” with Lutheran Church Extension
Fund. Since we have a small staff in relation to the membership of
the Synod. we are concerned that our staff use their time wisely by
making the right calls on the right individuals who need the ser-
vices of the Foundation.
In the area of consulting services, Capital Funding Services—a
cooperative stewardship approach to growth—has continued to
make progress at a rapid pace. A quality staff stands ready to help
congregations plan funding for major building projects, eliminate
burdensome debt, or increase members’ giving to expand ministry.
All services are provided by LCMS member consultants with fees
designed to be on a self-sustaining basis. While many other orga-
nizations exist to provide similar services, there is a desire by many
congregations of the Synod to have such services provided by in-
dividuals thoroughly trained in the principles of biblical steward-
ship as a way of life. Several attached charts depict the results of
these efforts.
Assets under management and investment-related activity are
depicted on the charts that follow this report. As can be seen, the
work of Trust and Investment Services has been richly blessed
these past years and additional outside investment managers have
been engaged. It is the present Board of Trustees’ intent not to add
additional investment staff but to engage outside specialists as war-
ranted, including appropriate relationships with Aid Association
for Lutherans and Lutheran Brotherhood investment specialists.
During the past triennium significant effort has been spent in
discussion with the President’s Blue Ribbon Committee on Struc-
ture as its work relates to the Foundation. As of this writing, four is-
sues remain as follows:
* The Board of Trustees believes that the membership of the Foun-
dation is already reflective of the Synod as a whole; therefore the
election of one-third of the Trustees by Synod in convention is
not necessary and would prove difficult in its implementation.
¢ The Board of Trustees believes that the slate of candidates for
the Foundation’s President should require consultation with the
Board of Directors and the synodical President but not their ap-
proval. The latter in effect would grant a veto power which is
neither appropriate nor necessary.
* In addition, the Trustees believe that the role of the Chief Finan-
cial Officer as a member of the Board of Trustees would be more
meaningful if he were elected by the convention after nomina-
tion by the synodical Board of Directors in consultation with the
boards on which he serves.
* An apparent conflict between proposed Art. XI e and Bylaw
3.185 regarding delegation of powers and duties regarding prop-
erty.
As is evidenced by this report, the transfer of responsibilities to
the Foundation by the 1992 convention has gone forward and has
received significant blessings during these past years. The Foun-
dation, organized in 1958 to assist all of God's people relating to
the LCMS as God’s stewards, is thankful to God for the original
vision, the changes adopted by the 1981 and 1992 conventions, and
for the opportunity to serve the entire Synod as together we respond
to the rapid changes going on all around us in this country and
throughout the world. We pray for God’s continued guidance to
God’s stewards and to us so that we prudently manage and invest
what has been entrusted to us. To Him be the glory!
Fred Bernthal, Chairman
Norman Sell, President
GIFT PLANNING SERVICES
FUTURE GIFTS BY CATEGORY-FACE VALUE
July 1996-June 1997
Direct (2.76%)=_
irrevocable (13.50%) :
“Revocable (83.74%)
Revocable $120,451,461
Irrevocable $ 19,415,288
Direct $ 3,969,404
Total $143,836,153