Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 68

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 68

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

68 SYNODICAL REPORTS

state the desired outcomes that meet prescribed human needs at a

prescribed cost; ‘

* determine board philosophy, its accountability, and specifics of
its governance job;

* clarify the manner by which delegation of authority to staff will

take place as well as how evaluation of performance will occur;

* set boundaries of acceptability within which methods and activi-
ties are responsibly expected of staff.

Results of this process appear to be that
* responsibility and authority are clear;

* focus is on performance, not activities;
* issues, not details, are addressed;
* board and staff are looking ahead, not backward;

adjustments (corrections) to policy are made as change occurs;
* board dialogue is open and challenging;

relationships are strengthened and trust improves;

* meetings are focused and participants are prepared;

parameters of acceptable behavior are stated, with roles defined.

Based upon the guiding principles and the board’s understand-
ing of its role in leadership, the Gift Planning staff goes about the
business of serving all LCMS donors regardless of to whom they
wish to donate. We have a most unique Foundation structured to
serve the totality of the Synod, its congregations, and related orga-
nizations. No other Foundation like this exists anywhere. There-
fore, we must be about the business of enhancing the individual
donor’s stewardship life and provide opportunities for expansion
and enhancement of the donor’s expression of God’s love in their
life. In almost every case we work with donors who know that “He
made the earth by His power, He established the world by His wis-
dom, and He stretched out the heavens by His understanding” (Je-
remiah 51:15). These Christian stewards know that the Lord has
plans for them. *... plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans
to give you hope and a future.” (Jeremiah 29:11). (See chart.)

As always, a great deal of work remains to be done, especially
in the area of staff training and the development of relationships,
including a closer “alliance” with Lutheran Church Extension
Fund. Since we have a small staff in relation to the membership of
the Synod. we are concerned that our staff use their time wisely by
making the right calls on the right individuals who need the ser-
vices of the Foundation.

In the area of consulting services, Capital Funding Services—a
cooperative stewardship approach to growth—has continued to
make progress at a rapid pace. A quality staff stands ready to help
congregations plan funding for major building projects, eliminate
burdensome debt, or increase members’ giving to expand ministry.
All services are provided by LCMS member consultants with fees
designed to be on a self-sustaining basis. While many other orga-
nizations exist to provide similar services, there is a desire by many
congregations of the Synod to have such services provided by in-
dividuals thoroughly trained in the principles of biblical steward-
ship as a way of life. Several attached charts depict the results of
these efforts.

Assets under management and investment-related activity are
depicted on the charts that follow this report. As can be seen, the
work of Trust and Investment Services has been richly blessed
these past years and additional outside investment managers have
been engaged. It is the present Board of Trustees’ intent not to add
additional investment staff but to engage outside specialists as war-
ranted, including appropriate relationships with Aid Association
for Lutherans and Lutheran Brotherhood investment specialists.

During the past triennium significant effort has been spent in
discussion with the President’s Blue Ribbon Committee on Struc-
ture as its work relates to the Foundation. As of this writing, four is-
sues remain as follows:

* The Board of Trustees believes that the membership of the Foun-
dation is already reflective of the Synod as a whole; therefore the
election of one-third of the Trustees by Synod in convention is
not necessary and would prove difficult in its implementation.

¢ The Board of Trustees believes that the slate of candidates for
the Foundation’s President should require consultation with the
Board of Directors and the synodical President but not their ap-
proval. The latter in effect would grant a veto power which is
neither appropriate nor necessary.

* In addition, the Trustees believe that the role of the Chief Finan-
cial Officer as a member of the Board of Trustees would be more
meaningful if he were elected by the convention after nomina-
tion by the synodical Board of Directors in consultation with the
boards on which he serves.

* An apparent conflict between proposed Art. XI e and Bylaw
3.185 regarding delegation of powers and duties regarding prop-
erty.

As is evidenced by this report, the transfer of responsibilities to
the Foundation by the 1992 convention has gone forward and has
received significant blessings during these past years. The Foun-
dation, organized in 1958 to assist all of God's people relating to
the LCMS as God’s stewards, is thankful to God for the original
vision, the changes adopted by the 1981 and 1992 conventions, and
for the opportunity to serve the entire Synod as together we respond
to the rapid changes going on all around us in this country and
throughout the world. We pray for God’s continued guidance to
God’s stewards and to us so that we prudently manage and invest
what has been entrusted to us. To Him be the glory!

Fred Bernthal, Chairman
Norman Sell, President

GIFT PLANNING SERVICES

FUTURE GIFTS BY CATEGORY-FACE VALUE
July 1996-June 1997

Direct (2.76%)=_
irrevocable (13.50%) :

“Revocable (83.74%)

Revocable $120,451,461
Irrevocable $ 19,415,288
Direct $ 3,969,404
Total $143,836,153