Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 129
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 129
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES 129
times neglect the tried and true structure and important elements
basic to the “traditional liturgy”; and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Confessions, namely, the Formula of
Concord, both Art. X of the Epitome and Solid Declaration, give
sound directive and warming regarding “‘adiaphora” and “Christian
liberty”; and
Whereas, A generation ago, a member of an LCMS congrega-
tion could enter any LCMS sister congregation from Maine to Cal-
ifornia and know the familiarity of being “home” away from home,
principally because of the commonality of solid doctrine and the
liturgy; and
WHEREAS, The typical LCMS congregational constitution con-
tains an article mandating that all hymnals and worship aids be in
conformity with the Holy Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions,
yet at the same time realizing that some special events and feast
days call for occasional special services with fresh approaches to
the traditional structure of the liturgy; and
WHEREAS, The Word of God directs His church to do every-
thing in decency and good order (1 Cor. 14:40); therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention encourage all of its congregations to not abandon
the “traditional liturgy,” but rather use it often and on a regular
basis; and be it further
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention encourage all of its congregations to review
and/or study the “traditional liturgy” to rediscover the richness of
its scriptural basis and rich theological balance; and be it finally
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention affirm the value of uniformity of worship through
our church body to establish harmony and avoid confusion.
Immanuel
Clovis, NM
2-11
To Encourage Faithfulness in New Mission Starts
Wuereas, The Synod in convention has stated that “liturgies,
sermons, hymns, songs, prayers, etc.,” of congregations of the
Synod should “(1) [be] Christ centered and not human centered;
(2) distinguish properly between Law and Gospel; (3) emphasize
the Gospel of Christ’s forgiveness; (4) [be] faithful to the Word of
God and in harmony with our Lutheran Confessions’’ (1995 Res.
2-06); and
WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has resolved, “That con-
gregations be encouraged to use the synodically approved hymnals:
The Lutheran Hymnal or Lutheran Worship” (1995 Res. 2-07).
(The intent of such a resolution is, of course, not to forbid the use
of anything not in the hymnals, which otherwise meets the crite-
rion of that which accords with the Word of God and the confes-
sion of the Lutheran church, but rather to indicate the Synod’s de-
sire that her parishes are parishes which actually use the
synodically approved hymnals); and
WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has warned of the dangers
of certain methods of the “church growth movement,” noting “wor-
ship forms and practices which focus the worshiper on his feelings
and experiences as evidence of God’s grace rather than on the ob-
jective and gracious work of God delivering His forgiveness of sins
for Christ’s sake ... as found, for example, in the historic liturgy of
the Lutheran Church” (1995 Res. 3-09); and
WuerEAS, There is a trend in the LCMS today for mission
parishes to use neither synodically approved hymnals at all, and
this bent is not conducive to unity—doctrinal or otherwise—in the
Synod; and
WHEREAS, The Synod is quite free to impose basic standards
upon its administrative entities (officers, District offices, etc.);
therefore be it
Resolved, That the Board for Evangelism, the Board for Con-
gregational Services, and all other synodical entities, including Dis-
tricts and District officials cease advocating and or planting hym-
nal-less churches; and be it further
Resolved, That all mission starts (barring specific linguistic bar-
riers, e.g., beginning a congregation among recent non-English-
speaking immigrants) use one of the officially recognized hymnals
(TLA or LW ) as the primary worship resource for liturgy and
hymnody; and in the case of work among unchurched people, there
be a forthright plan for the systematic introduction of one of these
hymnals, and a specific plan for education in Lutheran liturgy and
hymnody.
Zion
Fort Wayne, IN
2-12
To Encourage Faithfulness in New Mission Starts
WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has stated that “liturgies,
sermons, hymns, songs, prayers, etc.,” of the congregations of the
Synod ought be “(1) Christ-centered and not human-centered; (2)
distinguish properly between Law and Gospel; (3) emphasize the
gospel of Christ’s forgiveness; (4) are faithful to the Word of God
and in harmony with our Lutheran Confessions” (1995 Res. 2-06);
and
WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has resolved, “That con-
gregations be encouraged to use the synodically approved hymnals:
The Lutheran Hymnal or Lutheran Worship” (1995 Res. 2-07); and
WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has warned of the dangers
of the “Church Growth Movement,” noting “certain worship forms
and practices which focus the worshiper on his feelings and expe-
riences rather than on the objective and gracious work of God de-
livering His forgiveness of sins for Christ’s sake ... as found, for
example, in the historic liturgies of the Lutheran Church” (1995
Res. 3-09); and
WHEREAS, There is a trend in the LCMS today for mission
parishes to use neither of our Synod’s hymnals at all, and this trend
is not conducive to unity in the Synod; and
WHEREAS, The Synod is quite free to impose basic standards
upon its administrative entities (officers, boards, Districts, etc.):
therefore be it
Resolved, That all synodical entities, including Districts and
District mission boards cease advocating and/or planting English-
speaking churches where neither one of the synodically approved
hymnals is used; and be it further
Resolved, That the Commission on Worship be utilized at the
Church Planters’ Institute to assist mission pastors in implementing
sound Lutheran liturgical principles in missionary situations.
University
Minneapolis, MN
2-13
To Discourage Use of Certain Liturgical Form
Wuereas, Almighty God has graciously favored us with splen-
did Bible-based liturgies, which are offered in our currently autho-
rized hymnals; and
WHEREAS, These liturgies contain five different forms of cor-
porate absolution, which indicates that none of them is intended for
our exclusive use; and
WHEREAS, One of them bases corporate absolution on the pas-
toral office rather than on the resurrection of our Lord, reading:
“Upon this your confession, I, by virtue of my office as a called
and ordained servant of the Word, announce the grace of God to
all of you, and in the stead and by the command of my Lord Jesus
Christ I forgive you all your sins in the name of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Spirit’; and
WuereAsS, This liturgical formula (A) is “un-Lutheran”; (B) is
contrary to Scripture; (C) puts the pastor’s office ahead of Christ’s
redemptive office; and (D) employs obscure syntax: