Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 129

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 129

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES 129

times neglect the tried and true structure and important elements
basic to the “traditional liturgy”; and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Confessions, namely, the Formula of
Concord, both Art. X of the Epitome and Solid Declaration, give
sound directive and warming regarding “‘adiaphora” and “Christian
liberty”; and

Whereas, A generation ago, a member of an LCMS congrega-
tion could enter any LCMS sister congregation from Maine to Cal-
ifornia and know the familiarity of being “home” away from home,
principally because of the commonality of solid doctrine and the
liturgy; and

WHEREAS, The typical LCMS congregational constitution con-
tains an article mandating that all hymnals and worship aids be in
conformity with the Holy Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions,
yet at the same time realizing that some special events and feast
days call for occasional special services with fresh approaches to
the traditional structure of the liturgy; and

WHEREAS, The Word of God directs His church to do every-
thing in decency and good order (1 Cor. 14:40); therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention encourage all of its congregations to not abandon
the “traditional liturgy,” but rather use it often and on a regular
basis; and be it further

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention encourage all of its congregations to review
and/or study the “traditional liturgy” to rediscover the richness of
its scriptural basis and rich theological balance; and be it finally

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in its
1998 convention affirm the value of uniformity of worship through
our church body to establish harmony and avoid confusion.

Immanuel
Clovis, NM

2-11

To Encourage Faithfulness in New Mission Starts

Wuereas, The Synod in convention has stated that “liturgies,
sermons, hymns, songs, prayers, etc.,” of congregations of the
Synod should “(1) [be] Christ centered and not human centered;
(2) distinguish properly between Law and Gospel; (3) emphasize
the Gospel of Christ’s forgiveness; (4) [be] faithful to the Word of
God and in harmony with our Lutheran Confessions’’ (1995 Res.
2-06); and

WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has resolved, “That con-
gregations be encouraged to use the synodically approved hymnals:
The Lutheran Hymnal or Lutheran Worship” (1995 Res. 2-07).
(The intent of such a resolution is, of course, not to forbid the use
of anything not in the hymnals, which otherwise meets the crite-
rion of that which accords with the Word of God and the confes-
sion of the Lutheran church, but rather to indicate the Synod’s de-
sire that her parishes are parishes which actually use the
synodically approved hymnals); and

WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has warned of the dangers
of certain methods of the “church growth movement,” noting “wor-
ship forms and practices which focus the worshiper on his feelings
and experiences as evidence of God’s grace rather than on the ob-
jective and gracious work of God delivering His forgiveness of sins
for Christ’s sake ... as found, for example, in the historic liturgy of
the Lutheran Church” (1995 Res. 3-09); and

WuerEAS, There is a trend in the LCMS today for mission
parishes to use neither synodically approved hymnals at all, and
this bent is not conducive to unity—doctrinal or otherwise—in the
Synod; and

WHEREAS, The Synod is quite free to impose basic standards
upon its administrative entities (officers, District offices, etc.);
therefore be it

Resolved, That the Board for Evangelism, the Board for Con-
gregational Services, and all other synodical entities, including Dis-

tricts and District officials cease advocating and or planting hym-
nal-less churches; and be it further

Resolved, That all mission starts (barring specific linguistic bar-
riers, e.g., beginning a congregation among recent non-English-
speaking immigrants) use one of the officially recognized hymnals
(TLA or LW ) as the primary worship resource for liturgy and
hymnody; and in the case of work among unchurched people, there
be a forthright plan for the systematic introduction of one of these
hymnals, and a specific plan for education in Lutheran liturgy and
hymnody.

Zion
Fort Wayne, IN

2-12

To Encourage Faithfulness in New Mission Starts

WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has stated that “liturgies,
sermons, hymns, songs, prayers, etc.,” of the congregations of the
Synod ought be “(1) Christ-centered and not human-centered; (2)
distinguish properly between Law and Gospel; (3) emphasize the
gospel of Christ’s forgiveness; (4) are faithful to the Word of God
and in harmony with our Lutheran Confessions” (1995 Res. 2-06);
and

WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has resolved, “That con-
gregations be encouraged to use the synodically approved hymnals:
The Lutheran Hymnal or Lutheran Worship” (1995 Res. 2-07); and

WHEREAS, The Synod in convention has warned of the dangers
of the “Church Growth Movement,” noting “certain worship forms
and practices which focus the worshiper on his feelings and expe-
riences rather than on the objective and gracious work of God de-
livering His forgiveness of sins for Christ’s sake ... as found, for
example, in the historic liturgies of the Lutheran Church” (1995
Res. 3-09); and

WHEREAS, There is a trend in the LCMS today for mission
parishes to use neither of our Synod’s hymnals at all, and this trend
is not conducive to unity in the Synod; and

WHEREAS, The Synod is quite free to impose basic standards
upon its administrative entities (officers, boards, Districts, etc.):
therefore be it

Resolved, That all synodical entities, including Districts and
District mission boards cease advocating and/or planting English-
speaking churches where neither one of the synodically approved
hymnals is used; and be it further

Resolved, That the Commission on Worship be utilized at the
Church Planters’ Institute to assist mission pastors in implementing
sound Lutheran liturgical principles in missionary situations.

University
Minneapolis, MN

2-13

To Discourage Use of Certain Liturgical Form

Wuereas, Almighty God has graciously favored us with splen-
did Bible-based liturgies, which are offered in our currently autho-
rized hymnals; and

WHEREAS, These liturgies contain five different forms of cor-
porate absolution, which indicates that none of them is intended for
our exclusive use; and

WHEREAS, One of them bases corporate absolution on the pas-
toral office rather than on the resurrection of our Lord, reading:
“Upon this your confession, I, by virtue of my office as a called
and ordained servant of the Word, announce the grace of God to
all of you, and in the stead and by the command of my Lord Jesus
Christ I forgive you all your sins in the name of the Father and of
the Son and of the Holy Spirit’; and

WuereAsS, This liturgical formula (A) is “un-Lutheran”; (B) is
contrary to Scripture; (C) puts the pastor’s office ahead of Christ’s
redemptive office; and (D) employs obscure syntax: