Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 221
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 221
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION 221
date any radical change in tenure Johns Hopkins Magazine, Sep-
tember 1997, p. 31); and
WHEREAS, Any substantive change in the tenure policy as out-
lined in the Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
(6.25) can impact the well-being of faculty and institutions; there-
fore be it
Resolved, That the boards of regents, administrators, and fac-
ulty of the colleges and universities of the Concordia University
System engage in a discussion of the role of tenure in their mis-
sion; and be it further
Resolved, That a proposed change in Bylaw 6.25 of the Hand-
book of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be delayed until
such discussions have occurred in institutions of the Concordia
University System; and be it further
Resolved, That boards of regents and administrators of institu-
tions of the Concordia University System solicit input from faculty
in any proposed change from tenure to rollover contracts.
Faculty
Concordia College
Seward, NE
5-41
To Consider Issues re Tenure
and Rollover Contracts
WHEREAS, Discussions regarding the issue of tenure policies are
taking place; and
WuereEaS, Synodical doctrine is protected by the Statement of
Limitations to Academic Freedom which applies to tenured faculty
as well as nontenured faculty; and
WHEREAS, Tenured faculty may be dismissed on reasonable
grounds; and
WHEREAS, Tenure policies are useful in protecting academic
freedom and excellence; and
WHEREAS, Tenure policies, when advertised, attract higher qual-
ity applicants for positions; and
WHEREAS, Most full-time faculty members accepted job open-
ings offered as tenure track positions and changing that status
would be a switch from their agreement; and
WHEREAS, Tenure constitutes a vested property right for those
who have tenure; and
WHEREAS, It is unclear that current tenure policies are at the root
of the problems being addressed; and
WHEREAS, Faculty hold few other tangible job benefits compa-
rable to other institutions of higher education; and
WHEREAS, The University of Minnesota recently lost a bitter
legal battle with its faculty regarding tenure rights; therefore be it
Resolved, That any proposed changes to Bylaw 6.25 of the
Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be rejected;
and be it further
Resolved, That boards of regents and administrators of institu-
tions of higher education in the Concordia University System so-
licit input and approval from university faculties in any proposed
changes to current tenure policies.
Faculty
~ Concordia University
St. Paul, MN
5-42
To Insure LCMS Faculty in System Schools
WHEREAS, The Concordia University System represents The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as an arm of the church to edu-
cate church workers and others; and
WHEREAS, The theology and practice of the Concordia Univer-
sity System pledges to conform to the Lutheran Confessions and
the doctrinal position of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod;
and
WHEREAS, The tradition of the constituency of the faculty in the
Concordia University System has been 90 percent LCMS mem-
bers; and
WHEREAS, It is necessary to maintain a strong LCMS faculty to
integrate Lutheran theology and academic excellence; therefore be
it
Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education make it official
policy, and not merely the prerogative of the chairman of the Board
of Higher Education, or of the president of the Concordia Univer-
sity System, to insure that 90 percent of the faculties at each of our
Concordia colleges/universities be members of the LCMS; and be
it further
Resolved, That all colleges/universities of our system work to-
ward compliance with such a policy as soon as possible.
Circuit 16 Forum, South Wisconsin District; Circuit 17
Forum, South Wisconsin District
5-43
To Amend Colloquy Bylaws
WHEREAS, The 1992 Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod (LCMS) contained a category of eligibility for admis-
sion to the colloquy program for the pastoral ministry for those who
are “‘communicant members in good standing of synodical congre-
gations who are graduates of an established nonsynodical semi-
nary” (Bylaw 6.91 3); and
WHEREAS, The 1995 Handbook of the LCMS contains no cate-
gory of eligibility for admission to the colloquy program for the
pastoral ministry for graduates of nonsynodical seminaries unless
they are “ministers who are in good standing in other Christian
church bodies, are graduates of established seminaries, and have
served at least three years in a recognized ministry in their church
body” (Bylaw 6.91 a); and
WHEREAS, The alternate route programs at both LCMS semi-
naries are designed only for those who are either ministers of reli-
gion, commissioned, with at least 8 years of experience or laymen
with at least 10 years of significant experience related directly to
Word and Sacrament ministry within the LCMS; and
WHEREAS, The alternate route programs do not afford opportu-
nity for a candidate to have a program of preparation tailored to his
individual background after a theological interview has been con-
ducted; and
WHEREAS, Graduates of nonsynodical seminaries who want to
become pastors in the LCMS have no program of preparation open
to them within the LCMS other than completing an additional mas-
ter of divinity degree or applying to the alternate route program
after they have accumulated 10 years of significant experience re-
lated directly to Word and Sacrament ministry within the LCMS;
therefore be it
Resolved, That Bylaw 6.91 1 in the 1995 Handbook of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be amended by adding the fol-
lowing category of eligible applicants: Communicant members in
good standing of synodical congregations who are graduates of an
established nonsynodical seminary.
Faculty
Concordia Seminary
St. Louis, MO
5-44
To Clarify Seminary Requirement
for Pastoral Colloquy Applicants
Rationale
Bylaw 6.91 provides a process for ministers who were ordained
in anon-LCMS church body to become members of The Lutheran