Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 221

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 221

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION 221

date any radical change in tenure Johns Hopkins Magazine, Sep-
tember 1997, p. 31); and

WHEREAS, Any substantive change in the tenure policy as out-
lined in the Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
(6.25) can impact the well-being of faculty and institutions; there-
fore be it

Resolved, That the boards of regents, administrators, and fac-
ulty of the colleges and universities of the Concordia University
System engage in a discussion of the role of tenure in their mis-
sion; and be it further

Resolved, That a proposed change in Bylaw 6.25 of the Hand-
book of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be delayed until
such discussions have occurred in institutions of the Concordia
University System; and be it further

Resolved, That boards of regents and administrators of institu-
tions of the Concordia University System solicit input from faculty
in any proposed change from tenure to rollover contracts.

Faculty
Concordia College
Seward, NE

5-41

To Consider Issues re Tenure
and Rollover Contracts

WHEREAS, Discussions regarding the issue of tenure policies are
taking place; and

WuereEaS, Synodical doctrine is protected by the Statement of
Limitations to Academic Freedom which applies to tenured faculty
as well as nontenured faculty; and

WHEREAS, Tenured faculty may be dismissed on reasonable
grounds; and

WHEREAS, Tenure policies are useful in protecting academic
freedom and excellence; and

WHEREAS, Tenure policies, when advertised, attract higher qual-
ity applicants for positions; and

WHEREAS, Most full-time faculty members accepted job open-
ings offered as tenure track positions and changing that status
would be a switch from their agreement; and

WHEREAS, Tenure constitutes a vested property right for those
who have tenure; and

WHEREAS, It is unclear that current tenure policies are at the root
of the problems being addressed; and

WHEREAS, Faculty hold few other tangible job benefits compa-
rable to other institutions of higher education; and

WHEREAS, The University of Minnesota recently lost a bitter
legal battle with its faculty regarding tenure rights; therefore be it

Resolved, That any proposed changes to Bylaw 6.25 of the
Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be rejected;
and be it further

Resolved, That boards of regents and administrators of institu-
tions of higher education in the Concordia University System so-
licit input and approval from university faculties in any proposed
changes to current tenure policies.

Faculty
~ Concordia University
St. Paul, MN

5-42

To Insure LCMS Faculty in System Schools
WHEREAS, The Concordia University System represents The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as an arm of the church to edu-
cate church workers and others; and
WHEREAS, The theology and practice of the Concordia Univer-
sity System pledges to conform to the Lutheran Confessions and

the doctrinal position of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod;
and

WHEREAS, The tradition of the constituency of the faculty in the
Concordia University System has been 90 percent LCMS mem-
bers; and

WHEREAS, It is necessary to maintain a strong LCMS faculty to
integrate Lutheran theology and academic excellence; therefore be
it

Resolved, That the Board for Higher Education make it official
policy, and not merely the prerogative of the chairman of the Board
of Higher Education, or of the president of the Concordia Univer-
sity System, to insure that 90 percent of the faculties at each of our
Concordia colleges/universities be members of the LCMS; and be
it further

Resolved, That all colleges/universities of our system work to-
ward compliance with such a policy as soon as possible.

Circuit 16 Forum, South Wisconsin District; Circuit 17
Forum, South Wisconsin District

5-43

To Amend Colloquy Bylaws

WHEREAS, The 1992 Handbook of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod (LCMS) contained a category of eligibility for admis-
sion to the colloquy program for the pastoral ministry for those who
are “‘communicant members in good standing of synodical congre-
gations who are graduates of an established nonsynodical semi-
nary” (Bylaw 6.91 3); and

WHEREAS, The 1995 Handbook of the LCMS contains no cate-
gory of eligibility for admission to the colloquy program for the
pastoral ministry for graduates of nonsynodical seminaries unless
they are “ministers who are in good standing in other Christian
church bodies, are graduates of established seminaries, and have
served at least three years in a recognized ministry in their church
body” (Bylaw 6.91 a); and

WHEREAS, The alternate route programs at both LCMS semi-
naries are designed only for those who are either ministers of reli-
gion, commissioned, with at least 8 years of experience or laymen
with at least 10 years of significant experience related directly to
Word and Sacrament ministry within the LCMS; and

WHEREAS, The alternate route programs do not afford opportu-
nity for a candidate to have a program of preparation tailored to his
individual background after a theological interview has been con-
ducted; and

WHEREAS, Graduates of nonsynodical seminaries who want to
become pastors in the LCMS have no program of preparation open
to them within the LCMS other than completing an additional mas-
ter of divinity degree or applying to the alternate route program
after they have accumulated 10 years of significant experience re-
lated directly to Word and Sacrament ministry within the LCMS;
therefore be it

Resolved, That Bylaw 6.91 1 in the 1995 Handbook of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod be amended by adding the fol-
lowing category of eligible applicants: Communicant members in
good standing of synodical congregations who are graduates of an
established nonsynodical seminary.

Faculty
Concordia Seminary
St. Louis, MO
5-44
To Clarify Seminary Requirement
for Pastoral Colloquy Applicants
Rationale

Bylaw 6.91 provides a process for ministers who were ordained
in anon-LCMS church body to become members of The Lutheran