Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 149

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 149

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES 149

Wuereas, the 1995 convention passed a resolution that directed
that “all plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, and officiants
be approved by the synodical/District President,” and

WHEREAS, the District President has responsibility for supervis-
ing the rostered members in his District, and
WHEREAS, 1995 Res. 2-11B was used by the synodical Presi-
dent to approve and then disapprove an LCMS rostered pastor, Vic-
tor Belton, as a speaker for the National Youth Gathering in At-
lanta when he was under no discipline from his theological
supervisor, the President of the Florida-Georgia District, therefore
be it
Resolved, that 1995 Res. 2-11B be clarified so that all synodi-
cally rostered workshop and plenary speakers, preachers, or offi-
ciants for national gatherings be approved by their respective Dis-
trict President.
Zion
Anaheim, CA

2-80

To Amend 1995 Res. 2-11B re
National and District Youth Gatherings

WHEREAS, National and District youth gatherings are effective,
exciting opportunities to promote the development of Christian
faith in our young people as they boldly confess Jesus Christ as
their Lord and Savior; and

WHEREAS, Such gatherings promote unity of the Spirit through
the proper use of Word and Sacrament and provide opportunities
for Christian service and leadership training for youth; and

WHEREAS, The 1995 synodical convention passed a resolution
(2-11B) that directed that for only national youth gatherings “all
plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, and officiants be ap-
proved by the synodical/District President”; and

Wuereas, 1995 Res. 2-11B was used by the synodical Presi-
dent’s office to rescind approval of an LCMS rostered pastor as a
speaker for the national youth gathering in Atlanta, Ga.; and

Wuereas, The LCMS pastor is a member in good standing and
under no discipline from the District President, his ecclesiastical
supervisor; therefore be it

Resolved, That the 1995 Res. 2-11B be amended so that ap-
proval of all plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, or offi-
ciants for national youth gatherings who are members of LCMS
congregations be transferred to their respective District Presidents.

Our Father
Littleton, CO

2-81

To Increase Support of Concordia Historical Institute

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has cele-
brated a history of 150 years of God’s grace among the members of
our church body; and

WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute is commissioned with
the task of documenting the history of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod and making available for research and study all mate-
rials pertinent to this history; and

WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute, as the Synod’s De-
partment of Archives and History, is responsible for receiving and
preserving the minutes, files, records, and reports of officers,
boards, and commissions of the Synod; and

WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute is required by the By-
laws of the Synod to “promote interest in the history of the
Lutheran Church in America, particularly of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod” and to “stimulate historical research and
to publish its results”; and

WHEREAS, The vast majority of the materials contained at Con-
cordia Historical Institute are not arranged and described in a way

which makes their contents readily accessible to the members of
our church body; and

WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute does not have the
funds necessary for the staff needed to accomplish such arrange-
ment and description; and

WHEREAS, Every donation of materials made to Concordia
Historical Institute places additional financial requirements upon
Concordia Historical Institute, which must then provide for the
arrangement, storage, and preservation of these materials, thus
compounding the institute’s financial burden; and

WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, as a conse-
quence of its recent celebration of 150 years of God’s grace and
goodness upon the members of this Synod, wishes to recognize the
importance of preserving and proclaiming to future generations the
record of God’s wonderful acts among us; therefore be it

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention encourage all of its member congregations to support the
mission and work of Concordia Historical Institute by becoming
members of the institute or by providing for the needs of the insti-
tute in their annual congregational budget; and be it further

Resolved, That the Board of Directors of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod give serious consideration to these press-
ing needs of Concordia Historical Institute, which is the synodical
Department of Archives and History and seek to provide for the
staffing needs necessary for the systematic arrangement and de-
scription of the synodical Archives collections and for their con-
tinued preservation.

Board of Governors
Concordia Historical Institute

2-82

To Take Corrective Action re Inequity
in Compensation Due to Roster Status

Preamble

Through the years God has blessed our Synod through the min-
istry of our Lutheran schools. Well-trained and dedicated teachers
have made our schools one of the best outreach tools our Synod
enjoys as well as a training for our own young.

We owe a great deal of thanks to the many teachers who have
served in this ministry over the history of our church. Our church
has recognized their special contribution to the ministry of the
church by granting to those with the appropriate qualifications the
roster status of “Commissioned Minister.” This status is given to
those who have the important training to conduct their classrooms
in a way which reflects our understanding of Scripture and a proper
division of Law and Gospel.

Teachers who have this recognition are for the purposes of So-
cial Security tax considered self-employed. That means that they
must pay the full 15.3% Social Security tax on their own. Teachers
who do not have the roster status pay 7.65% and the church (or
local governing body) must also pay 7.65%. Many teachers on ros-
ter are not reimbursed for the additional tax that they must pay. The
result is that there is a financial penalty for being on the synodical
roster. Those without roster status are in reality paid more than
those with that status. This has led some to leave the roster for fi-
nancial reasons. This also becomes a financial disincentive for
nonrostered teachers to pursue synodical training through the PELT
or colloquy programs. This same type of financial inequity may
also exist with rostered workers in other institutions.

There are some that argue that there are tax advantages to being
on the roster that outweigh this tax penalty. That is only true if de-
ductions are itemized and any advantage is completely wiped out
for one when both spouses are on roster. ;

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod ex-
presses its expectation that no synodically rostered worker should
be financially penalized for his or her roster status; and be it further