Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 149
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 149
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
CONGREGATIONAL SERVICES 149
Wuereas, the 1995 convention passed a resolution that directed
that “all plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, and officiants
be approved by the synodical/District President,” and
WHEREAS, the District President has responsibility for supervis-
ing the rostered members in his District, and
WHEREAS, 1995 Res. 2-11B was used by the synodical Presi-
dent to approve and then disapprove an LCMS rostered pastor, Vic-
tor Belton, as a speaker for the National Youth Gathering in At-
lanta when he was under no discipline from his theological
supervisor, the President of the Florida-Georgia District, therefore
be it
Resolved, that 1995 Res. 2-11B be clarified so that all synodi-
cally rostered workshop and plenary speakers, preachers, or offi-
ciants for national gatherings be approved by their respective Dis-
trict President.
Zion
Anaheim, CA
2-80
To Amend 1995 Res. 2-11B re
National and District Youth Gatherings
WHEREAS, National and District youth gatherings are effective,
exciting opportunities to promote the development of Christian
faith in our young people as they boldly confess Jesus Christ as
their Lord and Savior; and
WHEREAS, Such gatherings promote unity of the Spirit through
the proper use of Word and Sacrament and provide opportunities
for Christian service and leadership training for youth; and
WHEREAS, The 1995 synodical convention passed a resolution
(2-11B) that directed that for only national youth gatherings “all
plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, and officiants be ap-
proved by the synodical/District President”; and
Wuereas, 1995 Res. 2-11B was used by the synodical Presi-
dent’s office to rescind approval of an LCMS rostered pastor as a
speaker for the national youth gathering in Atlanta, Ga.; and
Wuereas, The LCMS pastor is a member in good standing and
under no discipline from the District President, his ecclesiastical
supervisor; therefore be it
Resolved, That the 1995 Res. 2-11B be amended so that ap-
proval of all plenary and workshop speakers, preachers, or offi-
ciants for national youth gatherings who are members of LCMS
congregations be transferred to their respective District Presidents.
Our Father
Littleton, CO
2-81
To Increase Support of Concordia Historical Institute
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has cele-
brated a history of 150 years of God’s grace among the members of
our church body; and
WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute is commissioned with
the task of documenting the history of The Lutheran Church—Mis-
souri Synod and making available for research and study all mate-
rials pertinent to this history; and
WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute, as the Synod’s De-
partment of Archives and History, is responsible for receiving and
preserving the minutes, files, records, and reports of officers,
boards, and commissions of the Synod; and
WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute is required by the By-
laws of the Synod to “promote interest in the history of the
Lutheran Church in America, particularly of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod” and to “stimulate historical research and
to publish its results”; and
WHEREAS, The vast majority of the materials contained at Con-
cordia Historical Institute are not arranged and described in a way
which makes their contents readily accessible to the members of
our church body; and
WHEREAS, Concordia Historical Institute does not have the
funds necessary for the staff needed to accomplish such arrange-
ment and description; and
WHEREAS, Every donation of materials made to Concordia
Historical Institute places additional financial requirements upon
Concordia Historical Institute, which must then provide for the
arrangement, storage, and preservation of these materials, thus
compounding the institute’s financial burden; and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod, as a conse-
quence of its recent celebration of 150 years of God’s grace and
goodness upon the members of this Synod, wishes to recognize the
importance of preserving and proclaiming to future generations the
record of God’s wonderful acts among us; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention encourage all of its member congregations to support the
mission and work of Concordia Historical Institute by becoming
members of the institute or by providing for the needs of the insti-
tute in their annual congregational budget; and be it further
Resolved, That the Board of Directors of The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod give serious consideration to these press-
ing needs of Concordia Historical Institute, which is the synodical
Department of Archives and History and seek to provide for the
staffing needs necessary for the systematic arrangement and de-
scription of the synodical Archives collections and for their con-
tinued preservation.
Board of Governors
Concordia Historical Institute
2-82
To Take Corrective Action re Inequity
in Compensation Due to Roster Status
Preamble
Through the years God has blessed our Synod through the min-
istry of our Lutheran schools. Well-trained and dedicated teachers
have made our schools one of the best outreach tools our Synod
enjoys as well as a training for our own young.
We owe a great deal of thanks to the many teachers who have
served in this ministry over the history of our church. Our church
has recognized their special contribution to the ministry of the
church by granting to those with the appropriate qualifications the
roster status of “Commissioned Minister.” This status is given to
those who have the important training to conduct their classrooms
in a way which reflects our understanding of Scripture and a proper
division of Law and Gospel.
Teachers who have this recognition are for the purposes of So-
cial Security tax considered self-employed. That means that they
must pay the full 15.3% Social Security tax on their own. Teachers
who do not have the roster status pay 7.65% and the church (or
local governing body) must also pay 7.65%. Many teachers on ros-
ter are not reimbursed for the additional tax that they must pay. The
result is that there is a financial penalty for being on the synodical
roster. Those without roster status are in reality paid more than
those with that status. This has led some to leave the roster for fi-
nancial reasons. This also becomes a financial disincentive for
nonrostered teachers to pursue synodical training through the PELT
or colloquy programs. This same type of financial inequity may
also exist with rostered workers in other institutions.
There are some that argue that there are tax advantages to being
on the roster that outweigh this tax penalty. That is only true if de-
ductions are itemized and any advantage is completely wiped out
for one when both spouses are on roster. ;
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod ex-
presses its expectation that no synodically rostered worker should
be financially penalized for his or her roster status; and be it further