Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Sheet 303

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Sheet 303

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

288 , BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE

number of areas which it believes should be given further consid-
eration and should be modifted.

The Board of Directors is offering recommendations for con-
sideration with rationale provided for each.

Resolved, That the following recommendations be adopted:
A. Position of Chief Financial Officer

Rationale

Ever since its beginning the Treasurer has been an elected offi-
cer of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod. There does not ap-
pear to be a compelling reason for changing this procedure. The
Vice-President—Finance/Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer is not
only responsible to the Board of Directors but is also involved with
many other agencies. The Board of Directors is not the owner but
the custodian of the Synod’s property. He/she must therefore have
the full confidence of the entire Synod. This could best be achieved
and maintained by election as an officer of the Synod upon nomi-
nation by the Board of Directors after consultation with the Presi-
dent and with the other boards on which he serves. For business
reasons, including signature purposes, it is also desirable for the
Treasurer to retain Vice-President status, a status granted by the
1992 convention.

Qualification and nomination for the position could be deter-
mined as it presently is. Floor nominations could be limited as they
presently are for other positions where those intending to nominate
are to present the names within a specified period of time so that
they can be properly evaluated by the nominating committee. In
this case, the evaluation would be made by the Board of Directors.

Resolved, That the Vice-President—Finance/Treasurer/Chief
Financial Officer continue to be an elected position by constitu-
tional stipulation; and be it further

Resolved, That evaluation of candidates for nomination be car-
ried out by the Board of Directors of the Synod; and be it further

Resolved, That the nominee or slate of nominees for election as
Vice-President—Finance/Treasurer/Chief Financial Officer be pro-
vided by the Board of Directors; and be it finally

Resolved, That any additional nominees from the floor must
meet the requirements of Bylaw 3.985 a, with the Board of Direc-
tors serving as the Committee for Nominations for this position.

B. Terms of Service of Executives and Staff

Rationale

Appointment of persons to five-year terms establishes legal ex-
posure since such appointment can be subject to interpretation as a
contractual agreement. Annual review is provided at the present
time for all executives and, if desirable, a more thorough five-year
evaluation could be mandated. This would deal with the concerns
expressed by the Blue Ribbon Committee. At the same time, ser-
vice at the pleasure of the board would make it possible to remove
an executive at any time if the evaluative criteria were not met
without opening the board to the legal exposure which could be
possible under terms of a five-year appointment. Service at the
pleasure of the board also allows for changes in staffing that might
be needed to reflect changes in priorities and budgets.

Resolved, That those serving in executive officer/executive di-
rector positions, as well as other positions, continue to serve “at the
pleasure of the board”; and be it further

Resolved, That annual evaluations of persons in such positions
continue under Human Resources policies, which also provide for
thorough and extensive five-year reviews; and be it finally

Resolved, That if the provision of five-year terms is retained,
the addition of the conditions of “lack of funds or elimination of
position” be added to Bylaw 3.69 e, as reasons for termination.

C. Composition of Board Membership

Rationale

It is impossible for the elective process to provide assurance that
persons with the necessary expertise will be chosen to serve on the
boards of corporate entities. Furthermore, in the case of several,
LCEF and the Foundation, it would seem more appropriate that
those who invest their funds with these entities or contribute di-
rectly to them should have the responsibility for determining those
who would direct their activities.

Resolved, That for purposes of securing the necessary expertise
and broader representation, those corporate and program boards
presently appointed continue to be appointed in the same manner as
is the current practice; and be it further

Resolved, That if the proposal of the Blue Ribbon Committee
regarding national convention election of approximately one-third
of board members is adopted, those elected members be limited to
rostered members as provided for in the governing documents of
each corporation.

D. President’s Representative

Rationale

With the proposed elimination of the Council of Administra-
tors, the need for communication within the Administrative Team
is intensified. It is extremely important that information regarding
wiiat is taking place and what is planned in all agencies be avail-
able for sharing with all members of that group. For this reason, it
would seem most appropriate that members of the Administrative
Team be involved with all boards and agencies of the Synod.

Resolved, That in those situations where the President’s repre-
sentative serves on a board of corporate Synod or the governing
board of a synodical corporate agency, normally the President’s
representative be a member from the Administrative Team.

E. Concordia Publishing House Board of Directors

Rationale

The Blue Ribbon Committee has stated that “the Chief Finan-
cial Officer provides linkage with the financial matters of the syn-
odwide corporate entities as a voting member on the governing
boards of The Lutheran Church Extension Fund—Missouri Synod
and The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation, and as a
nonvoting member on the board of Concordia Publishing House.”
No rationale is provided for nonvoting status on the board of Con-
cordia Publishing House in contrast to voting status on other cor-
porate boards, including also Concordia University System. Be-
cause of the large financial interests involved in the governance of
Concordia Publishing House, which in 1997 had revenues of
$35,000,000 and net income in excess of $1,594,000, it would be
preferable for the Chief Financial Officer to also have both voice
and vote on that board. Since the Chief Financial Officer serves on
the board of Concordia Publishing House, it might not be neces-
sary for a President's representative to also be assigned to the board
if the CFO, a member of the Administrative Team, can provide the
necessary communication linkage.

Resolved, That the Chief Financial Officer be designated as a
voting member of the Board of Directors of Concordia Publishing
House.

F. Rewrite/Reformat the Synodical Constitution and Bylaws

Rationale

In 1992, the Commission on Structure was eliminated from the
Bylaws for several reasons. First, it was believed that some of the
major concerns had been dealt with by previous convention actions
and that only minor changes in Bylaws would be required in the
future. The decision of the Commission on Constitutional Matters
involving corporate agencies, however, led to the conclusion that