Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 277
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 277
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION 277
7-125
To Study Doctrine of Ministry
and Defer Implementation of Any Recommendation
from Nomenclature Study Committee
WHEREAS, The theology of ministry has not been clearly delin-
eated among us, nor has there been agreement among those in the
LCMS who have studied and written on the question; and
WHEREAS, Practice in our Synod needs constantly to be mea-
sured against fidelity to Scriptures and the Confessions rather than
assumed to be correct because of pronouncements by church fa-
thers; and
WHEREAS, There has been an erosion of the validity and dignity
of the various offices of the ordained and commissioned minister
by partitioning into auxiliary professional categories such as assis-
tant or associate pastor, teacher, musician, evangelist, director of
Christian education, deaconess and the like, which further obscures
the concept of ministry among those in service and being served;
and
WHEREAS, The lack of clarity in the concept of ministry and
dignity of the ministry in the view of the laity, combined with low
salaries and low prestige may hinder recruitment of church work-
ers; and
WHEREAS, The overview of the findings of the Nomenclature
Study Committee and their suggested methods for classifying
church workers was not received by the rostered church workers
in a timely manner, which would have allowed for studied consid-
eration before responding; and
WHEREAS, The study committee’s findings and suggested clas-
sifications have received a negative response from segments of the
professional church workers; and
WHEREAS, The laity of the church has not had opportunity to re-
view and respond to the committee’s findings and methods of clas-
sification; therefore be it
Resolved, That the Synod in convention encourage ongoing
prayerful study and deliberation of the doctrine of ministry, exam-
ining LCMS tradition in the light of Scripture and the Lutheran
Confessions; and be it further
Resolved, That such study and dialog be carried on by the fac-
ulties of the Concordia University System institutions and the sem-
inaries, the Lutheran Education Association and other groups of
ministers commissioned and ordained; and be it further
- Resolved, That the examination of the doctrine of ministry be
done through official synodical and institutional publications, pro-
fessional conferences, and Circuit Forums; and be it finally
Resolved, That action concerning the findings and recom-
mended methods of classifying church workers be postponed until
the 2001 synodical convention, when such examination by church
workers, both lay and rostered, and laity should be concluded.
Concordia University, River Forest, IL; Board of Regents,
Concordia University, River Forest, 16
7-126
To Affirm Continued Use of Current Nomenclature
for Commissioned and Ordained Ministers
WHEREAS, Res. 5-09A, “To Classify Ministers of Religion,”
was adopted by the 1983 convention of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod, “to declare unequivocally which positions are re-
garded by the Synod as contributing vitally to discharging the of-
fice of the public ministry,” by classifying them as Ministers of
Religion, Ordained” and “Ministers of Religion, Commissioned”;
and
WuerEAS, The ensuing 15 years of common usage and careful
education have emphatically affirmed that “‘ ‘Ministers of Religion,
Ordained’ and ‘Ministers of Religion, Commissioned’ are regarded
fully by the Synod as ministers of religion, entitled to be regarded
as such by all, in recognition of the fact, that even though the func-
tions between and within these two categories may differ, all these
functions contribute vitally to discharging the office of the public
ministry” (Resolution 5-09A, second resolve) and that this nomen-
clature has gained increasingly wide understanding and acceptance
in the Synod and even by government agencies; and
WHEREAS, The Nomenclature Study Committee has suggested
alternative nomenclature titles, especially for commissioned min-
isters, the purpose of which seems to be to remove the historically
affirmed by synodical conventions (1983 Res. 5-09A and 1989
Res. 2-02) usage of “minister” or “ministry” from called workers
who are not ordained; and
WHEREAS, These proposals would reverse 150 years of refer-
ence to Lutheran school teachers as being in ministry (1967 Res.
7-08; 1971 Res. 7-05; etc.), and would thus be confusing to the
church and disheartening to those who serve in the officially ros-
tered, commissioned ministry of the church; and
WHEREAS, The “third category” refers to people who are not on
the roster of Synod and therefore not eligible for calls or for status
as a member or minister of the Synod; therefore be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention affirm the continued use of the current nomenclature,
“Minister of Religion, Ordained” and “Minister of Religion, Com-
missioned,” to classify positions of congregational ministry; and
be it further
Resolved, That the “third category” be dropped from the By-
laws; and be it further
Resolved, That further study be done on ministry and nomen-
clature; and be it finally
Resolved, That all synodical ministers, ordained and commis-
sioned, be commended for their faithful, dedicated service to the
Lord and His people.
Board for Congregational Services
7-127
To Affirm Continued Use of Current Nomenclature
for Ministers of the Gospel
WHEREAS, In 1983 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in
convention adopted Res. 5-09A “to declare unequivocally which
positions are regarded by the Synod as contributing vitally to dis-
charging the office of the public ministry,” by classifying such po-
sitions as “Ministers of Religion, Ordained,” and “Ministers of Re-
ligion, Commissioned;” and
WHEREAS, For 15 years this nomenclature has helped clarify is-
sues relating to the divine call, especially emphasizing the Synod’s
recognition of its duly called teachers, DCEs and DCOs as minis-
ters of religion; and
WHEREAS, The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod has histori-
cally avoided vague ecclesiastical nomenclature fraught with his-
torical baggage in favor of terms which communicate clearly to
both our church and our society (president rather than bishop, for
example, or convention rather than council, not to mention such
terms as district, second vice-president, or delegate); and
WHEREAS, The current designations of “Minister of Religion.
Ordained,” and “Minister of Religion, Commissioned,” are spe-
cific, descriptive, and appropriate terms understood and accepted
throughout the Synod and even by government agencies; therefore
be it
Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention affirm the continued use of the current nomenclature.
“Minister of Religion, Ordained” and “Minister of Religion, Com-
missioned,” to classify positions regarded by the Synod as con-
tributing vitally to discharging the office of the public ministry.
Faculty
Concordia College
Seward, NE