Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 359
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 359
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS
As this quotation makes evident, the church fathers were not unaware
that in the narrative of the Scriptures and in the language of the church’s
worship God is consistently portrayed as masculine. Today the claim is
frequently advanced that this masculine rendering of God in the Bible is a
function of the patriarchal culture in which the Scriptures were written.
Biblical language, it is said, reflects cultural realities and biases which we,
given the new realities of our own cultural egalitarianism, are free to
replace through the use of “gender neutral” language. Such an analysis of
the biblical language, however, does not take with adequate seriousness
the uniqueness of Israel in the midst of the nations. The peoples sur-
rounding ancient Israel and the believers of the New Testament common-
ly possessed female as well as male deities. Rather than reflect the reli-
gious language of the broader culture, the language of the Bible was in
considerable contrast to the language and understanding of surrounding
peoples. Had the biblical authors thought of God in feminine terms (as in
surrounding cultures), we would expect that there would be some equi-
librium of use between masculine and feminine language concerning God.
In fact, however, that is not the case."
2. The Names of God. In both the Old and New Testaments the Scrip-
tures make consistent and pervasive use of masculine tenninology and
imagery when speaking about God. Within the Old Testament the proper
name of God is YHWH (7t™). More than any other designation of God,
this name names the God of Israel over against the false gods and god-
desses of the surrounding pagan peoples. Most specifically, the name
YHWH is associated with the mission of Moses to redeem Israel from
Egypt through the Exodus and the giving of the Law. YHWH is the
covenant name of God.
YHWH is the revealed name of God. It is the name God himself made
known to Moses. Noteworthy is the phrase “I am YHWH” (77* *38) in
which God names himself (e.g., Exod. 6:8; 12:12; Lev. 18:5, 6, 21; Isa. 43:15)."
However, the basic narrative for the name YHWH is Exod. 3:13-15. These
* The claim 1s sometimes made that because God is intrinsically “beyond” gender dis-
tinction, the use of feminine and masculine imagery in the Bible possesses equal weight and
sigmuficance, despite the clear preponderance of the masculine. We should remember, how-
ever, that the Gad who in his eternal nature is transcendent to all gender distinctions is the
God who is unknown and unknowable. God renders himself known and knowable in his
revelation which 1s canonically witnessed in the words of Scripture and fulfilled in the incar-
nate Son of the Father, the man Jesus.
“The passages listed here are typical of the emphatic use of the phrase “lam YH WH.”
Important is the repetition of the phrase in the Holiness Code (e.g., Lev. 18:5, 6, 21: 19:12, 14,
16, 18, 28, 30, 32, 37). For a full listing of the occurrences of this phrase, see Francis Brown,
S. R. Driver and Charles A. Briggs, eds., A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament
(Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1907), 219, The Septuagint tended to translate YHWH with “the
Lord” (6 0p.os), and this usage has come over into many English translations, However,
this rendering obscures the fact that YH WH is God's revealed name.
9
Elohim is used in the singular sense to refer to the God of Israel. YHWH is
the Elohim, “the God” of Israel, and is the only true Elohim. Therefore, there
is the frequent occurrence of the phrase “the Lord, your God” (YHWH,
your Elohim; see, e.g., Deut. 5:6, 8). Important, too, is a passage like Deut.
4:35: “{t] he Lord is God (literally: YHWH, he is Elohim); there is no other
besides him” (see also Deut. 4:39; 7:9; 1 Kings 8:60; 18:39; 2 Chron. 33:13).'4
As in the case of YHWH, the grammatical forms occurring with Elohim
are exclusively masculine. Nowhere do adjectives and verbal construc-
tions in the feminine appear in conjunction with the divine names of
Israel’s God. This is indicative of the fact that the scriptural portrayal of
God is consistently masculine. However, one might argue that the gram-
matical gender of the divine names YH WH, Adonai, and Elohim would nat-
urally demand corresponding grammatical gender in modifying adjectives
and verb forms. Such an objection, however, would not hold in the case of
pronouns. In neither the Old Testament nor in the New Testament is God ever
referred to by a feminine pronoun. This is important, for the character of a
Pronoun is to point to its referent. A pronoun specifies and identifies. Fre-
quently in the Old Testament the third singular masculine personal pro-
noun “he” (#97) and the second singular masculine personal pronoun
“you/thou” ("238) are used of God. Some examples of this usage follow:
Deut. 4:35:
... that vou might know that the Lord (YHWH) [he] (Rt) is God (Elohim).
Deut. 7:9:
Know therefore that the Lord your God [he] (R17) is God.
1 Kings 18:39:
And when all the people saw it, they fell on their faces; and they said,
“The Lord, he (835) is God; the Lord, he (17) is God.”
‘5 1 Kings 18:36-37:
Elijah the prophet came near and said .. ., “Answer me, O Lord,
answer me, so this people may know that thou ( ), O Lord, art God, and
that thou (7TR) hast tumed their hearts back.”
Ps. 102:12 (Hebrew, v. 13):
But thou (Tr), O Lord, art enthroned for ever; thy name endures to all
“ An important account in determuning that YH WH is the true and only Elohint is that
of Ehjah and the priests of Baal (1 Kings 18:20-35). In the confrontation Baal is shown to be
no Elohim at ail, while YHWH is demonstrated to be the true Elohim. Indeed, the name Eb-
jab means “my El (my God) is YHWH.”
'3 See also Num. 23:19, Deut. 4:39: 32:6; 1 Kings 8:60; 18:24; 2 Chron. 33:13; fsa. 45:18.
11
verses are part of the burning bush account in which God commissions
Moses to redeem Israel from Egypt (Exod. 3:14:17). When Moses inquires
after God’s name, God replies: "I AM WHOIAM.... Say this to the peo-
ple of Israel, ‘I AM has sent me to vou’... . Say this to the people of Israel,
‘The LORD, the God of your fathers . . . has sent me to you.’” * Although
there remain different opinions about the meaning of YHWH, the gram-
matical form of this personal name of God appears to be a third-person
singular masculine verb in the imperfect. In any case, all terminology
attending this name is masculine. For example, the verb forms which are
used with YHWHi are consistently in the masculine form: “I AM has sent
me (Exod. 3:14: “377C); ‘The Lord has sent me” (3:15: *2'70); ? “The Lord
has appeared to me” (3:16: 77); ‘The Lord has met with us” (3:18: 77P2),"
The same linguistic features occur in the narrative of the giving of the
Law on Mount Sinai (Exod. 20:1 ff.). God declares himself to be YHWH: “1
am the Lord (7: *228) vour God” (20:2). Again, all verbal forms attend-
ing the name of God are masculine. For example, Exod. 20:5-6 reads: “For
1 the Lord your God am a jealous God, visiting (72) "' the iniquity of the
fathers upon the children... , but showing ("=> teadfast love to thou-
sands... .” What obtains in these two narratives is true of the entire
Hebrew Scriptures: nowhere is a feminine verb form governed by YHWH.
The evidence is the same in regard to other designations for God.
Adonai ("my Lord,” *77®), often used as a circumlocution for God’s name,
is a noun in the masculine gender. It often appears in apposition to
YHWH, as in the phrase “my Lord, YHWH” or “YHWH, my Lord” (see
Gen. 15:2, 8; Ps. 68:21). The designation Elohim (C77), along with the
short form E] (8), appears to have been a generic Semitic name for deity.
Masculine plural in form, Elohim can refer to the many gods of paganism,
such as in Jethro’s declaration that the Lord (YHWH) is greater than all
gods (Elohim, Exod. 18:11; also Exod. 12:12; 20:3; Deut. 10:17). Moreover, in
the singular sense Elohim can refer to the specific god or goddess of a pagan
people.”* But in the overwhelming number of cases in the Old Testament,
*In God’s naming of himself, there is a progression of forms, from “1 AM WHO I AM”
(RAT TW to “PAM? (TW to “the Lord® (“77). For a thorough discussion of the
name YHWH. sve David N. Freedman, ", YHWH,” Theologwal Dictionary of the Old Testa-
ment. ed. G. Botterweck and Helmer Ringgren, trans. David Green (Grand Rapids; Wm. B.
Eerdmans, 1986), 4:500-521
* The Hebrew torm of the verb in Exed. 3:14, 15 is Qal perfect, third person masculine
singular
© The Hebrew form of the verbs in Exod. 3:16, 18 is Niphal perfect, thied person
masculine singular
¥ Qal partiaple, masculine singular
= Qal participle, masculine singular, See also the masculine verbs in Exod. 20:7, 11,
248, 12.
© Dagon (1 Sam. 5:7); Chemosh (udg. 11:24); Baal (1 Kings 18:24); Ishtar (1 Kings
11:5,33),
10
Ps. 63:1 (Hebrew, v. 2):
O God, thou (TX) art my God, I seek thee; my soul thirsts for thee
Isa. 63:16:
For thou (“HIR) art our Father, though Abraham does not know us and
Israel does not acknowledge us; thou (773), O Lord, art our Father, our
Redeemer from of old is thy name."
Common as well are the strong identifying phrases “You are he” (W™ "W78)
and especially “J am he” (#37 *38). Examples of these phrases follow:
2 Sam 7:28: .
And now, O Lord God, Thou art God (=°A87 81> Tek (literally: thou art
he the Got }), and thy words are true.
2 Kings 19:15:
And Hezekiah prayed before the Lord and said: “O Lord, the God of
Israel, who art enthroned above the cherubim, thou art the God, thou alone
(OTR TART eT Cya [iterally: thou art he. the God, thou alone }) of all the
earth; thou hast made heaven and earth.”
Jer. 14:22:
Are there any among the false gods of the nations that can bring rain? Or
can the heavens give showers? Art thou not he (W°7 778), O Lord our
God?!”
Deut. 32:39:
See now that L coer fam fe (80 "RR IR), and there is no god beside me.
Isa. 41:4:
Who has performed and done this, calling the generations from the begin-
ning? I, the Lord, the first, and with the last; fam he (#7 *28).
Isa. 52:6:
Therefore my people shall know my name; therefore in that day they shall
know that it is | (87 “28 [literally: | am he ]) who speak, here am L.'*
This usage of the personal pronoun corresponds to the use of the pos-
sessive pronoun, and of the personal pronoun as object of prepositions. In
Hebrew these are expressed by way of suffixes. For example, lachem (C27)
means “for you” (“you” here is plural), with the pronominal suffix C>
being the second person masculine plural. Within the Old Testament such
suffixes, when referring to God, invariably are masculine.'? For example,
* See also Exod. 19-23, } Kings 18:36; 2 Kings 19:19; 1 Chron. 17:25, 27; Ps, 44:3; 102:14, 27;
Isa. 37-16; 64:8; Jer. 149.
1 See also 1 Chron. 17:26; Neh. 9:7; Pas, 44:5; 102:28; Isa. 37:16
1 Gee also Isa. 43:4), 11, 13, 15, 25; 45:18; 46:4; 48:12; 51:12.
* The second person plural feminine suffix would be chen, "=.
12
359