Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 75
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 75
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
SYNODICAL REPORTS 75
In one of the Districts of our Synod approximately 10% of
the pastors have debt that could be considered insurmount-
able, meaning individual total indebtedness that surpasses
$50,000 (inclusive of student loans, consumer loans, and
credit card debt).
* As seen from a survey of one of our Synod's colleges, in the
recent graduating class, 15% had debt between $20-$30,000
and 50% had debt between $10-$20,000.
7. That according to a survey responded to by 20 of the Synod’s
35 District Presidents there are, as a best guess, at least 150 of
our Synod’s Pastors who have significant, unmanageable debt.
It must be emphasized that this figure is more than likely a
minimum number.
8. That professional church workers with large debt, themselves,
are concerned that this debt is negatively affecting their min-
istry.
9. That the salaries offered to starting pastors, teachers, and other
professional church workers, as new graduates within our
Synod, do not provide such new entrants with an adequate in-
come to service this debt.
10. That there is within our Synod a shortage of professional
church workers (for example, pastors’ and male elementary
principals to mention but a few) and that this shortage will be
compounded if the issue of debt service is not addressed.
11. Finally, that if not corrected, unresolved debt could lead pro-
fessional church workers to declare bankruptcy or seek em-
ployment outside the church, notwithstanding their individual
desire to remain as servants within the church.
Suggested Solutions
With respect to the issue of debt, we looked at this issue from
the perspective of a continuum. That is, when the debt was first in-
curred, i.e., at the time of the individual’s education and the fact
that such debt naturally includes both educational and living debt;
and, second, the fact that such debt can become compounded, and
remain unmanaged during the individual’s service within the
Synod, due to both inadequate salary levels and our Synod’s failure
to provide both resources and programs to manage the debt. Hence,
it becomes imperative that the Synod not only address the debt
problem at the time when the student first enters our synodical ed-
ucational system, but also while the student is within that system
and, thereafter, i.e., during the service life of that full-time profes-
sional church worker.
Before we list proposals for the President and the Board of Di-
rectors’ consideration we must emphasize that any debt, educa-
tional or otherwise, incurred by our Synod’s professional church
workers must remain the specific responsibility of the individual
who incurred that debt. Also, we should point out that during our
consideration of church worker indebtedness we did not believe it
necessary to inquire into nor distinguish as between the reasons for
the underlying debt. The debt exists. It is a growing concern and
problem. The issue is the establishment of a system for the Chris-
tian management and ultimate resolution of the growing indebted-
ness problem. Finally—and while the obligation to search for
means toward the proper resolution of the growing debt problem
of professional church workers rests with our Synod, its organiz-
tions and individual congregations—it is our Synod as a whole that
must accept the responsibility to assume the overall resolution of
the problem. Accordingly, some suggested solutions, both preven-
tative (or proactive) and remedial follow:
1. That the President of the Synod send to all synodical congre-
gations a pastoral letter that brings to the attention of the
Synod both the problem identified and the necessary steps
that must be taken to address the permanent resolution of this
problem.
2. That the Lutheran Church Extension Fund (““LCEF’”) should
make available loan programs to Districts and congregations
through which professional church workers would be able to
consolidate high interest debt to a more reasonable interest
level. And, that congregations be made aware of such
programs. In addition, such direct loans could be made
available to students, at the time of placement, through a
sponsoring District or congregation. However, the provision
of such low interest loans must be accompanied with debt
awareness and management programs.
. That the Stewardship Department of our Synod be
encouraged to continue with its current effort to both develop
and then implement personal, financial management
workshops for all of our Synod’s professional church
workers. An outline of the pilot program (for the South
Wisconsin District) was shared with the Financial Aid Task
Force. The proposed program looks comprehensive. Those
involved in this pilot project are to be commended. Such
programs should be aggressively promoted throughout the
Synod.
In addition the Stewardship Department is to be encouraged
to seek assistance and direction from agencies and individu-
als, both within and without our synodical system, who have
developed a recognized expertise in the area of managing fi-
nancial resources.
. That the Concordia University System (“CUS”), its
individual colleges and universities, and our Synod’s two
seminaries accept as their responsibility the task of both
identifying and then assisting students who are likely to face
financial problems while in attendance at their individual
institutions.
. That CUS also develop, or incorporate the work coordinated
by the Stewardship Department, and provide financial
planning workshops as a mandatory offering during the first
quarter/semester of the freshman year at the Synod’s colleges
or universities.
. That our two synodical seminaries develop, or incorporate
the work undertaken by the Stewardship Department, and
provide financial planning workshops as a mandatory
offering during the first quarter/semester of the first year of
seminary education.
. That the Synod’s CUS and its individual seminaries make
available continuing resources throughout the academic years
of its students in the area of financial counseling. Suggestions
would be in the areas of financial goal setting, how to handle
debt and manage income and expenses (distinguishing
between fixed and variable expenses) and being a wise
consumer of financial products and services.
. That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation
(“LCMSF’”) establish, seek contributions, and administer a
fund the purpose of which is to work with synodical Districts
and congregations to assist professional church workers
under their jurisdiction in both addressing and resolving the
individual indebtedness of such church workers. That such
financial assistance, through funding sources, also be
provided to our synodical schools and seminaries for their
use in developing and implementing financial resource
management programs and counseling.
. That the LCEF should establish a program whereby
individual investors in the LCEF will have the opportunity to
contribute interest income from investments to such fund(s)
under the LCMSF, as above suggested, or, where such
designated interest could be used for the specific purpose of
debt reduction for professional church workers or to assist in
the underwriting of the retirement needs of church workers,
as discussed later in this report.
. That the Synod’s District Presidents take a proactive approach
in identifying those professional church workers under their
ecclesiastical supervision with significant or unresolved debt
problems. That the District Presidents understand it is their re-
sponsibility to both set up procedures for the implementation
of preventive programs and to propose remedial action to re-
solve the problem of unresolved debt of the individual church
workers under their ecclesiastical supervision.
. That the LCMSF, in conjunction with other appropriate entities
within the Synod, provide the means to support a network of
financial planning consultants to meet with all those profes-