Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 75

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 75

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

SYNODICAL REPORTS 75

In one of the Districts of our Synod approximately 10% of
the pastors have debt that could be considered insurmount-
able, meaning individual total indebtedness that surpasses
$50,000 (inclusive of student loans, consumer loans, and
credit card debt).

* As seen from a survey of one of our Synod's colleges, in the
recent graduating class, 15% had debt between $20-$30,000
and 50% had debt between $10-$20,000.

7. That according to a survey responded to by 20 of the Synod’s
35 District Presidents there are, as a best guess, at least 150 of
our Synod’s Pastors who have significant, unmanageable debt.
It must be emphasized that this figure is more than likely a
minimum number.

8. That professional church workers with large debt, themselves,
are concerned that this debt is negatively affecting their min-
istry.

9. That the salaries offered to starting pastors, teachers, and other
professional church workers, as new graduates within our
Synod, do not provide such new entrants with an adequate in-
come to service this debt.

10. That there is within our Synod a shortage of professional
church workers (for example, pastors’ and male elementary
principals to mention but a few) and that this shortage will be
compounded if the issue of debt service is not addressed.

11. Finally, that if not corrected, unresolved debt could lead pro-
fessional church workers to declare bankruptcy or seek em-
ployment outside the church, notwithstanding their individual
desire to remain as servants within the church.

Suggested Solutions

With respect to the issue of debt, we looked at this issue from
the perspective of a continuum. That is, when the debt was first in-
curred, i.e., at the time of the individual’s education and the fact
that such debt naturally includes both educational and living debt;
and, second, the fact that such debt can become compounded, and
remain unmanaged during the individual’s service within the
Synod, due to both inadequate salary levels and our Synod’s failure
to provide both resources and programs to manage the debt. Hence,
it becomes imperative that the Synod not only address the debt
problem at the time when the student first enters our synodical ed-
ucational system, but also while the student is within that system
and, thereafter, i.e., during the service life of that full-time profes-
sional church worker.

Before we list proposals for the President and the Board of Di-
rectors’ consideration we must emphasize that any debt, educa-
tional or otherwise, incurred by our Synod’s professional church
workers must remain the specific responsibility of the individual
who incurred that debt. Also, we should point out that during our
consideration of church worker indebtedness we did not believe it
necessary to inquire into nor distinguish as between the reasons for
the underlying debt. The debt exists. It is a growing concern and
problem. The issue is the establishment of a system for the Chris-
tian management and ultimate resolution of the growing indebted-
ness problem. Finally—and while the obligation to search for
means toward the proper resolution of the growing debt problem
of professional church workers rests with our Synod, its organiz-
tions and individual congregations—it is our Synod as a whole that
must accept the responsibility to assume the overall resolution of
the problem. Accordingly, some suggested solutions, both preven-
tative (or proactive) and remedial follow:

1. That the President of the Synod send to all synodical congre-
gations a pastoral letter that brings to the attention of the
Synod both the problem identified and the necessary steps
that must be taken to address the permanent resolution of this
problem.

2. That the Lutheran Church Extension Fund (““LCEF’”) should
make available loan programs to Districts and congregations
through which professional church workers would be able to
consolidate high interest debt to a more reasonable interest
level. And, that congregations be made aware of such
programs. In addition, such direct loans could be made

available to students, at the time of placement, through a
sponsoring District or congregation. However, the provision
of such low interest loans must be accompanied with debt
awareness and management programs.

. That the Stewardship Department of our Synod be

encouraged to continue with its current effort to both develop
and then implement personal, financial management
workshops for all of our Synod’s professional church
workers. An outline of the pilot program (for the South
Wisconsin District) was shared with the Financial Aid Task
Force. The proposed program looks comprehensive. Those
involved in this pilot project are to be commended. Such
programs should be aggressively promoted throughout the
Synod.

In addition the Stewardship Department is to be encouraged
to seek assistance and direction from agencies and individu-
als, both within and without our synodical system, who have
developed a recognized expertise in the area of managing fi-
nancial resources.

. That the Concordia University System (“CUS”), its

individual colleges and universities, and our Synod’s two
seminaries accept as their responsibility the task of both
identifying and then assisting students who are likely to face
financial problems while in attendance at their individual
institutions.

. That CUS also develop, or incorporate the work coordinated

by the Stewardship Department, and provide financial
planning workshops as a mandatory offering during the first
quarter/semester of the freshman year at the Synod’s colleges
or universities.

. That our two synodical seminaries develop, or incorporate

the work undertaken by the Stewardship Department, and
provide financial planning workshops as a mandatory
offering during the first quarter/semester of the first year of
seminary education.

. That the Synod’s CUS and its individual seminaries make

available continuing resources throughout the academic years
of its students in the area of financial counseling. Suggestions
would be in the areas of financial goal setting, how to handle
debt and manage income and expenses (distinguishing
between fixed and variable expenses) and being a wise
consumer of financial products and services.

. That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod Foundation

(“LCMSF’”) establish, seek contributions, and administer a
fund the purpose of which is to work with synodical Districts
and congregations to assist professional church workers
under their jurisdiction in both addressing and resolving the
individual indebtedness of such church workers. That such
financial assistance, through funding sources, also be
provided to our synodical schools and seminaries for their
use in developing and implementing financial resource
management programs and counseling.

. That the LCEF should establish a program whereby

individual investors in the LCEF will have the opportunity to
contribute interest income from investments to such fund(s)
under the LCMSF, as above suggested, or, where such
designated interest could be used for the specific purpose of
debt reduction for professional church workers or to assist in
the underwriting of the retirement needs of church workers,
as discussed later in this report.

. That the Synod’s District Presidents take a proactive approach

in identifying those professional church workers under their
ecclesiastical supervision with significant or unresolved debt
problems. That the District Presidents understand it is their re-
sponsibility to both set up procedures for the implementation
of preventive programs and to propose remedial action to re-
solve the problem of unresolved debt of the individual church
workers under their ecclesiastical supervision.

. That the LCMSF, in conjunction with other appropriate entities

within the Synod, provide the means to support a network of
financial planning consultants to meet with all those profes-