Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 268

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 268

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

268 STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION

WHEREAS, The faculty of Concordia Seminary, subsequent to
his receiving of the theological diploma, refused certification to
Otten; and

WHEREAS, Otten subsequently appealed the denial of his certifi-
cation by the faculty of Concordia Seminary through the synodical
dispute resolution process in force at that time (Seminary vs.
Otten); and

WHEREAS, Seminary vs. Otten finally came within the jurisdic-
tion of the highest synodical judiciary body at that time, the Board
of Appeals (hereinafter BOA); and

WHEREAS, The faculty of Concordia Seminary, before Seminary
vs. Otten was heard by the BOA, accepted the burden of proof to
justify why they had not certified Otten; and

WHEREAS, The vote of the BOA on Nov. 11, 1960, on the ques-
tion whether to sustain the faculty of Concordia Seminary in deny-
ing, Otten certification resulted in a 5-5 tie; and

WHEREAS, By virtue of the tie vote of the BOA, on Nov. 11,
1960, Concordia Seminary failed in sustaining their burden of
proof in denying certification to Otten; and

WHEREAS, Otten has always maintained the BOA vote of
Nov. 11, 1960, should have resulted in his certification, while the
faculty of Concordia Seminary and various synodical officials
(none competent under Bylaws to render an informed opinion on
the meaning of the BOA vote) held the converse. Otten did not re-
ceive certification; and

WHEREAS, The Rev. Dr. Ralph Bohlmann, in his capacity as
President of Concordia Seminary and during his tenure in that of-
fice, twice in writing requested from the Commission on Appeals
(successor body to the BOA, hereinafter the COA) to rule on the
meaning of the tie vote of the BOA of Nov. 11, 1960; and

WHEREAS, During the time that the Rev. Dr. Ralph Bohlmann
was President of Concordia Seminary, the COA did not render an
opinion on the meaning of the tie vote of the BOA of Nov. 11,
1960, and accordingly when Dr. Bohlmann became synodical Pres-
ident, he requested the COA to render an opinion on who was the
prevailing party in the Nov. 11, 1960, vote of the BOA in the case
of Seminary vs. Otten; and

WHEREAS, COA investigated the facts concerning Seminary vs.
Otten and the tie vote of BOA of Nov. 11, 1960, pursuant to the
request of Synodical President Bohlmann, and after due delibera-
tion released its ruling on Seminary vs. Otten on Dec. 12, 1984;
and

WHEREAS, The COA ruling of Dec. 12, 1984, determined that
Otten had been, in fact, the prevailing party in the case Seminary
vs. Otten as a result of the BOA vote of Nov. 11, 1960; and

WHEREAS, All members of Synod were bound by the findings of
the COA ruling of Dec. 12, 1984, and the COA ruling was ap-
proved by Synod in convention of 1986; and

WHEREAS, Neither President Bohlmann nor the faculty of Con-
cordia Seminary accepted the COA ruling of Dec. 12, 1984, citing
extraneous, unproved allegations against Otten, which occurred
after the BOA vote of Nov. 11, 1960, his certification was with-
held; and

WHEREAS, Otten displayed his willingness to operate under the
suggestions of Synod in convention in subsequent sessions, no se-
rious steps were taken by the faculty of Concordia Seminary to ef-
fect his certification; and

WHEREAS, Synod in convention in 1995, through Res. 7-18A,
sought to have the matter of Rev. Herman J. Otten’s certification
concluded in a “God-pleasing” manner; and

WHEREAS, Res. 7-18A mandated the formation of a special
committee to determine the facts of the case and submit their find-
ings to the synodical President; and

WHEREAS, Res. 7-18A also foresaw a suspension of normal
rules for certification in its wording; and

WHEREAS, The special committee contained at least one mem-
ber bearing a personal animus against Otten and this member was
not recused; and

WHEREAS, The Commission on Constitutional Matters (CCM
hereinafter), shortly after the 1995 synodical convention, rendered
an opinion that any decision of the special committee related to the
certification of Otten must be in accord with the Bylaws of Synod,
and since the Bylaws of Synod state that Concordia Seminary has
the sole power to certify a graduate of Concordia Seminary, the
work product of the special committee was rendered irrelevant; and

WHEREAS, The special committee gave no credence to the COA
ruling of Dec. 12, 1984, and premised their entire approach to the
certification issue that only Concordia Seminary could certify
Otten; and

WHEREAS, The only way Otten will be certified by Concordia
Seminary is if the Bylaws of LCMS are amended to achieve certi-
fication for him; therefore be it

Resolved, That Bylaw 2.09 g is added to the Bylaws of Synod to
read as follows:

The Rev. Herman J. Otten, a 1957 graduate of Concordia Sem-
inary, as of the date of his graduation was in full compliance with
any of the provisions of Section 6.163 of the Bylaws that apply to
his case, and is by this action of the convention of the LCMS, cer-
tified as of the date of his graduation from Concordia Seminary.

St. Paul Evangelical, Paterson, NJ; Immanuel, Clovis, NM;
Holy Cross, Kerrville, TX; Mt. Hope, Boulder, CO

7-94

To Order Faculty to Certify Herman Otten

WHEREAS, Herman Otten has successfully completed a course
of instruction at Concordia Seminary, St. Louis, and was granted
his M.Div. in 1958; and

WHEREAS, Herman Otten was denied certification into the min-
isterium of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod by Concordia
Seminary without cause; and

WHEREAS, The highest adjudicatory body in The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod in 1960, the BOA, found in favor of Her-
man Otten by virtue of a tie vote in a proceeding where the burden
of proof was placed upon the seminary; and

WHEREAS, The highest adjudicatory body in The Lutheran
Church—Missouri Synod (COA) in 1984 affirmed that the 1960
verdict of the BOA was in favor of Herman Otten; and

WHEREAS, The faculty and administration of Concordia Semi-
nary have refused to certify Herman Otten in defiance of the 1960
BOA ruling and the 1984 ruling of the COA; and

WHEREAS, The faculty and administration have taken no action
which would result in the certification of Herman Otten, nor do
they seem to have such intent; and

WHEREAS, Herman Otten has sought redress of the wrong done
him by Concordia Seminary only through ecclesiastical means and
has been unable to gain such redress in spite of two adjudicatory
decisions in his favor; and

WHEREAS, Herman Otten has faithfully served as pastor of Trin-
ity Lutheran Church of New Haven, Mo. (a member congregation
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod), adhering to the offi-
cial theological positions of Synod; and

WHEREAS, Herman Otten has exhibited the highest standards of
pastoral care to the souls placed in his charge; and

WHEREAS, Herman Otten is of good report to the brother pas-
tors of the Circuit in which his congregation is located; therefore be
It

Resolved, That The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod in con-
vention herewith direct and mandate the synodical President to
order the faculty and administration of Concordia Seminary to take
effective measures under synodical Constitution Art. XI A 2, such
that Herman Otten is certified minister of religion, ordained of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod within 60 days following the
date of passage of this resolution.

Concordia
South Haven, MN