Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 251

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 251

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

STRUCTURE, PLANNING, AND ADMINISTRATION 251

WuereaS, The Handbook does not direct the COP to create a
bureaucracy of committees that duplicate the responsibilities of the
synodical headquarters and seminaries; and

WuerEAS, The Handbook does not direct the COP to train
LCMS clergy for “leadership”, to be ‘congregational mentors” or
to “experience . . . cross denominational leadership training” as
they intend to do in the December 1997 Reporter; and

WHEREAS, The Handbook does not direct the COP to raise and
expend funds to support programs and committees it chooses to in-
vent outside those expressly stated in the Handbook; and

WHEREAS, The convention of the Synod is to administrate the
Synod, raise funds, and fulfill the objectives of the Synod; and

Wuereas, Each District president has more than enough re-
sponsibilities to occupy his time besides setting up a bureaucracy to
administrate the Synod outside of his District; therefore be it

Resolved, That the COP is required by the convention of the
LCMS not to exceed any duties other than those specifically stated
in the Handbook; and be it further

Resolved, That the COP is prohibited from raising funds, ac-
cepting funds, or expending funds for any programs or committees
unless expressly directed by the convention; and be it finally

Resolved, That the COP focus its attention on teaching, con-
fessing, practicing, and defending from error the doctrine of The
Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod as is the duty of every LCMS
pastor.

Redeemer, St. Clair Shores MI; Immanuel, Clovis, NM;
Bethlehem, Fairborn, OH; Circuit 17 Forum, South
Wisconsin District; Faith, Corning, NY; Concordia, South
Haven, MN

7-39

To Remind District Presidents of Duties
and Limitations Incumbent on Office

WuereEAsS, The District President “shall represent the Synod in
his respective territory. He shall therefore cause the resolutions of
the Synod to be implemented in the District and shall therefore reg-
ularly report to the President of the Synod” (Bylaw 4:71; cf. Bylaw
4:73); and

WHEREAS, The synodical Handbook entrusts the District Presi-
dent with the duty of the supervision of the doctrine and practice of
the congregations within his territory (Bylaw 4.73) and charges the
Council of Presidents with the task of “counseling” with the syn-
odical President regarding matters of doctrine relative to the direc-
tives of the Constitution and Bylaws of the Synod (Bylaw 3.930),
and

WuereEAs, The Handbook does not grant District Presidents a
role in defining, creating, changing, or developing doctrine for the
Synod; and

WHEREAS, “Congregations shall seek the advice of the respec-
tive District President when calling ordained or commissioned min-
isters” (Bylaw 2.45), but while the District President is “consulted,”
congregations have full authority to extend a call to any church
worker who has been certified by the faculties of our educational
institutions or is a church worker in good standing within the Synod
(Bylaw 2.11); and District Presidents do not have the authority to
declare “unqualified” a candidate certified as “qualified” by one of
our educational institutions (Bylaw 2.09); therefore be it

Resolved, That the District Presidents be reminded of these du-
ties and limitations incumbent upon them as officers of the Synod;
and be it further

Resolved, That the President of Synod encourage the District
Presidents in these clearly stated duties and that the President of
the Synod be encouraged to use the executive power granted him
by the Bylaws (3.103) relative to a District President should he
deem it necessary and in accordance with the Bylaws of the Synod.

Concordia
South Haven, MN

7-40

To Return All District Presidents and Ordained Staff
to Parish Ministry

WHEREAS, Prior to 1947 nearly all District presidents in the
Synod, no matter how large their Districts, continued to serve their
congregations up to which time the LCMS grew to 4,000 congre-
gations; and

WHEREAS, The current cost of maintaining District offices and
their ever-increasing staffs and programs throughout the LCMS is
approaching the size of the synodical budget; and

WHEREAS, The development of computer technology, faxes, e-
mail, the Internet, etc., make the maintenance of regional District
offices an unnecessary expense and financial burden to the congre-
gations; and

Wuereas, The local District support of an additional pastor and
secretary to the elected District president’s congregation, if needed,
should be more than enough assistance for the District president to
serve the District without giving up his call; and

WHEREAS, There would be no need for the District president to
draw a salary from the District; and

WuEeREAS, Larger districts such as Michigan and Texas should
be divided to provide more effective service to congregations; and

Wuereas, In 1994 there were 8,510 pastors on the synodical
roster but only 5,312 pastors serving 6,168 congregations; and

Wuereas, In 1995 there were 8,564 pastors on the synodical
roster but only 5,287 pastors serving 6,175 congregations; and

WHEREAS, The increase of District staff and “church growth”
programs, conferences, seminars, etc., has proven to be a statistical
failure; and

WHEREAS, Providing pastors to congregations is more impor-
tant than expanding District staff and services; and

WHEREAS, The increase of staff, services, and bureaucracy in
District offices continues to divert congregational resources from
recruiting and training more pastors; and

WHEREAS, The continuing statistical decline of pastor serving
congregations is accompanied by the statistical increase of pastors
supported by the District bureaucracy; and

WHEREAS, There are approximately 900 vacancies in the
LCMS; and

WHEREAS, The first desire of pastors is to preach the Gospel and
serve congregations; therefore be it

Resolved, That in order to help alleviate the current crisis of va-
cancies in the congregations all pastors now serving in District of-
fices immediately enter the parish ministry; and be it further

Resolved, That all District presidents and District staff set an
example by such service that the foremost desire of a pastor is to
preach the Gospel and to serve congregations; and be it finally

Resolved, That the numerous redundant programs currently di-
verting the District staff and resources be abandoned in order to
focus full attention on pastors serving congregations in the Synod.

Immanuel, Peoria, IL; Redeemer, St. Clair Shores, MI; St.
John, Waterbury, CT; Immanuel, Clovis, NM; Grace,
Paris, TX

7-41

To Reinstitute Triennial “Every Congregation Visits”
by District Presidents

WHEREAS, Martin Luther and his associates reformed the office
of bishop by calling theologically competent pastors as “visitors’’
to personally visit congregations and church workers (see the 1528
“Instructions for the Visitors’’ in Luther’s Works 49); and

WHEREAS, The signers of the Book of Concord pledged that they
would cooperate in the effort toward church unity “through dili-
gent visitation of churches’’ (Tappert, p. 14); and