Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 320
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 320
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
320
THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS
Render unto Caesar...
and unto God
A Lutheran View of Church and State
A Report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
September 1995
Render unto Caesar...
and unto God
A Lutheran View of Church and State
Prolog: The American Crisis
This study is designed to examine historic Christian teaching regard-
ing Christians and government and to propose constructive ways in which
American Lutherans can participate in the creation of an appropriate pub-
lic philosophy and a viable American democracy.
The evidence of serious problems in the relationship between Ameri-
cans and their government is all around us. In fact, sociologist James Davi-
son Hunter has argued that these problems reflect an underlying “culture
war":
America is in the midst of a culture war that has had and will continue to
have reverberations not only within public policy but within the lives of
ordinary Americans everywhere.
I define cultural conflict very simply as political and social hostility
rooted in different systems of moral understanding. The end to which
these hostilities tend is the domination of one cultural and moral! ethos
over all others. Let it be clear, the principles and ideals that mark these
competing systems of moral understanding are by no' means trifling but
always have a character of ultimacy to them. They are not merely attitudes
that can change ona whim but basic commitments and beliefs that provide
a source of identity, purpose, and togetherness for the people who live by
them. It is for precisely this reason that political action rooted in these prin-
ciples and ideals tends to be so passionate.’
What is new about this, argues Hunter, is that in the past American politics
took place within a generally biblical framework while today that frame-
work is self-consciously secular. As a result, according to Hunter, “the older
agreements have unraveled. The divisions of political consequence today
‘James Davison Hunter, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic
Books, 1971), 34; 42.
CONTENTS
Prolog: The American Crisis .....
I. God and Caesar Revisited ...
A. What the Bible Says...
. The Church: From Persecuted to Persecuting ....
. The Protestant Reformation ..............c0000
. Holy War and Religious Toleration..........
. The American “Experiment” ..
. Is There a Moral to This Story?
II. A Lutheran Two-Kingdom Perspective
A. Interpretive Models of Church and State
B. Luther and the Lutheran Confessions
C, American Lutherans and the Missouri Synod ...
D. Is There Really a Lutheran Perspective? ....
III. Practicing What We Preach
A. The Failure of Two Extremes.
B. Moral Authority without Political Partisanship
C, For Example.
Epilog: “Who Speaks for the Church?” .....
Copyright © 1995 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
1333 South Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, MO 63122-7295
Manufactured in the United States of America
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod
Write to Library for the Blind, 13335. Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, MO 63122-7295, to obtain in
braille or in lange type for the visually impaired.
Scripture quotations are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyrighted 1946,
1952, © 1971, 1973. Used by permission.
The quotations from the Lutheran Confessions in this publication are from The Boak of Concord:
The Confessions of the Ev. Lutheran Church, ed. by Theodore G. Tappert, Fortress Press © 1959.
Used by permission of the publisher.
are ... the result of differing worldviews.” What is at stake, he concludes,
are “our most fundamental and cherished assumptions about how to order
our lives—our own lives and our lives together in this society. Our most
fundamental ideas about who we are as Americans are now at odds.”?
Os Guinness also believes that a deep-seated cultural upheaval is now
occurring in America, and he calls it “A Crisis of the Mandate of Heaven”:
The reason for this sober examinaton is that, despite its historic political
and economic triumphs, the American republic is entering its own time of
reckoning, an hour of truth that will not be delayed. It is nearing the cli-
max of a generation-long cultural revolution, or crisis of cultural authori-
ty. Under the impact of modernity, the beliefs, ideals, and traditions that
have been central to Americans and to American democracy——whether
religious, such as Jewish and Christian beliefs, or civic, such as American-
ism—are losing their compelling cultural power. This crisis is not a crisis
of legitimacy, like that of the Soviet Union, but a crisis of vitality that goes
to the heart of America’s character and strength. It therefore threatens to
pose questions not only for America’s continuing success and world dom-
ination, but for the vitality of democracy in America itself.’
Like Hunter, Guinness aims to navigate between the two extremes of the
culture war: the “reimposers” (who merely want to reimpose traditional
Evangelical Protestant hegemony) and the “removers” (who simply want
to cleanse Christian faith completely from American public life).t For Guin-
ness and Hunter the goal is not reimposing or removing Christianity but
creating common ground in the public square.
Because, as Guinness notes, “Democratic liberty ... is neither self-
derived nor self-sustaining’* and because American democracy has been
closely associated with biblical principles of liberty and justice, Christians
have an important stake in America’s cultural crisis. More is involved here
than religion, narrowly defined. At stake is the matter of a public philoso-
phy that both promotes religious liberty and draws its strength from it. Yet
such a widely-shared public philosophy is not even on the horizon. Thus,
its creation is both a challenge and question mark for thoughtful Christians.
These challenges are not entirely new. Problems in the relationship
between Christianity and the civil government have existed throughout
American history. In fact, they have existed throughout the history of the
Mhid., 42. Richard John Neuhaus agrees: “Our present moment and the decades ahead,
it is reasonable to think, may best be described as a Kulturkampf over the defining of the Amer-
ican experiment.” “From Providence to Privacy: Religion and the Redefinition of America,”
in Unsecular America, ed. Richard John Neuhaus (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 60
“Os Guinness, The American Hour: A Trme of Reckoning and the Once and Future Rote of
Faith (New York: The Free Press, 1993), 4
*Pid., 20.
“Beid., 19.