Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 320

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 320

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

320

THEOLOGICAL DOCUMENTS

Render unto Caesar...
and unto God

A Lutheran View of Church and State

A Report of the Commission on Theology and Church Relations
of The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

September 1995

Render unto Caesar...
and unto God

A Lutheran View of Church and State

Prolog: The American Crisis

This study is designed to examine historic Christian teaching regard-
ing Christians and government and to propose constructive ways in which
American Lutherans can participate in the creation of an appropriate pub-
lic philosophy and a viable American democracy.

The evidence of serious problems in the relationship between Ameri-
cans and their government is all around us. In fact, sociologist James Davi-
son Hunter has argued that these problems reflect an underlying “culture
war":

America is in the midst of a culture war that has had and will continue to

have reverberations not only within public policy but within the lives of

ordinary Americans everywhere.

I define cultural conflict very simply as political and social hostility
rooted in different systems of moral understanding. The end to which
these hostilities tend is the domination of one cultural and moral! ethos
over all others. Let it be clear, the principles and ideals that mark these
competing systems of moral understanding are by no' means trifling but
always have a character of ultimacy to them. They are not merely attitudes
that can change ona whim but basic commitments and beliefs that provide
a source of identity, purpose, and togetherness for the people who live by
them. It is for precisely this reason that political action rooted in these prin-
ciples and ideals tends to be so passionate.’

What is new about this, argues Hunter, is that in the past American politics
took place within a generally biblical framework while today that frame-
work is self-consciously secular. As a result, according to Hunter, “the older
agreements have unraveled. The divisions of political consequence today

‘James Davison Hunter, Culture Wars: The Struggle to Define America (New York: Basic
Books, 1971), 34; 42.

CONTENTS

Prolog: The American Crisis .....

I. God and Caesar Revisited ...

A. What the Bible Says...
. The Church: From Persecuted to Persecuting ....
. The Protestant Reformation ..............c0000
. Holy War and Religious Toleration..........
. The American “Experiment” ..
. Is There a Moral to This Story?

II. A Lutheran Two-Kingdom Perspective

A. Interpretive Models of Church and State

B. Luther and the Lutheran Confessions

C, American Lutherans and the Missouri Synod ...
D. Is There Really a Lutheran Perspective? ....

III. Practicing What We Preach

A. The Failure of Two Extremes.
B. Moral Authority without Political Partisanship
C, For Example.

Epilog: “Who Speaks for the Church?” .....

Copyright © 1995 The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

1333 South Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, MO 63122-7295

Manufactured in the United States of America

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval
system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying,
recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of The Lutheran Church—
Missouri Synod

Write to Library for the Blind, 13335. Kirkwood Road, St. Louis, MO 63122-7295, to obtain in
braille or in lange type for the visually impaired.

Scripture quotations are from the Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyrighted 1946,
1952, © 1971, 1973. Used by permission.

The quotations from the Lutheran Confessions in this publication are from The Boak of Concord:
The Confessions of the Ev. Lutheran Church, ed. by Theodore G. Tappert, Fortress Press © 1959.
Used by permission of the publisher.

are ... the result of differing worldviews.” What is at stake, he concludes,
are “our most fundamental and cherished assumptions about how to order
our lives—our own lives and our lives together in this society. Our most
fundamental ideas about who we are as Americans are now at odds.”?
Os Guinness also believes that a deep-seated cultural upheaval is now
occurring in America, and he calls it “A Crisis of the Mandate of Heaven”:
The reason for this sober examinaton is that, despite its historic political
and economic triumphs, the American republic is entering its own time of
reckoning, an hour of truth that will not be delayed. It is nearing the cli-
max of a generation-long cultural revolution, or crisis of cultural authori-
ty. Under the impact of modernity, the beliefs, ideals, and traditions that
have been central to Americans and to American democracy——whether
religious, such as Jewish and Christian beliefs, or civic, such as American-
ism—are losing their compelling cultural power. This crisis is not a crisis
of legitimacy, like that of the Soviet Union, but a crisis of vitality that goes
to the heart of America’s character and strength. It therefore threatens to
pose questions not only for America’s continuing success and world dom-
ination, but for the vitality of democracy in America itself.’

Like Hunter, Guinness aims to navigate between the two extremes of the
culture war: the “reimposers” (who merely want to reimpose traditional
Evangelical Protestant hegemony) and the “removers” (who simply want
to cleanse Christian faith completely from American public life).t For Guin-
ness and Hunter the goal is not reimposing or removing Christianity but
creating common ground in the public square.

Because, as Guinness notes, “Democratic liberty ... is neither self-
derived nor self-sustaining’* and because American democracy has been
closely associated with biblical principles of liberty and justice, Christians
have an important stake in America’s cultural crisis. More is involved here
than religion, narrowly defined. At stake is the matter of a public philoso-
phy that both promotes religious liberty and draws its strength from it. Yet
such a widely-shared public philosophy is not even on the horizon. Thus,
its creation is both a challenge and question mark for thoughtful Christians.

These challenges are not entirely new. Problems in the relationship
between Christianity and the civil government have existed throughout
American history. In fact, they have existed throughout the history of the

Mhid., 42. Richard John Neuhaus agrees: “Our present moment and the decades ahead,
it is reasonable to think, may best be described as a Kulturkampf over the defining of the Amer-
ican experiment.” “From Providence to Privacy: Religion and the Redefinition of America,”
in Unsecular America, ed. Richard John Neuhaus (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 60

“Os Guinness, The American Hour: A Trme of Reckoning and the Once and Future Rote of
Faith (New York: The Free Press, 1993), 4

*Pid., 20.

“Beid., 19.