Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 209
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 209
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
HIGHER EDUCATION
d. Upon receipt of a reply from the respondent or if no reply
is received, and the Board of Regents determines that all infor-
mal reconciliation efforts have failed, the Board of Regents shall
form a Review Committee of five persons (Matt. 18:16), which
shall be chosen as follows:
1. Each party shall select one faculty member and one re-
gent.
2. The fifth member shall be selected by blind draw from
the synodical roster of reconcilers and shall serve as chairman.
3. The selection shall be completed within one month of the
date on which the board decides to form the Review Committee.
e. If the board decides that the matter is of such a nature that
the interests of the institution will best be served, it may limit
the activities of the respondent. It may do so by relieving the re-
spondent of teaching and/or administrative duties pending final
resolution of the conflict. However, contractual obligations of
the institution shall continue until the matter is resolved.
f. The Review Committee shall proceed as follows:
1. The committee shall hold its first hearing no later than 60
days after the last committee member has been appointed.
2. The chairman of the committee shall notify the com-
plainant and the respondent, at least 28 days in advance. of the
date, time. and place of the said hearing.
3. If any part of the dispute involves a specific question of
doctrine or doctrinal application, each party shall have the right
to an opinion from the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations. If it involves questions of Constitution or Bylaw in-
terpretation, each party shall have a right to an interpretation
from the Commission on Constitutional Matters. The request for
an opinion must be made through the Review Committee, which
shall determine the wording of the question(s). The request for
an opinion must be made within four weeks of the final forma-
tion of the Review Committee. If a party does not request such
an opinion within the designated time, such a request may still
be made to the Review Committee, which shall, at its discretion,
determine whether the request shall be forwarded. The Review
Committee shall also have the right, at any time, to request an
opinion from the Commission on Theology and Church Rela-
tions or the Commission on Constitutional Matters. When an
opinion has been requested, the time limitations will not apply
until the opinion has been received by the parties. Any opinion
received must be followed by the Review Committee.
4. All hearings shall be private, attended only by the parties
and the witnesses who can substantiate the facts relevant to the
matter in dispute. The Review Committee shall establish the
procedure to be followed in the hearing and the relevancy of ev-
idence so that each party shall be given an opportunity to present
fully its respective position. In performing its duty, the Review
Committee shall continue efforts to reconcile the parties on the
basis of Christian love and forgiveness. If a party is a board or
commission of the Synod or its Districts, it shall be represented
by its chairman or a designated member.
5. Within 60 days after completion of the final hearing, the
Review Committee shall issue a written decision which shall
state the facts determined by the committee and the reasons for
its decision and forward them to the parties and the Board of
Regents. The Board of Regents shall then take appropriate ac-
tion, which shall be final.
g. However, if the complaint involves conduct under Bylaw
6.43 c 5 and 6, the complainant may take the complaint to the
District President, who shall follow the procedure set forth in
Bylaw 2.27.
h. If the committee decides there is a valid complaint (1) re-
garding matters under Bylaw 6.43 c 1-4. it may take whatever
action it deems appropriate, including recommendation for ter-
mination of the employment contract, (2) regarding matters
under Bylaw 6.43 ¢ 5-6, it must refer the complaint to the Dis-
trict President, who shall follow the procedure set forth in Bylaw
2.27.
i. Atevery stage of the above-described procedure, all par-
ties must be furnished copies of all documents filed.
6.49 Ecclesiastical Supervision
A faculty member who is on a roster of the Synod is under
the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In the event a mem-
209
ber is removed from membership in the Synod pursuant to pro-
cedure established in these Bylaws, then that member is also
considered removed from the position held and shall be termi-
nated forthwith by the Board of Regents.
6.53 Modified Service and Retirement
(Rationale: This is considered “age discrimination” under
the 1986 amendments to the “Age Discrimination in Educa-
tion Act.” No other synodical official has an age limit.]
&- [Moved to 6.16. “Nonrenewal Procedure”]
e: a. Faculty members may request early retirement under
the applicable provisions of the Concordia Retirement Plan.
Upon retirement, faculty members who are ordained or com-
missioned ministers of religion are retained on the appropriate
roster of the Synod on the basis of Bylaw 2.17, emeritus, and
may, by action of the Board of Regents, be retained on the roster
of their qaculy 3 as “emeriti” Bylaw 6 6. 27 76). Feowliyemerttt shalt
[Rationale: Contracts are covered under paragraph b below.
The age 75 limit is not permitted under Federal law.]
& b. Service loads and the conditions of service besveer-Fe-
after retirement shall be determined by the
Board of Regents.
{Rationale: The age 75 limit is not permitted under Federal
law.]
[{Rationale: This policy function is already covered by Board
of Regents responsibility 6.03 j 3]
(Rationale: This is covered by the policy activities described
in 6.03 j 3]
6.57 Sabbatical Leave and Leave of Absence
Each institution shall state policies regarding sabbaticals
for faculty and leave of absence procedures for all employees
within Board for Higher Education guidelines.
(Rationale: The Board of Regents is responsible for faculty
welfare (6.03 j 3), and responsible for detailed policies.]
D. Finances
6.61 Uniform Accounting Methods
The Board for Higher Education shall, #reenseketion-with
Syned-and on the basis of reasonable and generally accepted ed-