Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 209

LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 209

front matter 1 front matter 2 front matter 3 front matter 4 front matter 5 front matter 6 front matter 7 front matter 8 front matter 9 front matter 10 front matter 11 front matter 12 front matter 13 front matter 14 front matter 15 front matter 16 front matter 17 front matter 18 Page 1 Page 2 Page 3 Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 38 Page 39 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 50 Page 51 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 65 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 164 Page 165 Page 166 Page 167 Page 168 Page 169 Page 170 Page 171 Page 172 Page 173 Page 174 Page 175 Page 176 Page 177 Page 178 Page 179 Page 180 Page 181 Page 182 Page 183 Page 184 Page 185 Page 186 Page 187 Page 188 Page 189 Page 190 Page 191 Page 192 Page 193 Page 194 Page 195 Page 196 Page 197 Page 198 Page 199 Page 200 Page 201 Page 202 Page 204 Page 205 Page 206 Page 207 Page 208 Page 209 Page 210 Page 211 Page 212 Page 213 Page 214 Page 215 Page 216 Page 217 Page 218 Page 219 Page 220 Page 221 Page 222 Page 223 Page 224 Page 225 Page 226 Page 227 Page 228 Page 229 Page 230 Page 231 Page 232 Page 233 Page 234 Page 235 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264 Page 265 Page 266 Page 267 Page 268 Page 269 Page 270 Page 271 Page 272 Page 273 Page 274 Page 275 Page 276 Page 277 Page 278 Page 279 Page 280 Page 281 Page 282 Page 281 Page 282 Page 283 Sheet 299 Sheet 300 Sheet 301 Sheet 302 Sheet 303 Sheet 304 Sheet 305 Sheet 306 Sheet 307 Sheet 308 Sheet 309 Sheet 310 Sheet 311 Sheet 312 Page 298 Page 299 Page 300 Page 301 Page 302 Page 303 Page 304 Page 305 Page 306 Page 307 Page 308 Page 309 Page 310 Page 311 Page 312 Page 313 Page 314 Page 315 Page 316 Page 317 Page 318 Page 319 Page 320 Page 321 Page 322 Page 323 Page 324 Page 325 Page 326 Page 327 Page 328 Page 329 Page 330 Page 331 Page 332 Page 333 Page 334 Page 335 Page 336 Page 337 Sheet 353 Page 339 Page 340 Sheet 356 Page 342 Page 343 Page 344 Page 345 Sheet 361 Page 347 Page 348 Page 349 Page 350 Page 351 Page 352 Page 353 Page 354 Page 355 Page 356 Sheet 372 Page 358 Page 359 Page 360 Page 361 Page 362 Page 363 Page 364 Page 365 Page 366 Page 2 Page 368 Sheet 384 Page 370 Page 371 Page 372 Sheet 388 Page 374

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

HIGHER EDUCATION

d. Upon receipt of a reply from the respondent or if no reply
is received, and the Board of Regents determines that all infor-
mal reconciliation efforts have failed, the Board of Regents shall
form a Review Committee of five persons (Matt. 18:16), which
shall be chosen as follows:

1. Each party shall select one faculty member and one re-
gent.

2. The fifth member shall be selected by blind draw from
the synodical roster of reconcilers and shall serve as chairman.

3. The selection shall be completed within one month of the
date on which the board decides to form the Review Committee.

e. If the board decides that the matter is of such a nature that
the interests of the institution will best be served, it may limit
the activities of the respondent. It may do so by relieving the re-
spondent of teaching and/or administrative duties pending final
resolution of the conflict. However, contractual obligations of
the institution shall continue until the matter is resolved.

f. The Review Committee shall proceed as follows:

1. The committee shall hold its first hearing no later than 60
days after the last committee member has been appointed.

2. The chairman of the committee shall notify the com-
plainant and the respondent, at least 28 days in advance. of the
date, time. and place of the said hearing.

3. If any part of the dispute involves a specific question of
doctrine or doctrinal application, each party shall have the right
to an opinion from the Commission on Theology and Church
Relations. If it involves questions of Constitution or Bylaw in-
terpretation, each party shall have a right to an interpretation
from the Commission on Constitutional Matters. The request for
an opinion must be made through the Review Committee, which
shall determine the wording of the question(s). The request for
an opinion must be made within four weeks of the final forma-
tion of the Review Committee. If a party does not request such
an opinion within the designated time, such a request may still
be made to the Review Committee, which shall, at its discretion,
determine whether the request shall be forwarded. The Review
Committee shall also have the right, at any time, to request an
opinion from the Commission on Theology and Church Rela-
tions or the Commission on Constitutional Matters. When an
opinion has been requested, the time limitations will not apply
until the opinion has been received by the parties. Any opinion
received must be followed by the Review Committee.

4. All hearings shall be private, attended only by the parties
and the witnesses who can substantiate the facts relevant to the
matter in dispute. The Review Committee shall establish the
procedure to be followed in the hearing and the relevancy of ev-
idence so that each party shall be given an opportunity to present
fully its respective position. In performing its duty, the Review
Committee shall continue efforts to reconcile the parties on the
basis of Christian love and forgiveness. If a party is a board or
commission of the Synod or its Districts, it shall be represented
by its chairman or a designated member.

5. Within 60 days after completion of the final hearing, the
Review Committee shall issue a written decision which shall
state the facts determined by the committee and the reasons for
its decision and forward them to the parties and the Board of
Regents. The Board of Regents shall then take appropriate ac-
tion, which shall be final.

g. However, if the complaint involves conduct under Bylaw
6.43 c 5 and 6, the complainant may take the complaint to the
District President, who shall follow the procedure set forth in
Bylaw 2.27.

h. If the committee decides there is a valid complaint (1) re-
garding matters under Bylaw 6.43 c 1-4. it may take whatever
action it deems appropriate, including recommendation for ter-
mination of the employment contract, (2) regarding matters
under Bylaw 6.43 ¢ 5-6, it must refer the complaint to the Dis-
trict President, who shall follow the procedure set forth in Bylaw
2.27.

i. Atevery stage of the above-described procedure, all par-
ties must be furnished copies of all documents filed.

6.49 Ecclesiastical Supervision

A faculty member who is on a roster of the Synod is under
the ecclesiastical supervision of the Synod. In the event a mem-

209

ber is removed from membership in the Synod pursuant to pro-
cedure established in these Bylaws, then that member is also
considered removed from the position held and shall be termi-
nated forthwith by the Board of Regents.

6.53 Modified Service and Retirement

(Rationale: This is considered “age discrimination” under
the 1986 amendments to the “Age Discrimination in Educa-
tion Act.” No other synodical official has an age limit.]

&- [Moved to 6.16. “Nonrenewal Procedure”]

e: a. Faculty members may request early retirement under
the applicable provisions of the Concordia Retirement Plan.
Upon retirement, faculty members who are ordained or com-
missioned ministers of religion are retained on the appropriate
roster of the Synod on the basis of Bylaw 2.17, emeritus, and
may, by action of the Board of Regents, be retained on the roster

of their qaculy 3 as “emeriti” Bylaw 6 6. 27 76). Feowliyemerttt shalt

[Rationale: Contracts are covered under paragraph b below.
The age 75 limit is not permitted under Federal law.]
& b. Service loads and the conditions of service besveer-Fe-
after retirement shall be determined by the
Board of Regents.
{Rationale: The age 75 limit is not permitted under Federal
law.]

[{Rationale: This policy function is already covered by Board
of Regents responsibility 6.03 j 3]

(Rationale: This is covered by the policy activities described
in 6.03 j 3]

6.57 Sabbatical Leave and Leave of Absence

Each institution shall state policies regarding sabbaticals
for faculty and leave of absence procedures for all employees
within Board for Higher Education guidelines.

(Rationale: The Board of Regents is responsible for faculty
welfare (6.03 j 3), and responsible for detailed policies.]

D. Finances

6.61 Uniform Accounting Methods
The Board for Higher Education shall, #reenseketion-with

Syned-and on the basis of reasonable and generally accepted ed-