Collection › LCMS Convention Workbook (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1998 · 60th Convention › Page 76
LCMS Convention Workbook St. Louis, Missouri — 1998, Page 76
front matter 1
front matter 2
front matter 3
front matter 4
front matter 5
front matter 6
front matter 7
front matter 8
front matter 9
front matter 10
front matter 11
front matter 12
front matter 13
front matter 14
front matter 15
front matter 16
front matter 17
front matter 18
Page 1
Page 2
Page 3
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 50
Page 51
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 65
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 164
Page 165
Page 166
Page 167
Page 168
Page 169
Page 170
Page 171
Page 172
Page 173
Page 174
Page 175
Page 176
Page 177
Page 178
Page 179
Page 180
Page 181
Page 182
Page 183
Page 184
Page 185
Page 186
Page 187
Page 188
Page 189
Page 190
Page 191
Page 192
Page 193
Page 194
Page 195
Page 196
Page 197
Page 198
Page 199
Page 200
Page 201
Page 202
Page 204
Page 205
Page 206
Page 207
Page 208
Page 209
Page 210
Page 211
Page 212
Page 213
Page 214
Page 215
Page 216
Page 217
Page 218
Page 219
Page 220
Page 221
Page 222
Page 223
Page 224
Page 225
Page 226
Page 227
Page 228
Page 229
Page 230
Page 231
Page 232
Page 233
Page 234
Page 235
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Page 265
Page 266
Page 267
Page 268
Page 269
Page 270
Page 271
Page 272
Page 273
Page 274
Page 275
Page 276
Page 277
Page 278
Page 279
Page 280
Page 281
Page 282
Page 281
Page 282
Page 283
Sheet 299
Sheet 300
Sheet 301
Sheet 302
Sheet 303
Sheet 304
Sheet 305
Sheet 306
Sheet 307
Sheet 308
Sheet 309
Sheet 310
Sheet 311
Sheet 312
Page 298
Page 299
Page 300
Page 301
Page 302
Page 303
Page 304
Page 305
Page 306
Page 307
Page 308
Page 309
Page 310
Page 311
Page 312
Page 313
Page 314
Page 315
Page 316
Page 317
Page 318
Page 319
Page 320
Page 321
Page 322
Page 323
Page 324
Page 325
Page 326
Page 327
Page 328
Page 329
Page 330
Page 331
Page 332
Page 333
Page 334
Page 335
Page 336
Page 337
Sheet 353
Page 339
Page 340
Sheet 356
Page 342
Page 343
Page 344
Page 345
Sheet 361
Page 347
Page 348
Page 349
Page 350
Page 351
Page 352
Page 353
Page 354
Page 355
Page 356
Sheet 372
Page 358
Page 359
Page 360
Page 361
Page 362
Page 363
Page 364
Page 365
Page 366
Page 2
Page 368
Sheet 384
Page 370
Page 371
Page 372
Sheet 388
Page 374
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
76 SYNODICAL REPORTS
sional church workers identified by District Presidents, with
unresolved debt problems.
12. That a part of the problem of both significant and unresolved
debt is the fact that synodical salaries remain inadequate, in
many areas, to allow the professional church worker to pay off
legitimate educational and other debt within a reasonable pe-
tiod of time. Accordingly, District Presidents should establish
and implement reasonable salary guidelines for congregations
within their Districts. Again, while the implementation of any
such plan can be carried out through synodical District offices,
the resolution of the problems associated with inadequate
salary levels rests with the Synod as a whole.
In conjunction with this suggestion, the Financial Aid Task
Force was informed that the Human Resources Committee has
an ongoing survey of salary levels within our Districts. We en-
courage the completion of such survey and the inclusion in
such survey of all relevant job descriptions of professional
church workers within our Synod.
13. That District Presidents counsel all congregations who are con-
sidering calling or employing graduates or other professional
church workers where the compensation to be offered by that
congregation would be below the District’s suggested guide-
lines. Further, that it be understood that District Presidents are
not required to sign applications for candidates where a partic-
ular congregation’s compensation does not meet District salary
guidelines.
14. That with respect to those men who desire to enter into the pas-
toral ministry of our Synod, the relevant District interview
committee inquire into an applicant’s ability to finance the
total costs associated with that individuals’ seminary educa-
tion, provide counseling to such individuals if personal prob-
lems exist, and so inform the seminary for the latter’s contin-
ued concern and involvement throughout that individual’s
tenure at the seminary.
15. That with respect to congregations, they be encouraged, with
sensitivity, to inquire into the debt level of all current profes-
sional church workers, whether rostered or not, under their
care and discuss with them how the congregation can assist the
worker in addressing and resolving any debt situation. This
would also apply to congregations when they extend calls or
employment, in the first instance, to the professional church
worker.
As seen from the above suggestions, even if the Synod, its or-
ganizations, Districts, and congregations set in motion both pre-
ventive and remedial solutions to the problem of professional
church worker indebtedness, the problem will not be permanently
resolved until the church addresses the issue of adequate salary lev-
els for its professional church workers.
During consideration of the mandate given, two additional is-
sues arose. If left unresolved, such issues, like the problems ad-
dressed in this report, will lead to situations where the ministries
of our Synod’s professional church workers will be adversely af-
fected and could be but another cause for workers leaving their em-
ployment as full time church workers of our Synod. These issues
are
* that some congregations are paying only for the health benefit
package of the professional church worker and not paying for
that worker’s dependents. The latter payments, i.e., for depen-
dents, represent a substantial expenditure of monies;
* that some congregations are not paying the difference between
the full basis participation and the regular Concordia Retirement
Plan. ,
Again, these are but two more examples where the professional
church worker directly is having to pay for benefits, normally paid
for by employers in the typical employment situation; and, where
the payments by the church worker could further contribute to the
mounting debt problem. These issues need to be addressed.
Finally, it is the understanding of the Financial Aid Task Force
that the BHE/CUS has under way a major effort to establish an en-
dowment base of some $500 million to support students studying at
their institutions. This is commendable and should receive enthusi-
astic support throughout our Synod.
The Issue: Retired Church Workers and Widowed Spouses
The Facts
1. That the number of retired church workers, or their widowed
spouses, who today have insufficient income to support their
needs is an unknown figure. In a recent survey responded to
by some 20 of our Synod’s 35 District Presidents, the District
Presidents acknowledged that they did not have any idea as to
the extent of this problem.
2. That there is a problem is seen from certain statistics shared
with the Financial Aid Task Force by personnel from the
Worker Benefit Plans (““WBP”) office of our Synod.
¢ That current retired church workers, or their widowed
spouses, who have inadequate income would be under the
prior synodical retirement plan known as the Pension Plan
for Pastors and Teachers (“PPPT”’).
* That currently, WBP has three programs to address the
needs of retirees under the PPPT. These are the Supple-
mental Benefits to the PPPT, the Support Benefits Program
and the Special Assistance Program. Currently, the combi-
nation of these three programs would provide income up to
$7,200 for an individual and $12,000 for a couple (with the
widowed spouse receiving 40% of the total).
¢ That our Synod currently underwrites these aforementioned
three programs to the level of approximately $850,000 an-
nually.
¢ Further, that WBP has proposed changes that would take the
level of support to $12,000 for a single person and $20,000
for a couple (with the widowed spouse receiving 60% of
the total).
¢ That while these programs are available to retired church
workers, or their widowed spouses, such services are nei-
ther actively promoted throughout the Synod nor, as stated
above, do our Synod’s District Presidents have information
available to them that would allow the Districts to direct
WBP personnel to retired workers, or their widowed
spouses, who are in need of assistance.
¢ That the Concordia Retirement Plan, through legal con-
straints, is not permitted to use any monies (surplus or oth-
erwise) to assist, or subsidize the benefits available to par-
ticipants under the PPPT plan.
3. That the current three programs offered by WBP provide a
means for the resolution of the problem of inadequate income
for retired church workers or their widowed spouses under the
PPPT.
4. That, even though by the year 2020 the problem associated
with the inadequate funding of retirement salaries under the
PPPT should be resolved through natural attrition, additional
synodical funds beyond the amount currently allotted, i.e., ap-
proximately $850,000 a year (and declining), will likely be re-
quired to address the needs of these retired church workers, or
their widowed spouses, between now and the year 2020.
Suggested Solutions
Again, it is the understanding of the Financial Aid Task Force
that the issue of inadequate retirement benefits for professional
church workers, or their widowed spouses, pertains to the profes-
sional church worker of our Synod under the PPPT. Accordingly,
our recommendations follow:
1. That the President of the Synod send to all synodical con-
gregations a pastoral letter that brings to the attention of the
Synod both the problem identified and the necessary steps
that must be taken to address the permanent resolution of this
problem.
2. That the WBP should send a letter to all personnel within our
Synod who are under the PPPT advising them of the three
special programs referenced above. and the process by which
such persons could access funds under these programs.