Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 76
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 76
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
78 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
other labor at our synodical institutions as their tim
in order to show their appreciation of the benefits th ae, permit
_ and thus also to save additional expense to Synod “This henvine
your Committee holds, is a problem which cannot be 8 I rowerer,
fixed rules, but must, according to circumstances, be ore =
the a and faculty of each institution. , worked out by
Ince it is very desirable for
that @ person should not unnecessarily vols oe Pment ° ofarecter
port, it is a reasonable demand that a student who is bein mis ne
should not only live economically, but should during vacati m eorted
make due efforts to find remunerative employment and aie
doing supply-work should save as much as possible of hi student
in order to be able to contribute of his own earning t¢ : salary
penses at the college or at the Seminary. © foward his ex-
Respectfully submitted,
G. Cur. Barra. W. C. Kony
Joun H.C. Frirz.
Guiding Principles for the Support of Indigent Students
(Memorial 607.) ,
Wuereas, Districts, conferences, and individual congregati
Synod contribute each year many thousands of dollars for the Wonk
of indigent students at the various synodical institutions: and
Wuereas, Synod has provided no way in which the District
ferences, and congregations can exercise a uniform, wholesom onteol
over the students receiving such support; and © control
Wuergas, Synod has not provided any arrangement under which
therefore be it
Resolved, That Synod ado i idi
, pt the following guidin, inci
the support of indigent students: — # rineiples fox
1. Boards for indigent students shall as heretofore grant support
e a student during his first year at the institution on the basis of
the information and recommendations received from the local pastor,
teacher, or congregation. ,
2. Continued support after the first year shall be granted only
to such students as the faculty of the respective institution can re-
commend for such support on the basis of their scholastic standing,
application, Christian character, and deportment. (A uniform
standard to guide faculties shall be worked out by a committee rep-
resenting the various institutions. )
a1 3. Each sendent receiving support shall be held to give a reason-
able amount of service to his institution in r i
; eturn for the aid re-
ceived. — And be it further
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 79
Resolved: —
4. That Synod recommend to Districts, conferences, and in-
vidual congregations to adopt the above resolutions as their guiding
principles in granting support to students;
g. That Synod enjoin upon boards of control and faculties of
gynodical institutions to adopt guiding principles on which to base
recommendations for support and to withhold the recommendation in
all cases in which a student does not meet the requirements;
3. That the President of Synod appoint a committee of seven
men, to wit: a member of the General Board of Control, three men
from three District boards for indigent students, and three professors
who are now in charge of students’ funds;
4, That this committee establish the standard according to which
faculties shall give or withhold recommendations for support;
5. That this committee take all the necessary steps to bring about
the support of students in accord with the foregoing resolutions.
Respectfully submitted by
Tue Facuity or Concorpia TEACHERS CoLLecsE,
River Forest, Iv.
Artuur E. Diesine.
Aus. H. Mitter. F. H. Scumirr.
Action.
Regarding these memorials, Synod adopted the following guiding
principles for the support of indigent students, pursuant to the recom.
mendations of Committee 1, together with the recommendations : —
1. Since all our students receive free tuition and housing on the
part of Synod, all students ought to be ready to do some manual or
other labor at our synodical institutions as their time may permit in
order to show their appreciation of the benefits they are receiving and
thus also to save additional expense to Synod. This, however, your
Committee holds, is a problem which cannot be solved by any fixed
rules, but must, according to circumstances, be worked out by the
board and the faculty of each institution.
2. Boards for indigent students shall as heretofore grant support
to a student during his first year at the institution on the basis of the
information and recommendations received from the local pastor,
teacher, or congregation.
3. Continued support after the first year shall be granted only to
such students as the faculty of the respective institution can recom-
mend for such support on the basis of their scholastic standing, appli-
cation, Christian character, and deportment. (A uniform standard to
guide faculties shall be worked out by a committee representing the
various institutions.)