Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 76

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 76

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

78 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention

other labor at our synodical institutions as their tim
in order to show their appreciation of the benefits th ae, permit
_ and thus also to save additional expense to Synod “This henvine
your Committee holds, is a problem which cannot be 8 I rowerer,
fixed rules, but must, according to circumstances, be ore =
the a and faculty of each institution. , worked out by

Ince it is very desirable for

that @ person should not unnecessarily vols oe Pment ° ofarecter
port, it is a reasonable demand that a student who is bein mis ne
should not only live economically, but should during vacati m eorted
make due efforts to find remunerative employment and aie
doing supply-work should save as much as possible of hi student
in order to be able to contribute of his own earning t¢ : salary
penses at the college or at the Seminary. © foward his ex-
Respectfully submitted,

G. Cur. Barra. W. C. Kony
Joun H.C. Frirz.

Guiding Principles for the Support of Indigent Students
(Memorial 607.) ,

Wuereas, Districts, conferences, and individual congregati
Synod contribute each year many thousands of dollars for the Wonk
of indigent students at the various synodical institutions: and

Wuereas, Synod has provided no way in which the District
ferences, and congregations can exercise a uniform, wholesom onteol
over the students receiving such support; and © control

Wuergas, Synod has not provided any arrangement under which

therefore be it
Resolved, That Synod ado i idi
, pt the following guidin, inci
the support of indigent students: — # rineiples fox
1. Boards for indigent students shall as heretofore grant support
e a student during his first year at the institution on the basis of
the information and recommendations received from the local pastor,
teacher, or congregation. ,
2. Continued support after the first year shall be granted only
to such students as the faculty of the respective institution can re-
commend for such support on the basis of their scholastic standing,
application, Christian character, and deportment. (A uniform
standard to guide faculties shall be worked out by a committee rep-
resenting the various institutions. )
a1 3. Each sendent receiving support shall be held to give a reason-
able amount of service to his institution in r i
; eturn for the aid re-
ceived. — And be it further

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 79

Resolved: —

4. That Synod recommend to Districts, conferences, and in-
vidual congregations to adopt the above resolutions as their guiding
principles in granting support to students;

g. That Synod enjoin upon boards of control and faculties of
gynodical institutions to adopt guiding principles on which to base
recommendations for support and to withhold the recommendation in
all cases in which a student does not meet the requirements;

3. That the President of Synod appoint a committee of seven
men, to wit: a member of the General Board of Control, three men
from three District boards for indigent students, and three professors
who are now in charge of students’ funds;

4, That this committee establish the standard according to which
faculties shall give or withhold recommendations for support;

5. That this committee take all the necessary steps to bring about
the support of students in accord with the foregoing resolutions.

Respectfully submitted by
Tue Facuity or Concorpia TEACHERS CoLLecsE,
River Forest, Iv.
Artuur E. Diesine.
Aus. H. Mitter. F. H. Scumirr.

Action.

Regarding these memorials, Synod adopted the following guiding
principles for the support of indigent students, pursuant to the recom.
mendations of Committee 1, together with the recommendations : —

1. Since all our students receive free tuition and housing on the
part of Synod, all students ought to be ready to do some manual or
other labor at our synodical institutions as their time may permit in
order to show their appreciation of the benefits they are receiving and
thus also to save additional expense to Synod. This, however, your
Committee holds, is a problem which cannot be solved by any fixed
rules, but must, according to circumstances, be worked out by the
board and the faculty of each institution.

2. Boards for indigent students shall as heretofore grant support
to a student during his first year at the institution on the basis of the
information and recommendations received from the local pastor,
teacher, or congregation.

3. Continued support after the first year shall be granted only to
such students as the faculty of the respective institution can recom-
mend for such support on the basis of their scholastic standing, appli-
cation, Christian character, and deportment. (A uniform standard to
guide faculties shall be worked out by a committee representing the

various institutions.)