Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 77

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 77

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

80 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention

We recommend: —

1. T iy’ i
hat Synod recommend to Districts, conferences and j
B Indi.

vidual congregations to
dua adopt the above resoluti i
principles in granting support to students: mon as their fuiding

2. That Synod enjoin upon the boards of ¢

Association.

: (Unprinted. )
he Advisory Board for the N ational Lutheran Education Asso.

ciation had brought in a re i
com i i
toe 1 repneeet mendation concerning which Commit-
“ : ;
Your Committee is of the opinion that this m
erly belong before the forum of Synod and th
Synod to decline it.” es

Synod adopted this report.

atter does not prop-
fore recommends to

t in establishing the Hi t
(property value) of our institutions. This recom ade fonwert
adopted by Synod. mendation was

D. Matters Pertaining to the Survey Committee’s
Report.

; At the last synodical conven
in conjunction with the Vice
nine from our own circles to s
Teport at the next convention

tion, Synod instructed its President,
-Presidents, to appoint a committee of
urvey the entire enducational system and
of Synod. This committee consisted of

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 81

the following members: Prof. P. E. Kretzmann, D.D., Ph. D.; Prof. L.
Wessel, D. D.; Prof. O. F. Rusch; Rev. Herman A. Steege; Mr. Ralph
Richman ; Prof. W. H. Kruse; Rev. Th. H. Schroedel; Rev. A. Wis-
mar; Mr. Carl Zorn. In keeping with Synod’s resolution the report of
this committee was submitted to all the conferences of Synod, and a
copy of it was mailed to every pastor.

The report of the committee contained ten chief subdivisions.
Under I. were given a “Statement of Objectives and Standards,” “Gen-
eral and Specific Aims, or Objectives, in our Normal Schools,” “The
Place of Languages in Ministerial Training,” and “Recommendations
to Instruct Faculties to Follow Synod’s Outlines.”

Under II. the report dwelt on the “Extension of Pretheological
Training and the Rearrangement of the Institutions.” Part III spoke
of the “Extension of the Normal Course.” Part IV gave “Suggestions
for the Course of Study, Seventh Year of Pretheological Work.”
Part V dwelt on “Sports and Athletics at Our Institutions.” Part XI
brought recommendations on “Hymnology and Music in Our Institu-
tions.” Part VIL mentioned “A Few Suggestions to Improve Our
System of Electing Professors.” Part VIII recommended the estab-
lishment of a “General Board of Higher Education.” Under Part IX
recommendations were made “Concerning the Institution at Spring-
field.” Part X brought “Miscellaneous Matters and Recommenda-
tions” regarding a new plan of tuition for Synod’s educational institu-
tions, the holding of degrees, religious instruction, and rules of polite
behavior.

Memorials on the Survey Committee’s Report.

A large number of memorials were submitted to Synod on the re-
port of the Survey Committee. Memorial 125, by the faculty of Con-
cordia Teachers’ College, River Forest, Illinois, submitted a plan on
the reorganization of our colleges. Memorial 123, by the Ev. Luth.
Trinity Church, Springfield, Illinois, petitioned Synod to table the
report of the Survey Committee, particularly the part referring to the
Concordia Seminary at Springfield. A number of unprinted memorials
offered many recommendations regarding various items in the report
of the Survey Committee.

The whole report, together with the memorials pertaining to it,
was given careful consideration by Committee 1, which brought in its
recommendations to Synod, whereupon Synod passed the following
resolutions : —

Concerning Sections I and II (pages 1—19) : —

a. That Synod at this session do not formulate or adopt permanent
plans for a reorganization of our educational system;

b. That the Board of Directors be, and herewith is, empowered to
appoint a committee of 13, to be known as Committee on Higher Edu-
cation ; ,

6