Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 77
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 77
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
80 Proceedings of Thirty-Fifth Regular Convention
We recommend: —
1. T iy’ i
hat Synod recommend to Districts, conferences and j
B Indi.
vidual congregations to
dua adopt the above resoluti i
principles in granting support to students: mon as their fuiding
2. That Synod enjoin upon the boards of ¢
Association.
: (Unprinted. )
he Advisory Board for the N ational Lutheran Education Asso.
ciation had brought in a re i
com i i
toe 1 repneeet mendation concerning which Commit-
“ : ;
Your Committee is of the opinion that this m
erly belong before the forum of Synod and th
Synod to decline it.” es
Synod adopted this report.
atter does not prop-
fore recommends to
t in establishing the Hi t
(property value) of our institutions. This recom ade fonwert
adopted by Synod. mendation was
D. Matters Pertaining to the Survey Committee’s
Report.
; At the last synodical conven
in conjunction with the Vice
nine from our own circles to s
Teport at the next convention
tion, Synod instructed its President,
-Presidents, to appoint a committee of
urvey the entire enducational system and
of Synod. This committee consisted of
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 81
the following members: Prof. P. E. Kretzmann, D.D., Ph. D.; Prof. L.
Wessel, D. D.; Prof. O. F. Rusch; Rev. Herman A. Steege; Mr. Ralph
Richman ; Prof. W. H. Kruse; Rev. Th. H. Schroedel; Rev. A. Wis-
mar; Mr. Carl Zorn. In keeping with Synod’s resolution the report of
this committee was submitted to all the conferences of Synod, and a
copy of it was mailed to every pastor.
The report of the committee contained ten chief subdivisions.
Under I. were given a “Statement of Objectives and Standards,” “Gen-
eral and Specific Aims, or Objectives, in our Normal Schools,” “The
Place of Languages in Ministerial Training,” and “Recommendations
to Instruct Faculties to Follow Synod’s Outlines.”
Under II. the report dwelt on the “Extension of Pretheological
Training and the Rearrangement of the Institutions.” Part III spoke
of the “Extension of the Normal Course.” Part IV gave “Suggestions
for the Course of Study, Seventh Year of Pretheological Work.”
Part V dwelt on “Sports and Athletics at Our Institutions.” Part XI
brought recommendations on “Hymnology and Music in Our Institu-
tions.” Part VIL mentioned “A Few Suggestions to Improve Our
System of Electing Professors.” Part VIII recommended the estab-
lishment of a “General Board of Higher Education.” Under Part IX
recommendations were made “Concerning the Institution at Spring-
field.” Part X brought “Miscellaneous Matters and Recommenda-
tions” regarding a new plan of tuition for Synod’s educational institu-
tions, the holding of degrees, religious instruction, and rules of polite
behavior.
Memorials on the Survey Committee’s Report.
A large number of memorials were submitted to Synod on the re-
port of the Survey Committee. Memorial 125, by the faculty of Con-
cordia Teachers’ College, River Forest, Illinois, submitted a plan on
the reorganization of our colleges. Memorial 123, by the Ev. Luth.
Trinity Church, Springfield, Illinois, petitioned Synod to table the
report of the Survey Committee, particularly the part referring to the
Concordia Seminary at Springfield. A number of unprinted memorials
offered many recommendations regarding various items in the report
of the Survey Committee.
The whole report, together with the memorials pertaining to it,
was given careful consideration by Committee 1, which brought in its
recommendations to Synod, whereupon Synod passed the following
resolutions : —
Concerning Sections I and II (pages 1—19) : —
a. That Synod at this session do not formulate or adopt permanent
plans for a reorganization of our educational system;
b. That the Board of Directors be, and herewith is, empowered to
appoint a committee of 13, to be known as Committee on Higher Edu-
cation ; ,
6