Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 31
LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 31
Page 4
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
Page 19
Page 20
Page 21
Page 22
Page 23
Page 24
Page 25
Page 26
Page 27
Page 28
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
Page 48
Page 49
Page 52
Page 53
Page 54
Page 55
Page 56
Page 57
Page 58
Page 59
Page 60
Page 61
Page 62
Page 63
Page 64
Page 66
Page 67
Page 68
Page 69
Page 70
Page 71
Page 72
Page 73
Page 74
Page 75
Page 76
Page 77
Page 78
Page 79
Page 80
Page 81
Page 82
Page 83
Page 84
Page 85
Page 86
Page 87
Page 88
Page 89
Page 90
Page 91
Page 92
Page 93
Page 94
Page 95
Page 96
Page 97
Page 98
Page 99
Page 100
Page 101
Page 102
Page 103
Page 104
Page 105
Page 106
Page 107
Page 108
Page 109
Page 110
Page 111
Page 112
Page 113
Page 114
Page 115
Page 116
Page 117
Page 118
Page 119
Page 120
Page 121
Page 122
Page 123
Page 124
Page 125
Page 126
Page 127
Page 128
Page 129
Page 130
Page 131
Page 132
Page 133
Page 134
Page 135
Page 136
Page 137
Page 138
Page 139
Page 140
Page 141
Page 142
Page 143
Page 144
Page 145
Page 146
Page 147
Page 148
Page 149
Page 150
Page 151
Page 152
Page 153
Page 154
Page 155
Page 156
Page 157
Page 158
Page 159
Page 160
Page 161
Page 162
Page 163
Page 236
Page 237
Page 238
Page 239
Page 240
Page 241
Page 242
Page 243
Page 244
Page 245
Page 246
Page 247
Page 248
Page 249
Page 250
Page 251
Page 252
Page 253
Page 254
Page 255
Page 256
Page 257
Page 258
Page 259
Page 260
Page 261
Page 262
Page 263
Page 264
Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod
⤓ Download page image (full resolution)
Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected
Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 33
Another triennium has passed, and the Administration Building,
tedly granted by Synod, has not yet become a reality. We
ratand the difficulties confronting Synod which interfered with
e erection of this building, but we trust that Synod will also realize
difficulties which the lack of this building has created for our
faculty and students. We therefore hope that Synod will not only
readily grant the amount requested for the Administration Building
at Springfield, but will take the necessary steps to insure the im-
mediate erection of this building.
We ask $200,000 for the Administration Building. Individual
members of Synod, in large numbers, have long ago realized the abso-
jute need of such a building in Springfield. Synod officially recog-
nized that need in 1926 and again in 1929 and granted $179,000 for
the building. In 1926 we had asked for the latter amount, hoping
that the building would be erected in that triennium and that the next
convention would grant an additional amount, sufficient to add a
chapel. In 1929 we asked for $250,000 which included the chapel, but
were granted only the original amount. We are asking now for an
additional amount of $21,000 over that originally granted in 1926 so
that the building, if and when it is erected, may be complete.
The resolution of the 1929 convention to spend $10,000 on the
old building, so-called Building No. 41, was for various reasons not
carried out. If the Administration Building is erected, we shall find
ways and means to get along with Building No.1 at a small expense
to Synod.
Your college and seminary in Springfield have never had any-
thing remotely resembling a gymnasium. As a consequence our stu-
dents have little opportunity to carry out consistently in practise the
admonition implied in the proverb: Mens sana in corpore sano. It
must be kept in mind that not all our students are mature men. Many
of them are still in the formative stage as regards their physical
development and therefore have need of opportunity and facilities to
further their physical well-being and growth. In view of these facts
we ask Synod to grant $50,000 for the erection of a gymnasium at our
Springfield Concordia.
For a number of years two of our professors have had to live at
some distance from the college. This not only means that Synod was
required to pay rent, but it has also made for additional difficulties as
far as these professors and their work is concerned. We do not believe
that Synod would willingly make unreasonable demands upon the time
and energies of its professors, and for that reason we are confident
that it will grant the $11,000 which we ask to erect at least one
residence.
In presenting the needs of this institution of Synod to this honor-
~ able body, it is fitting to refer not only to its physical, but also, and
3