Collection › LCMS Convention Proceedings (St. Louis, Missouri) › 1932 · 35th Convention, Milwaukee › Page 31

LCMS Convention Proceedings St. Louis, Missouri — 1932, Page 31

Page 4 Page 5 Page 6 Page 7 Page 8 Page 9 Page 10 Page 11 Page 12 Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 Page 16 Page 17 Page 18 Page 19 Page 20 Page 21 Page 22 Page 23 Page 24 Page 25 Page 26 Page 27 Page 28 Page 29 Page 30 Page 31 Page 32 Page 33 Page 34 Page 35 Page 36 Page 37 Page 40 Page 41 Page 42 Page 43 Page 44 Page 45 Page 46 Page 47 Page 48 Page 49 Page 52 Page 53 Page 54 Page 55 Page 56 Page 57 Page 58 Page 59 Page 60 Page 61 Page 62 Page 63 Page 64 Page 66 Page 67 Page 68 Page 69 Page 70 Page 71 Page 72 Page 73 Page 74 Page 75 Page 76 Page 77 Page 78 Page 79 Page 80 Page 81 Page 82 Page 83 Page 84 Page 85 Page 86 Page 87 Page 88 Page 89 Page 90 Page 91 Page 92 Page 93 Page 94 Page 95 Page 96 Page 97 Page 98 Page 99 Page 100 Page 101 Page 102 Page 103 Page 104 Page 105 Page 106 Page 107 Page 108 Page 109 Page 110 Page 111 Page 112 Page 113 Page 114 Page 115 Page 116 Page 117 Page 118 Page 119 Page 120 Page 121 Page 122 Page 123 Page 124 Page 125 Page 126 Page 127 Page 128 Page 129 Page 130 Page 131 Page 132 Page 133 Page 134 Page 135 Page 136 Page 137 Page 138 Page 139 Page 140 Page 141 Page 142 Page 143 Page 144 Page 145 Page 146 Page 147 Page 148 Page 149 Page 150 Page 151 Page 152 Page 153 Page 154 Page 155 Page 156 Page 157 Page 158 Page 159 Page 160 Page 161 Page 162 Page 163 Page 236 Page 237 Page 238 Page 239 Page 240 Page 241 Page 242 Page 243 Page 244 Page 245 Page 246 Page 247 Page 248 Page 249 Page 250 Page 251 Page 252 Page 253 Page 254 Page 255 Page 256 Page 257 Page 258 Page 259 Page 260 Page 261 Page 262 Page 263 Page 264

Scan: The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod

⤓ Download page image (full resolution)

Transcription machine transcription, uncorrected

⤓ Download .txt · copy text

Ev. Luth. Synod of Missouri, Ohio, and Other States. 1932. 33

Another triennium has passed, and the Administration Building,
tedly granted by Synod, has not yet become a reality. We
ratand the difficulties confronting Synod which interfered with
e erection of this building, but we trust that Synod will also realize
difficulties which the lack of this building has created for our
faculty and students. We therefore hope that Synod will not only
readily grant the amount requested for the Administration Building
at Springfield, but will take the necessary steps to insure the im-
mediate erection of this building.

We ask $200,000 for the Administration Building. Individual
members of Synod, in large numbers, have long ago realized the abso-
jute need of such a building in Springfield. Synod officially recog-
nized that need in 1926 and again in 1929 and granted $179,000 for
the building. In 1926 we had asked for the latter amount, hoping
that the building would be erected in that triennium and that the next
convention would grant an additional amount, sufficient to add a
chapel. In 1929 we asked for $250,000 which included the chapel, but
were granted only the original amount. We are asking now for an
additional amount of $21,000 over that originally granted in 1926 so
that the building, if and when it is erected, may be complete.

The resolution of the 1929 convention to spend $10,000 on the
old building, so-called Building No. 41, was for various reasons not
carried out. If the Administration Building is erected, we shall find
ways and means to get along with Building No.1 at a small expense
to Synod.

Your college and seminary in Springfield have never had any-
thing remotely resembling a gymnasium. As a consequence our stu-
dents have little opportunity to carry out consistently in practise the
admonition implied in the proverb: Mens sana in corpore sano. It
must be kept in mind that not all our students are mature men. Many
of them are still in the formative stage as regards their physical
development and therefore have need of opportunity and facilities to
further their physical well-being and growth. In view of these facts
we ask Synod to grant $50,000 for the erection of a gymnasium at our
Springfield Concordia.

For a number of years two of our professors have had to live at
some distance from the college. This not only means that Synod was
required to pay rent, but it has also made for additional difficulties as
far as these professors and their work is concerned. We do not believe
that Synod would willingly make unreasonable demands upon the time
and energies of its professors, and for that reason we are confident
that it will grant the $11,000 which we ask to erect at least one
residence.

In presenting the needs of this institution of Synod to this honor-
~ able body, it is fitting to refer not only to its physical, but also, and
3